Friday, November 30, 2007

Gus Khouri on the Issues (You Tube)



Gus Khouri on the Issues (You Tube)


Gus Khori is running against Tim Jones to represent the Liberal Party in the next federal election in Newmarket-Aurora. Belinda Stronach has endorsed Tim Jones in this race. Belinda announced she was stepping down for politics earlier this year. It should be an interesting race provided Dion doesn't fill his quota for women candidates in this riding.

You can visit Gus Khouri's website by visiting http://www.gusonthehill.ca
Tim Jones website is: http://www.tim-jones.ca
Belinda's endorsement of Tim Jones from the Auroran can be found here


-Darryl


On Foreign Policy:



On Environment:



On Canadian Youth

Ontario Tories respond to McGuinty's economic approach

Tories respond to McGuinty's economic approach



Putin suspends European forces treaty


Putin suspends European forces treaty

Associated Press

MOSCOW — President Vladimir Putin on Friday signed a law suspending Russia's participation in the Conventional Forces in Europe treaty, the Kremlin announced.

The move, although expected, was bemoaned by the United States.

The suspension takes effect Dec. 12. Under the moratorium, Russia will halt inspections and verifications of its military sites by NATO countries and will no longer be obligated to limit the number of conventional weapons deployed west of the Urals.

The 1990 arms control treaty set limits on the deployment of heavy conventional weapons by NATO and Warsaw Pact countries, to ease tensions along the border between the old Eastern bloc and Western Europe. The treaty was revised in 1999 after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Russia ratified the updated treaty in 2004, but the United States and other NATO members have refused to follow suit, saying Moscow first must fulfill obligations to withdraw forces from Georgia and from Moldova's separatist region of Trans-Dniester.

Both houses of parliament passed the law on the moratorium at Mr. Putin's initiative.

Mr. Putin called for Russia's temporary withdrawal from the treaty amid mounting anger in the Kremlin over U.S. plans to build a missile defence system in eastern Europe.

The suspension also reflects Russia's growing military confidence, as it uses soaring budget revenues to rebuild the armed forces and restore Russia as a world military power.

Under the CFE, “we cannot move an extra tank in our territory,” said Sergei Mironov, speaker of the upper house of parliament, according to the ITAR-Tass news agency. “In this sense, we've ceased to be masters in our own territory.”

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that “even after Dec. 12 we will continue the work and seek agreements that would help attain a balance,” the Interfax news agency reported.

U.S. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns said Washington was disappointed that Putin signed the law.

“This is a mistake. It is Russia unilaterally walking out of one of the most important arms control regimes of the last 20 years,” Mr. Burns said at an international security conference in Madrid.

Russia announced two weeks ago that it had pulled out the last of its troops based in Georgia. However, questions remain about Russian troops in the separatist Georgian region of Abkhazia.

Study: Canadian Beer Drinkers Threaten Planet

Study: Canadian Beer Drinkers Threaten Planet

Friday, November 30, 2007

AP



A threat to the planet, eh?

Scientists have found a new threat to the planet: Canadian beer drinkers.

The government-commissioned study says the old, inefficient "beer fridges" that one in three Canadian households use to store their Molson and Labatt's contribute significantly to global warming by guzzling gas- and coal-fired electricity.

"People need to understand the impact of their lifestyles," British environmental consultant Joanna Yarrow tells New Scientist magazine. "Clearly the environmental implications of having a frivolous luxury like a beer fridge are not hitting home. This research helps inform people — let's hope it has an effect."

The problem is that the beer fridges are mostly decades-old machines that began their second careers as beverage dispensers when Canadians upgraded to more energy-efficient models to store whatever Canadians eat besides doughnuts and poutine.

University of Alberta researcher Denise Young, who led the study, suggests that provincial authorities hold beer-fridge buy-backs or round-ups to eliminate the threat — methods that Americans use to get guns off the streets.

“Nature Boy” Ric Flair campaigns for Huckabee

“Nature Boy” Ric Flair campaigns for Huckabee





Taliban Using Child as Human Shield

Taliban Using Child as Human Shield

Thursday, November 29, 2007

CNN/YouTube Republican Debate

CNN/YouTube Republican Debate


Part 1



Part 2



Part 3



Part 4



Part 5



Part 6



Part 7



Part 8



Part 9



Part 10



Part 11



Part 12



Part 13



Part 14

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Musharraf Quits Pakistani Army Post


Musharraf Quits Pakistani Army Post

By CARLOTTA GALL

Published: November 29, 2007

LAHORE, Pakistan, Nov. 28 — President Pervez Musharraf resigned his military post as chief of army staff today, handing over the command stick to his successor in a ceremony at Pakistan’s army headquarters and ending his eight years of military rule. He remains president and will be sworn in to a new five-year term in the capital on Thursday, but as a civilian president his power will be diminished.


Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kayani, 55, the vice chief of army staff, becomes the Chief of Army Staff, replacing Mr. Musharraf. General Kayani is a former head of Inter-Services Intelligence, Pakistan’s main intelligence agency, and a graduate of the Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas. He has played a prominent role in cooperating with the United States in the fight against terrorism in Pakistan and is expected to continue that policy.

Mr. Musharraf had come under growing pressure internationally and from his own disenchanted public to relinquish his military post, and his grip on political power will be significantly loosened without the uniform. While the military remains loyal to him, General Kayani is understood to want to remove the army from the forefront of politics and concentrate on military concerns.

Mr. Musharraf, who imposed emergency rule on the country on Nov. 3, imprisoning political opponents, lawyers and judges and closing down television stations, will continue to chair the national security council as a civilian president and has given himself added powers under recent amendments.

After 46 years in the army, Mr. Musharraf admitted it was wrenching to give up his military role. “I am sad to leave the army which has been like a family to me,” he said in an emotional speech before Pakistani government and military officials and their wives gathered on a parade ground in the garrison city of Rawalpindi, south of the capital, Islamabad. “Although I am taking off the uniform the army will always be in heart.”

He praised the army for coming forward for the nation in years of hardship and national calamities and commended General Kayani as an excellent commander who he had known for 20 years.

Pakistan’s top officials said on Monday that after giving up his uniform Mr. Musharraf would be sworn in as a civilian president in Islamabad on Thursday. That would be a belated, though significant, concession to both his political opposition here and supporters in the Bush administration who have demanded it as an important step toward restoring civilian rule.

Mr. Musharraf conducted what the Pakistani military said was a round of farewell calls to the country’s armed forces on Tuesday.

He visited the Joint Chief of Staff headquarters, where he was received by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, Gen. Tariq Majeed, the military said in a statement. Later, he visited the naval headquarters and the air headquarters.

However, Mr. Musharraf’s opponents have made clear that giving up his military role may not be enough to appease his critics.

Former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who has returned to Pakistan after an eight-year absence to make a challenge in parliamentary elections scheduled for January, condemned Mr. Musharraf for imposing emergency rule.

Mr. Sharif said he would not serve as prime minister under a Musharraf presidency, demanded an end to the state of emergency and called for the reinstatement of fired Supreme Court justices.

Mr. Sharif was tossed out of power by Mr. Musharraf in a 1999 coup. Such a forceful stand contrasts in many respects to Mr. Sharif’s own time as prime minister. He is best remembered here and in Washington as the leader who brought the world a nuclear Pakistan, flirted with war with India and forged strong ties with religious conservatives. His tenure was marred by charges of rampant corruption and by confrontations with the courts and the media as well.

Mr. Sharif’s return to Pakistan now is likely to stir deep unease in the Bush administration, which has stood with Mr. Musharraf as its best bet in the fight against terrorism, said Daniel Markey, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who until recently dealt with Pakistan issues at the State Department.

Nonetheless, Washington appears to have taken a back seat, or at least a stance of resignation at the inevitable, as the Saudis, perhaps Pakistan’s most revered ally, engineered the return of Mr. Sharif, Mr. Markey said.

Not least, Mr. Sharif’s return complicates the Bush administration’s support for Benazir Bhutto, another former prime minister and opposition leader, whom Washington has favored as a more secular politician, and a more certain partner against Islamic extremists.

Officials in Washington and London promoted her return from exile in October as a way to put a friendlier face on General Musharraf’s increasingly unpopular military regime.

While Ms. Bhutto and Mr. Sharif are known to detest the general, they detest each other as well. Whether they can form a cohesive opposition against Mr. Musharraf before parliamentary elections set for Jan. 8 is far from clear.

While Mr. Sharif said he would not take part in the elections unless the emergency rule was lifted, he went ahead to meet the Monday deadline for filing nominating papers for the election.

Carlotta Gall reported from Lahore. Jane Perlez contributed reporting from Islamabad. Graham Bowley contributed reporting from New York.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Extremism and Weak Leadership

Extremism and Weak Leadership

November 27, 2007

More Nazi Talk from Dion Deputy Leader Elizabeth May. More Inaction from Stéphane Dion.

Yesterday, the Green Party Leader and Stéphane Dion confidant, Elizabeth May, repeated a disgraceful and callous comparison of the Harper Government’s Environment Plan to the appeasement of the Nazi regime.

Ms. May’s previous attempt to vilify those who disagree with her radical agenda as being similar to Nazi appeasers drew widespread condemnation from faith groups ranging from the Canadian Jewish Congress, B’nai Brith Canada and the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada. Her remarks also drew criticism from Stéphane Dion himself, a not unimportant fact, since Ms. May has become a Dion lieutenant after they formed the ‘Red-Green’ electoral pact and is now running as the Liberal candidate in the riding of Central Nova.

Rather than show some humility and learn from her previous mistake, Ms. May is once again back to her old tricks. Writing on her personal election blog Ms. May repeated the accusation that the Harper government’s made-in-Canada climate change plan represented “a moral failure more culpable than that of Neville Chamberlain.”

“I repeat those words now, not because I thirst for abuse, but because in the light of day, following Canada’s actions in Uganda, they seem an understatement.” May concluded in her post.

Ms. May’s remarks not only betray her extreme opinions, it also betrays her lack of class and terrible judgment.

Such sentiments are disgraceful and have no place in any legitimate public debate. They certainly are unfit for any so-called political ‘leader’ and are directly offensive to the hundreds of thousands of Canadians who lost a family member to the atrocities of the Nazi regime.

The only question that remains is with regard to Stéphane Dion’s judgment. After Ms. May’s last Nazi outburst, Stéphane Dion admitted that her remarks were unacceptable and should be withdrawn.

By not only repeating, but actually intensifying her rhetoric, Ms. May is showing a complete lack of regard for Stéphane Dion and his leadership. He originally formed an alliance with Ms. May for political gain. Stéphane Dion must therefore be prepared to be held accountable for his new lieutenant’s extremism.

Will Stéphane Dion formally condemn Ms. May’s over-the-top rhetoric and sever his relationship with her and her party? Or will he share responsibility for the gross insensitivity of her remarks and the hurt that they have caused. Either way Elizabeth’s May inappropriate rhetoric is something that Canadians will not let Stéphane Dion ignore.

Monday, November 26, 2007

My Thoughts: Annapolis Middle East Peace Conference



My Thoughts: Annapolis

Annopolis:

Tomorrow is going to go down in history as one of the most important days for the George Bush legacy. After 7 years of complete neglect, Bush and Rice have decided to pull a complete 180 and actually hold a peace conference where core issues can finally be discussed with regards to this conflict.

To the credit of Condoleezza Rice, a lot of work and some results have come about at the result of her efforts. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas have been talking about core issues such as security, borders, settlements, Jerusalem, water, prisoners, the right of return and the creation of a democratic Palestinian state that is capable of living side by side with Israel in peace. Saudi Arabia recently reintroduced the 2002 Arab Peace deal offering full recognition of Israel in exchange for a solution to the Palestinian issue. Saudia Arabia has agreed to attend the conference and that is a major victory for the administration due to the fact that Saudi Arabia currently does not recognize Israel or have any relations with the Jewish state. Rice was also successful in inviting Syria to attend on the condition that they are free to mention the issue of the Golan Heights at the conference. Over 40 invitations were issued and representatives from the world community will be on hand. The hope is that the foundations for negotiations can be established in order to bring an end to this conflict. The United States has invested a lot of time and effort into getting something done. Rice and Bush are said to realize that this conference is the only chance of bringing about a legacy in the Middle East that goes beyond Iraq.

The odds of success unfortunately at this time are not good. All the major parties come to Annapolis weak. George Bush is finished as President as far as major domestic policy is concerned. Once the official race kicks off on January 3, all attention will be on where the Presidential hopefuls plan to take America in the future. If this conference is a failure, Bush will likely finish his tenure by managing Iraq and putting pressure on Iran while the rest of the world waits for the next President to change course on a series of issues. Bill Clinton was mocked for attempting Camp David in the lame duck period of his presidency. The question now is how serious is Bush about bringing peace to the Middle East? Rice has set a goal of coming to an agreement before Bush leaves office in January 2009. The question is does he have anywhere near enough capital domestically or internationally to achieve it? Bush is now in lame duck mode and if this conference fails what will transpire between January and the time that the new President takes over in the Middle East as a whole.

Ehud Olmert also comes to the conference weak. He is in a minority government situation and is trying to walk a balancing act in order to keep his coalition government together. He personally is facing a series of allegations into various financial and ethical scandals. His approval ratings tanked due to his handling of the Lebanon war in 2006. Members of his own party including chief negotiator and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni have called on his to resign. His main opposition Likud is counting on failure and planning to portray Olmert as giving the US and Palestinians too many concessions while further threatening Israeli security and interests. For Olmert if he can begin serious negotiations, he can make the case that he is required to see the process through. Any deal would likely face ratification through a referendum in both Israel and Palestine. The question is how many concessions is he able to make when his coalition can fall apart at any time , resulting in new elections and likely the end of his time as Prime Minister of Israel.

Mahud Abbas comes to the conference as half the President of Palestine. Hamas won parliament elections that were not recognized by Western powers. The Saudis brokered a national unity government that was also not recognized by the world because it included Hamas members. Thanks to backing from Iran and the ability to smuggle weapons from Egypt into Gaza, Hamas took over Gaza in a military coup. Fatah as a result has no real jurisdiction over that part of the state they are negotiating for. Hamas was not invited to the conference, and they have also said they will not see any decisions reached at the conference as binding to them. Abbas also knows that the IDF is the only thing keeping him from getting overthrown by Hamas in the West Bank as well. For Abbas, two things must be achieved. First he needs to be on the world stage shaking hands with international and Arab leaders so that he can demonstrate to his people that he is the legitimate President of the Palestinian Authority. Second, he needs to bring about some benefits that he can tangibly show to his people in order to fend off attacks from Hamas that he is an American/Israeli puppet who is betraying the Palestinian cause. If Abbas can begin serious negotiations with Olmert, he will demonstrate that he can achieve results and will begin to marginalize Hamas among people on the street who just want peace. If he comes back empty handed, Hamas will brand him a traitor and promote "resistance" as the only way to achieve a state. Iran, Hezbollah and likely Syra would exploit the lack of results as justification for their actions in the region. Moderates in the region such as in Jordon and Egypt will lose face and look weak to their people. Saudi Arabia's Prince Abdullah would face more pressure from within the US while at the same time trying to hold onto power in a country they are responsible for radicalizing. Anticipating failure, Saudi officials will not engage themselves in photo ops or hand shakes with Israeli officials. Syria chose to send its deputy foreign minister as oppose to the foreign ministers represented by every other delegate. Syria is at a major crossroads in its history. It must chose between peace with Israel, the return of the Golan Heights and normalized relations with the world or their alliance with Iran, Hezbollah and possibly North Korea as well. The stakes are extremely high, the situation in the Middle East is volatile and the situations in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Lebanon and Pakistan cast a dark shadow over the event. At the same time, all the leaders have a personal interest in some form of success and a need to move forward with negotiations and an eventual solution within a relatively short period of time.

Bush, Olmert and Abbas have an interest in at least creating the impression of momentum. If they fail: Likud will take out Olmert. Hamas will take out Abbas. 2008 Campaign's Republicans and Democrats will take out Bush. The rest of the world's leaders will sit on their hands and wait for January 2009.

There are also three wild cards in the process. For UK Prime Minister Tony Blair who is now special envoy to the Middle East and will be required to draw on his skills in solving the Northern Ireland dispute here. Blair also has a legacy on the line. Former US President Bill Clinton may also eventually play an active role should Hillary get to the White House or in the event Bush turns to Clinton's experience as Rice did a few months ago. By the way has anyone seen Jimmy Carter??? I am surprised he hasn't played an unofficial role up until this point.

What is the solution that everyone expects to end this conflict?

1, Israel is recognized as a Jewish state, Palestine a Muslim state and both recognize each others right to exist living side by side in peace.

2, Palestine will likely consist of Gaza, most of the West Bank and part of East Jerusalem as its capital. Holy sites need to be accessible to Jewish, Christian and Muslim individuals who share in the religious significance of the land.

3, Israel will be allowed to maintain some of the larger settlement blocks in exchange for other lands leading to the 100% equivalent of the West Bank for a Palestinian state. All other illegal settlements would have to be dismantled within Palestine.

4, Palestinians would have to drop the right of return and demand they be allowed to settle in Israel. Some form of symbolic recognition and international compensation in order to settle within the Palestinian state may be required in return for dropping this issue.

5, Muslim states would be required to recognize the Jewish state of Israel, normalize relations through embassies, trade, diplomatic contacts, visas and dropping all economic boycotts. There should also be pressure on these states to reform their education system, end hate incitement, crack down on terrorists, respect human rights and begin a process towards legitimate democracy. Settling outstanding 1967 border disputes with Lebanon and Syria would be required to marginalize extremist forces in both countries and bring about peace treaties with these two countries.

6, The international community, the Israeli population and the Palestinian population would have to ratify the agreement. Once the end game is known, pressure would then be on Hamas to disarm and join the democratic system as a legitimate political party. The end of terrorism and security of Israel would need to be guaranteed BEFORE this agreement is implemented. Prisoners on both sides would ultimately have to be released.

7, The Middle East would be expected to cooperate against extremism and "recognition" would lead to good relations. This would allow the holy land prosper for all peoples. Nations in the Middle East could turn the focus away from violence and into economically prosperous states benefiting from an oil economy along with huge tourism potential. Regular people in the region deserve peace, security and a chance to improve their standard of living.

At this point, everyone has acknowledged there will be a two state solution to this conflict. The question is how do we get to implementing that solution when so many outside forces are at play? Tomorrow we will see if these leaders are ready to finally give peace a chance.

Thanks for reading...

Darryl

PM launches Initiative to Save a Million Lives

PM launches Initiative to Save a Million Lives

Canada-led health program will save over 500 of the world’s poorest children every day

26 November 2007
Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced today that Canada, in partnership with UNICEF, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Health Organization, the World Bank, and other donor countries, is leading an ambitious initiative to improve healthcare for impoverished mothers and children in Africa and Asia.

The Initiative to Save a Million Lives will strengthen health systems by training frontline health workers and delivering affordable healthcare services directly to local communities.

“The Canadian-led Initiative to Save a Million Lives will deliver basic, cost-effective and life-saving health services to mothers and children in countries where the needs are greatest,” said Prime Minister Harper. “Once fully implemented, the Initiative will save over 500 children’s lives every day.”

“Canada is on track to double its aid to Africa by 2008-09, “said Prime Minister Harper.

“These actions are getting real results, including lower rates of HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and malaria, increased peace and security, stronger economic growth, and better governance.”

Canada’s contribution of $105 million over five years to the Initiative will train over 40,000 health workers and provide much-needed treatment for diseases such as malaria, measles and malnutrition. These efforts alone are expected to save 200,000 lives in Africa.

Harper's Trip to the Commonwealth Summit and Africa

From the official Prime Minister of Canada Website:
http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media_gallery.asp?media_category_typ_id=3













Obama Inhaled..."that's the point"

Obama Inhaled..."that's the point"





Sunday, November 25, 2007

Congratulations Saskatchewan Roughriders on Grey Cup Win







CFL Grey Cup in Toronto



After week of hype, Grey Cup hours away




The Grey Cup

The Grey Cup

11/25/2007 10:45:26 AM

After a week of hype, the Grey Cup Game is finally only hours away.

Quarterback Ryan Dinwiddie has waited patiently all season for an opportunity to register his first CFL start.

His chance will come today on the CFL's biggest stage.

The former Boise State star will make his first career CFL start in the Grey Cup at Rogers Centre against the Saskatchewan Roughriders. Dinwiddie gets the start after No. 1 quarterback Kevin Glenn broke his left arm in last weekend's 19-9 East Division final against the Toronto Argonauts.

Glenn was injured trying to recover a fumble off a botched handoff when Toronto linebacker Kevin Eiben fell on the quarterback's arm early in the fourth quarter. Dinwiddie came in and completed all four passes he attempted for 80 yards as the Bombers were able to preserve their lead and go on to register the victory.




Dinwiddie will have plenty of veteran talent around him.

Running back Charles Roberts was the CFL's second-leading receiver this season with 1,379 yards despite missing Winnipeg's final two regular season games with a thigh injury. But he has run for over 100 yards in both of the Bombers playoff victories.

Winnipeg's receiving corps features three bona fide stars in Terrence Edwards (80 catches, 1,280 yards, nine touchdowns), Derick Armstrong (83 catches, 1,142 yards, six touchdowns) and Milt Stegall (69 catches, 1,108 yards, eight touchdowns). The offensive line isn't bad, either, having given up just 27 sacks this year, lowest in the CFL.

But Saskatchewan has a definite edge at quarterback with veteran Kerry Joseph. Joseph, 34, in his fifth CFL season, was named the league's outstanding player this week as well as a first-team all-star. Joseph was third in passing with 4,002 yards but was the leading rusher among quarterbacks with 737 yards and 13 touchdowns.

He led a Roughriders offense that averaged 27.2 points per game this season, tied with B.C. for tops in the CFL despite being without leading receiver Matt Dominguez, who suffered a season-ending knee injury about midway through the year.

D.J. Flick, obtained in an off-season trade from Hamilton, and youngster Andy Fantuz have both been huge for the Saskatchewan club down the stretch.

Flick finished as the club's receiving leader with 70 catches for 1,020 yards and a league-leading 10 touchdown grabs. Fantuz, a former first-round draft pick, had 56 catches for 978 yards and seven touchdowns during the season but is the league's playoff-leading receiver with 13 catches for 193 yards and a touchdown.

Running back Larry Cates, the team's leading rusher during the regular season with 866 yards, returned to the lineup in last weekend's West Division final win over B.C. despite having a stress fracture in his foot. Cates is expected to suit up Sunday.

The numbers: Winnipeg was 3-5-1 on the road this season and 3-4-1 against West Division teams. Saskatchewan was 6-3 on the road this year and 6-2 against East Division squads.

Keys to the game: All eyes will be firmly fixed on Dinwiddie in this game. While he's sorely lacking in experience, the good news is Winnipeg had a simple game plan against Toronto, one that Dinwiddie might find useful against the Riders.

In the East final, the Bombers allowed Roberts to firmly establish the run, which gave the offense a lot more potential options. In this case, Winnipeg looked to get its short passing game going, which seemed to work against the Argos.

If the Bombers can do the same against Saskatchewan, not only would it serve to bolster Dinwiddie's confidence, but also allow Winnipeg to have a ball- control offense that would also serve to keep Joseph and the Riders' offense off the field.

However, the Roughriders will undoubtedly try to establish a swarming pass rush in order to fluster the young Bombers quarterback and force him into making mistakes. Saskatchewan's defense isn't overly big, but it is fast and athletic, two elements that Dinwiddie will have to take into account every time he gets the snap from center.

Big games are usually won by the teams that make the fewest mistakes.

Dinwiddie will undoubtedly make some errors because of his inexperience, which could put the Blue Bombers precariously behind the eight ball against a pretty good Roughriders team.

http://www.tsn.ca/cfl/

http://toronto.cflgreycup.ca/



Noam Chomsky on U.S. policy towards Iran

Noam Chomsky on U.S. policy towards Iran





Noam Chomsky Interview on CBC



Canada gets its way on climate change


Won't repeat Kyoto error: PM


THE CANADIAN PREss

KAMPALA, Uganda – Stephen Harper concluded a Commonwealth summit today by bluntly describing the Kyoto accord as a mistake the world must never repeat.

The Prime Minister characterized the landmark climate change deal as a flawed document and served notice that Canada will not support any new international treaty that carries its fatal flaw.

Harper said the key error of Kyoto was slapping binding targets on three-dozen countries but not the rest, including some of the world's biggest polluters like the United States, China and India.

So Canada will enter key negotiations on a post-Kyoto deal next month with a relatively simple position: all major polluters must be included, or there's no deal.

Harper came under fire from some quarters for promoting that view at the Commonwealth summit but was adamant that the everyone-in approach is the only solution.

Harper's stance places the bar for success extremely high at upcoming United Nations talks in Bali, Indonesia, but he said it's better than the incrementalist approach of the past.

"This was the Kyoto mistake," Harper told a news conference at the summit's conclusion.

"We already did the `One-third of the countries will take binding targets and let's hope the rest fall into line."'

"We're already there. That hasn't worked."

Harper's remarks on Kyoto offer the latest in a series of public stances he has taken on the treaty, which demands six per cent emissions cuts below 1990 levels by 2012.

Five years ago he described it as a money-sucking socialist scheme and ridiculed the science of global warming when the previous Liberal government ratified the treaty.

More recently, he's simply described its targets as unattainable because of the Liberals' well-documented failure to cut emissions, a view that was reflected in his government's policy-setting throne speech.

On Sunday, he suggested Kyoto was flawed all along.

"We already saw Kyoto," he said.

"If we get a third of the world to sign on first and wait for the other two-thirds, it's never going to happen."

Harper says he has helped to achieve something that's never been done before: Getting the United States, China and, now, India, to agree to tackle climate change at successive international summits.

At the G8, at APEC, and now with India at the Commonwealth, he got the world's biggest economies to agree to the general principle of cutting emissions.

Just a few days ago at an Asian summit, India refused to endorse a resolution that called for it to strive toward undefined, so-called "aspirational" goals on greenhouse emissions.

But this week, the Indians and the entire 53-member Commonwealth did sign on to such an agreement.

Harper was a key player in making that happen, and some other countries were furious at Canada as a result.

To procure India's approval, the Commonwealth had to strip out any reference to binding targets in a resolution that had the support of almost any country.

Some foreign diplomats were so disgusted that they sought out Canadian journalists to tell them what their country was doing behind closed doors.

One called the Harper approach a perfect recipe for making sure nothing happens.

Canada was among the only countries to oppose a resolution that had called on developed countries to meet binding targets, without making any reference to developing ones like India.

The other major holdout, Australia's government led by John Howard, was turfed from office in an election during the summit.

Howard's successor, Kevin Rudd, has promised to sign the Kyoto accord immediately upon taking office.

Malaysia's leader expressed disappointment that binding targets were excluded from the final resolution.

"I was hoping that there was something specific we could decide upon – but it was not possible," Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi told a news conference. "In some way I do feel a bit disappointed."

He said he hopes developed countries take a lead role, while adding that poorer countries also have a responsibility to act.

Harper says there's no other choice.

China, India, and the United States, none of whom are bound by Kyoto, account for more than half of global emissions alone.

Harper says they must all be brought on side in a global system that includes binding targets for everyone. But then why, he was asked, hadn't he push for binding targets for all Commonwealth members?

His reply spoke straight to the challenge that lies ahead at the UN talks in Bali, and to the point raised by some foreign diplomats who opposed his all-or-nothing approach.

"We would not get consensus here," Harper said.

That has some wondering if Harper feels it's impossible to get 53 Commonwealth members to support a purely symbolic resolution that refers to targets, what hope is there that 200 countries could leave Bali with a deal that binds them to detailed targets?

But the prime minister disputed reports that Canada was isolated at the summit and pointed out that his government helped write the climate change deal that was ultimately adopted.

"For the first time in a very long time Canada's voice is being heard. And the consequence of our voice being heard is we're getting the changes we want to see," he said.

The host of the summit did mention a Canadian prime minister in his closing remarks, but it wasn't Harper.

Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni concluded his address by quoting former Liberal prime minister Pierre Trudeau's 1973 description of the Commonwealth as a family.

And while Harper spoke, a camera caught Museveni more than once drifting in and out of sleep.

************

Canada gets its way on climate change

Globe and Mail Update and Canadian Press

KAMPALA — Commonwealth leaders agreed to a much watered-down agreement on climate change after Prime Minister Stephen Harper resisted any reference to binding targets on greenhouse gas emissions.

The agreement, announced at a news conference Saturday afternoon was a setback for other Commonwealth members, led by Britain, who had called for binding commitments for greenhouse gas reductions in the statement.

But Mr. Harper said that he could not agree to the original proposal which put binding commitments on some large greenhouse-gas emitters and not for others.

“We will not agree to a framework that binds some countries and not others because that is a recipe for failure on the issue of climate change,” he told reporters. “We already have a protocol like that and it doesn't work. We need a protocol that involves everyone.”

Mr. Harper denied that Canada had been isolated during the discussions. “I didn't find that to be the case at all when we discussed this among leaders,” he said without naming who his allies may have been during the discussions.

“Our view is that the first thing that's important we that we get a framework that includes everyone. That is the most important in this declaration as it was at the G8 as it was at APEC, the recognition everybody should be involved.”

Mr. Harper said he still wants a new global climate-change treaty that includes binding targets for every country, and Canada will take that position to critical climate talks in Indonesia next month, where world governments will seek to hammer out a successor agreement to the Kyoto accord.

The comments come during a Commonwealth summit in Uganda.

A diplomat from another Commonwealth country described Canada's position — that there's no deal unless everyone agrees — as a recipe for inertia on climate change.

As for binding emissions targets: “Canada's view is that we need binding targets on all nations. That's going to be the approach we're going to take to international negotiations.”

A British official said his delegation was disappointed it failed to get the word binding into the statement but he insisted the statement remains strong.

The Commonwealth operates by consensus which means that all 53 leaders had to sign up to it.

Canada and Australia had been the lone holdouts against an earlier resolution that would have included such targets — and the Australian government has just been defeated in an election.

The earlier resolution would have committed developed countries to binding targets but not developing countries. Canada argued that the deal was unfair because it excluded India, a Commonwealth member and one of the world's biggest polluters.

The agreement hints at the position Canada will likely take into next month's long-anticipated climate talks in Bali, Indonesia. The Conservative government believes that big polluters who did not sign the Kyoto accord — notably China, India and the U.S. — should be included in the post-Kyoto deal. But Mr. Harper says any targets should be flexible enough to deal with different national circumstances.

***********



Suspending Pakistan tough decision: Harper

Mike Blanchfield , CanWest News Service

Published: Sunday, November 25, 2007

KAMPALA, Uganda - Prime Minister Stephen Harper said suspending Pakistan from the Commonwealth was a tough decision, but hopefully the country would be brought back to the fold.

Harper spoke Sunday for the first time on one of the two main issues that dominated the Commonwealth summit. The organization suspended Pakistan three days earlier for violating its democratic principles by not lifting a state of emergency.

President Pervez Musharraf declared a state of emergency there on Nov. 3, arresting the chief justice, curbing journalists and holding lawyers, rights activists and opposition members.

Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper applauds a speech during the Commonwealth Heads of State Meeting (CHOGM) final session and concluding statements in Munyonyo, November 25, 2007.

Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper applauds a speech during the Commonwealth Heads of State Meeting (CHOGM) final session and concluding statements in Munyonyo, November 25, 2007.


Harper called it "a difficult decision but one which we have done while emphasizing our desire to help Pakistan back to the path of democracy."

Pakistan accused the Commonwealth of making an "unreasonable and unjustified" suspension and threatened to withdraw from the organization.

Harper lauded his host, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni for his hospitality and "steady and thoughtful management" of the three days of talks at a scenic retreat on the shores of Lake Victoria.

Museveni appeared to doze off for several seconds as Harper spoke.

For the most part, Museveni escaped any serious public criticism from his guests over his country's dubious human rights record and the 21-year war that has raged in his country's north displacing more than one million people in squalid camps enslaving tens of thousands of child soldiers.

But Harper said he raised both those concerns in a bilateral meeting with Museveni Sunday. While he did not provide details, he suggested that he did not take a hard line with the leader who has been assailed for rigging elections, intimidating his courts and improperly amending his country's constitution to remove any term limits on how long he can sit as president.

"We're not blind to the problems that exist in this country. That said, if you look at the sweep of history in the recent decades, this country is moving in a positive direction," Harper said.

He called it a balancing act to try to urge further progress without "jeopardizing the progress that's already taken place."

Prior to this three-day summit, Human Rights Watch criticized Uganda for violating democratic freedoms, including intimidating the judiciary.

"Any serious discussion at the Commonwealth summit should recognize that human rights violations are inimical to sustainable development. Commonwealth members need to hold leaders accountable if their abusive human rights policies thwart the development of their own countries," the organization said.

Kizza Besigye, the Ugandan opposition leader who was jailed when he ran against Museveni for the presidency two years ago, led a small protest that was confined to an isolated airstrip on Friday.

"We believe that the Commonwealth as it is functioning today is not in any way or manner capable of dealing with the values for which it was set up," he said. "It is increasingly becoming an irrelevant organization."

Harper admitted that even though the Commonwealth "does put democracy, human rights and good governance at its core," that doesn't mean that all its members are model democracies.

Harper said that the suspension on Pakistan shows that the Commonwealth takes its commitment to human rights seriously.

"The principal value of the Commonwealth: it is the one organization where those values, however imperfectly practiced, sight is not totally lost of them."

Harper flies to neighbouring Tanzania on Monday to meet President Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete. Harper is to pay a brief visit to a Ugandan preschool.

Ottawa Citizen

Bitterest Rival of Musharraf Returns Home

Bitterest Rival of Musharraf Returns Home

Published: November 25, 2007

LAHORE, Pakistan, Nov. 25 — Nawaz Sharif, the Pakistani opposition leader and former prime minister, arrived home from exile to a tumultuous welcome at Lahore airport on Sunday evening. Hundreds of supporters whistled and cheered, hoisting him and his brother, Shahbaz Sharif on their shoulders through ranks of wary riot police.


Aamir Qureshi/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Nawaz Sharif greeted supporters upon his arrival in Lahore on Sunday.

“I have come to save this country,” he said standing on top of a radio cab desk in the arrivals hall. “I have come to fulfill the responsibility that is given me,” he told the crowd. But few could hear him, so loud was the chanting and cheering from supporters. “Long live! Long live! Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif!” they shouted.

The bitterest rival of Gen. Pervez Musharraf, Mr. Sharif, 57, was returning eight years after his government was overthrown by the general, and he was thrown in prison and later sent into exile.

His attempt to return to the country in September was met with a huge police crackdown and he was immediately deported on the orders of General Musharraf, who has repeatedly said he would not allow Mr. Sharif back to contest parliamentary elections.

Yet in a sign of the rapidly changing political environment in Pakistan, and after Saudi Arabia, which has hosted Mr. Sharif for much of the last seven years, interceded on his behalf, General Musharraf relented this week and agreed to allow him and his brother to return. A heavy police deployment tried to prevent a large crowd forming at the airport and along the route into town, but it did not try to restrain Mr. Sharif or break up the gathering of his supporters. Police vehicles provided him with an escort into the city of Lahore.

Mr. Sharif is a rich industrialist from Lahore who gained enormous national popularity as prime minister when he conducted Pakistan’s first nuclear explosions in 1998. His return, with barely one day left for candidates to file their nomination papers for parliamentary elections, is likely to change the political scene overnight.

He represents the most formidable challenge to General Musharraf’s remaining in power as president for another five-year term, since unlike Benazir Bhutto, the other former prime minister and opposition leader, Mr. Sharif has publicly ruled out doing any deal with the general and has called for his removal from power.

His unimpeded return suggested that General Musharraf and his ruling party, a faction of the Pakistan Muslim League, is resigned to his political comeback. The faction that has backed General Musharraf for the last five years is likely to suffer the most from Mr. Sharif’s return, and politicians are already predicting defections from one faction to another.

In his first words to his supporters on Sunday, he reiterated that he had not done any deal to return and put an end to the politics of back-room deals. “My deal is with you people, my heart says that there will be a change and the poor will get employment,” he said.

His return from Saudi Arabia was negotiated in the last few days when General Musharraf made a surprise visit to Saudi Arabia, where Mr. Sharif has been living since his deportation in September. The Pakistani leader had asked the Saudi leader, King Abdullah, to keep Mr. Sharif in exile until after the elections, but the Saudi leader made it clear that he no longer wanted to be embroiled in taking side in Pakistan’s politics, according to politicians close to the government.

His party and an alliance of opposition parties have called for a boycott of the parliamentary elections scheduled for Jan. 8, unless the de facto martial law that General Musharraf imposed three weeks ago is lifted within days.

Nevertheless, party members said they had instructions to go ahead and file their nomination papers for seats in the provincial and national assemblies. A final decision on whether to boycott would be made later, officials said.

Even with de facto martial law in force, with restrictions on the news media and political parties, including the right to assembly, opposition parties are divided over whether to boycott the elections. Ms. Bhutto, leader of the Pakistan Peoples Party, filed her nomination papers on Sunday in her home city of Karachi. Although the party has not made a final decision on a boycott, they are expected to contest the elections, rather than risk having no representation in the new assemblies. If the Pakistan Peoples Party, which is probably the largest political party in the country, contests the elections, Mr. Sharif’s call for an opposition boycott would founder.

Officials of Mr. Sharif’s party, also a faction of the Pakistan Muslim League, said that hundreds of party workers had been arrested overnight to prevent a large crowd gathering to greet him. But nevertheless thousands of supporters in minibuses and trucks, on motorbikes and bicycles, filled the road outside the airport, many pressing forward to touch his white sport utility vehicle and catch a glimpse of him and his brother inside.

Mr. Sharif’s brother, Shahbaz, is a politician in his own right: he used to be chief minister of Punjab, Pakistan’s most populous province, and he was also deported when he tried to return to the country in 2004.

Yet it was with the evident cooperation of the police and the provincial authorities, that Mr. Sharif transferred into a custom-built open-topped campaign truck, emblazoned with huge posters of himself and his brother, and spoke to several thousand supporters at a large intersection some five kilometers from the airport in to town.

“For eight years I was away from you and you were away from me but I resided in your hearts and you were in my heart. I can see the proof of it in front of me right now,” he told them, speaking into a microphone from the top of the bus. “My heart tells me that, God willing, change is inevitable,” he said.

Mr. Sharif is likely to take a strong stand against any compromise with the general, playing on the growing frustrations of the public with his military regime. “These politicians who make deals who bow their heads in front of a dictator we have to defeat them,” he told his supporters.

Many of the supporters gathered at the airport included bankers, factory owners, and students, said they were tried and frustrated after eight years of military rule. Gerneral Musharraf’s imposition of emergency rule three weeks ago to secure his own election to another five-year term was a final embarrassment, they said.

Jane Perlez contributed reporting from Islamabad.

Syria to Attend Mideast Peace Conference


Syria to Attend Mideast Peace Conference


Published: November 25, 2007

Filed at 12:03 p.m. ET

DAMASCUS, Syria (AP) -- Syria announced Sunday that it will attend the Annapolis summit on Mideast peace, saying it would send its deputy foreign minister because the future of the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights had been put on the agenda.

The official news agency, SANA, said Deputy Foreign Minister Faysal Mekdad would travel to the U.S.-backed conference, a decision made ''after the Syria track was added to the conference agenda,'' the agency said. Syria had said it will attend only if the conference discusses the Golan Heights, the strategic plateau captured by Israel in the 1967 Mideast war and later annexed.

Syria did not explain why it will not be sending its foreign minister, like other Arab participants, but the decision appears to indicate that it is not entirely confident the conference will address its concerns over the Golan Heights.

White House press secretary Dana Perino said that the Golan Heights were ''not specifically on the agenda'' but attendees would be able to freely raise issues.

A spokeswoman for Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said Israel nonetheless saw the announcement as a positive development.

''The meetings are clearly about the Israeli-Palestinian process, but could be the beginning of new avenues to peace in the Middle East,'' spokeswoman Miri Eisin said.

Broad Arab attendance at the Maryland summit was a key goal for the U.S., which is hoping that could help bring about an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal.

''This large number signals broad support for Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts,'' said Gordon Johndroe, President Bush's National Security Council spokesman.

En route to Washington, Olmert said before Syria's announcement that Israel would ''favorably'' consider negotiations with Syria if conditions ripen. Israel wants Syria to break out of Iran's orbit and stop harboring Palestinian and Lebanese militants opposed to the Jewish state's existence.

Nearly 50 nations and organizations are set to attend the summit. Iran has not been invited.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said before the Syrian announcement that the peace conference would only serve the interests of Israel, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported.

''The peace conference has no benefit for the oppressed Palestinian nation. It is only for supporting the Zionists occupiers,'' Ahmadinejad said.

''Participation in this summit is an indication of the lack of intelligence of some so-called politicians,'' he said, accusing the participants of giving concessions to the ''Zionists.''

Iran is a primary backer of Hamas, the militant group that seized the Gaza Strip from moderate Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah movement in June. Tehran says its support to Palestinians groups is limited to humanitarian aide.

Ahmadinejad is famous for his anti-Israel rhetoric. Since 2005, his calls for the disappearance of the Jewish state have prompted international criticism.

Fear over Shiite Iran's growing influence and regional ambitions may have helped push largely Sunni Arab states and the Israelis toward stronger peace efforts.

In Gaza, Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri declined to criticize the Syrian decision, saying his group would have preferred if the Arabs collectively didn't go to the conference.

''The Syrian leadership is the one to evaluate its own interests, the way it sees fit,'' he said. ''Hamas generally rejects the collective participation of the Arab official regimes.''

Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said that Arab participants in the conference, which begins Monday night in Washington, then moves to Annapolis, should not expect to dictate the contours of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.

On the plane carrying Livni and Olmert to the U.S., Livni suggested that a lack of Arab backing contributed to the failure of the last round of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, which broke down in bloodshed in early 2001. The Arab world, she said, ''should stop sitting on the fence.''

''There isn't a single Palestinian who can reach an agreement without Arab support,'' she said. ''That's one of the lessons we learned seven years ago.''

But she also said that ''it is not the role of the Arab world to define the terms of the negotiations or take part in them.''

--------

Associated Press Writer Amy Teibel contributed to this report from Washington.

Countdown to the Grey Cup



Countdown to the Grey Cup



CBC News at Six - Countdown to the Cup




CFL East Final WPG at TOR- Nov. 18, 2007




CFL West Final SSK at BC- Nov. 18, 2007




Saturday, November 24, 2007

Emergency rule declared in Lebanon


Emergency rule declared in Lebanon

Associated Press

BEIRUT — President Emile Lahoud said Friday that Lebanon is in a "state of emergency" and ordered the army to take over security powers, hours before he was stepping down without a successor and leaving a political vacuum in the divided country. The pro-Western government of Prime Minister Fuad Saniora rejected the move, raising tensions.

The announcement by the pro-Syrian president immediately raised further confusion amid Lebanon's political turmoil, which many fear could explode into violence between supporters of the government and the opposition.

The president cannot declare a state of emergency without approval from the government, but Lahoud's spokesman said Saniora's government is considered unconstitutional.

"The president of the republic declares that because a state of emergency exists all over the land as of Nov. 24, 2007, the army is instructed to preserve security all over the Lebanese territory and places all the armed forces at its disposal," presidential spokesman Rafik Shalala said.


The statement instructed the army "to submit the measures it takes to the Cabinet once there is one that is constitutional," he said.

Mr. Saniora's government rejected the announcement.

"It has no value and is unconstitutional and consequently it is considered as if it was not issued," said a government spokesman, who asked not to be identified because an official announcement has not yet been made by the prime minister.

The spokesman said the constitution stipulates that the Cabinet — not the president — has the authority to declare a state or emergency and to give the army the authority to take over security.

"Any decision not issued by the Cabinet has no constitutional value," the spokesman told The Associated Press.

The army command refused to comment on the developments.

The military had already been on alert for several days, deploying hundreds of troops in tanks, armored personnel carriers and jeeps along intersections leading to Beirut and around the downtown area where the parliament building is located. The city was normal throughout the day, but traffic was lighter than usual, and most schools were closed.

Mr. Lahoud was still expected to step down when his term ends at midnight Friday. Both sides had been counting on the military to ensure calm in the political chaos, and it was unclear if Lahoud's announcement would give the military any powers beyond security measures.

But his talk of a "state of emergency" raised already high tempers as both sides enter a new phase of trying to find a new president for the country.

Parliament made a final attempt Friday afternoon to convene to vote on a president before Lahoud leaves office. But the opposition, led by the Shia militant group Hezbollah, boycotted the session, preventing it from reaching the necessary two-thirds quorum.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who is aligned with the opposition, scheduled another session for Nov. 30 to give the factions more time to try to find a compromise candidate — which they have failed to do in weeks of talks mediated by France's foreign minister and other international officials.

Leaders from each side were pledging not to take steps to provoke the other — though Mr. Lahoud's announcement raises the heat.

"We have no choice but to have a consensus," Saad Hariri, leader of the anti-Syrian parliamentary majority, said after the failed session. "It is not in Lebanon's interest that the (presidential) palace is left empty."

The presidency is the latest front in the power struggle between the anti-Syrian coalition that holds a slim majority in parliament and the opposition, led by Syria and Iran's ally, Hezbollah. The anti-Syrians have tried to put one of their own in the presidency to replace Mr. Lahoud, a staunch ally of Damascus, but have been blocked by opposition boycotts of the legislature.

Much of what happens next in Lebanon — a battleground between the West and the Syria-Iran axis — may depend in part on Tuesday's U.S.-sponsored Mideast peace conference. Syria has not formally decided whether to go to Annapolis, Md., but it likely will.

Government supporters have accused Syria of using its allies in Lebanon to block a deal on the presidency until it sees what it gets in the conference. Damascus wants Annapolis to address its demands for the return of the Israeli-held Golan Heights.

**********

In Lebanon, something's got to give

Failure to agree on a new president could have wide-ranging repercussions

From Friday's Globe and Mail

BEIRUT — For an entire year, a tent city has occupied the centre of this city, an expression of the hatred Hezbollah and its allies have for the pro-Western government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora. But the government hasn't fallen.

For just as long, Mr. Siniora and his cabinet have spent most of the time hiding inside the Prime Minister's office and a nearby five-star hotel, a manifestation of the fear they feel after a long string of political assassinations targeting their ranks. Yet none of the killings have ever been prosecuted.

After 12 months of political deadlock that has paralyzed this country, something finally has to give today as Lebanon's seemingly never-ending political crisis enters a new phase.

By midnight tonight, duelling political factions will either have to compromise to select a new president, or there will be a political void, one that many Lebanese fear could transform this cold conflict into a hot one.

A armoured vehicle secures an intersection in Beirut on Friday as the Lebanese army was deployed heavily in the capital. Joseph Barrak/AFP/Getty Images

Enlarge Image

A armoured vehicle secures an intersection in Beirut on Friday as the Lebanese army was deployed heavily in the capital. (Joseph Barrak/AFP/Getty Images)


"Last day before zero hour: either a miracle or vacuum," blared the headline in yesterday's An-Nahar newspaper.

The parliamentary vote to choose a successor to President Émile Lahoud has been postponed four times, highlighting just how crucial and complicated it is to find a candidate acceptable to both Mr. Siniora and Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, not to mention their allies abroad.

Mr. Siniora's government is backed by the United States, France and Saudi Arabia; Hezbollah by Syria and Iran.

How Lebanon goes today is likely to have broad implications. A compromise could herald a broader détente that would boost prospects for next week's Mideast peace summit put together by U.S. President George W. Bush, and even perhaps help cool tensions over Iran's nuclear program.

But if the process collapses into chaos, and many observers predict it will, it could be a harbinger of more violence throughout the region.

Adding to the implications in a region increasingly torn along sectarian lines is the fact Mr. Siniora and his key backer, Saad Hariri, are Sunni Muslims, while Hezbollah is a Shia movement. Both sides have Christian allies.

Hours before Mr. Lahoud's term expired, everything was still possible yesterday. Crisis talks continued late last night, with French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner desperately trying to mediate. All sides, however, suggested the odds of a compromise were growing slimmer.

The country's constitution mandates that the president must be a Maronite Christian, one of the three main religious groups in the country. The opposition wants Michel Aoun, a popular and controversial former general, in the post, while the pro-Western side wants a technocrat.

Mr. Siniora's allies have vowed that if no deal is reached, they will use their parliamentary majority to choose a president from their own ranks. The opposition has warned it would boycott such a vote, not recognize the new president, and set up a parallel administration. The two sides are already blaming each other for the looming failure. "We suspect that Syria and Iran do not really want a new president. They feel much more comfortable with a void," Nayla Mouawad, a minister in Mr. Siniora's cabinet, said in an interview.

If no president is named by midnight tonight, the constitution allows Mr. Siniora to assume executive powers on an emergency basis.

Mr. Lahoud - who was installed by Damascus in 1998 while Syrian troops still occupied Lebanon - has warned that he would take "extraordinary measures" to avoid a power void. Those could include handing power over to the head of the army, General Michel Suleiman, when his term expires at midnight.

"Mr. Lahoud will not leave the country to fall into chaos and let Siniora assume the presidency," predicted Ibrahim Moussawi, editor of al-Intiqad, a newspaper affiliated with Hezbollah. "What happens next, no one knows."

Amal Saad Ghorayeb, visiting scholar with the Carnegie Middle East Centre, said Mr. Siniora and his allies - collectively known as the March 14 coalition - now face an unpalatable choice. They either capitulate to the opposition and agree to a candidate imposed on them by Hezbollah, or face the prospect of violent confrontation against an opposition that is far better armed than they are.

"March 14 is stuck between a rock and a hard place," Ms. Ghorayeb said. "It's the opposition who are calling the shots."

Key problems facing any new president would be whether Hezbollah should be allowed to keep its weapons, and the international tribunal investigating the 2005 assassination of Mr. Hariri's father, former prime minister Rafik Hariri.

More broadly, the governing coalition would like to make peace with neighbouring Israel, while Hezbollah and its allies argue that can't happen until Israel first withdraws from all the territory it has occupied since 1967, including the disputed Shebaa Farms region at the meeting point between Syrian, Lebanese and Israeli territory.

How the crisis could play out

Possible scenarios for Lebanon's presidential election:

Compromise candidate Finding someone who satisfies

both the pro-Western ruling coalition and the Hezbollah-led opposition seems increasingly unlikely. A list of possible candidates drawn up by Maronite Patriarch Nasrallah Sfeir has reportedly been rejected by the opposition.

Parallel governments Prime Minister Fouad Siniora and his allies hold a simple majority in parliament, and have for months suggested that if no compromise is reached, they could go ahead and elect a member from their own ranks. The opposition says such a move would be unconstitutional since the president needs to be elected by a two-thirds majority, and have threatened to

respond to such a step by naming their own president and cabinet.

Void at the top An increasingly likely scenario would see Mr. Siniora assume executive powers on an interim basis. The

opposition is heatedly against such a move, especially since Mr. Siniora is a Sunni Muslim and the constitution stipulates that the presidency is reserved for a Maronite Christian.

State of emergency Outgoing President Émile Lahoud, who was installed nine years ago by Syria, could declare martial law and hand power over to the popular head of the army, General Michel Suleiman.

Interim president Another scenario that's been proposed in recent days would see a interim president installed for an 18-month period, with a mandate limited to overseeing fresh parliamentary elections. This scenario has the benefit of

putting the crisis off, but would be seen as a victory for the

opposition, since opinion polls suggest that Hezbollah and its allies would triumph in any new election.

Howard Defeated in Australia (updated)




Howard Defeated in Australia (updated)



Update: Howard has also lost his own seat. Howard spoke to the Canadian parliament shortly after Harper was elected and later invited Harper to speak to the Australian parliament on September 11. After 11 years in power, Conservative world leaders have lost a major friend in John Howard tonight.

It should be interesting to see where Rudd takes Australia as far as Iraq, the environment, relations with China/USA, and Afghanistan are concerned. This election was extremely important internationally based on media reports coming out of the Commonwealth summit with regards to climate change. Australia is expected to ratify Kyoto under Rudd and quite possibly will swing Australia with the EU as oppose to the United States and Canada during the crucial climate change discussions in Bali.

It is hoped that when Rudd pulls troops out of Iraq he will consider sending them to help the mission in Afghanistan. Leaders in the UK, Australia, Spain, Italy and elsewhere have all gone down largely due to sending their troops to Iraq and being seen as too supportive of George Bush's foreign policy.

Thanks for reading..

-Darryl

************




Bush Ally Defeated in Australia



Kevin Rudd, the Australian Labor Party leader, greeted his supporters in Brisbane after his election victory.


Published: November 25, 2007


SYDNEY, Australia, Nov. 24 — Australia’s prime minister, John Howard, one of President Bush’s staunchest allies in Asia, suffered a comprehensive defeat at the hands of the electorate on Saturday, as his Liberal Party-led coalition lost its majority in Parliament.


Sergio Dionisio/Getty Images

Prime Minister John Howard conceded defeat.

He will be replaced by Kevin Rudd, the Labor Party leader and a former diplomat. “Today Australia looks to the future,” Mr. Rudd told a cheering crowd in his home state of Queensland. “Today the Australian people have decided that we as a nation will move forward.”

Mr. Howard’s defeat, after 11 years in power, follows that of José María Aznar of Spain, who also backed the United States-led invasion of Iraq, and political setbacks for Tony Blair of Britain.

Mr. Howard conceded nearly two hours after the last polling booths closed in the west of the country.

“A few moments ago I telephoned Mr. Kevin Rudd and I congratulated him and the Australian Labor Party on a very emphatic victory,” Mr. Howard told a roomful of emotional supporters.

“I leave the office of prime minister with our country prouder, stronger and more prosperous than ever,” he said.

Returns for a small number of seats are yet to be compiled, but analysts estimate that over all the Labor Party gained 28 seats to win a comfortable 22-seat majority in the 150-seat lower house of Parliament, where governments are formed. Official results are expected within the next day or two.

Mr. Howard may suffer the indignity of losing his own seat of Bennelong on Sydney’s north shore, which he has held for 33 years, to a former television anchor and rookie politician. He would be the first sitting prime minister to lose his seat since 1929.

It was a bruising campaign, and the Liberal Party has said it will challenge some results on the grounds that the Labor candidates had broken electoral law by failing to resign from government jobs before running for office. The Labor Party said it had broken no laws.

Mr. Rudd, 50, campaigned on a platform of new leadership to address broad concerns about the environment, health and education. He has said his first acts as prime minister would include pushing for the ratification of the Kyoto agreement on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and negotiating the withdrawal of Australia’s 500 troops from Iraq.

Analysts said the leadership change was unlikely to bring a radically new foreign policy, although they expected a shift in emphasis in the relationship with the United States, Australia’s closest ally. “Australia will remain a close ally of the United States, and Rudd remains committed to the alliance,” said Michael Fullilove, of the Lowy Institute for International Policy in Sydney. But he noted that “if there is a Democratic administration elected next year, to some extent they would become closer.”

Mr. Howard has a strong personal relationship with Mr. Bush that is based on a similar socially conservative philosophy and a shared outlook on terrorism.

Australian opinion polls have shown that although Australians remain strong supporters of the so-called Anzus alliance — the security pact among Australia, New Zealand and the United States — they do not approve of Mr. Bush or the Iraq war.

The attempts by Mr. Howard’s coalition to stress its economic record apparently failed to impress voters. The Australian economy has had 17 years of continuous growth, lately driven by Chinese demand for Australian iron ore and coal. Mr. Howard had warned voters that a Labor victory would endanger the country’s prosperity.

But despite the coalition campaign, there was little distance between the parties on economic policy, and the defining characteristics came down to the personalities of the leaders. In addition, Mr. Howard was running for a historic fifth term, and many voters said they were ready for a change.

“Howard is out of touch,” said George Varvaressos, 52, who voted in eastern Sydney on Saturday morning. “It’s the arrogance of being in power for too long — he hasn’t been listening.”

If Australia’s strongest military and political alliance is with Washington, the fuel for its economy is coming from China. Mr. Fullilove says Mr. Rudd’s ability to manage the relationship among Canberra, Washington and Beijing would be crucial.

Mr. Rudd, 18 years younger than Mr. Howard, has a reputation as a cerebral student of policy, as opposed to the Liberal leader’s image of a hardened and aggressive political animal.

“He seems more personable, approachable. He doesn’t seem arrogant — yet — and I have respect for him,” said Marcelle Freiman, who voted for Mr. Rudd in eastern Sydney on Saturday.

Mr. Rudd’s dry image was altered by the news that he had visited a strip club during a trip to New York in 2003.

He was a diplomat in Beijing and speaks Mandarin. He impressed many with a fluent address to Chinese President Hu Jintao when Mr. Hu visited Australia in September.

Mr. Fullilove said Mr. Rudd’s experience regarding China is unlikely to make a significant difference to Australia’s relationship with the United States. “I would counsel against people assuming that because Kevin Rudd speaks Mandarin there would be a big rebalancing of the relationship in favor of Beijing,” he said.

Friday, November 23, 2007

The REAL News

The REAL News




The Real News is a non-profit news and documentary network focused on providing independent and uncompromising journalism. Our staff, in collaboration with courageous journalists around the globe, will investigate, report and debate stories on the critical issues of our times.

We are member supported and do not accept advertising, government or corporate funding.

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRealNews

ABC News: Barack Obama leads in Iowa

ABC News: Barack Obama leads in Iowa


Big news from Iowa as a new poll shows Barack in the lead as well as seen to be the most trustworthy candidate. November 19, 2007.

Women for Obama

Women for Obama

A short documentary that explores why women across the nation are supporting Barack Obama for president.

Barack Obama on Iraq, Opposition from the Start

Barack Obama on Iraq, Opposition from the Start

Barack Obama opposed this war before it even began. Watch clips of his opposition before and after the war as well as his plan for moving forward.



Liberals gunning for February election, insiders say




Liberals gunning for February election, insiders say

From Friday's Globe and Mail

OTTAWA — Stéphane Dion's federal Liberals are constructing an election scenario in which they would try to defeat the government in February, before the Conservatives can deliver another budget, according to party strategists, officials and MPs.

The opposition party is feeling more bullish since the Mulroney-Schreiber affair set the Tories on the defensive, but is concerned it will suffer damage if it continues to abstain on confidence votes in the House of Commons - and wants to prevent the Conservatives from delivering a feel-good election budget.

With the budget - usually delivered in late February or March - likely to become a confidence showdown, the Liberals are planning a pre-emptive strike, several Liberals familiar with the strategy told The Globe and Mail.

That means the new year could see a role reversal in the election posturing in the Commons, with Mr. Dion pushing to defeat the government, and Prime Minister Stephen Harper trying to delay.

Even in a minority Parliament, the government controls many of the procedural levers, and can delay "opposition days" until after a budget is tabled, which would make it difficult for the Liberals to put forward a no-confidence motion.

"We're going to go before the budget," one Quebec Liberal said. "The budget will be full of candy for everybody. He's going to have money for seniors, for youth, for everybody. If you [wait and] go on the budget, then it means you're opposing tax cuts, money for all those people, and the campaign will be on that."

Only last month, Mr. Dion was forced to order his troops to abstain on confidence votes over the Conservatives' Throne Speech and mini-budget to avoid an election while public support for the Liberals was falling and their campaign plans were incomplete.

But many insiders fear the party's credibility will suffer if it lets Mr. Harper govern for too long. And, shaken by an election scare, the party's organizers have been given a few crucial months to get ready.

At least one more confidence vote is likely before Christmas, on a budget-implementation bill, but the Liberals plan to "suck it up one more time, and then go early in the new year," one Liberal said.

Another Liberal strategist said: "[On what issue] we'll go is the question. I think people realize that just abstaining is not realistic. It sends the message that we are not ready for an election and that's not the case."

However, the Liberals may not get the opportunity to bring the government down before the budget. A source said the Tories are considering pushing back "opposition days" until after the government's economic blueprint is tabled.

Opposition parties get a certain number of days per session during which they can set the debate and, if they wish, call for no-confidence in the government - but the government has until March 26 to schedule seven opposition days. In 2005, Paul Martin's Liberal government pushed back opposition days when it was threatened with defeat.

The hawks and doves in Liberal circles are still divided, with some of Mr. Dion's advisers, including principal secretary Johanne Sénécal, skeptical about rushing to the polls. Others would prefer to see whether the public inquiry into the relationship between former Conservative prime minister Brian Mulroney and deal-maker Karlheinz Schreiber harms the Conservatives. And, of course, a fall in the polls might cause an about-face.

But the pendulum has swung toward pushing for an early election. The Liberal Leader is said to be one of the more avid proponents of an election early in the new year.

According to some of his advisers, Mr. Dion believes his best hope of defeating Mr. Harper will come in a head-to-head contest when the two are likely to garner relatively equal media attention and have the same campaign funds at their disposal.

Economist: Bush is Mr. Palestine




The Middle East summit

Mr Palestine

Nov 22nd 2007
From The Economist print edition

George Bush is the only man who can bring an independent Palestine closer

GEORGE BUSH is not likely to be remembered by history as the saviour of the Middle East. He botched Iraq, dropped his democratic “freedom agenda” when the Arabs started voting for the wrong people, and has spent most of his two terms more or less ignoring Palestine. On this last front, however, he now has an opportunity for redemption.

If all goes to plan, Mr Bush will preside on November 27th over a peace meeting in Annapolis, Maryland. Expectations of this one-day event are at rock bottom. Nobody foresees much more than some bland speechifying and a photo-opportunity. And yet, if he is bold, Mr Bush has it in his power to turn Annapolis into a significant step towards peace. All he has to do is pluck up the courage to make the right speech.

Please come, we promise nothing will happen...

That may sound like a wild claim to make of an event already shrouded in defeatism. This is a party nobody is thrilled to have been asked to. Ehud Olmert is going because an Israeli prime minister cannot leave an invitation from the White House to curl in the in-tray. Mahmoud Abbas is going because after losing the Gaza Strip to Hamas he must show that he is still president of Palestine, if only in the eyes of the great powers. Not even the hosts seem excited. Condoleezza Rice, America's secretary of state, is a genuine if late convert to the idea that America can budge things in Palestine. But the rest of the administration appears to see Annapolis as a way to roll out the customary pieties on Palestine and so make it easier for America to line up its Arab friends against Iran.

Worse still, these modest ambitions have shrivelled as the day has neared (see article). Plan A was for Mr Olmert and Mr Abbas to talk to one another before Annapolis and make a joint declaration when they arrived. To give the Palestinians what Ms Rice calls a “political horizon” (ie, hope) this declaration was supposed to go beyond Mr Bush's oft-repeated but ephemeral “vision” of an independent Palestine and fill in the vital missing detail on borders, refugees and Jerusalem. But although the two sides have indeed talked in recent weeks they have not bridged their longstanding differences.

That is no surprise. With Hamas snapping at his heels, it would take immense courage for the timorous Mr Abbas to modify the Palestinians' mantra: a state on the 1967 borders, a capital in Jerusalem and the “right” of the refugees of 60 years ago to return to what is now Israel. And although Mr Olmert is at least the prime minister of a functioning state, he governs in coalition with men who hate the very idea of an independent Palestine and have worked sedulously to tie his hands. Polls show that many Israelis long to be rid of the Palestinian territories. But even they wonder how they can trust Mr Abbas's ramshackle Palestinian Authority to police a state when it has already lost Gaza to the rocket-firing rejectionists of Hamas and might well lose the West Bank too.

In the absence of a pre-Annapolis meeting of minds, America has therefore moved to Plan B. There may still be a joint declaration, but it will be vague. It will pay homage to the principle of two states and recite the relevant, long-ago United Nations resolutions, which both sides know by heart but interpret differently. The two sides may then promise to sit down together the day after Annapolis to talk about borders, refugees and Jerusalem, with the hope of reaching agreement within a year. In the meantime, Tony Blair, in his new guise as the UN's midwife for Palestine, will set out his plans to strengthen the economy and institutions of the West Bank in preparation for the independence that will come, some day.

Are such modest aims worth going to Annapolis for? Just about. If Mr Bush gets the Saudis and Syrians as well as the Egyptians and Jordanians to show support in Maryland, this may boost and embolden Mr Abbas, at least for a while. If Annapolis leads to economic help and makes Israel free up movement on the West Bank, the life of many Palestinians will improve. If talks about borders, refugees and Jerusalem really do start right away, this will be a change: Israel previously cited the “road map” of 2003 as a reason to pickle final-status negotiations in formaldehyde until the PA uprooted the Palestinian militias. And if Israel honours its own obligation to freeze settlement in the territories, this may persuade some of the Palestinians who have good reason to doubt it that there will still be room one day for a state of their own.

Plan B, in short, is probably better than nothing. But if he dares, Mr Bush has it within his power to make Annapolis so much more. He cannot bring a free Palestine into being at a stroke, or even within the final year of his own presidency. The Israelis are right to say that the divided Palestinians are in no shape right now to govern a state: at some point Hamas has first to be bullied, bribed or cajoled into accepting Israel's permanence and joining the peace camp. But Annapolis does offer Mr Bush the perfect chance to make a speech that could set the Palestinians fair on the path to statehood, and leave America's next president in a far better position to finish the job.

...unless George W. Solomon turns up too

In this speech Mr Bush needs to set out forthrightly America's own plan for dividing Palestine. That would mark an historic change. In the past—in Madrid in 1991, for example, and at Camp David in 2000—the Americans asked the Israelis and Palestinians to thrash out their differences on their own. But they can't. The gap is too wide, and even when their respective leaders want to narrow it neither dares move towards the other for fear of the uproar from the ideological bitter-enders at home. The existence of an American blueprint that commanded international support would, however, immediately transform the political dynamic of both societies, fortifying the moderates and pushing the hardliners to the margins.

Although it would be too much to expect Mr Bush to unfurl a map at Annapolis, he could come quite close. For a start, he should make it clear that when America talks of a two-state solution, it has in mind a border based on the pre-1967 line. Three years ago Mr Bush said in a public letter to Ariel Sharon that it would be unrealistic to expect Israel to evacuate all the dense settlement blocks it has planted in the West Bank. Fine. But since most settlers live close to the old border, he can now tell Israel that it cannot keep more than a few percentage points—say 5% or so—of the West Bank, and that it must offer the Palestinians land from its own side in compensation. On refugees, Mr Bush should say, as Bill Clinton did, that their right to “return” should be exercised in the new Palestine and not in pre-1967 Israel: that is a bitter pill but it is the logic of a peace based on partition. And Israel too must accept a bitter potion: Jerusalem, the beating heart of both peoples, will have to be the capital of both.

If Mr Bush gives this speech, Mr Olmert and Mr Abbas will wax furious. They might agree with him in their hearts, but if only for domestic political consumption they will have to accuse the American president of setting an ambush, bullying the little guys, prejudging the final-status issues and riding roughshod over the views and rights of the people most directly affected. These fulminations can be safely ignored. Israel and the Palestinian territories alike are full of politicians who will tell you knowingly but off the record that only a deal along the lines described above stands the remotest chance of bringing permanent peace. It is high time the superpower and the rest of the world threw their weight behind such a plan. The photo-op at Annapolis may be just the place to do it.

CNN/YouTube Debate: Submit Your Question Today!

CNN/YouTube Debate: Submit Your Question Today!

I wish they would bring this format to Canadian political debates...
-Darryl



United States to host Mideast peace conference for Nov. 27




United States to host Mideast peace conference for Nov. 27; 49 invited

By Anne Gearan, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS






WASHINGTON - The State Department announced Tuesday that the United States will host a Middle East conference next week as a prelude to talks that President George W. Bush hopes will put the Israeli-Palestinian peace process back on track.

The announcement by spokesman Sean McCormack came after Israel and the Palestinians confirmed having received invitations to the meeting, which is intended to launch their first serious peace negotiations in more than seven years.

McCormack told reporters that 49 countries, institutions and individuals, including select Arab states and other key countries with a stake in the Mideast peace process were invited to the meeting beginning Nov. 27. The session is expected to cover three days, with meetings in both Washington and the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md. It is meant to commit Israel and the Palestinians to formal peace talks that carry international backing.

Bush will deliver a speech to open the meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will be the official host, said David Welch, assistant secretary of state for near-Eastern affairs. Bush also will speak at a dinner with participants on the night before the parties head to Maryland.

"It will be a signal opportunity to launch the bilateral negotiations between the parties," Welch told reporters at the State Department, adding that the ultimate goal is greater security for the Jewish state of Israel and creation of a Palestinian state one day.

Welch said the United States is "hopeful" for a positive response to the invitations that were sent out on Tuesday, but he wouldn't elaborate on which key Arab countries may have accepted, including major players such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said Tuesday he hopes a peace deal could be completed by the end of next year.

Earlier Tuesday, Bush began reaching out to key countries that could be spoilers for the U.S.-sponsored conference.

Bush discussed the meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in a telephone call and also called Saudi King Abdullah. Russia and particularly Saudi Arabia would be key participants, and their absence would all but doom chances for the session to be considered a serious run at peace.

It was not clear whether the Russian or Saudi leaders would attend.

Bush, Abbas and Olmert would represent their people directly, but all other countries are expected to be represented by foreign ministers.

U.S. diplomats have issued the equivalent of a "save-the-date" notice to a long list of other invitees, McCormack said.

"We have had informal contacts with many of the invitees, so they are aware of the dates and many of the logistical arrangements so they can make their plans," McCormack said. Those contacts over recent days were notice "that an invitation will be forthcoming in the not-too-distant future," he said.

The White House has said Bush will attend at least part of the event.

About 40 countries and organizations seem certain to receive invitations, and the list could be longer. The countries include Arab states with a stake in improving the Palestinians' lot, countries with a history or interest in Mideast peacemaking, plus organizations such as the United Nations, International Monetary Fund and World Bank.


********

U.S. wants Israeli-Palestinian peace deal before Bush leaves office

By Matthew Lee And Anne Gearan, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS






WASHINGTON - Washington's top diplomat says the United States will try to close a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians before President George W. Bush leaves office.

But Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice cautions much needs to be done and there is no guarantee of success.

Speaking in advance of next week's peace conference, Rice says both Israeli and Palestinian leaders have pledged to work try to reach a deal with in the next year to set up an independent Palestinian state.

Bush and Rice are hosting Israeli and Palestinian leaders in Washington and at an international conference in Annapolis, Md., next week that leaders say will launch the first direct negotiations on a peace deal in seven years.

Rice describes the Annapolis session as an important launchpad for talks to settle Israel's conflict with the Palestinians and other issues that underlie the Jewish state's disputes with its Arab neighbours.

Rice did not say exactly who will attend, adding that the guest list is not expected to be finalized until the weekend.

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Canada Announces Vast New Park in NWT





Canada to Announce Vast New Park

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/22/world/americas/22boreal.html?em&ex=1195794000&en=1d981bf6ef8a4465&ei=5087%0A

By IAN AUSTEN

Published: November 22, 2007

OTTAWA, Nov. 21 — The Canadian government plans to announce today that it will convert 25.5 million acres of northern woodland into a new national park and wildlife protection areas.

The result will be one of North America’s largest conservation areas, about 11.5 times the size of Yellowstone Park, and ease pressure from the mining and energy industries on an area that is important for wildlife, if sparsely populated by humans.

“This is the largest land withdrawal for protection ever in Canada,” said Monte Hummel, president of the World Wildlife Fund Canada. “This is real conservation history being made.”

Cabinet orders putting the plan into effect was published to little notice last week. A public announcement of the plan is expected shortly in Ottawa.

The lands are within the boreal forest, a band of trees about 1,600 miles wide that sweeps across much of Canada and continues in northern Scotland, Scandinavia and Russia. About 77 percent of Canada’s forest is in the boreal band and its trees, mostly evergreens, are believed to play an important role in offsetting the rise in gases related to global warming created by burning fossil fuels. Large numbers of migratory birds and waterfowl make their summer home with the forest.

Under the plan, 8.5 million acres surrounding the Eastern Arm of Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories will become a national park. Another 15.3 million acres between the new park and an existing wildlife refuge will be designated as conservation land under the management of native groups Further to the northwest, near the Mackenzie River valley, 3.7 million acres will turned into a national wildlife area.

Mr. Hummel’s group, along with the Pew Charitable Trusts in the United States and other organizations, has been working with native governments in northern Canada to increase protection of the boreal forest since 2000. But a series of recent developments, Mr. Hummel said, accelerated the process over the past couple of years.

A consortium of energy companies including ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and Shell are planning a pipeline down the Mackenzie River valley to deliver natural gas to the United States. Diamond mines have been opened in the Northwest Territories by several firms, including Tiffany and Company. Renewed interest in nuclear energy has also increased uranium exploration.

The new land protections will not disrupt existing industrial projects and mining exploration but it will place a moratorium on new projects. Mr. Hummel said that the plan also provides a corridor for the Mackenzie Valley pipeline.

“It keeps options for open that were fast disappearing,” Mr. Hummel said. “It gives everyone in the area breathing space to sit down and plan.”

Pakistan gets the boot



Pakistan gets the boot

Globe and Mail Update

KAMPALA — Pakistan was ordered suspended from the Commonwealth Thursday "pending restoration of democracy and the rule of law" in the country.

A key committee of the Commonwealth decidied that the situation in Pakistan, despite some improvement, "continued to represent a serious violation of the Commonwealth's political values." leaving it with no choice but to suspend the country.

While it welcomed a promise by Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf to resign as head of the army and his decision to release detainees, it expressed concern over the continued detention of journalists, lawyers and human rights activists, as well as continued suspension of the constitution and the independence of the judiciary.

The 53-nation organization carried through with a threat to exclude Pakistan from its activities following a day-long meeting of the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group, made up of nine Commonwealth members including Canada.

"This decision was taken in sorrow, not in anger," said British Foreign Secretary David Miliband, who added that he and his colleagues believe that "democracy and the rule of law are the best allies of security and stability in Pakistan."

Helena Geurgis, Canada's junior foreign minister, also welcomed the decision indicating it had been taken after a long and gruelling session. She said it was important to reinforce the Commonwealth's commitment to democracy.

Commonwealth Secretary-General Don McKinnon said it had been "a difficult issue" to resolve, adding "maybe we exhausted ourselves talking about it."

Pakistan, the world's most unstable nuclear power, had pleaded for more time Thursday and argued that it was making progress toward restoring democracy.

But as she entered a Commonwealth meeting earlier today, Ms. Guergis said Pakistan's time had run out.

The Commonwealth largely made up of Britain and its former colonies, had already given Pakistan's military ruler, President Gen. Pervez Musharraf, a Thursday deadline to lift emergency rule and step down as army chief.

"We adhere to and we support the principles of democracy," Ms. Guergis said.

"Right now, we have to uphold that. We have to stand behind that, and support that. Right now Pakistan is not doing that."

She said Pakistan had failed to accomplish any of the five criteria set out for it by the Commonwealth.

A group of nine countries met to decide on Pakistan's status.

The group made its decision not in a standard vote, but through a consensus decision.

Pakistan was last kicked out of the organization in 1999 after Gen. Musharraf seized power in a coup. It took the country five years to be reinstated.

Canada's position came after conciliatory-sounding words from Britain.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown told reporters before leaving London that Gen. Musharraf had assured him on Wednesday that he was moving to meet international concerns.

"He has assured me that he will do his utmost to lift the state of emergency in time for free and fair elections to be held and to give up his military rule and responsibilities as soon as possible," Mr. Brown said.

Gen. Musharraf has given no timeline for his plans to step down as army chief. However, aides say that could happen as early as Saturday.

Mr. Brown said he also spoke to U.S. President George W. Bush on Tuesday about the crisis in Pakistan.

"We have co-operated closely with Pakistan on economic and political reform, counter-radicalization and vital regional issues," the British leader said.

"But President Musharraf has no doubt about the strength of feeling in the international community" over his decision to restrict civil liberties by declaring a state of emergency, Mr. Brown said.

The Queen will formally open the summit on Friday.

After the meeting, Mr. Harper will head to Tanzania for a one-day visit before returning home early Tuesday.

En route to Uganda, Mr. Harper's plane stopped to refuel in Nice, and the prime minister stepped out of the airport to take a stroll in the rain along the French Riviera.

With files from Canadian Press

Josee Verner calls Saudi rape ruling "barbaric"



Minister slams Saudi court ruling

The Canadian Press and Reuters

The Canadian government says it will complain to Saudi authorities about a court sentence of six months in jail and 200 lashes for a woman who was gang raped.

Josée Verner, minister responsible for the status of women, called the ruling "barbaric."

Ms. Verner said the government will formally express its condemnation to "the appropriate Saudi authorities."

The United States, which wants Saudi Arabia to attend a Middle East conference next week, gave only mild criticism.

"This is a part of a judicial procedure overseas in the court of a sovereign country," said State Department spokesman Sean McCormack. "That said, most would find this relatively astonishing that something like this happens."

The woman's original sentence of 90 lashes for being in the car of a man who was not a relative was doubled this month as punishment for "her attempt to aggravate and influence the judiciary through the media."

Under Saudi Arabia's strict interpretation of Islamic sharia law, women are not allowed in public in the company of men other than their male relatives.

The woman has said the 2006 attack took place as she tried to retrieve her picture from a male friend. While in the car, two men climbed into the vehicle and drove to a secluded area. She said she was raped by seven men.

Seven men were convicted and handed prison sentences of two to nine years.

Forbes: The Business Of Hockey


Forbes Special Report
The Business Of Hockey
By Michael K. Ozanian and Kurt Badenhausen 11.08.07, 6:00 PM ET
http://www.forbes.com/business/2007/11/08/nhl-team-values-biz-07nhl_cx_mo_kb_1108nhlintro.html


row2image
NHL Team Values
By The Numbers:
Most Valuable NHL Teams
Best Players For The Puck
Team Spotlight:
Toronto Maple Leafs
Maple Leaf Timeline
Vote:
Who will win the 2008 Stanley Cup?

In the two seasons since team owners canceled the 2004-05 campaign to force a salary cap on the players, the 30 NHL franchises have increased an average of 23% in value, and the league has gone from an operating loss of $96 million to a profit of $96 million.

The average hockey team is now worth $200 million and last season posted a profit (in the sense of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of $3.2 million on revenue of $81 million. Even small-market hockey teams are hot properties: Tampa Bay Lightning owner William Davidson, who bought the team, the operating lease to the arena, and 5.6 acres of surrounding real estate for $115 million in 1999, is on the verge of selling that package for $206 million.

No, television ratings have not improved. Last season's Stanley Cup finals between the Anaheim Ducks and the Ottawa Senators were the lowest in history, and NBC pulled in a horrid 1.1 regular-season rating. And to win back the love from fans and sponsors spurned by the lockout, team owners have kept ticket and advertising prices essentially where they were three years ago.

The surge in team values and profits is due to the salary cap that was included in the new collective bargaining agreement (which has lowered player costs from 66% of revenue to 54% since the 2003-04 season, according to our data) and a stronger Canadian dollar (the six hockey teams north of the border pay players in U.S. dollars).

By The Numbers: Most Valuable NHL Teams

By The Numbers: Most Bang For The Puck

Timeline: The Toronto Maple Leafs

Revenues for the Montreal Canadiens were $109 million last season, 21% higher than two seasons ago, while profits were $25 million, a 236% gain. In 2001 George Gillett paid $181 million for the team and the Bell Centre arena. We now value his investment at $283 million.

The Vancouver Canucks are now worth $211 million, 43% more than before the lockout. Last season the team posted a profit of $12.8 million, after barely breaking even in the few seasons before the lockout. In addition, greater revenue sharing from the new collective bargaining agreement (CBA) helped teams like the Pittsburgh Penguins and Edmonton Oilers turn a profit.

But the CBA has hurt the bottom line of some small-market franchises by establishing a minimum team payroll in addition to a salary cap. The minimum team payroll was $28 million last season and jumped to $34 million for the current campaign. The Minnesota Wild and Nashville Predators had payrolls of $24 million in the season before the lockout, and both turned a profit. Yet both teams finished the 2006-07 season in the red because of their increased payrolls.

With only $6 million per team in national television revenue ($8 million for most Canadian franchises), real estate economics and local television deals still determine the league's pecking order. The Toronto Maple Leafs are the most valuable ($413 million) and profitable ($53 million) team in the NHL. The Leafs' parent, Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment, owns the Air Canada Centre, the Toronto Raptors basketball team, Leafs TV and Raptors NBA TV.

The Air Canada Centre is one of the busiest arenas in North America, with about 300 events a year. The ability to cross-market premium seating and advertising with two teams helped generate a league-high $138 million in revenue for the Maple Leafs. The team also had the highest local TV revenue, raking in $23 million last year.

It is no coincidence that the New York Rangers, who have a business model similar to that of the Maple Leafs and are tied with the Canadiens with the second-richest local television deal, are the next most valuable team in the league, worth $365 million. The Philadelphia Flyers ($244 million), Colorado Avalanche ($214 million) and Los Angeles Kings ($209 million) are also among the league's top 10 in value, in part because their owners control their buildings and can add the appeal of an NBA franchise.

The downside: Owners of sports conglomerates rarely win championships. While multi-team owners with media properties accumulate the most wealth, poorer, single teams, which rely on the playoffs to make money, win Stanley Cups. None of the last three Cup winners--Anaheim, Carolina and Tampa Bay--are worth more than the league average $200 million. Toronto has not won the Cup since 1967, and the Rangers have won one championship in the last 67 years. There is nothing like necessity when it comes to winning.

By The Numbers: Most Valuable NHL Teams

By The Numbers: Most Bang For The Puck

Timeline: The Toronto Maple Leafs

Joe Clark urges Harper to reshape Canada's foreign policy


Former PM urges Harper to reshape Canada's foreign policy

Chris Cobb , CanWest News Service

Published: Thursday, November 22, 2007

OTTAWA - On the eve of a major summit of Commonwealth leaders, former prime minister Joe Clark is urging the Harper government to reshape Canada's foreign policy which he says is too closely allied to the interests of the Bush administration.

The Commonwealth represents almost two billion people, or 30 per cent of the Earth's population.

One quarter of the Commonwealth's population is Muslim, an aspect that Clark and others say makes it a particularly valuable asset for today's wider Canadian foreign policy.

Former Prime Minister Joe Clark

Former Prime Minister Joe Clark


The United States is not a member of the 53-country group.

"The present government pursues the most narrowly gauged Canadian foreign policy in memory, focused principally on the U.S. and its priorities," said Clark. "The Commonwealth is part of the wider world in which the Harper government shows much less interest than did any of its predecessors. So I detect no evident Canadian political will to use the Commonwealth effectively."

Harper travels to Uganda for his first Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting this weekend, a moveable, bi-annual gathering of prime ministers and presidents from countries little and large, most of which have a connection to the former British Empire.

Sandra Buckler, director of communications for Harper, said the prime minister's presence at the meeting is evidence of Canada's commitment to the institution.

"The very fact that the prime minister is attending this even when the House is sitting and we are a minority government ... speaks very definitely to his commitment to this organization."

Clark, a long-serving external affairs minister in Brian Mulroney's Progressive Conservative government, said Canada has traditionally used the Commonwealth to balance its relationship with the United States.

"Canada's most successful foreign policy has been to simultaneously be as close as possible to the U.S. and as active and independent as possible in the wider world. They are the two sides of the Canadian coin," he said. "The Commonwealth was one of the effective instruments of our reach into the wider world."

At the meeting, in the Ugandan capital Kampala, Harper and his fellow leaders will choose a new Commonwealth secretary general to replace the outgoing Don McKinnon, a former New Zealand foreign minister who has been in the job since 2000.

McKinnon was in Ottawa several weeks ago to meet with Harper whom he described as "obviously well-briefed" and especially interested in the Commonwealth's position on climate change.

McKinnon said he is constantly being asked about the Commonwealth's relevance to its developed nation members such as Canada, but said he has no doubt that for their modest contributions, they are getting value for money. "If Canada wants to initiate something internationally," he said, "they can use us to do that. It is another angle on Canada's external relationships and external relationships are all about advancing your own interests.

McKinnon's replacement is likely to be from India, a growing economic force within the Commonwealth, and the favourite is Kamalesh Sharma, the current Indian High Commissioner to London.

The heads of government meeting will be dominated by Pakistan, now under threat of suspension from the Commonwealth following Gen. Pervez Musharraf's imposition of emergency rule.

Commonwealth observers will also be watching Harper for any sign of renewed interest from Canada's government.

"Harper doesn't appear to have any enthusiasm for the Commonwealth," said British Commonwealth scholar Derek Ingram, author of several books on the 53-nation group. "It's worrying because Canada has always taken the lead on so many things within the organization and been such a positive influence."

After the United Kingdom, Canada is the second largest financial contributor to the Commonwealth though the amounts are relatively small.

Canada's contribution to the Commonwealth is half the $40 million it contributes to the 55-member la Francophonie, a group of countries bound together by the French language.

Clark added he sees the Mulroney government's role in pressuring the South African government to abolish apartheid as a watershed.

"I'm a prejudiced witness," he said, "but believe a critical moment in the Commonwealth's transformation was when Britain stepped back from the anti-apartheid campaign, and Canada stepped forward, demonstrating that others-than-Britain can lead the Commonwealth."

Happy Thanksgiving to My American Friends and Family



Happy Thanksgiving to My American Friends and Family!!!!

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

ASEAN adopts landmark charter to create EU-style bloc

ASEAN adopts landmark charter to create EU-style bloc



Southeast Asian leaders adopted a landmark charter Tuesday that seeks to promote free trade and human rights, but their vision to create an integrated, EU-style bloc is being marred by Myanmar's snub to democracy.

Leaders of the ASEAN stand together for a group photo with counterparts from China, Japan and South Korea during the 11th ASEAN plus three Summit in Singapore on Tuesday.
Photo: AP

In a diplomatic bungle, the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations also abruptly withdrew an invitation to UN envoy Ibrahim Gambari to address Asian leaders after Myanmar objected.

They further rejected calls to suspend Myanmar from the bloc to punish the junta's crackdown on pro-democracy protesters that left 15 people dead in September, and its refusal to free opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

"ASEAN Leaders will strive to prevent the Myanmar issue from obstructing our efforts to deepen integration and build an ASEAN Community," Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said in his opening remarks at the annual summit.

Still, ASEAN leaders urged Myanmar's junta to open a "meaningful dialogue" with Suu Kyi, release her from house arrest, free all political detainees and work toward a "peaceful transition to democracy."

The key event of the gathering was the adoption of the ASEAN Charter after nearly three years of haggling.

The long-overdue ASEAN Charter is aimed at formally turning the 40-year-old organization, often derided as a toothless talk shop, into a rules-based legal entity. That means ASEAN can sue and be sued under the charter, and will be held accountable for all the treaties and agreements it signs. It will also set up enforceable financial, trade and environmental rules.

One of the most significant pledges in the charter is to set up a regional human rights body. Critics note, however, that it will have limited impact, given that it will not be able to punish governments that violate the human rights of their citizens.

Negotiators have watered it down by dropping earlier recommendations to consider sanctions, including possible expulsion, in cases of serious breaches of the covenant by member nations.

"Of course there has been some watering down," said former Indonesian foreign minister Ali Alatas, who helped draft the charter. Still, "I think it's a good step forward; it's a momentous step forward."

Charm Tong, a Shan refugee from Myanmar and well-known human rights activist who was welcomed by US President George W. Bush at that White House last year, called the ASEAN Charter a sham for caving into Myanmar, also known as Burma.

"ASEAN is shameful because it washes its hands off Burma, and passed on the burden of dealing with Burma to the UN," Tong said in a statement released by the Solidarity for Asia Peoples Advocacies.

Bodyguards for Myanmar's Foreign Minister, Nyan Win, pushed away reporters trying to get him to comment on the debate. "I have no comment on that question," Nyan Win said when asked about why the junta would not release Nobel laureate Suu Kyi, who has been under house arrest for 12 of the last 18 years.

Philippine President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo warned Manila was unlikely to ratify the ASEAN Charter unless Myanmar restores democracy and frees Suu Kyi.

"The expectation of the Philippines is that if Myanmar signs the charter, it is committed to returning to the path of democracy and releasing Aung San Suu Kyi," Arroyo told Myanmar's Prime Minister Thein Sein during a meeting Monday.

"Until the Philippine Congress sees that happen, it would have extreme difficulty in ratifying the ... charter," she said.

The Charter must be ratified by a Cabinet decision, referendums or by parliaments of member countries, a process likely to take a year. The pact will collapse if one country fails to ratify it.

Myanmar is satisfied with the document, Myanmar senior diplomat U Aung Bwa told AP. "Myanmar will go along; all's well that ends well," he said.

ASEAN was founded during the Cold War years as an anti-communist coalition, evolving into a trade and political bloc. It consists of Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam.

They will hold a second conclave Wednesday, known as the East Asia Summit, with leaders of China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand.

Lee, the chairman of ASEAN this year, had invited Gambari to address the expanded summit about the progress he has made with Myanmar's junta. He announced late Monday that objections by Myanmar and other ASEAN leaders forced him to withdraw the invitation, even as Gambari was en route to Singapore from New York.

Instead, Lee said, Gambari would meet with leaders and brief them individually.

Chuck Norris featured in Huckabee Ad

Chuck Norris featured in Huckabee Ad


Mike Huckabee and Chuck Norris review facts about Governor Huckabee.


MPtv-Interview Mark Holland on Animal Cruelty

MPtv-Interview Mark Holland on Animal Cruelty

I would like to see this bill from Mark Holland passed as part of our tough on crime agenda.
-Darryl

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Stronach pledges $1M to create breast cancer reconstructive chair




Stronach pledges $1M to create breast cancer reconstructive chair

TORONTO - Toronto is set to become a Canadian centre for breast reconstructive surgery thanks in part to a high-profile boost from politician and breast cancer survivor Belinda Stronach.

Stronach says she has raised $1 million to establish an academic chair at the Toronto General and Western Hospital Foundation, to ensure that state-of-the-art techniques are available to Canadian women.

She also committed to raising an additional $1 million for the initiative with the hopes of making Toronto a world leader for breast reconstruction.

Stronach was diagnosed with breast cancer and under went surgery in the U.S. earlier this year.

She says she wants more women to know that the surgery is available to them.

Stronach says she also wanted to give the program at Toronto General Hospital and the University of Toronto the resources to expand so that more surgeons can be trained in breast reconstruction.

CFL sees NFL in Toronto as a threat to the league


Cohon sees NFL in Toronto as a threat to the league

Canadian Press

TORONTO — Mark Cohon believes the NFL coming to Toronto is a very real threat to his league and the CFL commissioner is prepared to tackle it head on.

Cohon made the frank admission at the commissioner's annual Grey Cup news conference Friday, marking the first time the league has publicly taken such a definitive stance on the issue.

Should the NFL head north of the border on a permanent basis, Cohon would look to establish a partnership between the two leagues to preserve the CFL's future.

"All of the tea leaves are indicating that it's shifting," Cohon said. "You have guys like Ted Rogers and Larry Tanenbaum and Phil Lind, very powerful Canadians who are interested, you have an owner in Ralph Wilson in Buffalo who has said, 'When I die, my estate will sell the franchise,' you have the Bills interested in marking Toronto as part of their territory, which I believe is indication that, 'Hey this our territory, we don't want another NFL team coming here.'

Recent

The Globe and Mail

"So I think there's all these things lining up as an indication that it could happen. So, I'm not sticking my head in the sand, that would be the worst thing for the CFL commissioner to do. So I think there's a real potential."

Last month, Wilson unveiled a plan at an NFL owners meeting for the Bills to play eight games (three exhibition, five regular season) over five years at the Rogers Centre, starting next season. Earlier in the summer, the 89-year-old Wilson announced he wouldn't sell the Buffalo franchise in his lifetime but that it would be sold the highest bidder upon his death.

Talk of the NFL coming to Toronto has existed since the 1970s. But the combination of Wilson's statement, the Bills' playing regular-season games at Rogers Centre, the strength of the Canadian dollar and deep pockets of the Toronto NFL group headed up by Rogers and Tanenbaum has many believing the NFL's arrival here is inevitable.

Toronto Argonauts owners David Cynamon and Howard Sokolowski obviously think so, too. They've spoken to Cohon and the other league owners about buying an NFL franchise for Toronto to ensure the Argos' long-term survival in the city.

The overwhelming belief is that if the NFL does come to Toronto, it will not only spell the end of the Argos and Hamilton Tiger-Cats, but ultimately the CFL. But Cohon said he's speaking with NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and his top priority is protecting the CFL's eight member franchises.

"Clearly, if our franchises in southern Ontario are hurt in any way, it has a profound impact on our league," he said. "Our television deal gets re-arranged, our corporate interests get hurt.

"I'm not going to preside over a league that has a Grey Cup just out west. That's not what I was hired to do. Any type of relationship that we have has to make sure that the eight existing franchises are strong, growing and healthy. I think southern Ontario is critical to this league and I'll make sure I protect it and grow it."

In the 1970s when the Toronto Northmen of the now-defunct World Football League was formed, the federal government threatened to pass legislation banning the league from operating in Canada to protect the CFL. The WFL team never played a down in Canada, instead moving to Memphis.

However, Cohon says the CFL doesn't need the government's assistance just yet.

"At some point, the question is when do I want to have that discussion?" he said. "For (the NFL) to work here, they know they want to help us.

"My first approach is let's figure out what we can do and if that doesn't work we'll have a different discussion."

The NFL talk overshadowed what was otherwise a decent season for the CFL. For example:

— The Grey Cup is a sellout in its first return to Toronto since 1992, with 53,000 tickets sold.

— Attendance league-wide is up. The league's average attendance this year was 29,167, its highest number since 1983, and this is the sixth straight year CFL attendance exceeded two million spectators.

— There were 12 per cent more touchdowns scored this year compared to last. As well, there were nine special-teams TDs scored, compared to just three in 2006.

— CFL games averaged 49 total points scored, an increase of four per cent from last year.

— Bombers slotback Milt Stegall broke the CFL's career touchdowns record while Montreal quarterback Anthony Calvillo became just the fourth player in league history to surpass 50,000 career passing yards.

But there were problems.

The league continued to have issues with officiating and was left red-faced when two players it suspended were both allowed to play due to drawn-out appeals.

Cohon said the CFL will increase its budget for the recruitment and training of officials as well as the equipment they use while also meeting with the CFL Players' Association to discuss possibly amending the appeals process.

Cohon didn't announce an agreement in principle for the CFL to return to Ottawa. The league remains in talks with a local group headed up by Ottawa 67's owner Jeff Hunt but a team might not be able to begin play there until 2010 due to a re-development plan for Lansdowne Park, where Frank Clair Stadium is located.

Ideally, Cohon would like the CFL to expand to 10 teams, with either Quebec City or Halifax being prime candidates if they can get a stadium.

"The plan for Ottawa is complicated," Cohon said. "But because the league is strong now we don't need to rush into a situation and fall down.

"I think it would be better to go from eight (teams) to 10, if we could do it but that would be predicated on building stadiums. I don't anticipate that's going to happen in a short period of time but I think it's logical and a step forward is by building stadiums in those locations."

Raw video: Polish man dies after tasered at Canada airport

Raw video: Polish man dies after tasered at Canada airport

Watch the unedited amateur video of the Tasering of a man at Vancouver International Airport. (Warning: Graphic content)

*Note: I wasn't planning on posting it, but a few people asked me where they could see the video to judge for themselves what happened. Obviously this case is an outrage and clearly if the situation was reversed, Canadians would be furious by what appears to have happened. I think it is important that we get to the bottom of this and make sure such a thing never happens again.
-Darryl

Monday, November 19, 2007

Question to McCain: How do we beat the bitch?

Question to McCain: How do we beat the bitch?


An excellent question?????? Another McCain stumble...

New Hillary You Tube "Caucusing Is Easy" Video

New Hillary You Tube "Caucusing Is Easy" Video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLxtP2UhSLY
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/splash/

Cannabis Compound May Stop Metastatic Breast Cancer


Cannabis Compound May Stop Metastatic Breast Cancer

By Carolyn Colwell

HealthDay Reporter
Monday, November 19, 2007; 12:00 AM

MONDAY, Nov. 19 (HealthDay News) -- A non-toxic, non-psychoactive compound in marijuana may block the progress of metastatic breast cancer, according to a new study by researchers in California.

"This is a new way to treat a patient that is not toxic like chemotherapy or radiotherapy. It is a new approach for metastatic cancer," said lead researcher Sean D. McAllister, an associate scientist at the California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute in San Francisco.



The compound found in cannabis, called cannabidiol (CBD), inhibits a gene, Id-1, that researchers believe is responsible for the metastatic process that spreads cells from the original tumor throughout the body.

Opting for a musical metaphor, senior researcher Pierre-Yves Desprez likened Id-1 to "an [orchestra] conductor. In this case, you shoot the conductor, and the whole orchestra is going to stop. If you shoot the violinist, the orchestra just continues to play."

In humans, the Id-1 gene is found only in metastatic cancer cells, said Desprez, a staff scientist at the institute. Before birth, they are present and involved in the development of human embryos, but after birth, they go silent -- and should stay that way, he said.

But in metastatic cancer "when [the genes] wake up, they are very bad," he said. "They push the cells to behave like embryonic cells and grow. They go crazy, they proliferate, they migrate." Desprez said, "We need to be able to turn them off."

According to the study, CBD does exactly that.

"We are focusing on the latest stages of cancer," Desprez added. The cancer cell itself is not the problem, because a tumor can be "removed easily by surgery," he said. The problem is the development of metastatic cells which is "conducted" by Id-1.

McAllister and Desprez said they arenotsuggesting that patients with hormone-independent metastatic breast cancer smoke marijuana. For one thing, a sufficient amount of CBD could never be obtained in that way, they said.

The research that has been done on marijuana and its compounds, however, is helpful, McAllister, said. CBD has been around for a long time, and researchers have found it is not psychoactive, and its "toxicity is very low," he added.

The new findings are published in the November issue ofMolecular Cancer Therapeutics.

If McAllister's and Desprez's work results in the development of a cancer treatment, someone with metastatic cancer might be placed on CBD for several years. That means low toxicity is important, McAllister explained.

McAllister also suggested that Id-1 is "so important in providing the [metastatic] mechanism in these cells in so many types of cancers" that they "provide us an opportunity potentially to target other types of cancers."

The study's findings were "were a serendipitous discovery, in a way," McAllister said. Desprez noted that he had been working on the Id-1 gene for 12 years. His lab had demonstrated that it was a key gene for invasive breast cancer and tumor progression, and Desprez had found a way to inhibit it in mice, but not in humans.



Then, two years ago, McAllister -- an expert on cannabinoids -- and Desprez, a cancer researcher, started to work together. Through their combined forces "what we found is actually what I was looking for for the last 12 years," Desprez said.

Further study is needed before CBD can be conclusively identified as a treatment option, McAllister and Desprez said. "We need to involve a team of physicians, because we are bench [basic] scientists," McAllister said.

One expert called the findings intriguing but preliminary.

"This is the first evidence that a cannabinoid can target the expression of an important breast cancer metastasis gene," noted Manuel Guzman, a Spanish expert on cannabinoids and cancer. He described the California study as giving "preliminary insight into the question of whether CBD could be used clinically to treat metastatic breast cancer."

However, "all the experiments in the paper have been conducted in cultured cells and none of them in any animal model of breast cancer, which would be one of the steps for further research," added Guzman, who is a professor of biochemistry and molecular biology at Complutense University in Madrid.

Guzman also noted that "Id-1 is just one of many genes involved in breast cancer metastasis" and that future research also needs to examine the impact of CBD on these other metastasis genes.

More information

There's more on breast cancer at the U.S. National Cancer Institute.

SOURCES: Sean D. McAllister, Ph.D., associate scientist, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco; Pierre-Yves Desprez, Ph.D., staff scientist, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco; Manuel Guzman, Ph.D., professor, biochemistry and molecular biology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain; November 2007,Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

Good Ad: "Joe is Right"

Joe is Right:

I really like this ad that comes from the Joe Biden campaign.


Sunday, November 18, 2007

Chavez Prediction: Oil at $200 per barrel



Venezuela urges more "revolutionary" role at OPEC summit

Shaun Polczer , CanWest News Service

"If the United States was mad enough to attack Iran or threaten Venezuela again then the price will not be $100, it will be $200,"
-Hugo Chavez

Published: Sunday, November 18, 2007

RIYADH, SAUDI ARABIA -- Oil prices could double to more than $200 US a barrel if the United States attacks Iran, Venezuela's Hugo Chavez told OPEC leaders in Saudi Arabia Saturday, urging the cartel to take a more active "revolutionary" role in world affairs.

"If the United States was mad enough to attack Iran or threaten Venezuela again then the price will not be $100, it will be $200," Chavez said as his Iranian counterpart, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, looked on.

Calling $100 "a fair price, a just price" Chavez electrified the third summit of OPEC's heads of state with a fiery speech that called for member nations to take a more reactionary role to battle poverty and injustice in developing nations.


"The basic reason for all this aggression is oil. We have seen it in the situation in Iraq and the threats against Iran," he said.

Saudi officials sat stone-faced as Chavez extolled the Cuban revolution and exhorted his OPEC colleagues to take a hard line against consuming nations, especially the United States.

Contradicting one of the basic themes of the summit, Chavez said "it's not OPEC's role to guarantee supply . . . OPEC must change and become a much stronger player in the geopolitical domain."

All week Saudis have taken pains to portray the kingdom as a reliable supplier with the slogan "providing petroleum, promoting prosperity and protecting the planet."

Chavez's comments appeared to earn a rebuke from Saudi King Abdullah who said it is OPEC's responsibility to safeguard the world economy.

"The prosperity of the world is common and shared," he said, calling for "bridges and dialogue" between producing and consuming nations.

"Oil shouldn't be a tool for conflict, it should be a tool for development," he said. "Our organization has consistently upheld these objectives."

In concluding his remarks, Abdullah committed $300 million to fund climate change research, including technologies to capture and sequester carbon dioxide, which has been pegged as a cause of global warming.

Likewise, OPEC's secretary general, Abdalla Salem el-Badri urged "transparency and predictability" in the cartel's policies and said OPEC's role ought to be "market stabilization."

He sought to reassure consumers that "petroleum resources in member countries are sufficient to meet increased demand."

The comments underscored the divisions between OPEC's hawks led by Chavez and the desire of Saudi officials to avoid a backlash that would reduce demand for OPEC oil in the world's largest consumer, the United States, which uses a quarter of the world's oil - or some 21 million barrels a day.

As a growing supplier, Canada has been seen as a way for the United States to lessen its dependence on imported oil from both Venezuela and the Middle East.

Canada produces a quality of heavy oil that is similar to Venezuela's Orinoco belt and supplies from Alberta's oilsands have steadily been trickling south.

Earlier this year, the Spearhead pipeline began delivering heavy oil to Cushing, Okla. while construction of TransCanada Corp.'s Spearhead has been approved to send oilsands output to the Gulf Coast.

When the current round of oilsands expansions come online after 2010, Canada will become the world's third largest producer, ahead of all OPEC producers except Saudi Arabia.

That prompted Saudi oil minister Ali Al-Naimi last week to roll out the red carpet for Canada to join OPEC. In a special ceremony Sunday OPEC will formally induct Angola and Ecuador into the club of 13 nations, while Brazil is also reportedly interested in joining after a multi-billion barrel discovery.

Meanwhile, Chavez invoked the ghost of Ronald Reagan, insisting that the former U.S. president sought to bring the cartel "to its knees . . . and almost succeeded" while taking credit for prices that have risen 10-fold since the last OPEC summit in Caracas in 2000.


"Today, OPEC stands strong as it ever has been in the past."

spolczer@theherald.canwest.com

Calgary Herald

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Tory would've been sitting prettier under MMP



Tory would've been sitting prettier under MMP



By CHRISTINA BLIZZARD, TORONTO SUN


It was Britain's wartime prime minister, Winston Churchill, who observed democracy is "the worst form of government -- except for all the others."

On Oct. 10, voters soundly rejected an opportunity to dramatically change the kind of democracy we have and move to a form of proportional representation called Mixed Member Proportional.

This proposal was put together by the so-called Citizens' Assembly, who were looking for new ways to make the voting system more attractive to average voters.

Peter MacLeod, of Queen's University's Centre for the Study of Democracy, has crunched the numbers from last month's vote and says the Legislature would look quite different had it been elected using MMP.

It is difficult to be entirely accurate in this calculation. MacLeod points out we can't say for sure how people would have directed their second vote for the party, but he estimates the Tories would have gained the most from MMP.


With 107 seats under the First Past The Post system, the Grits have 71 seats; PCs 26; NDP 10 and the Greens have none.

Under a 129-seat House under MMP, the Liberals would have dropped dramatically to 56 seats; PCs would have 41; NDP 22; Greens, 10.

The Liberals would have no "list" MPPs; the PCs 15; NDP 12. All 10 Greens would be from the party list .

MacLeod offers a caveat with these figures. Other variables may come into play. With an MMP system, there could have been additional parties -- northern, aboriginal or a cities party -- joining the fray.

"The recent election wasn't a contest of ideas, it was a monologue about one bad idea. Yet Ontarians had no way to tune into a different conversation," he said.

"There was no space for a discussion about any number of issues -- mainly because we've created a political culture where ideas and issues have themselves become dangerous," he said.

"No wonder so many people simply change the channel or pull the plug."

SEATLESS IN TORONTO

MacLeod points out the irony of John Tory's situation. Right now, Tory has no seat in the Legislature and one of his MPPs will likely become a sacrificial lamb and resign to bring the leader into the chamber.

"Had the same election been run using the proposed system, his leadership wouldn't be an issue, he'd have won a seat from his party's list and the Conservative caucus would be a full 15 seats richer, while the Liberal government would be scrambling to form a coalition," he pointed out.

MMP, he says, traded the "winner-takes-all gamble of First Past The Post for an electoral insurance policy." An MMP system connects the central party to its core voters across the province, and helps isolate parties from small swings in marginal constituencies, such as the one triggered by Tory's ill-fated proposal for faith-based schools, MacLeod says.

The great fear about MMP is small parties would fracture the Legislature. This really wouldn't have happened since none of the existing "fringe" parties came anywhere close to crossing the 3% threshold needed for a seat.

But back to Churchill. He also noted the best argument against democracy is "a five-minute conversation with the average voter." Many potential voters in this province simply sat home Oct. 10. Voter turn-out was a pathetic 52%.

"We may have voted down the referendum, but we're getting perilously close to voting down democracy too. A 52% turnout isn't much of an endorsement and yet I can't believe this is what people want," MacLeod said.

The issue of democratic renewal now seems forgotten, since Premier Dalton McGuinty dropped the democratic renewal portfolio from cabinet.

That doesn't augur well for this the democratic process. The MMP proposal had many flaws. It was a complex issue for voters to grasp as they also grappled with election issues.

MMP died a cruel death on election night. But at least it opened up a conversation about democracy and elections -- and how and why we vote. But when almost half of eligible voters stay home on election day, it's tough to call it democracy. The people may have spoken -- but they did so very quietly.

Prime Minister to Attend Commonwealth Meeting and Visit Tanzania




PRIME MINISTER STEPHEN HARPER TO PARTICIPATE IN THE COMMONWEALTH HEADS OF GOVERNMENT MEETING AND VISIT TANZANIA

November 16, 2007
Ottawa, Ontario

Prime Minister Stephen Harper today announced that he will attend the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Kampala, Uganda , from 23 – 26 November, 2007.

At CHOGM, the Prime Minister and other leaders will discuss a wide range of global and Commonwealth issues. They will also review recent political and economic developments and consider the particular concerns of small states.

Founded in 1931, the Commonwealth is a voluntary association of 53 diverse, independent countries interacting through a network of governmental and non-governmental links.

Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs and International Trade Helena Guergis will precede the Prime Minister in Kampala, where she will attend the Commonwealth Foreign Ministers meeting and the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG) meeting on November 22, 2007.

Prime Minister Harper will then travel to Tanzania on November 26, 2007, where he will meet with Tanzanian President Jakaya Mrisho Kikwete.

Canada and Tanzania’s long-standing relationship has matured over the years from one that focused primarily on development cooperation to include increased trade and investment activities — to the point that Canada is now one of the leading foreign investors in the country - and political dialogue.

Friday, November 16, 2007

US offers mild criticism in Saudi rape case




Ruling Jolts Even Saudis: 200 Lashes for Rape Victim

Published: November 16, 2007

JIDDA, Saudi Arabia, Nov. 15 — A Saudi court on Tuesday more than doubled the number of lashes that a female rape victim was sentenced to last year after her lawyer appealed the original sentence. The decision, which many lawyers found shocking even by Saudi standards of justice, has provoked a rare public debate about the treatment of women here.

The victim’s lawyer, Abdulrahman al-Lahem, a well-known human rights activist, drew the court’s ire because of his strong public criticism of the handling of the case. He has called his client’s conviction unjust and said the sentences of the seven men who raped her were too lenient.

He is also known for his past defense of critics of the monarchy.

The victim’s name has not been released. She was raped about 18 months ago in Qatif, a city in the Eastern Province, and has become known in the Saudi media as “the Qatif girl.” She was 19 years old at the time of the assault.

Her case has been widely debated since the court sentenced her to 90 lashes a year ago for being in the same car as an unrelated man, even after it ruled that she had subsequently been raped. For a woman to be in seclusion with a man who is not her husband or a relative is a crime in Saudi Arabia, whose legal code is based on a strict Wahhabi interpretation of Islamic law.

Adding to the charged political nature of the case, the victim is a member of the kingdom’s Shiite Muslim minority.

Mr. Lahem’s license to practice law has been suspended and he is facing a hearing before a Ministry of Justice disciplinary committee on Dec. 5 in Riyadh for appearing regularly on television and talking about the case.

Judges of the Qatif General Court have accused him of trying to tarnish the court’s image by talking to the media.

The young woman’s offense was in meeting a former boyfriend, whom she had asked to return pictures he had of her because she was about to marry another man. The couple was sitting in a car when a group of seven men kidnapped them and raped them both, lawyers in the case told Arab News, a Saudi newspaper.

The woman and the former boyfriend were originally sentenced to 90 lashes each for being together in private, while the attackers received sentences ranging from 10 months to five years in prison, and 80 to 1,000 lashes each.

Mr. Lahem appealed the attackers’ sentences, saying that they were too lenient and that the treatment of the victim was too harsh. In its new decision issued Tuesday, the court increased the victim’s sentence to 200 lashes and six months in jail. It also increased the sentences of her attackers to prison terms of two to nine years.

The woman remains free for the time being and has not yet been lashed.

Lashing is a common sentence under the Saudi penal code, applied for crimes ranging from homosexuality and drinking alcohol to theft and adultery. Usually, lashes are meted out in increments because offenders could not survive hundreds of lashes at once. The administrator of the punishment is supposed to hold a Koran under his arm so he cannot swing the whip too fiercely; lashes are not supposed to leave permanent scars. The sentence is frequently delivered in public, often at the entrance to a jail.

“I don’t agree with this judgment,” Bassem Alim, a lawyer in Jidda, said of the woman’s sentence. “I think it’s overly severe. She should not be punished for going to the media and explaining her case.”

Mr. Alim, a friend of the victim’s lawyer, said the standard punishment for adultery is 60 to 80 lashes, so the sentence was unusually harsh, even for Saudi Arabia.

“I don’t think she was committing adultery in that car,” Mr. Alim added.

Some liberal commentators said her sentence highlighted the justice system’s failure to treat women fairly.

Abeer Mishkhas, a columnist who writes frequently about women’s rights, wrote in Arab News that the woman seemed to have been singled out for particularly draconian treatment. Ms. Mishkhas noted that a Riyadh court sentenced a Nigerian man to six years in prison and 600 lashes for rape, and an accomplice who filmed the offense was sentenced to 12 years in prison and 1,200 lashes.

“What is the difference in the two cases?” Ms. Mishkhas wrote. “The girl in the Riyadh case was not punished though she had been involved earlier with one of the men. The Qatif girl was sentenced to 90 lashes because the court suspected the ‘intention of doing something bad.’”

Mr. Lahem told Agence France-Presse that the court might be subjecting him to pressure because of his past criticism of the judiciary.

He declined to be interviewed for this article. In the past he has occasionally refused to speak to the news media because he said he had been ordered not to by the government.

Mr. Lahem has had run-ins with Saudi authorities since he represented three Saudis who were jailed in 2003 for calling for a constitutional monarchy, a severe crime in a country where the power of the royal family is absolute. He was also jailed at one point for several months and his passport was removed to prevent him from traveling abroad after he criticized the judicial system on Al Jazeera, the television network.

“I am skeptical of the reasoning used by the court in seeking to punish Al Lahem,” Mr. Alim said. “He’s a good friend of mine and I know it is not in his nature to make fun of or belittle the courts. I hope he is cleared at the hearing.”

The victim is now married, and her husband told local reporters that he planned to appeal the verdict.

Mulroney sues Liberal MP over TV comments




Mulroney sues Liberal MP over TV comments

Canadian Press

TORONTO — Comments by a Liberal MP about Brian Mulroney's dealings with German-Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber were malicious and defamatory, the former Conservative prime minister is alleging in a new lawsuit.

In a statement of claim filed last week in Ontario Superior Court, Mulroney cites several statements West Nova member Robert Thibault made in a television interview Oct. 31.

In the interview, Mr. Thibault said Mulroney had claimed he didn't know Schreiber and had no business relationship with him, the documents say.

The former prime minister, now a lawyer in Montreal, also takes issue with another comment Mr. Thibault made about the timing of payments Schreiber made to Mulroney for private business services.


The Globe and Mail

Mr. Thibault told CTV's Mike Duffy that “according to Schreiber, the first funds were delivered while Mr. Mulroney was still a member of Parliament in May 1993.”

The timing and method of the payments —$300,000 — is crucial because it turns on whether the money was received while Mr. Mulroney was still in office, something he has steadfastly denied.

In his statement of claim, Mr. Mulroney denounces Mr. Thibault's comments as “all false.”

“Mr. Thibault intended by these statements to convey to the public that Mr. Schreiber made payments to Mr. Mulroney while Mr. Mulroney was prime minister, that Mr. Mulroney falsely denied knowing Mr. Schreiber, and falsely denied having any business relationship with Mr. Schreiber.”

Mr. Mulroney also alleges that Mr. Thibault had an opportunity to apologize and retract the statements, but failed to do so.

The suit seeks $2-million in damages and punitive damages, which Mr. Mulroney wants paid to the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario in Ottawa and the Ontario Health Institute.

“Mr. Thibault intended to, and did attack, Mr. Mulroney's credibility,” the suit claims. “He did so for political gain. He did so maliciously.”

In an interview Thursday with Nova Scotia radio station CJLS, Mr. Thibault dismissed Mr. Mulroney's claim as an intimidation tactic.

“The only thing we received a couple of weeks ago was a letter from Mr. Mulroney's lawyers, which my lawyer has responded to,” Mr. Thibault said.

“I see this as a sort of an intimidation. I won't be intimidated by it. My lawyers will deal with the lawsuit if there is a lawsuit.”

Mr. Schreiber, who is in custody, was making a last-ditch legal attempt Thursday to stave off extradition to his native Germany, where he is wanted on tax-evasion charges.

Mr. Schreiber is also suing the former PM for failing to perform promised business services, but has not alleged he paid the $300,000 in cash while Mr. Mulroney was still in office, according to Mr. Mulroney's new claim.

Mr. Mulroney is challenging the jurisdiction of the Ontario courts to hear the case, which he wants heard in Quebec, and has yet to respond to the Schreiber suit.

Mr. Mulroney previously sued the government for libel after allegations of kickbacks related to the multi-million dollar purchase of Airbus planes surfaced during the 1980s.

The suit was settled with Mr. Mulroney obtaining an apology and $2.1-million.

Mr. Thibault has been one of the main opposition critics over recent allegations made by Mr. Schreiber about his business dealings with Mr. Mulroney, and said he has no plans to back down.

“I'll continue doing my job to try and find out the full truth in this matter,” Mr. Thibault said.

Mr. Mulroney's claim also notes that the RCMP investigated the alleged Airbus kick-back scheme and found the accusations to be groundless.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has set the stage for a public inquiry into the Mulroney-Schreiber affair.

GM to bring back electric car


Volt hitting the road this year

GM promises production version for 2010

Chris Vander Doelen, The Windsor Star

Published: Wednesday, November 14, 2007

General Motors will put prototypes of its first electric car on the road for testing within five months, company vice-chairman and product chief Bob Lutz said Wednesday.


Chevrolet Volt.

Photograph by : GM


GM is percieved as being far behind Toyota in terms of its environmental credentials, despite having spent "billions" on research that the company says will put 16 hybrids on North American roads within the next few years.

The Detroit giant introduced the first production versions of its hybrid pickup trucks at the Los Angeles auto show on Wednesday: the 2009 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra. Hybrid versions of the Chev Tahoe and GMC Yukon went on sale this month.

But a plug-in, "gas-less" car powered by lightweight lithium-ion batteries is what GM has set its sights on producing, and that day is rapidly drawing closer, Lutz says.

GM took delivery of its first lithium-ion batteries for testing last week and will install them in a prototype for road testing in the first quarter of 2008, Lutz said at the Los Angeles auto show.

The first test mules, as workable, usually jury-rigged prototypes are known in the automotive business, will actually look like the new 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. But they will ride on a new chassis specially designed for the Volt, a sporty two-door concept car first shown to the public at the Detroit auto show in January.

If the lithium-ion batteries prove robust enough and safe enough from overheating -- their prime weakness -- GM says it hopes to have the Volt in showrooms as soon as 2010.

The Volt is considered light years ahead of GM's experimental EV-1 electric car, the notorious experiment which blew up in the company's face when it proved unworkable.

The EV-1 batteries were twice as heavy and only half as powerful as the ones to be used in the Volt, and they took eight hours to charge instead of three -- and they required 220-volt electrical service, instead of the 110-volts found in wall socket power which will power the Volt.

Fuel cells "are a little bit more distant in the future," says Mark LaNeve, vice-president of sales, service and marketing for GM North America. And although GM is often chastized for being behind the Japanese on alternative-fuel vehicles, "we've spent billions" developing them, LaNeve said in a pre-LA auto show interview.

GM considers hybrids a "short-term solution" because they have two powertrains -- electric and gasoline -- and are therefore inherently inefficient to build and sell, LaNeve said. "That said, we feel we've got to be in the game" -- hence GM introduction of a half dozen hybrids this fall, to be followed by a steady stream in coming years.

GM decided to install its hybrids first in trucks to maximize their fuel savings, and because the company believes that "Americans shouldn't have to drive a tiny little vehicle to get fuel efficiency. We're a big country and we have big needs."

But the hybrids "are not for everybody," he said. GM expects that somewhere between five and 10 per cent of the 600,000 to 700,000 Silverados it hopes to sell next year will be hybrid versions of the truck.

The new hybrid Tahoe, LaNeve aid, achieves the same mileage as a four-cylinder Toyota Camry. The truck is the first production vehicle to employ the two-mode hybrid system jointly developed by GM, BMW, and the former DaimlerChrysler. The other companies are also all rushing hybrids to market.

The system is called a "two-mode" hybrid because it has two electric motors built inside a special transmission; one mode operates at low speed like Toyota's hybrid system, the second at highway speeds.

The Volt, by comparison, is considered "transformational technology," LaNeve said. It will be powered by electric motors alone, although it will have a "tiny little engine" onboard which spins a generator to repower its batteries when they are depleted after an estimated 60 kilometres.

The engine will be "somewhere between a lawn mower and a motorcycle" engine in size, LaNeve said. Other GM executives put its size at about one litre of displacement - less than half the size of most small car engines today.

"The ultimate goal is to get (GM) out of the environmental debate," he said.

-- with files from Bloomberg

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Brazil strikes oil!




All this and oil too

Nov 15th 2007 | SÃO PAULO
From The Economist print edition

God may indeed be Brazilian after all


Illustration by Claudio Munoz

WHEN Francisco Suares, a Portuguese explorer, wrote home to his brother in Lisbon about Brazil's natural bounty in 1596, he declared himself “ashamed to write it, fearing that I shall not be believed.” And so it remains today. Brazil's forests are bigger than anywhere else's. Its soil is so fertile that some trees grow to full maturity quicker than people do. Beneath the soil lie huge mineral deposits that are raw material for China's double-digit growth. Brazil is already on its way to becoming an alternative-energy superpower. And as if to prove a popular saying that “God is Brazilian”, it now seems that there are billions more barrels of oil than previously thought lying beneath deep waters off the country's coastline.

Just how many billions is unclear, but Petrobras, Brazil's state-controlled oil company, announced earlier this month that it reckons the Tupi oilfield contains between 5 billion and 8 billion barrels. That may not quite yet put Brazil in the same league as Venezuela and Saudi Arabia, as Dilma Rousseff, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's chief of staff who also chairs Petrobras's board, excitedly proclaimed. But the higher estimate would make the Tupi field alone equal to all of Norway's reserves. It contains light crude, which is less expensive to refine and therefore worth more. And there may be other big deposits to be found nearby.

José Sergio Gabrielli, Petrobras's chief executive, refuses to speculate about how big an oil power Brazil might become. But he does concede that there is the potential for many more discoveries on the scale of Tupi—which itself is the world's second-biggest strike in 20 years, after Kazakhstan's 12 billion-barrel Kashagan field, discovered in 2000.

Most of Brazil's oil comes from the Campos basin, in the waters off Rio de Janeiro. It is typically found at depths of 1,000-2,000 metres below the seabed. Below that lies a huge layer of salt, at some points more than a mile thick. This stretches both north and south to the hitherto less prolific basins of Espirito Santo and Santos. It is below the salt, in the Santos basin, that Petrobras discovered Tupi. The company has also found “sub-salt” oil in Espirito Santo, although it has not yet assessed the scale of this. Mr Gabrielli believes that the two basins have yielded relatively little oil to date not because it is not there, but because it lies deeper underground, below the salt.

Tupi's oil will be hard to extract. Petrobras is a world leader in deep-water oil production, but Tupi is farther down than any of its existing fields. Drilling through the salt layer and the hard rock beneath brings further technical difficulties. The first test-well alone cost $240m. Moreover, there is a shortage of skilled labour and equipment throughout the oil industry at the moment—although Mr Gabrielli says Petrobras can transfer staff and resources from other projects if necessary.

Despite these caveats, it is reasonable to assume that Brazil's economy and currency will get a boost when the oil starts flowing, it is hoped, in 2010. The discovery might also tip the balance of power in South America further in Brazil's favour. Already self-sufficient in oil, Brazil is now likely to become a significant exporter. That may reduce the clout of Venezuela's oil-rich president, Hugo Chávez, in the region. As if to underline this, Petrobras announced on November 13th that it was pulling out of a joint venture in Venezuela.

Brazil's drive towards oil self-sufficiency follows the opening up of the industry to foreign investment in the 1990s, when the government also floated some 40% of Petrobras's shares on the stockmarket. Britain's BG Group has a 25% stake in the Tupi field, and Portugal's Galp Energia holds 10%.

The government followed up the announcement of the Tupi field by withdrawing neighbouring blocks from an auction of exploration rights due later this month. That might signal rising petro-nationalism. But it also looked prudent, since those blocks may be worth much more as more becomes known about Tupi.

Amid the euphoria, which included an instant leap of 26% in Petrobras's share price, came suspicion about the timing of the announcement. Less than a week after it was made, the company announced a poor set of results, with operating profit down 22% compared with the same quarter last year.

Petrobras has also faced mounting difficulties in supplying natural gas to thermal power plants, especially since its fields in Bolivia were quasi-nationalised last year. Some see the Tupi announcement as an attempt to distract attention from this. “It is like throwing a second ball onto a football pitch when the game is going against you,” says Alexandre Marinis of Mosaico, a political consultancy.

Electricity rationing under the previous government in 2001-2 helped Lula to win office. One solution now would be to raise the price of gas, but officials are worried that this would feed into inflation, and jeopardise the scope for further cuts in interest rates. Mario Pereira, an energy consultant, reckons that the risk of electricity shortages should wane after 2008, if Petrobras completes a planned liquefied natural-gas terminal on time.

That may be a big if. Lula and Ms Rousseff, a former Trotskyist who is sometimes touted as a potential presidential candidate for the ruling Workers' Party, were keen to associate the government with Petrobras's strike. But the oil may not start flowing until after the next presidential election in 2010. Energy may be an electoral headache rather than a boon for the government, if not for the country.

Pot activists hail ruling


Pot activists hail ruling

The Canadian Press

OTTAWA — Marijuana activists are hailing a recent court ruling as the beginning of the end of Canada's prohibition on pot, but the Crown dismisses the decision as non-binding.

A trial judge in Oshawa, Ont., threw out charges of simple possession of marijuana against three young men on Oct. 19, relying on a previous court ruling that found Canada's pot law unconstitutional.

In making his decision, Judge Norman Edmondson cited a decision last July by a fellow judge of the Ontario Court of Justice.

In the earlier case, which is being appealed by the Crown, Judge Howard Borenstein accepted the defence lawyer's argument that Ottawa must pass a law - rather than rely solely on government policy - to allow accredited medical marijuana users to possess pot.

Health Canada has been forced by a series of court decisions to set up a medical marijuana program authorizing patients struggling with chronic conditions to use dope to alleviate their symptoms.

And a court ruling in 2003 required Health Canada to provide government-certified marijuana to these patients so they don't have to turn to the black market for their medicine.

In the July 13 Borenstein decision, defence lawyer Bryan McAllister successfully argued that the law itself should have been changed, not just the program. And because the law has not been rewritten to accommodate medical users, the prohibition on all use - including recreational use - collapses because the law is unconstitutional, the court ruled.

A spokeswoman for the Crown said the October decision in Oshawa will not be appealed.

"The decision of the trial judge is not binding upon any other trial judge and the [Borenstein] decision he relied upon ... was wrongly decided," Stephane Marinier, of the Brampton, Ont., office of Public Prosecution Service of Canada, said in a e-mail.

The Crown will make its counterarguments in an appeal of the Borenstein decision at Ontario's Superior Court of Justice, Ms. Marinier said.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Canada imposes new sanctions on Myanmar/Burma




Canada imposes new sanctions on Myanmar

Globe and Mail Update and Reuters

Canada will impose “the toughest sanctions in the world” on Myanmar, also known as Burma, to further isolate its military junta after September's violent crackdown on protesters, Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier announced Wednesday.

“Canada has long had measures against Burma. Now we are going to impose the toughest sanctions in the world,” Mr. Bernier said during a speech to the Economic Club of Toronto.

“Tougher sanctions against Burma are the right thing to do. They are right on moral grounds. The regime in Burma is abhorrent to Canadian values,” he said.

The sanctions include a ban on all imports and exports to and from Burma, except for humanitarian goods, and a ban on new investment by Canadians and Canadian companies.

As well, Ottawa will freeze assets in Canada of any designated Burmese nationals connected with the junta, prohibit the provision of Canadian financial services to and from Canada, and prohibit the export of any technical data to Myanmar. Canadian-registered ships and aircraft will be prohibited from docking or landing in the country.

“The strongest message has to be sent. Sanctions are the means by which we, not just Canada, but the international community, can best exert pressures against the military junta,” Mr. Bernier said.

Recent trade figures show minimal exports and imports flowing between Canada and Burma.

This year, there have been virtually no Canadian exports to Burma. Imports from Burma to Canada, meantime, were $5.8-million in the first nine months of this year, according to Statistics Canada data released Friday.Canada has exported some pharmaceutical products and shipped some aerospace parts in recent years, but exports to the country are generally "tiny," said Peter Hall, deputy chief economist at Export Development Canada.

Almost half of the $5.8-million in imports this year from Burma have been fish and seafood, according to Statscan's trade division. Woven apparel and vegetables have each accounted for almost $1-million, while other imports include knit apparel, wood, machinery, art, precious stones and straw.

In September, the junta ordered thousands of soldiers to crush protests by Buddhist monks in the streets of Rangoon. At least 10 people were killed. Hundreds more were held in detention.

The new Canadian sanctions, which follow similar announcements in recent weeks by the European Union and Japan, coincide with a warning by China, which is concerned international penalties could make Myanmar “another Iraq,” a senior diplomat said Wednesday.

Assistant Foreign Minister He Yafei said Myanmar was now headed in the right direction in the aftermath of mass protests demanding democracy and then a harsh wave of arrests.

Noting recent visits to Myanmar by U.N. special envoy Ibrahim Gambari and contacts between the imprisoned opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi and the ruling generals, He said now was the time for “encouragement”, not sanctions.

“We should be patient,” the Chinese diplomat told a news conference about a summit of Asian leaders in Singapore next week. “We especially disapprove of sanctions. Sanctions cannot solve the problem, and will only make matters worse.”

Meanwhile, a senior junta official said Myanmar rejects “interferences” in its domestic affairs, citing the need to protect its sovereignty.

Deputy Defence Minister Aye Myint told a news conference at the ASEAN Defence Ministers Meeting in Singapore that the former Burma was “stable”, and that its “home-grown principle is viable for the long-term operation of our political process”.

“We will not accept the interferences that will harm our sovereignty,” he said.

The 10-nation Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) is one of the few international groups to accept Myanmar as a member. It has been criticized for failing to bring the country into the fold despite its 10-year-old policy of engaging the nation through dialogue.

Clinton urges Canada to stay course in Afghanistan



Bill Clinton in Toronto Update:


I was fortunate to be in attendance for yesterday afternoon's speech by Bill Clinton. Aside from congratulating Canada on its work in Afghanistan, Haiti and a new free trade agreement signed with Columbia that will incorporate labor standards; Clinton spoke on a wide range of topics making for a very interesting speech. There was a lot of talk on the environment and its potential to create great new jobs for the 21st century. There was also talk about poverty, inequality in the world and environmental sustainability. He also touched on the middle East peace conference, health care, AIDS and many other issues affecting an increasingly interdependent world. I really enjoyed the speech (and also meeting David Suzuki) and I am interested to see where Hillary Clinton will take the United States (and the world) should she get elected as the current polls project.

Thanks for reading...

Darryl

************

Clinton urges Canada to stay course in Afghanistan

Updated Wed. Nov. 14 2007 9:28 AM ET

The Canadian Press

NIAGARA-ON-THE-LAKE, Ont. -- The "tough going" in Afghanistan that's claimed 71 Canadian soldiers has been compounded by the failure of the United States to send more of its soldiers into the war-torn country, but Canada must stand by the mission all the same, former U.S. president Bill Clinton said Tuesday.

In a speech aimed at convincing business leaders to find the economic benefit in tackling global warming head on, Clinton paused to make an appeal for Canada's continued "good work" in Afghanistan.

"I promised myself ... I would never come to Canada without thanking you for what I know is often unpopular, which is the participation of the Canadian Forces in Afghanistan," Clinton said.

"I know it's tough going and the United States has made it worse, in my opinion, by not sending enough forces there of our own because of our preoccupation with Iraq, but you did a good thing."

Polls suggest that many Canadians are opposed to remaining in Afghanistan until 2011 and would like to see soldiers withdraw by the initial target date of February 2009.

The Harper Conservatives have repeatedly promised that the final say on the mission will not belong to them but to Parliament -- which will be able to vote sometime in the next few months.

The government has also set up a task force, headed by Liberal John Manley, to offer advice on the mission.

Clinton concluded his words on Afghanistan with a plea for Canadian policy makers: "I hope you'll stay."

The former U.S. president worked the Afghan message into the broader speech he delivered in this picturesque southern Ontario town, one that focused on the challenges facing the global community -- including global warming -- and how to overcome them.

Despite such weighty issues, Clinton didn't let the chance pass to joke about the strength of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. greenback.

"I thought if I spent the night here I might have to take a loan," he said.

On the environment, Clinton lauded the work of his former vice president Al Gore and challenged the audience of political and business leaders to see global warming as an economic opportunity.

Oil and gas companies must refocus themselves into becoming "energy" companies that rely on biofuels, he said.

Clinton also targeted inequality, including the lack of access to health care, as a major problem facing the global economy and implored Canada to stick by its political and social institutions.

"Don't ever let the health-care tail wag the health-care dog, or else you'll be in trouble," Clinton said, adding U.S. manufacturing jobs have been lost to Canadian companies in recent years due to the country's health-care policies.

Clinton's speech opened this year's Ontario Economic Summit, an annual gathering of provincial political and business leaders.

Chainsaw Massacre in Sharon





Mayor led tree-cutting crew at Sharon Temple

Town of East Gwillimbury to hold inquiry into unauthorized removal of trees on conservation site


Nov 14, 2007 04:30 AM

Call it the Sharon Temple Tree Massacre.

When chainsaw-wielding, goggle-attired Mayor James Young showed up at the historic Sharon Temple last month it took the museum curator by surprise.

"Very peculiar," thought curator John McIntyre, after arriving site to witness the mayor of the Town of East Gwillimbury – of which Sharon is a part – amputating tree branches in the heavily treed culvert next to Young's own office at the civic centre.

But McIntyre was under the impression that the mayor and the town crew were just trimming the branches. The mayor even handed the curator a can of orange paint and asked him to mark trees whose branches could be cut, ostensibly for better maintenance access to the culvert, recalled McIntyre, an architectural historian who lectures at Seneca College.

Little did McIntyre dream that he was signing a death warrant for 50 to 75 mature trees and bushes, many of them towering pines.

When he returned several days later and saw stumps where white pines once towered, the horrified curator immediately phoned the Ontario Heritage Trust for advice.

The temple – and its lands – is one of 30 sites in Ontario that are protected by the three levels of government – federal, provincial and municipal – said Sean Fraser, manager of conservation services at the Ontario Heritage Trust.

The trust has a conservation easement that protects the site.

"The unauthorized removal of trees is certainly a rare occurrence on a conservation site," said Fraser.

"The context of the site itself has been severely compromised from a cultural historical perspective."

This site is considered "one of the great cultural landmarks of the country," said Fraser.

All the missing trees and bushes are to be replaced as soon as realistically possible, so that the property is in "exactly the same position" as it was on Oct. 23, said Fraser. That was the day before the mayor and a town crew started hacking away at the trees, about 60 metres north of the culvert, while Councillor Marlene Johnston watched.

The Sharon Temple, celebrating its 175th anniversary this year, is a tiered wedding-cake style of architecture built by a breakaway Quaker sect, sitting on about 2 hectares of land north of Newmarket.

The town council has washed its hands of the massacre. Actions taken by Young and Johnston "were taken on their own accord, not on authority of town council," Licinio Miguelo, the town's spokesperson wrote in a press release yesterday.

The other councillors, he wrote were "not consulted."

Now the town has hired an arborist and a municipal law expert and erected a temporary fence where the trees once guarded the lands between the civic centre and the temple.

What strikes McIntyre as strange is that the 32-year-old mayor, now in his third term, is a supporter of the historic site, his office wall lined with framed photos of the Sharon Temple. Young was even a representative with the museum board.

The mayor has since been replaced as the council's liaison with the temple by Councillor Jack Hauseman.

Young said last night, "At this time, we're going through a review," adding he wanted to wait until after the review is completed to say more.

"There's a variety of reasons those actions took place," said Young, without elaborating.

East Gwillimbury Councillor Virginia Hackson said Young had "apologized at a public meeting and he felt his actions were inappropriate."

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Ballot win would be show of trust, Putin says





Ballot win would be show of trust, Putin says

Updated Tue. Nov. 13 2007 12:35 PM ET

The Associated Press

KRASNOYARSK, Russia -- President Vladimir Putin said Tuesday a convincing victory for the party he is leading in next month's parliamentary elections would give him the "moral right" to maintain strong influence in Russia after he steps down next year.

Putin's remarks in Siberia were the clearest affirmation yet that he plans to keep a powerful hold on Russia's reins, but he stopped short of saying whether he would seek a formal role.

Putin said last month that he would lead the dominant party's ticket in the Dec. 2 elections to the State Duma, the lower house of parliament. The decision appeared aimed at boosting the United Russia party's chances and ensuring himself a power base when term limits force him from office next year.

"If the people vote for United Russia, it means that a clear majority of the people put their trust in me, and in turn that means I will have the moral right to hold those in the Duma and the Cabinet responsible for the implementation of the tasks that have been set as of today," Putin said while drinking tea with workers at a road construction site in Krasnoyarsk, a vast Siberian region that reaches beyond the Arctic Circle.

"In what form I will do this, I cannot yet give a direct answer. But various possibilities exist," Putin said in response to a question from a construction worker who asked what he would do after he leaves office and why he had decided to lead the United Russia ticket. "If the result is the one I am counting on, I will have this opportunity."

In the parliamentary elections, voters will choose only among parties, not individuals. Seats are allocated proportionally to those parties that receive at least 7 percent of the vote.

The people who lead party tickets do not always take seats in parliament, and the Kremlin has said Putin has no intention of doing so. Since Putin agreed to head the United Russia ticket, the party has cast the election as a referendum on the president and the course he has set for the country.

Putin, who is immensely popular but barred by the constitution from seeking a third straight term in the March 2008 presidential election, has long indicated that he hopes to remain influential after stepping down and has not ruled out a bid to return to the Kremlin in 2012.

He said last month that he might become prime minister, but there have been indications that he would choose an informal path, using an overwhelming electoral victory for United Russia as a mandate to maintain authority as a national leader backed by the people.

Putin sought to reinforce that idea -- and send a message to those who have expressed doubt that he can manage to keep his grip on the country after leaving office.

"As the old saying goes, 'Victory belongs not to those who have might on their side but to those who have truth on their side,'" Putin said. "This has deep meaning."

More pragmatically, Putin also stressed that the Duma has the power to reject the president's nominee for prime minister, suggesting that with the dominant party behind him, he would have a check on the president elected to succeed him.

Putin was in Krasnoyarsk for a meeting with regional governors and Cabinet ministers focusing on the transport sector. He also met with students and instructors from major universities in Siberia and southern Russia.

For his first major trip inside Russia since the parliamentary campaign began -- and what the Kremlin says is likely to be his last before the vote -- he chose a region where voters gave him below-average support in the last national election.

While he was careful to stress that Putin's visit was "not political," the regional head of United Russia, Vyacheslav Novikov, said it would probably give the party a boost in the upcoming vote.

Across the city sprawled along the north-flowing Yenisei River, United Russia billboards -- reading "Putin's Plan is Russia's Victory" -- far outnumber other parties' ads, and smaller United Russia signs are affixed to lamppost after lamppost along the main avenue downtown.

A local state-run TV network late Monday showed Soviet-style preparations for Putin's visit, with a plow driver saying, "We're working for Putin," as he pushed snow off the long airport road. Another worker scraped ice from the guardrail.

Maria Nikitina, 18, an economics student walking downtown, had not heard of Putin's visit but said she planned to vote for United Russia -- largely because of its association with the president.

"Russia is rising, the country is moving forward," she said.

Opposition parties say the authorities use their power to unfairly benefit United Russia.

The regional head of the liberal Union of Right Forces party, Vladislav Korolyov, said that illegal pressure from the authorities is preventing his party from getting its message to voters.

Authorities pressure managers of potential campaign event venues to keep the party out, and police have barred the distribution of the party's campaign newspaper on trumped-up grounds, he said.

Opinion polls indicate United Russia will win a majority of votes and that only the Communist Party is certain to clear the 7 percent barrier.

Regardless of the election results, Yana Grinko, a 21-year-old university student who met with Putin, said she hopes he won't be out of the Kremlin for good.

"I hope he returns to us in 2012," she said.

Text of Mulroney statement




Text of Mulroney statement

The following is the text of a statement to be issued Tuesday by former prime minister Brian Mulroney, as read to The Globe and Mail by a spokesman for Mr. Mulroney, Luc Lavoie.

The Rt. Hon. Brian Mulroney wants a full-fledged public commission of inquiry.

Twelve years ago to the day, I was trying to deal with very grave and damaging accusations against me, contained in a letter sent to the Swiss authorities. These accusations were related to the sale in 1988 of Airbus planes to Air Canada, back then a Crown Corporation.

After a tough and lengthy battle against these false and horrendously libellous accusations, the government of the day had to admit that they had absolutely no evidence to support them, and apologized to me and my family. In addition, they had to reimburse me of all my legal and other expenses.

Twelve years later, the same people at the CBC and at certain other media organizations who were at the origin of the 1995 accusations are still conducting their vendetta. Last Friday, Prime Minister Stephen Harper decided that he needed the counsel of an independent third party to advise him on the course of action to follow after new allegations were made in an affidavit filed by Karlheinz Schreiber from his prison cell where he is detained pending the execution of an extradition order confirmed twice by the Supreme Court of Canada.

I will fully co-operate with the special adviser soon to be appointed by the Prime Minister, but I have come to the conclusion that in order to finally put this matter to rest and expose all the facts and the role played by all the people involved, from public servants to elected officials, from lobbyists to the police authorities, as well as journalists, the only solution is for the government to launch a full-fledged public commission of inquiry which would cover the period from 1988 to today.

Only then will the whole truth be finally exposed and tarnished reputations restored. I am willing to meet the special adviser to reiterate my conviction that this is the only way to prove to Canadians that I have done nothing wrong.

Bill Clinton in Toronto!




Bill Clinton in Toronto!


Today at 1:45pm, Bill Clinton will be speaking in Toronto and I am looking forward to attending. If there was one politician that got me interested in politics it was the Presidency of Bill Clinton. The personality, record on the economy, ability to project that he cares about the people he serves and his attempt to broker peace between Israel and Palestine are things I really liked about Bill Clinton. During Clinton's time in office, the economy was good and America was respected and liked around the world. Since leaving office, Bill Clinton has been involved in a series of projects including reducing poverty in Africa as well as the environment. He is also married to Hillary Clinton, likely the next President of the United States if polls today are correct. A couple of months ago I had the chance to meet Jimmy Carter after coming to Toronto to launch his new movie at the Toronto Film Festival. It was a great experience and I am looking forward to today's experience in hearing what Mr. Clinton has to say. Should be an interesting talk.

Thanks for reading...

Darryl

Monday, November 12, 2007

The Web Takes Ron Paul for a Ride

The Web Takes Ron Paul for a Ride

Nathaniel Brooks for The New York Times

Ron Paul greets supporters at the Holiday Inn in Philadelphia before a rally at Independence Mall on Saturday. More Photos >


By KATHARINE Q. SEELYE and LESLIE WAYNE

Published: November 11, 2007

PHILADELPHIA, Nov. 10 — From posting video on YouTube to enlisting friends through Facebook, all of the presidential candidates are looking for ways to harness the Internet. In the case of Ron Paul, the Internet has harnessed him.

Skip to next paragraph

Multimedia

Ron Paul’s Cyber-CampaignSlide Show

Ron Paul’s Cyber-Campaign

Related

Times Topics: Ron Paul

Blog

The Caucus

The CaucusThe latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.

Mr. Paul, a 10-term Texas congressman who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination, came into the campaign with a conservative platform: a return to the gold standard, abolition of the I.R.S., a literal view of the Constitution. His campaign was bare bones. Then he started appearing in debates. His emphatic presence and fierce opposition to the war in Iraq set him apart from his fellow Republicans. Setting him even farther apart were ideas like blaming American foreign policy for the attacks of 9/11 and abolishing the Federal Reserve.

If his campaign had taken place in the pre-Internet era, it might have gone the way of his 1988 Libertarian campaign for president, as a footnote to history. But because of the Internet’s low-cost ability to connect grass-roots supporters with one another — in this case, largely iconoclastic white men — Mr. Paul’s once-solo quest has taken on a life of its own. It is evolving from a figment of cyberspace into a traditional campaign, with yard signs, direct mail and old-fashioned rallies, like one here on Saturday attended by a few thousand people under cold, gray skies. Mr. Paul said it was his biggest rally so far. He said it proved his campaign was more than “a few spammers” and called it a “gigantic opportunity” to establish credibility.

How much the Paul campaign had snowballed on the Internet became evident last week when supporters independent of the campaign raised $4 million online and an additional $200,000 over the phone in a single day, a record among this year’s Republican candidates. There is even talk that Mr. Paul could influence the primary in New Hampshire, where he could draw votes from Senator John McCain of Arizona, who is trying to revive the independent persona that helped him win the state’s primary in 2000.

In an interview on Friday, Mr. Paul, 72, a retired physician and a grandfather, acknowledged that the influence of the Internet had surprised even him.

“We always knew it was supposed to be important,” he said of the Internet. “My idea was you had to have someone who was a super expert, who knew how to find people. But they found us.”

As for the record one-day fund-raising, he said, “I had nothing to do with it,” adding that he had so far neglected to thank the people responsible. (James Sugra, 28, of Huntington Beach, Calif., acting on his own, posted an online video proposing one big day of fund-raising; Trevor Lyman, 37, of Miami Beach, then independently created a site, www.thisnovember5th.com, that featured the video.)

Mr. Paul estimated that the one-day haul had brought “$10 million worth of free publicity.”

He added, “It’s kind of sad, but the money is what has given us credibility, not the authenticity of the ideas.”

Those ideas were on display Saturday as Mr. Paul said young people should be able to opt out of Social Security, called for an audit into how much gold really is in Fort Knox, and, in urging an end to the war, declared, “The Versailles Treaty is one of our biggest problems we’re dealing with today, because it was under the Versailles Treaty that we created — the West created — this artificial country called Iraq.”

He also called the Internet “a strong political equalizer,” adding that the attention after the one-day fund-raiser had been “a very, very valuable lesson for us.”

Stirring the interest in contributions to the Paul campaign is an innovation on his Web site, www.ronpaul2008.com, a real-time display of the dollars and the names of donors as they roll in. By contrast, most campaigns conceal their fund-raising and time the release of financial information for political effect.

“What is new is how Paul’s openness about his daily fund-raising data helped foster this surge,” said Andrew Rasiej, a co-founder of techPresident.com, a nonpartisan Web site that tracks the candidates’ use of technology. “It fed a powerful user-driven feedback loop.”

That success is propelling Mr. Paul increasingly toward the nuts and bolts of concrete campaigning. His staff members — in headquarters above a dry-cleaning shop in Arlington, Va., where some have built bunk beds in their cubicles — began a $1.1 million television campaign in New Hampshire this week. He even held an old-school fund-raiser here on Saturday, behind closed doors.

The Paul campaign says it expects to expand its staff of 70 paid workers and 8 unpaid state coordinators. (By contrast, Rudolph W. Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City, who is also seeking the Republican nomination, has 244 paid staff members.)

“To have any chance of success, you have to blend the old with the new,” said Lew Moore, Mr. Paul’s campaign manager. “If you just have a cyber-campaign and that does not translate into votes or money, it would be a fantasy and we would just be a video game.”

The new success means new challenges: Can Mr. Paul translate the passion that has been bubbling up on the Internet into votes? Can he hold together his disparate collection of supporters who have united online? And as the campaign moves forward, who will chart its course?

To his online supporters, the responsibility lies with them.

“I feel like I am the campaign,” said Chester Gould, 26, who owns a technology company and was among 28 supporters last week at an Albany “meetup,” an online term for like-minded people who share an interest, whether it be needlepoint or politics, and then agree to meet in person.

Skip to next paragraph

Multimedia

Ron Paul’s Cyber-CampaignSlide Show

Ron Paul’s Cyber-Campaign

Related

Times Topics: Ron Paul

Blog

The Caucus

The CaucusThe latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.

Howard Dean, who pioneered the use of the Internet in presidential politics in 2004, also used meetups, which are now commonplace in campaigns. But Paul supporters have demonstrated how a handful of people can build them into a movement. There are now more than 1,140 Paul meetup groups in 900 cities with more than 67,000 members.

The meetups have operated largely independently from the campaign, but like the campaign are moving their efforts from the Internet to the ground.

“The crux of the problem we have is that most of the public has not heard of Ron Paul yet,” said Jeff Gaul, 50, an Albany insurance broker and public adjustor, who bought a batch of Paul yard signs at his own expense and urged others at the Albany meetup to do so.

At the meetup — in an unadorned, dimly lighted coffeehouse — supporters spent two hours discussing ways to establish a greater physical presence, including creating and paying for their own radio advertisements for Mr. Paul and gathering signatures for a petition drive to get him on the New York State ballot.

Their self-directed activity reflects just how much the Internet has changed politics since Mr. Dean’s campaign.

“The Dean campaign was decentralized, but I think Paul’s movement is actually run by nonstaffers,” said Zephyr Teachout, a visiting assistant law professor at Duke University who was Mr. Dean’s director of online organizing. “The buggy is pulling the horse.”

Ms. Teachout said that most campaigns this year knew that they needed “to build really amazing tools and spend a lot of time on the Web site” to create voter loyalty. But that led many to micromanage their Web sites. By contrast, she said, “the Paul campaign took the opposite lesson — that it was about openness and power — and focused far less on the tools and far more on decentralization as a driving force.”

Without centralization, the meetups can seem like sessions devoted to reinventing the wheel. But many at the Albany meeting said their freedom was empowering and only fed their enthusiasm, though they were drawn to Mr. Paul for different reasons.

Andrew Fox, 28, who described his day job as “sitting on a bench with a soldering iron” repairing cable TV boxes, agreed the other night to become the treasurer for the Albany group. “We have effectively lost our form of representative government,” Mr. Fox said. “The war is the worst thing, but we also have a police state at home.”

David Weck, 54, a chiropractor from Schenectady, said that he was a Democrat but that Mr. Paul was the only candidate who seemed committed to smaller government.

“Never in a million years did I think I would be interested in a Republican candidate,” Mr. Weck said, “especially after this administration.”

Mr. Gould said he was alarmed about the nation’s currency, a favorite Paul topic. Federal Reserve notes, Mr. Gould said, are “like a loan off of a loan that’s physically impossible to ever repay,” meaning the country “will continuously be in massive debt.”

Mr. Paul’s supporters seem prepared to push at least as far as he will, but how far he will go is not yet clear; he has waved off suggestions of a third-party candidacy.

“As long as there’s momentum, and if they’re starting another fund-raiser for me, how can I walk away?” Mr. Paul said in the interview. But if the votes don’t materialize, he added, “after every primary, you’d have to have a bit of a reassessment.”

House in Session Tomorrow...Random International Thoughts




House in Session Tomorrow...Random International Thoughts


*Tomorrow the House of Commons returns for a final session before the end of the year. The Brian Mulroney scandal will likely be the focus as oppose to the more pressing issues of Afghanistan, the environment, cities, federal spending, the Canadian dollar, manufacturing job losses, Pakistan, Iran, the Annapolis Middle East peace conference, justice bills and democratic reform such as the elected or abolished senate. There is also a large amount of serious domestic issues facing the country and the strengthening of the Canadian federation. Today the world is a very dangerous place and with a pending recession in the United States, there are a lot more important priorities than an alleged transaction between Brian Mulroney and
Karlheinz Schreiber. If Mulroney was engaged in any wrong doing, I think he should be held accountable as should be the case with any past Prime Minister Liberal or Conservative. It is a shame that given how infrequently parliament is in session, this is the issue that will be focused on in Ottawa. I think this shows the real disconnect between the media, Ottawa and the everyday people on the street facing a variety of challenges just to get by.

*On the issue of capital punishment, I am against it. Canada is among many nations supporting a UN resolution against the death penalty and I think that is a good thing. The issue that is being debated in the House now isn't about Canada bringing back the death penalty. It is questioning the right of Canada to challenge laws set by sovereign American citizens through their elected officials. Do we want to provide rapists or murderers a benefit over others simply because they hold Canadian citizenship? Do we want them to serve their sentences in Canada? Do we expect the American government to allow us to set Canadian laws independently and cooperate if Americans commit crime on our soil? Americans are engaged in their own debate on the death penalty as evidenced by the court cases involving lethal injections. Canada's international position is clear on the death penalty. I also trust the US justice system and American voters to make a decision that is appropriate for their own nation. We can have confidence that they will get a fair trial by standards similar to our own courts. In politics you pick and chose your battles and I don't think defending Canadian criminals who committed violent acts in the United States is a battle worth fighting, nor should it be high on the agenda of our foreign policy.

*On Thursday the Prime Minister came to York Region and spoke to an audience in Vaughn that numbered well over one thousand people. Stephen Harper spoke about his governments record and rallied the audience by talking about issues that mattered both locally and in Ottawa. The crowd was very diverse and the energy level and excitement was high. Stephen Harper came out to the song "Better Now" by Collective Soul after being introduced by Thornhill candidate Peter Kent. Several good shots were landed on Susan Kandis (the local Liberal MP) and the Liberals for attending a Tamil Tiger funeral and their position on the Israel-Lebanon war. Harper highlighted his record on cleaning up government, reducing taxes, bringing Canada back on the world stage and the strength of the economy and national unity at this time. In attendance were several Ontario PC Candidates including Lois Brown and Peter Kent, Conservative MPs Jason Kenney, Wajid Khan, newly elected Thornhill PC MPP Peter Shurman, Toronto mayor candidate Jane Pitfield and many others. After his speech, Harper spent well over a half an hour taking photos with people and having a quick chat with supporters. Some of the highlights of Harper's speech as quoted in Caroline Grech's Era Banner article include:

“I believe this may be the largest series of tax reductions in federal history. It’s a tremendous accomplishment. But one I might add if you don’t mind me saying this, one that your local member of parliament had nothing to do with,” Mr. Harper said to laughs from the crowd. “Because the Liberals fought us every step of the way, or at least abstained every step of the way.”

“The only significant mention she made in Parliament this year was to complain about the Prime Minister sharing Rosh Hashanna greetings with members of the Jewish community. Can you imagine that?” Mr. Kenney asked, adding Ms Kadis also sends the same type of greeting to her constituents. “It has caused me to say that she has chosen to celebrate the holiday as the High Holiday of Hypocrisy,” Mr. Kenney said.

“When people like Mr. Dion say they’re considering a tax increase, you better consider grabbing a hold of your wallets and hiding,”

“...A year and a half ago, when other MPs were marching in the streets with Hezbollah, our government stood firmly by the democratic state of Israel. A battle between a democratic state and terrorist groups that seek to destroy both it and its people is not a matter of shades of grey, it’s a matter of right and wrong, Mr. Harper said. “We’re on the side of right.”


The event felt like an election rally, and it is no secret that if you look at volunteer motivation, fundraising, polls, record on the issues and leadership; Conservatives are ready for an election any time. Because Dion abstained "every step of the way", this session Conservatives are likely to build on their record further by getting the crime package, tax cuts and priorities of the throne speech through the House of Commons. The longer Harper stays in power, the more international exposure he will receive and the longer he has to address weaknesses and build on his strengths. It now looks like the government is going to survive until at least the budget at this point. I predict that if the budget passes, this government might actually last until the fixed election date in the fall of 2009.

*It was great to see Jack Layton call for a referendum on abolishing the senate. I prefer to see it reformed and elected (possibly with some form of proportional representation) but if this issue cannot get on the agenda or result in provincial agreement; than I would support at least abolishing the status quo until a better idea is presented. There is no purpose in allowing the current unelected senate stall legislation that is passed in the House of Commons by elected MPs. It should also not be a retirement home for party hacks and ex-politicians. It is undemocratic and provides minimal value in today's Canadian society. There is increasing public awareness on this issue and the media is putting significant pressure on parliament to address it. It is quite possible that this referendum will get through the house and either pass in time for the fixed election date or if it gets stalled in the Senate, there will face a public backlash and put Dion in a very difficult position.

*The environment is an important issue and will likely remain of top concern to voters. Despite the threat of Global Warming, the economy is likely to be the biggest concern by the time an election is called. $100 gas prices, a reducing trade surplus, an increasing dollar, manufacturing job losses and the housing market could all be top of mind issues when voters cast their ballots.

*Hazel McCallion is the best municipal politician to fight a battle against the federal government for additional funding. She has credibility as a tight spender and a proven track record of respecting tax payer dollars. Her city represents some ridings that have a chance to go for or against Conservatives. She is tough when it comes to a fight and she is very popular in Ontario as a politician. She is an internationally recognized civic leader and has experience dealing with other levels of government. She doesn't come with the baggage of strong negative opinions among various partisans in Ottawa and Queens Park that Miller brings to the table. If David Miller and the Toronto Star were smart, they would take a backseat and allow Hazel to be the salesperson for municipal funding. The provincial government has promised to address uploading the costs of programs that all leaders agreed should not be funded by property taxes. Hazel McCallion combined with mayors from around the GTA and across the country would be far more affective pushing a Cities Now agenda then the dead One Cent campaign that never went anywhere primarily because of Miller's reputation as a irresponsible spender, pro-Union activist and a man who has had his hat out at every federal and provincial election since he was first elected. Miller would challenge this perception but right or wrong he is seen as a socialist by people familiar with his politics across the country and not everyone is sympathetic to Toronto's concerns. During the tax increase debate that never surfaced during the mayor election campaign, Miller was exposed as being weak and arrogant. In the later years of his term, it is going to be even harder to control an ambitious council waiting for the next election campaign. Hazel McCallion demonstrates the legitimate need for additional funding and highlights the fact that cash strapped municipalities need a new deal not just the city of Toronto. Let Hazel do the talking Mr. Miller.

*After last week's "PM to Cities: Drop Dead" headline, the Toronto Star has fully demonstrated their Liberal bias and for months have been publishing editorials that make it obvious that it is no longer credible as a neutral source of journalism. The editorial on the Senate slapped the NDP and Jack Layton proving that the NDP and Conservatives are both equally targeted by a clearly pro-Liberal newspaper. Creating alarmist headlines that often times people see without reading the article does democracy a major disservice. Harper said that cities are part of provincial jurisdiction and that is the reality. He never said "drop dead" and McGuinty himself said the meeting was very civil with Harper.

*I think the time is right for a First Ministers conference to get the premiers talking on a series of issues that are relevant to their interests. There has been talk of a single Stock Market regulator, a reduction in interprovincial trade barriers, wait times, a national power grid, pharmacare, an elected/abolished senate, municipalities, transit infrastructure, the environment/carbon market, childcare and restricting federal spending on new programs under provincial jurisdiction. The country is more united then it has been in a long time. There is a lot to talk about. I think a conference before the next budget would be a good way for Harper to move forward on his agenda with a firm understanding of where the various Premiers stand on the issues that have been on the recent agenda. Several Premiers have called for this, and I think it would be good for Stephen Harper if he moved forward with at the very least an informal gathering of the provincial leaders. Several provincial elections have recently taken place and it is important to establish good federal/provincial relations within our federation.

*The issue of Afghanistan will soon be debated front and center in parliament as promised. A decision must be reached by April. Other nations such as Japan and the Dutch are debating their missions at this time. The situations developing in both Pakistan and Iran could have an impact on Canadians serving oversees in Afghanistan. The committee headed by John Manley has solicited public feedback and will report back soon. The NDP and Conservatives have been fairly clear on where they stand on this mission. Ultimately it is the Liberal and Bloc parties that will determine if the current mission is extended should this government survive the current session. It is also possible this could be decided through an election taking place around budget time but before the April deadline to express our intentions to NATO. Pakistan is due to have elections on January 9. The UN will likely soon debate a new round of sanctions on Iran and Bush/Cheney have said frequently that no option is off the table when it comes to making sure Iran does not acquire the technology to build a nuclear weapon. If Pakistan becomes unstable or if Iran is attacked; Canadian troops in Afghanistan could be indirectly threatened by events beyond the control of the Canadian government or it's military leaders. We need to have a serious debate about this mission and what the goals are for both Afghanistan and Canada's participation in bringing peace, democracy, human rights and prosperity to this nation. Will debate rise above partisan politics??? Will elections in the United States in 2008 and in Australia this month have any impact on the Afghan mission??? Canadians have a lot to consider as we look at the mission beyond February 2009.

*Stephane Dion is a disaster and right now my biggest fear of him is that he will be replaced by Liberals before the next election. I think Liberals really need a policy convention to truly rebuild and move forward as a party and true alternative to the government. The party is falling apart and there doesn't seem to be an easy fix for them under these circumstances. I also believe many in the party were attracted to power and now many factions seem lost attempting to find a common purpose in opposition. The Liberal Party is outdated and needs more then a new leader. It needs to redefine Liberalism and figure out where it stands on the big issues of the day. Their grassroots must feel completely powerless right now. No one ever wants to get too confident, but at this point it would seem Dion has nowhere to go but down.

*Western media has not put a lot of focus on recent American efforts to bring peace to the Middle East through a proposed conference in Annapolis. Israelis and Palestinians are working on a joint declaration of principals and heavy diplomacy is taking place to rally international support for a new round of negotiations on the core issues of this conflict. Rice has been attempting to encourage Lebanon, Jordon, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria and other gulf states to attend. These states are conflicted between wanting to avoid a photo op that brings about no real progress while also realizing that the threats of extremism have made their own regimes vulnerable. Bringing peace to the Middle East would be a huge accomplishment and Bush's best attempt to leave a positive legacy. Canada should push hard to support this conference hosted by the United States and encourage negotiations with the goal of a Palestinian state by the end of Bush's presidency. No agreement would of course be implemented until terrorist forces are disarmed, the Palestinian economy and democratic institutions are built and only after Israel is recognized by all the states in the Muslim world and the various Palestinian factions. The world needs to get serious about a two state solution and reducing the power of extremists in that part of the world. I hope Bush and Rice continue to push hard for this conference to be a success and I hope the international community takes it seriously. I also hope that Israelis and Palestinians continue negotiating and attempting to find common ground on the most difficult issues. Any agreement should be ratified by a referendum among both populations and recognized by the entire international community. Now is as good a time as any to attempt to bring peace to the Middle East, paint a political horizon and reduce the threat of terrorism in the region and in the west. The American 2008 election is likely the best time to decide on what to do about Iran and how to end the conflict in Iraq. The Middle East does not need another war right now and serious diplomacy is required to bring stability and peace to this volatile region.

*The 2008 American Presidential election is starting to get interesting. There are two big debates this month. Democrats will be in Vegas this Thursday. Later in the month Republicans will face off in the CNN YouTube debate. For the first time, it looks like Hillary Clinton is facing some trouble. Will Iowa be the place where Obama or Edwards make this a race??? Richardson seems to be running for vice-president but I think there will be a lot of pressure on a Hillary/Obama ticket in 2008. The rest of the contenders like Gavel, Kuchinich, Biden and Dodd seem out of this race. Al Gore is highly unlikely to enter the race making this a three way contest between Clinton, Obama and Edwards right now. On the Republican side it is anyone's race with Rudy, Romney, McCain and Thompson all still in it. Ron Paul is doing well online and there is still time for lesser known candidates to get into this race. Right now it would be foolish assuming it is a lock that Clinton and Giuliani will face off in 2008. Personally I am rooting for Ron Paul on the Republican side (only candidate I would support) and am tied between Obama/Clinton/Gore and Edwards on the Democratic side. An Obama/Clinton ticket with Obama as the Presidential candidate would probably be the best case option for Democrats. In the first quarter of 2008, the nominees will be clear and the world will begin watching the new direction the Republican and Democratic Presidential candidates will take the United States following the George W. Bush presidency.

*Yesterday I was proud to attend the Remembrance Day ceremonies in Aurora. It is important to remember those who have made the ultimate sacrifice representing Canada in World War I, World War II, Korea, Afghanistan and UN peacekeeping missions around the world. The victories earned by our Veterans have led to Canadians from coast to coast to living in freedom and with a good standard of living. It is important for younger generations and future generations to remember the sacrifices and victories that played a role in creating the history and nation that we call Canada today. Remembrance Day carries special significance when our country is at war as it is today in Afghanistan. We also still have peacekeeping forces serving in UN missions in Bosnia, Haiti, the Middle East and in Africa. I believe Remembrance Day should be a national holiday so that everyone would have the opportunity to pay tribute to those that have served our country and made it what it is today. This year, I was glad it feel on a Sunday so I could be a part of the parade and service in Aurora. The Aurora legion also put on a great reception afterwards.


Thanks for reading...


Darryl

Somalia's War Flares Up Again

Somalia's War Flares Up Again

Monday, Nov. 12, 2007 By ALEX PERRY

Mogadishu

A crowd of Somalis beat the body of an Ethiopian soldier as it is dragged in the streets of Somalia's capital.


Click here to find out more!

It was still possible, this summer, to see some hope in Somalia. The country was in dire need of some. The Ethiopian army, which invaded last December, had killed thousands of Somalis and lost thousands of its own in some of the fiercest fighting that the capital, Mogadishu, had seen in 16 years of civil war. There was also an acute and mounting humanitarian crisis, as hundreds of thousands of refugees fled the capital for makeshift camps in the desert. But an August lull in the fighting allowed Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi to claim violence was ending. And Washington, which sent a small number of U.S. Special Operations troops to accompany the invasion, was optimistic that the government the Ethiopians installed — the Transitional Federal Government (T.F.G.) — would make progress towards national reconciliation. If that could be accomplished, the U.N. and other agencies might feel safe enough to re-start the substantive humanitarian assistance Somalia required. International business, led by enterprising Chinese telecoms investors, was even probing Somalia's financial prospects. Might Somalia, left to fester in bloody chaos for so long, finally be re-joining the world?

That hope has now evaporated. In October, the T.F.G.'s inability to rise above tribal rivalries was laid bare when internal feuds culminated in President Yusuf Abdullah's firing of his Prime Minister Ali Mohammed Gedi. This month, fighting between Ethiopian troops and Somali insurgents again erupted in Mogadishu, prompting tens more thousands of refugees to desert the capital. In scenes reminiscent of the 1993 battle between U.S. troops and a Somali militia, the bodies of two dead Ethiopian soldiers were dragged through the streets.

Somalia is once again the war no one wants to touch. Ethiopia is discovering, as the U.S. has in Iraq, that invasion and occupation are two different things. It is stuck fast in its own East African quagmire, reluctant to stay yet unable to withdraw. This month, in response to a Security Council request, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon said sending in a U.N. peacekeeping force was "neither realistic, nor viable" and — appropriating the White House's language — suggested the formation a multinational "coalition of the willing." Ban knows full well that no one is willing. The African Union, which promised 8,000 peacekeepers, has supplied just 1,600 Ugandan troops. And the recurrent image of bodies in the street discourages anyone else from stepping forward.

Why does this matter? There are two immediate reasons. The humanitarian crisis unfolding in Somalia is now on a par, in numbers and acuteness, with Darfur. The U.N. says 1.5 million people need assistance, of which a mere 60,000 are getting it. And Somalia is of significant strategic interest. Pirates based there regularly strike ships heading to and from the Suez Canal, and attacks have rocketed this year. The conflict in Somalia — which pits Ethiopian and T.F.G. troops against Somali rebels, backed by Eritrea — also has the potential to ignite a larger regional war that engulfs the Horn of Africa. Last week, Ban Ki-Moon expressed serious concern about the military buildup along the Eritrea-Ethiopia border, while State Department spokesman Sean McCormack urged Eritrea and Ethiopia to pull back troops from key border areas and use "maximum restraint" to avert a new war.

Most important for the U.S., Somalia has wider international ramifications for terrorism. It has been a home to al-Qaeda-funded Islamist radicals since the early 1990s. The Ethiopians invaded to topple the Union of Islamic Courts (U.I.C.), which had ruled Mogadishu for six months and whose leader declared a jihad on Ethiopian troops then operating inside Somalia. According to insurgents I spoke to this summer in Mogadishu, U.S. intervention alongside Ethiopian forces — U.S. warplanes carried out at least two strikes on suspected Islamists in the south of the country in January, and a warship unleashed an artillery barrage on another group in the north of the country in June — radicalized the Somali insurgency further.

U.S. generals frequently refer to Somalia as the "third front in the war on terror." Hundreds of foreign Islamist fighters are heeding calls from Osama bin Laden to go fight in Somalia, according to analysts in the region. And militant leader Aden Hashi Ayro, wounded in the January strikes, has now recovered and is leading a reconstituted and overtly anti-American U.I.C. rebellion in Mogadishu. There is little question that such dire assessments are becoming increasingly accurate.

Lest We Forget...







In Flanders Fields

by John McCrae, May 1915

In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep,
though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.

Saturday, November 10, 2007

King Juan Carlos to Chávez: "Shut up" (ENGLISH SUBTITLES)

King Juan Carlos to Chávez: "Shut up" (ENGLISH SUBTITLES)



**************

Chavez hits back at Spanish king

Chavez, right, said the king "acted like an angry bull", adding: "I'm no bullfighter - but ole!" [AFP]

Venezuela's president has struck back at Spain's king, who told him to "shut up" at a leader's summit in Chile over the weekend.

Hugo Chavez suggested on Sunday that King Juan Carlos knew beforehand that a coup was going to be staged against Chavez in 2002.


Chavez said Spain's ambassador had appeared at Venezuela's presidential palace during the two-day coup to support Pedro Carmona, the interim president, with the king's blessing.


"Mr King, did you know about the coup d'etat against Venezuela, against the democratic, legitimate government of Venezuela in 2002?" Chavez said to reporters in Chile.

"It's very hard to imagine the Spanish ambassador would have been at the presidential palace supporting the coup-plotters without authorisation from his majesty."

'Shut up!'

The spat began on Saturday when Chavez accused Jose Maria Aznar, the former Spanish prime minister, of backing the 2002 coup and repeatedly called him "fascist" in an address at the Ibero-American summit of leaders from Latin America, Spain and Portugal.

"Fascists are not human. A snake is more human," Chavez had said on Saturday.

Spain's current socialist prime minister, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, urged Chavez to be more diplomatic and show respect for other leaders despite political differences.

"President Hugo Chavez, I think there is an essential principle to dialogue, and that is, to respect and be respected, we should be careful not to fall into insults," Zapatero said.

Chavez continued to interrupt as Zapatero spoke, although his microphone was turned off.

A frustrated Spanish monarch, seated next to Zapatero, then leant towards Chavez and loudly said: "Why don't you shut up?" before leaving the chamber.

The incident comes weeks before a
divisive charter referendum [AFP]

"They told me some Spanish officials grabbed him by the arm, because he's strong and tall. He acted like an angry bull" as he stormed out, Chavez recalled in comments published Sunday by Spain's El Mundo newspaper. "I'm no bullfighter - but ole!"

Chavez, who faces violent protests at home against a proposed constitutional reform package that would greatly boost his power, said the incident had been exaggerated by the media.

"I hope this will not damage relations," Chavez said as he left his Santiago