Monday, December 31, 2007

Bloomberg Moves Closer to Running for President


Bloomberg Moves Closer to Running for President



Buoyed by the still unsettled field, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg is growing increasingly enchanted with the idea of an independent presidential bid, and his aides are aggressively laying the groundwork for him to run.

On Sunday, the mayor will join Democratic and Republican elder statesmen at the University of Oklahoma in what the conveners are billing as an effort to pressure the major party candidates to renounce partisan gridlock.

Former Senator David L. Boren of Oklahoma, who organized the session with former Senator Sam Nunn, a Democrat of Georgia, suggested in an interview that if the prospective major party nominees failed within two months to formally embrace bipartisanship and address the fundamental challenges facing the nation, “I would be among those who would urge Mr. Bloomberg to very seriously consider running for president as an independent.”

Next week’s meeting, reported on Sunday in The Washington Post, comes as the mayor’s advisers have been quietly canvassing potential campaign consultants about their availability in the coming months.

And Mr. Bloomberg himself has become more candid in conversations with friends and associates about his interest in running, according to participants in those talks. Despite public denials, the mayor has privately suggested scenarios in which he might be a viable candidate: for instance, if the opposing major party candidates are poles apart, like Mike Huckabee, a Republican, versus Barack Obama or John Edwards as the Democratic nominee.

A final decision by Mr. Bloomberg about whether to run is unlikely before February. Still, he and his closest advisers are positioning themselves so that if the mayor declares his candidacy, a turnkey campaign infrastructure will virtually be in place.

Bloomberg aides have studied the process for starting independent campaigns, which formally begins March 5, when third-party candidates can begin circulating nominating petitions in Texas. If Democrats and Republicans have settled on their presumptive nominees at that point, Mr. Bloomberg will have to decide whether he believes those candidates are vulnerable to a challenge from a pragmatic, progressive centrist, which is how he would promote himself.

The filing deadline for the petitions, which must be signed by approximately 74,000 Texas voters who did not participate in the state’s Democratic or Republican primaries, is May 12.

Among the other participants invited to the session next Sunday and Monday is Senator Chuck Hagel, a Nebraska Republican, who has said he would consider being Mr. Bloomberg’s running mate on an independent ticket.

Mr. Boren declined to say which candidate would be strongest, but suggested “some kind of combination of those three: Bloomberg-Hagel, Bloomberg-Nunn.” He said Mr. Bloomberg would “not have to spend a lot of time raising money and he would not have to make deals with special interest groups to raise money.”

“Normally I don’t think an independent candidacy would have a chance” said Mr. Boren, who is the University of Oklahoma’s president. “I don’t think these are normal times.”

Mr. Bloomberg, who has tried to seize a national platform on gun control, the environment and other issues, has been regularly briefed in recent months on foreign policy by, among others, Henry A. Kissinger, his friend and the former secretary of state, and Nancy Soderberg, an ambassador to the United Nations in the Clinton administration.

Advisers have said Mr. Bloomberg, a billionaire many times over, might invest as much as $1 billion of his own fortune (he spent about $160 million on his two mayoral races) on a presidential campaign.

But they warned that while they were confident of getting on the ballot in every state, the process was complicated and fraught with legal challenges, and that Mr. Bloomberg would begin with an organizational disadvantage, competing against rivals who have been campaigning full time for years.

Still, the mayor said this month at a news conference, “Last I looked — and I’m not a candidate — but last time I checked reading about the Constitution, the Electoral College has nothing to do with parties, has absolutely nothing to do with parties. It’s most states are winners take all. The popular vote assigns electoral votes to the candidate, and I don’t think it says in there that you have to be a member of one party or another.”

The key players — virtually the only players — in Mr. Bloomberg’s embryonic campaign are three of his deputy mayors, Kevin Sheekey, Edward Skyler and Patricia E. Harris. Another aide, Patrick Brennan, who was the political director of Mr. Bloomberg’s 2005 re-election campaign, resigned as commissioner of the city’s Community Assistance Unit earlier this year to spend more time exploring the mayor’s possible national campaign.

One concern among Mr. Bloomberg’s inner circle is whether a loss would label him a spoiler — “a rich Ralph Nader” — who cost a more viable candidate the presidency in a watershed political year. One person close to the mayor, who spoke on condition of anonymity so as not to be seen discussing internal strategy, stressed that Mr. Bloomberg would run only if he believed he could win.

“He’s not going to do it to influence the debate,” the person said.

The mayor was asked last week at a news conference whether a Bloomberg campaign would cost the Democratic or Republican nominee more votes.

“You know,” he replied, “if it’s a three-way race, the public has more choice than if it’s a two-way race, and has more choice in a two-way race than a one-way race. Why shouldn’t you have lots of people running, and what’s magical about people who happen to be a member of a party?”


Related

Text: A Bipartisan Invitation (December 31, 2007)

Sam Waterston, the actor whose former co-star on “Law and Order,” Fred D. Thompson, is a Republican presidential candidate, is a founder of Unity08. That group also hopes to advance a nonpartisan ticket, and Mr. Waterston says the mayor is often mentioned on the group’s Web site as a prospective nominee.

“If he formally embraced Unity08’s principal goals of a bipartisan, nonpartisan, postpartisan ticket — which he’s almost in a position to do all by himself, having been a Democrat, a Republican, and now an independent — and of an administration dedicated to ending partisanship within itself and in Washington, then it’s hard to think of anyone better placed to win Unity08’s support if he sought it,” Mr. Waterston said. “And, of course, there’s nothing that says Unity08 couldn’t draft him.”

Some associates said that after six years as mayor, Mr. Bloomberg was itching for a new challenge — much like he was in 2000 when, as chief executive of Bloomberg L.P., he was flirting with running for mayor.

But Mr. Bloomberg will also have to weigh several intangibles: Can he run for president and serve as mayor of a combustible metropolis simultaneously for eight months? (He believes he can, and would not resign as mayor to run.) Does he want to be president badly enough to sacrifice his zealously guarded personal privacy? (He’s not completely convinced.)

Meanwhile, he thoroughly enjoys the attention, and despite the public denials, suggests that he is poised to run if the political stars align themselves for a long-shot, but credible, independent campaign. During a private reception this month, Mr. Bloomberg playfully presided over a personal variation of bingo, in which guests could win by correctly guessing the significance of the numbers on a printed card.

“Two hundred seventy-one?” Mr. Bloomberg asked.

One guest guessed correctly: It was George W. Bush’s bare electoral-vote majority in 2000.

Ron Paul TV Ad: We Have The Answer

Ron Paul TV Ad: We Have The Answer

While it is unlikely that Ron Paul is going to come out of Iowa the winner, expect him to have a huge showing. No candidate has done a better job of utilizing YouTube (42,440 subscribers, 6,531,477 channel views) to get his message out. He also has a series of loyal followers who are posting their own ads and videos on the YouTube site. He has also been successful on the internet in terms of raising funds. Over 4 million dollars in one day. I predict Paul will crack 10% on January 3 possibly defeating both Thompson and Rudy. What is motivating all of these young people to join the revolution??? The constitution and freedom it seems.
-Darryl

























Legalizing Marijuana:



Ron Paul on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno,



Congressman Ron Paul Visits Dorm Room

Stories that slipped through the cracks


Stories that slipped through the cracks
Dec 31, 2007 04:30 AM

FOREIGN AFFAIRS REPORTER

It you're ending the year awash in facts and figures, swamped with dire stories and suffering crisis fatigue, you're not alone.

But chances are you're reading about the same countries and regions – while equally startling stories on those that don't make the headlines are missing in action.

As the year ends, media monitors, and groups that deal with the world's forgotten crises, have made a plea for attention to the stories that slipped through the cracks in 2007.

The international medical charity Médecins sans Frontières lists 10 "most underreported humanitarian stories," ranging from the collapse of Zimbabwe's health-care system to ruinous ongoing drug wars in Colombia to the spread of violence and disease in the Russian Caucasus. "Millions of people trapped in war, forced from their homes and lacking the most basic medical care do not receive attention commensurate with their plight," says Nicolas de Torrente, executive director of MSF-USA.

And media attention is often critical for generating money and aid for millions who are at risk or in the line of fire worldwide, he points out. They include:


Somalia: One of the world's most violent countries, its people are battered by civil war and are now caught between American-backed Ethiopian troops and Islamist militias. Hundreds of thousands have fled Mogadishu, the capital, leaving behind an untold number of dead.
Zimbabwe: Under the regime of President Robert Mugabe, Zimbabweans have been hit by rampant unemployment, skyrocketing inflation, food shortages and political instability. Now the health-care system that was once the pride of southern Africa is collapsing, while 3,000 people a week die of AIDS.
Sri Lanka: The beleaguered eastern and northern regions have slid back into warfare between government forces and Tamil Tiger rebels, terrifying civilians with targeted bombings, killings, mine attacks, suicide bombings, forced recruitment and arbitrary arrests. Hundreds of thousands have been displaced since last year.
Democratic Republic of Congo: War has returned to the eastern province of North Kivu with a vengeance, as government and UN forces battle guerrilla gangs who carry out a campaign of murder and vicious sexual attacks on women. Aid for victims of violence, malnutrition and deadly epidemics has slowed because of insecurity.
Colombia: After decades of turf wars over drugs, and fighting between government and guerrilla groups, militants have a "stranglehold" on half the rural areas, forcing children to take up guns and murdering those they accuse of collaborating with rivals. Desperate families fleeing to urban slums are faced with more violence and disease.
Burma: The Buddhist monk-led revolt this fall reminded the world of the brutality of the isolated Burmese regime. But left unsaid were the underlying daily problems of high malaria and HIV-AIDS rates, inadequate health care, and acute deprivation and violence that have afflicted embattled minority groups along the Thai border.
Central African Republic: The beleaguered civilians of one of the world's poorest countries are already coping with malnutrition, malaria and deadly diseases. But fighting between rebels and government forces in the north has forced thousands to flee as villages have been "attacked, pillaged and burned." Desperate and homeless people also face violence from roadside bandits.
Chechnya: While Russia says the war has ended in its tiny, independence-seeking southern republic, and the ruined capital Grozny has seen some rebuilding, fighting has spread to neighbouring areas of the southern Caucasus. Civilians in Chechnya are in danger from disease, gun battles and other violence. Other underreported stories of 2007 are earmarked by U.S.-based Foreign Policy magazine, among them:
Robotroops: "In June with little fanfare," the magazine says, "the U.S. army deployed the first armed robots to Iraq, marking a new era in modern warfare."
Oil and water: While Washington looks for an exit strategy from Iraq, "the Pentagon is committing itself to guarding the country's oil supply indefinitely" by planting a military installation atop an oil terminal in the northern Persian Gulf.
Cyberwar: A new world war kicked off with a "barrage of cyber attacks emanating from Russia" which crippled Estonia's banking, police and government offices. China was later accused of hacking into a computer network used by top U.S. defence officials.
Raging fever: "Warming climates may be putting millions of people around the world at risk" of mosquito-transmitted dengue fever, which causes excruciating joint pain, and sometimes fatal bleeding. Paraguay declared a state of emergency last March.

Sunday, December 30, 2007

2008 critical year for Canada's Afghanistan mission


2008 critical year for Canada's Afghanistan mission

Mike Blanchfield , CanWest News Service; Ottawa Citizen

Published: Saturday, December 29, 2007

OTTAWA -- Canada and its allies face a year of reckoning in Afghanistan in a struggle that has now lasted as long as the Second World War and shows little sign of ending.

The first few weeks and months of 2008 will be a time of deep introspection in Canada, the United States and the European capitals of NATO, as well as allied countries such as Australia. Canada's Conservative government wants to extend the county's military commitment to 2011 from the scheduled end in February 2009, but must find a way to overcome three opposition parties.

There are also more pressing obstacles to tackle on the international stage, and finding more foreign troops to quell the Taliban-al-Qaida insurgency is just the beginning. The key will be bringing unity of purpose to the international community's disorganized, scattershot approach - perhaps by appointing a new "super-envoy" to Afghanistan. The insurgency was able to exploit this lack of co-ordination in 2007 with a record year of violence that left 29 Canadian soldiers and thousands of innocent Afghans dead.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper will soon receive the report of the Manley commission, which will likely spell out how Canada can ill afford to abandon its military contribution to Afghanistan by February 2009.

That will set the stage for yet one more vote in Parliament on Canada's future in Afghanistan, one that Harper clearly hopes will transcends partisan politics and result in an extension of Canadian involvement for two more years.

"As a key player in Afghanistan, Canada has a vital leadership role to play in working with its allies to secure Afghanistan's future. We will need to step up to the plate and show real leadership on this file," said Fen Hampson, the director of the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University in Ottawa. "2008 will be Afghanistan's year of reckoning."

Hampson points to a deteriorating security situation, aided by the Taliban's allies in neighbouring Pakistan, a country on the brink of chaos following the assassination of opposition leader Benazir Bhutto. Compounding the instability is the "endemic problems of corruption" that continue to plague the government of President Hamid Karzai, including Afghanistan's flourishing opium trade, which is eroding authority and trust in his leadership.

With the sun setting on the Bush administration, there is also renewed focus in Washington on reviewing the military strategy in Afghanistan, a forgotten war that has been eclipsed by four years of bloodshed in Iraq.

All of this high-level angst will have to produce one concrete deliverable by April: a major announcement of some sort when NATO leaders meet in Romania for their annual summit.

The 26-member alliance and its 11 partner countries contribute 40,000 of the 50,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan. But NATO needs at least another 3,000, not to mention a few dozen helicopters and other heavy equipment.

Beyond that, there is a collective realization that the West has been floundering in Afghanistan, lacking an overarching direction.

Speaking at the recent summit in Edinburgh, Scotland, of countries active in volatile southern Afghanistan, including Canada, the U.S., the Netherlands, Britain and his own, Australia's new defence minister Joel Fitzgibbon said the West has shown a "a lack of coherent strategy."

That fuelled further calls by Canada and others for a "super envoy" to co-ordinate NATO and United Nations efforts in Afghanistan.

Britain's Lord Paddy Ashdown, who performed a similar international role from 2002 to 2005 in Bosnia, has been heavily rumoured for that job.

While a lack of troops has hampered reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan, the absence of co-ordination between NATO and its other allies has made the situation even worse, said Hampson.

A super-envoy is needed to "knock heads and bring together the different elements of the mission - security, reconstruction, economic development, etc. - into a coherent strategy," he said.

Ashdown, a former politician and military officer, has the skills and "heft" to do the job. "The question is whether he wants it after his bruising battles in Bosnia."

But others question whether a super envoy is the solution to Afghanistan's problems.

"The danger with having a high representative that would do all the co-ordination for both NATO and the UN is that the Karzai government - which is weak with elements of corruption - would not be able to learn from their mistakes because somebody else would be there to co-ordinate all the various activities coming into the country," said Alain Pellerin, executive director of the Conference of Defence Associations in Ottawa.

In 2007, Canada lost 29 soldiers, raising its death toll to 73 since 2002, compared with 2006 when 36 Canadian soldiers and one diplomat died in Afghanistan.

Canada may have had a slightly less bloody year than before, but 2007 saw a marked deterioration in the overall security situation in Afghanistan, including a record high 140 suicide attacks.

The insurgency has been able to exploit the lack of unity within NATO, and also its collective tactical inexperience in fighting a guerrilla insurgency, says Sean Kay, chair of international studies at Ohio Wesleyan University.

That means hit and run attacks on foreign troops aimed at undermining support for the mission in their respective home countries.

"The enemy knows this, and they can get effectively inside NATO's decision making loop by targeting what they do on the ground to appeal to publics back at home. That becomes the center of gravity for modern warfare."

As a result, the Taliban is now believed to have influence in more than half the country, especially the south. As a UN official in Kabul conceded recently, the worsening security situation was "squeezing humanitarian space" and led to the deaths of 15 aid workers, 11 of them Afghans.

"This is the inevitable consequence of a worsening security situation," said Charlie Heggins, a top UN official.

With the British set to withdraw from southern Iraq, they could be in a position to add to their sizeable Afghanistan deployment, which now stands at 7,800 troops - more than three times Canada's contribution.


But there is also a growing realization that if the alliance is to succeed in Afghanistan, one country will have to save the day: the United States.

"As we have known for many years, Afghanistan was the real security problem the day the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, occurred and has remained so every since," said Hampson.

Pellerin said the U.S. will be in a position to do more in Afghanistan because Iraq is showing some modest signs of stabilizing and raising the possibility that some of the 160,000 American troops there might be brought home - even though the U.S., with 26,000 troops, has already supplied more than half the foreign military personnel in Afghanistan.


"At the end of the day," said Pellerin, "it's always the Americans who seem to lift the most."

Ottawa Citizen

****

Gird for long haul, Kabul tells Canadians

From Thursday's Globe and Mail

Afghanistan's ambassador to Canada wants Canadians to take a world view of the problems in his country, saying Western leaders understand there is no “quick fix.”

Omar Samad said yesterday that weekend visits to Afghan President Hamid Karzai by French President Nicolas Sarkozy, Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi and new Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd are “a political signal … that they consider Afghanistan a very important world issue.

“I hope that the message that this sends to Canadians at this point is that they should look at it as a very critical and strategic world issue that requires long-term commitment,” Mr. Samad said.

“Every one of these leaders made it very clear during their visit that Afghanistan matters, that Afghanistan is a long-term engagement and that no one should expect a quick fix.”

Defence Minister Peter MacKay, who has been visiting Canadian troops in Kandahar, is expected to meet Mr. Karzai today in Kabul.

Mr. Samad's comments come as Prime Minister Stephen Harper indicated he will hold a spring vote in Parliament on whether to extend the Canadian mission to Afghanistan from February of 2009 to 2011.

In a year-end interview with The Canadian Press, Mr. Harper said he is uncertain whether Canadians understand the importance of remaining involved in Afghanistan.

Asked whether he believes Canadians truly appreciate what is at stake, Mr. Harper replied: “I don't know, the short answer is I don't know.

“The government understands we took on an important international commitment for important reasons of international security that in the long run impact directly on our country.

“So I don't know whether Canadians do – or don't – understand.”

“I think Canadians are deeply troubled by the casualties,” he added.

The Prime Minister has said repeatedly that the mission should be extended and he recently created a non-partisan commission, headed by former Liberal deputy prime minister John Manley, to report on Canada's role in Afghanistan. The report is expected in late January.

“All we can only hope from the Manley exercise is that it causes parliamentarians, particularly in our Official Opposition – which as you know commenced this mission – to sit back and think about what is in the best interest of the country before a vote is actually held,” Mr. Harper said.

“We really have got to avoid – on this one – taking a decision for reasons of short-term politics. We must take a decision that is in the long-run interest of the country, its international reputation and the respect we should all show for the sacrifice our men and women have made to secure it.”

Mr. Samad said he would not comment on whether the weekend visits by the French, Italian and Australian leaders indicate their countries are ready to increase their number of troops or fight in the more dangerous southern region, where Canadian troops are stationed.

The issue of so-called “burden sharing” is controversial, as Mr. Harper and others have said Canadians have taken on a disproportionate load. Polls suggest Canadians believe their troops are paying too high a price and want out of the mission; 73 soldiers and one diplomat have been killed in the past two years.

Mr. MacKay said this year that he and the Prime Minister will be pressing other North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries for clear commitments for increased troops and equipment in southern Afghanistan. They want these commitments to be nailed down in time for the alliance's leaders summit in Romania this April.

Experts are warning that the coming vote in Parliament about extending the mission will be messy and one the minority government will not win.

“I don't think the government can get a vote through the House,” said historian Jack Granatstein. “I think it's very sad. … It will really be a test of Canadians, whether we have the stomach to fight, to fight a war.”

Dr. Granatstein supports Canadian troops remaining in Afghanistan until 2011. But he said it will be very “tough to get the vote through” the House of Commons, adding that it will become “messy” with splits in the Liberal caucus.

But Liberal defence critic Denis Coderre said the Liberal caucus is “totally solid” on the extension issue. He said there has to be “some rotation” of troops and a refocusing of the mission.

And Peter Harder, former deputy minister of Foreign Affairs, said a May vote is “logical.” He sees risks in a vote before then, as he believes the last thing Mr. Harper wants is for “Parliament to reject what Manley recommends …”

He said the ability for MPs to debate the mission in a non-partisan way will be critical. As well, he added, a vote before the April summit in Romania would be risky, especially if Mr. Harper loses. Mr. Harder said that would “look rather bad for Canada.”

Roland Paris, the director of the Centre for International Policy Studies at the University of Ottawa, said Canadian troops have done a professional job under difficult circumstances, given that the entire mission has not been adequately funded by NATO. He said the NATO meeting in April will be key, as announcements will be made by member countries regarding their commitment to the mission.

“I think ultimately Canadians would be open to the idea of a continued combat mission in Afghanistan,” he said.

“Is it not possible for us to consider other ways for us to play an important role? Combat and non-combat? … I think pulling out in 2009 would be a mistake.”

With a report from The Canadian Press


***********


Bush and Rice commend Canada's `invaluable' service in Afghanistan
U.S. president reassures allies on the importance of perilous undertaking
Dec 21, 2007 04:30 AM

WASHINGTON BUREAU

WASHINGTON–George W. Bush has praised Canada's "brave souls'' fighting in Afghanistan, but made it clear his administration was worried fatigue was setting in among NATO allies fighting the Taliban.

The U.S. president's comments were echoed later in the day by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice after a meeting with Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier.

Bush told a year-end press conference the U.S. was reviewing its Afghanistan strategy with an eye to reassuring NATO partners they are part of a coherent plan to provide security in the country and improve the lives of average Afghans.

"Our objective is to help people meet a mission that they're comfortable with achieving, and convince them this is going to take a while,'' he said.

"It's going to take time for this democratic experiment there in Afghanistan to work.''

The president said his biggest concern "is that people say, `Well, we're kind of tired of Afghanistan and, therefore, we think we're going to leave.'"

Canada has taken a disproportionate number of casualties, losing 73 soldiers in the Kandahar region in the south.

Washington has expressed its concern about other NATO allies who are not on the front-line fight and is seeking a more equitable distribution of responsibilities from its allies.

"I would like to praise the Brits, the Canadians, the Dutch, the Danes and other countries for their contributions – the Aussies – of shooters, fighters, people that are willing to be on the front line of this battle,'' Bush said.

"These are brave souls.''

Rice, with Bernier at her side, said Canada was "pulling its weight'' in Afghanistan and Bernier said he hoped next year's parliamentary debate would end with Canada agreeing to extend its current mandate beyond February 2009.

"It's a dangerous mission, but it's a mission that we're proud of,'' he said. "All our allies, they know. I don't have to raise it. They know what we suffer as Canadians.''

Bernier said the Harper government is awaiting the recommendations of a panel headed by former Liberal foreign affairs minister John Manley, then it will put the question to Parliament.

"I hope that will be a vote to have a strong commitment for the international community,'' he said.

Rice said the contribution of Canada in Afghanistan was "both invaluable and effective.

"I want to thank the foreign minister, but I want to thank also the people of Canada."

************

Canada plans to keep a base in Kandahar until 2015

The Canadian Press

OTTAWA — The Foreign Affairs Department has developed plans to keep a Canadian provincial reconstruction base in Kandahar until at least 2015, federal officials say.

The department has also started recruiting diplomatic staff to fill posts at the base for one-year assignments that stretch beyond Parliament's self-imposed deadline of February, 2009, for an end to the military mission.

Sources within the department said the two diplomatic openings currently being filled run from the fall of next year to the fall of 2009.

The provincial reconstruction base, nestled in an old fruit-canning factory in a Kandahar suburb, was set up in 2005.

It functions as the headquarters for Canada's reconstruction efforts, giving development officials, the RCMP and corrections officers a secure location from which to help Afghans rebuild their shattered country.

The base, while protected by the Canadian military, is entirely separate from the combat units, located at Kandahar Airfield, NATO's principal base in southern Afghanistan.

Contingency plans for a long-term Canadian diplomatic and development presence in the war-torn city were initially drawn up in the spring of 2006, not long after the Conservatives came to office and at the same time that an extension to the military mission was proposed, diplomatic sources said.

The proposal apparently has so-called "off-ramps" that would allow Ottawa to withdraw, or hand over the Kandahar base to another country.

But the first opt-out date is not until 2011, the same year an international agreement to rebuild Afghanistan expires, the sources indicated.

Coincidentally, 2011 is the same year the Conservative government chose in its Throne Speech as an extension for Canada's military commitment.

The Foreign Affairs Department did not respond to requests for comment.

This fall, Prime Minister Stephen Harper assembled a panel of eminent Canadians, headed by former Liberal cabinet minister John Manley, to study Canada's future role beyond the expiry of the current mission.

Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier, appearing before the Commons foreign affairs committee Tuesday, made a distinction between the military and development efforts.

"The mandate of development and reconstruction is a commitment until 2011 under the [Afghanistan] compact with other countries," Mr. Bernier said, responding to a question from Bloc Québécois defence critic Claude Bachand.

"Mr. Manley's mandate just has to do with the military mission."

Liberal MP Dan McTeague, who was at the committee meeting, said his ears perked up after hearing that statement and wondered whether the Conservatives would use an extended development commitment as a pretext to keeping troops in the country.

"We all know development can't proceed without security, at least that's what they keep telling us," Mr. McTeague said yesterday.

Later in the Tuesday hearing, Mr. Bernier emphasized that the Conservatives don't believe that Canada "should simply abandon the Afghans in 2009."


***********

Bhutto's death could have impact on Afghanistan mission

Extremists in border region could be encouraged by chaos

Craig Offman, National Post Published: Friday, December 28, 2007


The assassination of Benazir Bhutto will push Pakistan further into chaos, embolden extremists on its Afghan border and imperil Canadian troops who are trying to root out Taliban forces.

"This is obviously a negative development," Robert Grenier, the CIA's former top counterterrorism officer, said in an interview. "This event holds the seeds of regional instability."

Ms. Bhutto had just addressed a campaign rally before an attacker shot her and then blew himself up at a park in the northern city of Rawalpindi, killing the opposition leader and at least 16 others. Earlier that day, the former prime minister had a state visit with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, with whom she discussed the thorny issue of cross-border insurgents, an issue that has a direct effect on Canadian soldiers stationed in the southern province of Afghanistan.

Taliban-trained insurgents, suicide bombers and supplies often come and go with near-impunity, wreaking havoc on forces trying to stabilize Mr. Karzai's country.

"Karzai has seen her as a natural ally who has voiced opposition to Islamic fanaticism," said Mr. Grenier, who observed that the "atmospherics" between the two countries had improved recently.

Afghan officials had been hoping that Ms. Bhutto, the main opposition leader in the upcoming Jan. 8 elections, would have helped to improve relations between the neighbours and eliminate insurgents who are destabilizing both of their countries.

Still, Kabul and Islamabad have long disputed the origins of intensified Taliban-and Al-Qaeda-linked violence. President Karzai often pits the blame on militant sanctuaries in Pakistan, led by President Pervez Musharraf, rather than in his own country, where 60,000 international soldiers -- more than 1,700 of whom are Canadian -- are hoping to demolish a Taliban-led insurgency that seeks to install a theocracy like the one it had before NATO forces drove them out after the 9/11 attacks.

Serving in the southern Afghan province of Kandahar, Canada's troops are confronting well-organized extremist fighters who have allegedly been trained in Pakistan or have been seeking shelter there. More than 70 soldiers have already died there.

Seth Jones, a Southeast Asian politics professor at Georgetown University, said that political instability in Pakistan does not bode well for Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan, who were counting on Pakistan to quell extremism within its borders.

"If the government is focused on opposition and it is spending most of its resources on stabilizing its volatile politics, it will have negative implications for Canadian forces," said Dr. Jones, who is also an analyst for the Virginia-based Rand Corporation.

Most analysts predict that Gen. Musharraf will devote most of his resources to a clampdown on his opponents, diverting his attention from other concerns such as his neighbours. In the long term, however, this kind of martial law might include a more major effort to root out extremists who profoundly dislike his rule. "If there is a silver lining," said Dr. Jones, "is that nothing could push these two government together like this kind of situation."

National Post

*********************

In the line of duty: Canada's casualties


http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/afghanistan/casualties/total.html

Loonie voted top news story of the year


Loonie voted top news story of the year
Dec 30, 2007 04:21 PM

THE CANADIAN PRESS

OTTAWA – Fair-feathered friend to some, foul burden to others, the iconic Canadian bird that took on the world's superpower currencies in 2007 has been picked as the top Canadian news story of the year.

The soaring loonie had no peer as the year's top story in the annual survey of Canada's broadcasters and newspaper editors conducted by The Canadian Press.

With 74 of 136 votes cast, the loonie was the clear choice over a wide assortment of headline grabbers that ranged from the RCMP Taser incident (runner-up with 15 votes) to the Robert Pickton trial to climate change and - last year's choice as top story - the war in Afghanistan.

"The Canadian dollar is the best roller coaster ride of the year," said Jim Poling, managing editor of The Hamilton Spectator.

"It is every person's story - from grandma and grandpa's cross-border shopping trips, to importers, farmers and parts manufacturers. There's hardly a Canadian who didn't engage in the flurry over the dollar."

"Not only Canadians were paying attention. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said the loonie and Canada's economy has also caught the eye of his global counterparts."

"People are paying attention to Canada because of our strong economic fundamentals and the loonie to a certain extent reflects the strength of those economic fundamentals," he said.

"It's good news overall as long as the currency is reflecting the economic fundamentals. When we had some significant speculation in the currency that distorted the market, that was not good."

"And it didn't escape the notice of American late-night talk shows, which presented the loonie's challenge of the mighty U.S. dollar as bewildering and humiliating."

The faux-news show, The Daily Show, featured deadpan comedian John Hodgman asking host Jon Stewart what cruel deity would could have permitted the U.S. dollar to be equal to the Canadian loonie.

Six years ago, the joke was on the loonie. On Jan. 21, 2002, the currency bottomed out at 61.79 cents US, its lowest ebb in history, and the punch lines revolved around the "northern peso".

"From there it had nowhere to go but up."

But few would have predicted when the year began that it would be among the top-performing world currencies, and that it would not only storm the parity wall but send it crashing along with the myth of the greenback's preeminence in the world.

One of Canada's top economists, TD Bank's Don Drummond, recalls sheepishly a bold prediction that the currency would finish 2007 strongly at 90 cents US when he was asked to write on the dollar's prospects for the Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters' magazine last winter.

"I tried to get them to retract all the copies of the 2006 edition so that no one could check it, but they didn't think it was practical," joked Drummond.

The forecast appeared reasonable, even rosy, at the beginning of January, when the loonie stood around 86 cents US, looking comfortable at that altitude for several months before making a move to the 90-cent level in April.

Except for hitting a brief air pocket during the subprime meltdown in August, the loonie just kept climbing, despite the best efforts of Flaherty and Bank of Canada governor David Dodge to talk it down.

It reached parity for the first time in 31 years on Sept. 20 and rocketed to above 110 cents US on Nov. 7 - a modern-era record - before settling down back to around parity.

Along the way, it caused much gnashing of teeth among Canada's manufacturers and foresters, who found their products both in less demand and less valuable.

It caused a backlash among Canadian shoppers who griped that prices in stores hadn't dropped sufficiently.

And it was the bird that launched tens of thousands of autos for the border.

In October alone, there were 2.2 million same-day car trips across the border, about 120,000 more than in October 2006.

"It absolutely hammered a lot of people, but it sure benefited a lot of people too," noted Drummond.

"If you wanted to go on a trip, if you wanted to buy a nice little place in Florida, if you were a business conducting imports you got a heck of a price break. And it kept inflation down and that helped keep interest rates down, and that has benefited a lot of people."

"Among those that saw a direct gain were professional hockey, baseball and basketball franchises - such as the Toronto Blue Jays and Edmonton Oilers - who paid their players in cheaper U.S. greenbacks and collected gate receipts in suddenly valuable loonies."

But the loonie is a coin and, as such, it has two sides. The other side is that Canada's manufacturing heartland - Ontario and Quebec - was hammered by the flip side of the equation. With not all figures in, manufacturers shed 100,000 jobs and the forestry sector about 8,000 as plants and mills downsized, slowed operations or just went under.

The forestry sector might have taken the biggest punch, says Avrim Lazar of the Forest Products Association of Canada, because all the inputs in production, from the lumber, to transportation, to energy costs, were in Canadian dollars and the vast majority of the revenues were in U.S. dollars.

"Canada makes its living selling stuff to the United States and having your currency appreciate by huge amounts relative to your biggest customer basically means you are going to sell less and make less money," he said.

"Rarely has a currency been so well named. It is loony and you just don't know what it will do next."

"Predicting what the loonie will do next is a mug's game, as many have discovered. Estimates for next year range from 90 cents US to above $1.10 US, this latter forecast from currency analyst Dennis Gartman of Virginia, who has been bullish on the Canadian currency since 2002."

Drummond said the trick to deciding how high or low the Canadian dollar will fly is as simple as deciding what will happen to the prices for commodities such as oil, gold and minerals.

"If you can predict commodity prices, you can come pretty close to the dollar," he said. "Since 2002, the dollar has not deviated very much from commodity prices."

Democratic Candidates Final Pushes for Iowa


Democratic Candidates Final Pushes for Iowa

Hillary Clinton














Barack Obama:













John Edwards:












Joe Biden:











Bill Richardson











Republican Candidates Final Pushes for Iowa




Candidadte Final Pushes for Iowa



Rudy Giuliani







Mike Huckabee







Mitt Romney:







John McCain









Ron Paul











Fred Thompson







Potential Wildcard Independent Candidates in US???


Potential Wildcard Independent Candidates in US???

Ralph Nader:





Michael Bloomberg:



Al Gore:





Ron Paul:



Arnold Schwarzenegger:





Pat Buchanan:

China Will Make Hong Kong Wait to Elect Leader


China Will Make Hong Kong Wait to Elect Leader

Published: December 30, 2007

HONG KONG — Chinese officials announced Saturday that Hong Kong would have to wait at least another decade for democratic elections to select its leader, and for more than 12 years to have the right to directly elect the entire legislature.

The decision is the latest in a series of setbacks for the democracy aspirations of Hong Kong residents, and another sign that Beijing’s current leaders have scant appetite for experimenting with greater public participation in political decision-making.

The Basic Law, the mini-Constitution imposed by China on Hong Kong after Britain returned the city to Chinese rule in 1997, raises the prospect of choosing Hong Kong leaders starting in 2007 by the principle of one person, one vote. But having already decided in 2004 to postpone universal suffrage until at least 2012, Beijing’s leaders took the next step on Saturday of postponing action for at least five years after that.

Donald Tsang, the current chief executive who is Hong Kong’s leader, plans to retire in 2012.

That has raised the prospect of a struggle among pro-Beijing political groups at that time over who might succeed him.

Pushing back even the possibility of universal suffrage until 2017 means that whoever succeeds Mr. Tsang would probably be running for re-election and would have all the advantages of an incumbent.

Delaying action until 2017 also means that Beijing’s current leaders would leave the problem of how to handle Hong Kong to their successors, who will be chosen in 2012, because President Hu Jintao and Prime Minister Wen Jiabao are both expected to retire in early 2013.

The Chinese government’s timetable for democratic reform in Hong Kong follows a decision by the Standing Committee of the Chinese Parliament, the National People’s Congress, to reject universal suffrage there in 2012, a timetable that opinion polls suggested is favored by a majority of the people of Hong Kong.

The earliest voters would be entitled to elect the chief executive by popular vote is now 2017. They must wait until 2020 before possibly having the opportunity to vote for the entire 60-seat Legislative Council.

Currently, half of the council is elected by limited franchise from special interest groups; voters choose the other half from geographic constituencies.

The chief executive is chosen by an electoral college of 800 representatives, most of them loyal to Beijing.

Chinese officials also announced Saturday that if universal suffrage is introduced in 2017, only candidates nominated by a committee that would probably resemble the current electoral college would be allowed on the ballot.

This slow road to democracy was strongly criticized Saturday by local democratic parties.

In a joint statement, democrats called on the central government to “respect the wishes of Hong Kong people” and reverse the decision.

The United States and Britain also criticized the announcement.

“We believe they should have the opportunity to achieve their aspirations for democracy as soon as possible,” said Dale G. Kreisher, a spokesman for the American consulate.

David Miliband, the British foreign secretary, said, “Today’s announcement by the National People’s Congress that there will not be universal suffrage in the 2012 Hong Kong elections will be a disappointment for all those who want to see Hong Kong move to full democracy as soon as possible.”

But government officials in Hong Kong and Beijing said the decision finally gave Hong Kong the certainty of a timetable for achieving universal suffrage.

“The timetable for universal suffrage has been set,” Mr. Tsang said. “Hong Kong is entering a most important chapter in its constitutional history. We should try to apply fresh thinking to secure implementation of universal suffrage for the chief executive first in 2017, to be followed by that for the Legislative Council in 2020. We must treasure this hard-earned opportunity.”

Mr. Tsang and a senior congress official, Qiao Xiaoyang, justified the decision to wait another decade before introducing universal suffrage on the grounds of preserving stability of a community still divided over how and when to achieve full democracy.

Hong Kong still faces a long process of hard negotiation over how the new electoral system will work, and the proposed timetable could be derailed.

The democratic and pro-Beijing forces are deeply divided over many practical issues, including the rules governing a nominating committee that will select candidates for chief executive and how many of them will be able to run.

The ruling of the Standing Committee only states that direct elections “may be implemented” beginning in 2017.

It requires the existing system to remain in place unless Hong Kong’s legislature can agree by a two-thirds majority on any changes.

New election laws would also have to be approved by the chief executive and the congress.

The chairman of the Democratic Party, Albert Ho, said there was no guarantee democracy would be achieved according to the proposed timetable.

“This could be an empty goal,” he said on local radio.

Michael E. DeGolyer, a political analyst, said achieving progress toward democracy depended largely on the ability of Hong Kong politicians to agree on an electoral system.

He said the congress had simply given the chief executive the authority to propose an electoral system based on universal suffrage.

“It did not say you will present us a plan,” Mr. DeGolyer said. “It said you ‘may’ present us a plan. It might be something that Hong Kong people themselves decide not to do for some reason.”

Bhutto’s Son and Husband to Lead Party


Bhutto’s Son and Husband to Lead Party

LAHORE, Pakistan — Three days after the death of Benazir Bhutto, the Pakistan People’s Party on Sunday chose her 19-year-old son, Bilawal, and her husband, Asif Ali Zardari, as co-leaders of the party, the biggest and most potent in Pakistan.

During a meeting of the party executive in Naudero in the western province of Sindh, Ms. Bhutto’s will was read, and the new political line up, which follows the dynastic tradition started with her father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the party founder, follows her wishes, party officials said.

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, a tall and composed Oxford student, took the center chair at the news conference at the Bhutto family enclave as he read the announcement that the party would contest the coming election.

“The long and historic struggle for democracy will continue with renewed vigor,” he said. “My mother always said democracy was the best revenge.”

Ms. Bhutto’s husband, Mr. Zardari, said the party had passed a resolution that would be sent to the United Nations calling for an international inquiry into the circumstances of her death. He specified that the British government should help in the inquiry. He added the government did not accept the inquiries being conducted by the government of President Pervez Musharraf.

The decision to contest the election is seen as a pragmatic move to attract the massive sympathy vote that the party expects in the wake of Ms. Bhutto’s assassination. Some analysts said they believed the party could top the government party’s vote, and command a new parliament.

But the government indicated Sunday that the election, scheduled for Jan. 8, would likely be delayed, perhaps as much as four months, leaving vast uncertainties over the volatile political scene here.

The news conference was an emotional affair, dominated by Mr. Zardari, who spoke in Urdu, often in a voice of near rage. Mr. Zardari, known as Mr. Ten Percent during his reign as Minister for Investment during Ms. Bhutto’s second term as Prime Minister, was jailed in Pakistan for eight years on corruption charges. Mr. Zardari still faces corruption charges in Switzerland, his lawyer there said earlier this week.

On Sunday, he said the coming election would be a “war against the people in the government of Pakistan now.” It was not a war against the army, he added.

He was particularly tough on President Pervez Musharraf, calling his political party, a faction of the Pakistan Muslim League, the “Qatil” League.The word “Qatil” in Urdu means murderer.

When reporters began directing questions at his son, Mr. Zardari stepped in saying that Bilawal was still of a “tender” age, and that one question was enough. In answer to that question, Mr. Bhutto Zardari said he would return to run the party full time once he had completed his studies at Oxford.

Mr. Zardari urged the main opposition leader, Nawaz Sharif, who heads a faction of the Pakistan Muslim League and promised to boycott the election, to contest the election, too. Mr. Sharif is likely to follow the recommendation.

For the last several days, Mr. Sharif has gone out of his way to show conciliation towards the Bhutto clan, showing up at the hospital as soon as she was pronounced dead and then following up with a visit to her family compound to offer prayers after her burial.

Mr. Sharif said that together his party and the Pakistan Peoples Party party can make common cause against the Musharraf government.

As pressure increased on Pakistan to accept an international inquiry into Ms. Bhutto’s death, the team of doctors who frantically tried to revive her Thursday said they had requested an autopsy but were rebuffed by the chief of police in Rawalpindi, according to a member of the board of the hospital where she was treated.

The question of an autopsy has become central to the circumstances of Ms. Bhutto’s death because of conflicting versions put forward by the Pakistani government of how she died.

On the night Ms. Bhutto died, an unnamed Interior Ministry spokesman was quoted by the official Pakistani news agency as saying that the former prime minister had died of a “bullet wound in the neck by a suicide bomber.”

The next day, Javed Iqbal Cheema, the Interior Ministry spokesman, said at a news conference that Ms. Bhutto had died of a wound suffered when she hit her head on a lever attached to the sunroof of the vehicle that was carrying her through a crowd after a political rally. “Three shots were fired, but they missed her,” Mr. Cheema said. “Then there was an explosion.”

The explanation was greeted with disbelief by Ms. Bhutto’s supporters, ordinary Pakistanis and medical experts outside the government.

Pakistani and Western security experts said they believed the government’s insistence that Ms. Bhutto was not killed by a bullet was designed to deflect attention from the lack of government security around her vehicle as she left the park in the city where the Pakistani Army keeps its headquarters, and where the powerful Inter Services Intelligence agency has a strong presence, Pakistani and Western security experts said.

Dr. Mohammad Mussadiq Khan, the principal professor of surgery at the hospital, said on the night of her death that Ms. Bhutto had died of a bullet wound, according to the account of Athar Minallah, the board member of the Rawalpindi General Hospital.

Mr. Minallah released the medical report written by Dr. Khan and six other doctors together with an open letter supporting the doctors in their call for an autopsy.

The report did not mention a bullet because the actual cause of the head injury was left to the autopsy required under Pakistani law when a person dies under suspicious or criminal circumstances, Mr. Minallah said.

The report said the doctors had tried for 41 minutes to revive her. It said “the patient was pulseless and was not breathing” when she arrived at the hospital.

“A wound was present on the right temporoparietal region through which blood was trickling down, and whitish material which looked like brain matter was visible in the wound,” it said.

Although Mr. Cheema, the government spokesman, insisted that Ms. Bhutto did not die of a bullet wound, he also insisted that Baitullah Mehsud, a Pakistani militant linked to Al Qaeda, was responsible for her death. In short, his contention at his briefings was this: a gunman fired, but missed; a suicide bomber from Mr. Mehsud’s group then blew himself up, and as Ms. Bhutto ducked from the attack, she hit her head on a lever on the sunroof of her car.

An account of Ms. Bhutto’s death that did not involve a gunshot wound was the optimal explanation for the government, said Bruce Riedel, an expert on Pakistan at the Brookings Institution in Washington, and a former member of the National Security Council in the Clinton administration.

“If there is a gunshot wound the security was abysmal,” Ms. Riedel said. The government did not want to be exposed on its careless security approach, he said.

As the government’s explanation raised questions, new images of the gunman, dressed in a sleeveless black waistcoat and wearing rimless sunglasses, were splashed across the front pages of Pakistan’s Sunday papers.

The man with the gun who is seen opening fire on Ms. Bhutto just a few meters from her wore a short haircut similar to those of plainclothes intelligence officials. He is seen standing in front of a man whose head is covered in a shawl in the style of Pashtun men from the Pakistani tribal areas where Al Qaeda has strongholds. He is described in the newspaper, Dawn, as the suicide bomber who detonated a bomb after the shots were fired.

In the open letter that Mr. Minallah distributed along with the medical report to the Pakistani news media and to The New York Times, Mr. Minallah suggested the doctors felt they were being pressured by the government to back the theory that she had died by hitting her head on the lever of the car’s sunroof.

But the doctors had stressed to him that “without an autopsy it is not at all possible to determine as to what had caused the injury,” Mr. Minallah wrote in his open letter.

The chief of police in Rawalpindi, Aziz Saud, “did not agree” to the autopsy request by the doctors, Mr. Minallah added.

Saturday, December 29, 2007

Quebec City still clings to NHL dream



Quebec City still clings to NHL dream

12/28/2007 12:56:34 PM


Sitting in his grand baroque-style inn next to the golf course he built on a tract of farmland just southwest of Quebec City - both expensive, risky ventures that testify to his positive outlook - Stastny says the game belongs in Quebec's capital.

All the town needs is a proper professional rink and a billionaire backer - two key ingredients that aren't even on the horizon in the city of 700,000.

"Personally, I'm an eternal optimist," says Stastny, once the right winger on the Nordiques' famous trio of Stastny brothers.

Unlike brothers Peter and Anton, Marian Stastny has remained in Quebec, building a business and raising a family long after his hockey-playing days were over.

"I think a team will come here at some point," says Stastny. "But it will take some kind of crisis in the NHL for the team to return here."


That crisis, Stastny says, would entail several U.S. teams going broke simultaneously, an event that might force the NHL to retreat to hockey strongholds north of the border.

It would be a complete reversal of the financial troubles that drove teams from Quebec City and Winnipeg in the 1990s.

The Nordiques became the Colorado Avalanche in 1995 while the Winnipeg Jets moved to Phoenix one year later.

Neither team ever won a Stanley Cup in Canada, but the Nordiques won more playoff series and maintained one of the most intense rivalries in hockey history with the Montreal Canadiens.

The Avalanche did lift the cup in 1996, leaving many Nordiques fans bitter that the franchise had become so successful so soon after leaving the province.

Dormant NHL dreams sporadically spring to life in Winnipeg and Quebec City, as well as in Hamilton and other parts of southern Ontario.

In the past few years, financial troubles in Pittsburgh and Nashville brought brief spurts of hope to Canadian cities itching for a team.

In recent months, billionaire businessman Jim Balsillie tried - and failed - to wrestle the Nashville Predators into southern Ontario.

Manitoba Conservative Leader Hugh McFadyen lost his bid for provincial premiership in May after a desperate promise to bring back the Jets.

Many Manitoba pundits considered the pandering pledge the low point of the election campaign.

At least Winnipeg has a shiny new 15,000-seat arena, though it's a little small by NHL standards. The city also has a deep vein of nostalgia, making Jets T-shirts and ball caps the most prominent sellers at many Winnipeg gift shops.

Quebec City, a government town with a badly out-of-date arena, few corporate headquarters and no billionaires looking for expensive distractions, has even further to go, Stastny concedes.

A poll published in the fall showed barely half of Quebec City residents wanted the return of an NHL team.

Quebec City's mayor - who occupies a political post usually reserved for a town's chief cheerleader - is especially blunt about his city's NHL prospects.

"It's pointless, people get excited for no reason," said Regis Labeaume, who was elected Dec. 2 to replace the flamboyant Andree Boucher, who died unexpectedly of a heart attack.

"The problem in Quebec City isn't the building, a building we can organize. It's the $200 million to buy a franchise, it's television rights, it's selling corporate boxes.

"If a building was the problem, instead of these things, Winnipeg would already have a team."

Stastny sees other clouds on the immediate hockey horizon.

Quebec City will co-host the 2008 World Hockey Championships with Halifax this spring. The Quebec capital nearly lost the tournament when various levels of government balked at providing loan guarantees.

Local enthusiasm for the tournament, which will feature match-ups like an early tilt between Denmark and the Czech Republic, is not quite reaching a fever pitch.

"I'm a bit worried that the world championships will discourage people," Stastny said. "It's not a tradition in North America, it's almost secondary. In Europe, it's very important and people support it.

"Here, who knows."

Little-known Quebec City businessman Mark Charest maintains a website where he touts a return of the Nordiques. He emerged to spell out grand visions for $600-million sports installations, only to recede back into obscurity.

He couldn't be reached for an interview.

"I've seen it before, it's just another businessman with empty pockets trying to be important," Stastny said. "It takes someone with money, someone financially strong leading the parade.

"In the conditions of today, it takes $200 million to get a team," said Stastny, who still gets misty-eyed talking about the sport that brought him to Quebec from Slovakia, then part of Czechoslovakia, to play with his brothers in 1981.

"It would have been much easier to keep the team when it cost $14 million."

US Presidential Candidates on Pakistan

US Presidential Candidates on Pakistan


Ron Paul



Rudy Giuliani



John McCain



Mitt Romney



Mike Huckabee



Hillary Clinton



Barack Obama



Bill Richardson



Joe Biden



Various News Coverage on Bhutto and Pakistan




Various News Coverage on Bhutto and Pakistan


Hillary calls for investigation into Bhutto's assassination
(CNN)




Pakistan mourns Bhutto
(Aljazeera English)



Pakistan in turmoil after assassination of Bhutto
(theRealNews)



Movement for democracy not dead in Pakistan
(theRealNews)



Who killed Benazir Bhutto?
(Aljazeera English)

Calgary to be Canada's first trans fat-free city


Calgary to be Canada's first trans fat-free city

Updated Fri. Dec. 28 2007 9:06 PM ET

CTV.ca News Staff

Calgary is about to impose new health regulations on city restaurants, forcing them to severely limit the amount of trans fats in oils and sandwich spreads.

The new city-wide law to kick in on Jan. 1, 2008, will require that oils and spreads used in food preparation contain less than two per cent trans fats.

Calgary will be the first city in Canada to institute such health-conscious regulations. New York City became the first in North America to limit trans fats in July.

Dr. Brent Friesen, the city's chief medical officer, said the change will mean major health benefits for residents.

"With healthier choices we can see a reduction of somewhere between six and 22 per cent in cardiovascular disease," he said.

Restaurants will be given a five month grace period to institute the changes before risking health code violations and having their operating permits pulled.

Russ Dunn, owner of Calgary's Chicken on the Way, says the change will certainly cost restaurants, but that there's no reason to wait.

"About a year ago we switched from hydrogenated oil to trans fat free oil," he told CTV Calgary. He said he now spends 30 per cent more a month for trans fat free canola oil.

"It's more expensive to begin with, I guess it costs more to make it, plus they use it for fuel now, so it just went up again."

Of the over 400 restaurants surveyed by the Calgary Health Region, more than 80 per cent say they already comply with the cooking oil regulation, and more than 66 per cent say the already limit trans fats in the sandwich spreads.

Craig Sherer, the kitchen manager of Crush Restaurant, said customers won't notice a change once the new rules are instituted.

"The average person outside, I don't think they're going to notice it. So those people saying it's crucial to have this fry oil -- I don't think so," he said.

In 2009, a second phase of the law will take effect meaning all food products sold in Calgary stores must have less than five per cent trans fats.

In June, the federal government gave the food industry two years to reduce the amount of trans fats in their food.

Health Minister Tony Clement said they would monitor the trans fat levels in the interim.

On Dec. 20, he said some chains were making health-conscious changes while others seemed to make no effort.

With a report from CTV Calgary's Sneha Kulkarni

Friday, December 28, 2007

Bhutto assassination: Who stands to benefit?


Bhutto assassination: Who stands to benefit?

Joseph Brean, National Post Published: Friday, December 28, 2007



Before returning to Pakistan in October after almost a decade in exile, Benazir Bhutto wrote to President Pervez Musharraf, identifying several people she believed were actively trying to kill her, from Taliban warlords to Pakistani generals. Yesterday's attack suggests one or more were ultimately successful, but despite one claim of responsibility, the true identity of her killers remains a mystery. There are several suspects who stand to benefit, among them:

AL-QAEDA

Assassins with guns is not al-Qaeda's usual mode of assassination -- they prefer car bombs -- but as a Westernized secular woman, Ms. Bhutto was not Pakistan's usual politician. Her pledge to crack down on militants in the North-West Frontier Province was a direct challenge to al-Qaeda and its leaders, who are thought to be hiding there, and any further instability in Pakistan could only serve them well. After the failed suicide bombing attempt on her life in October, which killed 140 people, an al-Qaeda representative wrote to Ms. Bhutto threatening that she would be slaughtered "like a goat." And yesterday, honestly or otherwise, an al-Qaeda leader in Afghanistan posted a claim of responsibility to an Italian Web site, saying the killing was ordered by Ayman al Zawahri, Osama bin Laden's deputy, who took part in the assassination of President An-war Sadat of Egypt in 1981.

WAZIRI WARLORDS

Overt threats on Ms. Bhutto's life have been made by two warlords from the North-West Frontier Province, on the Afghan border. Baitullah Mehsud, a warlord who leads the fight against the Pakistani army in South Waziristan, and Haji Omar, chief of the Pakistani Taliban, both boast strong loyalty among veterans of the mujahedeen resistance against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan.

A TRAITOR

Given the proximity from which Ms. Bhutto was shot, speculation arose yesterday that the assassin must have had inside help in gaining access to her entourage, and was perhaps motivated by a dispute over the alleged powersharing deals that Ms. Bhutto was thought to have struck with either Mr. Musharraf or Nawaz Sharif.

NAWAZ SHARIF

It is unlikely that this former prime minister and head of the Pakistan Muslim League, who also recently returned from exile, would put a price on the head of his political opponent. But there is no love lost between the two party leaders.

PERVEZ MUSHARRAF

Pakistan's hardline President has earned a reputation for dismissing legislative assemblies, suppressing media and public dissent and declaring martial law to further his political goals. He has proven himself pragmatic and ruthless, but assassination might be a step too far even for him. Ms. Bhutto's supporters blame him for failing to ensure her safety, but Ms. Bhutto had reached a behind-the-scenes detente after he granted her amnesty on corruption charges and she stepped back from her demand that he resign. All of this suggests Mr. Musharraf had an eye to future powersharing, not murder.

THE MILITARY OR INTELLIGENCE SERVICES

Among the people Ms. Bhutto feared were plotting against her were Ijaz Shah, director general of Pakistan's intelligence agencies and a close ally of Mr. Musharraf. But her suspicions extended to all corners of the country's extensive spy and military networks, which remain deeply linked to the Musharraf government.

"I know exactly who wants to kill me. They are dignitaries of General Zia's former regime who are behind extremism and fanaticism," she told Paris-Match, referring to General Muhammed Zia-ul-Haq, military ruler of Pakistan from 1977 to 1988. It was Gen. Zia who deposed Ms. Bhutto's father in a 1977 coup and executed him two years later.

AN AD HOC CONSPIRACY

Ms. Bhutto has been targeted before, often by loose groups of financiers and functionaries. Notably, in the summer of 1993, shortly after he bombed the World Trade Center in New York, jihadi terrorist Ramzi Yousef travelled to her hometown of Karachi and tried to plant a bomb. It detonated early, scuppering the plot, but proving Ms. Bhutto has enemies at all levels in Pakistan.

PAKISTAN PEOPLE'S PARTY:

Founded by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto in 1967; headed by Benazir Bhutto as "Life chairperson."

Founding principles Seeks the establishment of an egalitarian democracy and the application of socialistic ideas to promote economic and social justice. Opposition to military rule. Supported land reform to help peasant workers; nationalization of industries and administrative reforms to reduce bureaucratic power.

The party creed "Islam is our faith; democracy is our politics; socialism is our economy; all power to the people."

History Founded largely as a vehicle for the political ambitions of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, its manifesto emphasized nationalization of banks, industries, insurance companies, schools and colleges. Sought to combine moderate Islam with socialist values to appeal to as broad a constituency as possible. A well-organized populist party, it won elections in 1970, 1977, 1988 and 1997 but has often been accused of autocratic rule and corruption and subject to repression by a succession of military rulers. After Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's execution in 1979, the party was headed by his widow, Nusrat, and daughter. Benazir Bhutto twice served as prime minister but was ousted both times and since 1997 the PPP has been an opposition movement headed by Ms. Bhutto in exile. She returned this year to reorganzie the party and campaign for the restoration of democratic rule.

Source: Encyclopedia of Modern Asia; Time; Wikipedia

BACK STORY:

DEATH RUNS IN THE FAMILY

ZULFIKAR ALI BHUTTO

Hanged on April 5, 1979, after being convicted of conspiracy in murder of rival Ahmed Raza Kasuri. Execution went ahead after military ruler General Muhammed Zia ul-Haq refused international appeals to commute the sentence. Gen. Zia was promoted by Bhutto over more senior generals, but declared a state of emergency and twice had Bhutto arrested before putting him on trial. Neither his wife Nusrat or daughter Benazir were allowed to attend his funeral.

---

SHAHNAWAZ BHUTTO

Youngest of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's four children, found dead at age 27 in his home in Cannes, France, in July, 1985. Death was attributed to drug abuse but family claimed he was poisoned. Shahnawaz had campaigned with his brother Murtaza to prevent their father's execution, and later organized resistance to Zia's rule. The brothers were convicted in absentia for involvement in a 1981 hijacking in which a Pakistani diplomat was killed.

---

MURTAZA BHUTTO

Shot to death at age 42 by police during an encounter at his home in Karachi in 1996, while his sister Benazir was prime minister. Murtaza became increasingly radical after the death of his father and founding of the Al-Zulfikar Organization with his brother. Elected to the Sindh assembly in 1993, he accused his sister of corruption and led a breakaway faction of the party their father founded. Critics accused her of complicity in his death.

---

BENAZIR BHUTTO

Shot by a suicide bomber in Rawalpindi, Dec. 27, 2007.

Source: National Post


**************

Report: Pakistan blames Bhutto's death on al-Qaeda linked group



  • Story Highlights
  • NEW: Suicide bomber part of group with ties to al Qaeda, TV report says
  • NEW: No sign militant group has claimed responsibility for Benazir Bhutto's death
  • State-run news agency in Pakistan reports al Qaeda has claimed responsibility
  • In e-mail, Bhutto critical of President Pervez Musharraf for inadequate protection


ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (CNN -- The Pakistani Interior Ministry said Friday the suicide bomber who killed Benazir Bhutto has been identified as belonging to a militant group with links to al Qaeda, Pakistan's GEO TV reported.

art.al-zawahiri.afp.gi.jpg

An Italian news agency says al Qaeda's Ayman al-Zawahiri began planning the Pakistan killing in October.


The ministry said the attacker was with Lashkar-e-Jhangvi -- a Sunni Muslim militant group that the Pakistani government has blamed for hundreds of killings -- according to the report.

There was no sign the group has claimed responsibility for the attack on the Pakistan opposition leader.

The U.S. State Department lists Lashkar-e-Jhangvi as a terrorist organization and said it had links to the Taliban. Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf banned the group in 2001.

"In January 1999, the group attempted to assassinate former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif," the State Department Web site says.

Also Friday, a report by the state-run news agency Associated Press of Pakistan said al Qaeda had claimed responsibility for the attack in a statement.

The agency quoted Interior Ministry spokesman Brig. Javed Iqbal Cheema as saying, "Al Qaeda in a statement has accepted the responsibility of her assassination, as in the past she had been receiving life threats from this terrorist group."


No one has accepted responsibility for Bhutto's death on radical Islamist Web sites that regularly post such messages from al Qaeda and other militant groups.

CNN could not independently confirm that al Qaeda has claimed responsibility.

On Thursday, the FBI and Department of Homeland Security issued a bulletin citing an alleged claim of responsibility by the terror network for Bhutto's death, a DHS official said.

But FBI and other law enforcement officials said that the claim is unsubstantiated and that federal officials are not making any comments about its validity.

Bhutto, 54, was killed Thursday in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, by flying shrapnel stemming from a suicide bombing, the Pakistani government said.

Italian news agency Adnkronos International apparently was the source of the al Qaeda claim, saying the terror network's Afghan commander and spokesman Mustafa Abu Al-Yazid had telephoned the agency with it.

"We terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat [the] mujahedeen," the Italian news agency quoted Al-Yazid as saying.

The agency said that al Qaeda's No. 2 official, Ayman al-Zawahiri, set the wheels in motion for Bhutto's assassination in October.

One Islamist Web site repeated the assertion, but experts in the field don't consider the site to be a reliable source for Islamist messages.

The DHS official said the claim was "an unconfirmed open source claim of responsibility" and the bulletin was sent out at about 6 p.m. Thursday to state and local law enforcement agencies.

The official characterized the bulletin as "information sharing."

FBI spokesman Richard Kolko said the validity of such a claim is "undetermined." Kolko said the FBI and the intelligence community is reviewing it "for any intelligence value."

Ross Feinstein, spokesman for Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell, said the U.S. intelligence community is monitoring the situation and trying to figure out who is responsible for the assassination.

"We are not in a position to confirm who may be responsible," Feinstein said.

Bhutto had been critical of what she believed was a lack of effort by Musharraf's government to protect her.

About a week after an October 18 car-bomb attack on her motorcade in Karachi, Pakistan, Bhutto sent an an e-mail to Mark Siegel, her U.S. spokesman, lobbyist and longtime friend.

Siegel forwarded the message to CNN's Wolf Blitzer with instructions not to report on it unless Bhutto was killed.

In the e-mail, Bhutto said Musharraf should bear some of the blame if anything were to happen to her.

"I have been made to feel insecure by his minions and there is no way what is happening in terms of stopping me from taking private cars or using tinted windows or giving jammers or four police mobiles to cover all sides cld happen without him," she said in the e-mail.

Musharraf, after an emergency meeting of his top officials Thursday, told his nation the attack was "the work of those very same people with whom we are waging a war. Pakistan's biggest threat comes from these terrorists."

"We will not sit in peace until we finish off these insurgents and terrorists, until we get rid of them from their very roots because in this is Pakistan's success and health," he said. "Otherwise, this is the biggest obstacle in our quest for peace.

*************

Pakistan: Fractured skull killed Bhutto


  • Story Highlights
  • Benazir Bhutto died after hitting head on car's sunroof, Pakistan government says
  • Former prime minister earlier said to have died from bomb shrapnel or bullets
  • NEW: Pakistan People's Party official says government explanations are "pack of lies"
  • U.S. official names Taliban leader as suspected plotter


ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (CNN) -- Benazir Bhutto died from a fractured skull caused by hitting her head on part of her car's sunroof as a bomb ripped through a crowd of her supporters, a spokesman for Pakistan's Interior Ministry said Friday.

art.bhuttofuneral.jpg

Asif Ali Zardari, in white cap on left, helps carry the coffin of his wife Benazir Bhutto during Friday's burial.


"When she was thrown by the force of the shockwave of the explosion, unfortunately one of the levers of the sunroof hit her," said spokesman Brigadier Javed Iqbal Cheema.

The explanation is the latest from the Interior Ministry. It initially said Bhutto was killed by shots fired by the bomber, and then, via the state-run Associated Press of Pakistan, it said the cause of death was a shrapnel injury.

But Farzana Raja of Bhutto's Pakistan People's Party told CNN the government's explanation is "a pack of lies," she told CNN. Raja also accused the government of a "total security lapse."

At a news conference, Cheema showed images of Bhutto in a car, standing up through an open sunroof, looking out at the crowd as she was about to be driven away.

When the gunshots rang out and the explosion occurred, Bhutto "fell down or perhaps ducked" and apparently hit her head on a lever, Cheema said, adding that the lever was stained with blood.

The blast killed at least 28 more people and at least 100 were wounded.

The Interior Ministry also revealed Friday that it had proof showing that al Qaeda was behind Bhutto's assassination.

Cheema said the government had an intelligence intercept in which an al Qaeda militant "congratulated his people for carrying out this cowardly act."

However, that claim has not appeared on radical Islamist Web sites that regularly post such messages from al Qaeda and other militant groups.

The Interior Ministry told Pakistan's GEO-TV that the suicide bomber belonged to Lashkar-e-Jhangvi -- an al Qaeda-linked Sunni Muslim militant group that the government has blamed for hundreds of killings.

U.S. officials believe that a Taliban leader, Baitullah Mahsud, may be the person behind the assassination.

Bhutto was laid to rest in a chaotic funeral at her ancestral home of Garhi-Khuda Baksh on Friday after violent scenes erupted across Pakistan following her death a day earlier.

Hundreds of thousands of people in the surrounding streets almost brought the procession to a standstill before it finally reached the Bhutto family's mausoleum.

The throngs of her grieving supporters crushed up against the flag-draped coffin, while minor scuffles also broke out.

Violence erupted in Pakistan in the hours before Bhutto's funeral started, with at least nine people reported killed and banks, train stations and cars torched.

Bhutto's body arrived in the hours before dawn at Garhi-Khuda Baksh after a long journey by plane, helicopter and ambulance.

The opposition leader's family -- her husband Asif Ali Zardari and three children -- accompanied the body aboard a Pakistani Air Force C-130 transport plane to Sukkor but traveled by bus from there to Larkana and on to Garhi-Khuda Baksh.

Another former prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, told CNN on Friday that he had planned to attend Bhutto's funeral, but was advised not to by Zardari, who cited security concerns.


The prime minister's office has launched a judicial inquiry and the Ministry of the Interior is setting up a police inquiry, according to Information Minister Nisar Memon.

Memon said no decision had been made to postpone parliamentary elections scheduled for January 8.

Bhutto, who was campaigning for the elections, had completed an election rally and was leaving the rally site, Rawalpindi's Liaquat Bagh Park, at the time of the attack.

Her father and former prime minister, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, was hanged in the same northern city in 1979.

As a shocked Pakistan absorbed the news of Bhutto's death, authorities called for calm and asked residents to stay inside.

In Sindh province, where Karachi is located, police said demonstrators had burned a dozen banks, set two train stations on fire, along with three trains. Since Thursday, 240 vehicles have been burned.

Because of the violence, paramilitary forces in Sindh were told to "shoot on sight" anyone causing civil disturbances, a spokesman for the Pakistan Rangers said.

But by Friday morning, Pakistani media reported an uneasy calm had spread across the shaken country, now marking a three-day period of mourning declared by President Pervez Musharraf.

Bhutto led Pakistan from 1988-1990 and 1993-96, but both times the sitting president dismissed her amid corruption allegations. She was the first female prime minister of any Islamic nation.

A terror attack targeting her motorcade in Karachi in October killed 136 people on the day she returned to Pakistan after eight years of self-imposed exile.

Bhutto had been critical of what she believed was a lack of effort by President Musharraf's government to protect her.

Thursday, December 27, 2007

World condemns Benazir Bhutto's murder

World condemns Benazir Bhutto's murder



Update: Canadian Position:

In Canada, Prime Minister Stephen Harper called the assassination a threat to democracy. He said the Jan. 8 election is important to democracy and urged Musharraf to let it go ahead.

Harper also said he’s concerned about increased instability in the region. Canadian troops are deployed in neighbouring Afghanistan as part of a NATO force supporting the Afghan government.

Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier condemned “in the strongest terms this attack ... Today’s violence is especially heinous in view of the upcoming elections on Jan. 8, 2008. The anti-democratic intent of the perpetrators could not be more obvious,”

http://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/288947


********


From Israel to Washington to New Delhi and points in between, dismay and condemnation poured forth Thursday over the assassination of Pakistani opposition leader Benazir Bhutto, along with concern for the stability of the volatile region. World leaders lauded her bravery and commitment to democratic reform.

President Shimon Peres said he was shocked by Bhutto's death.

"Benazir Bhutto was a brave woman, who did not hide her opinions, did not know fear and served her people with courage and rare capability," Peres said in statement.

"I had the privilege to meet her on several occasions, during which she expressed interest in Israel and said that she hoped to visit upon returning to power. Benazir was a charismatic leader and a fighter for peace in her country and across the world," said the president.


In India, which has fought three wars against Pakistan, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said Bhutto is irreplaceable, and noted she had striven to improve relations between the two nuclear-armed countries.

"I was deeply shocked and horrified to hear of the heinous assassination," Singh said. "In her death, the subcontinent has lost an outstanding leader who worked for democracy and reconciliation in her country."

Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai, who met Bhutto earlier on Thursday in Islamabad, said he was "deeply pained" by the assassination of "this brave sister of ours, a brave daughter of the Muslim world."

"She sacrificed her life, for the sake of Pakistan and for the sake of this region," he said. "I found in her this morning a lot of love and desire for peace in Afghanistan, for prosperity in Afghanistan and ... Pakistan."

In a letter to Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, French President Nicolas Sarkozy called the attack an "odious act" and said "terrorism and violence have no place in the democratic debate and the combat of ideas and programs."

Bhutto, a former two-time prime minister of Pakistan, was killed in a suicide attack in Rawalpindi just 10 weeks after she returned to her homeland from eight years in exile. A suicide attack on her homecoming parade killed more than 140 people. The articulate, poised 54-year-old had lashed out at the spread of Islamic extremism as she campaigned for next month's parliamentary elections.

The United States had been at the forefront of foreign powers trying to arrange reconciliation between Bhutto and Musharraf, who under heavy US pressure resigned as army chief and earlier this month lifted a state of emergency, in the hope it would put Pakistan back on the road to democracy.

President Bush demanded that the killers be brought to justice.

"The United States strongly condemns this cowardly act by murderous extremists who are trying to undermine Pakistan's democracy," he said. He expressed his deepest condolences to Bhutto's family and to the families of others slain in the attack and to all the people of Pakistan.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon also called for the perpetrators to be brought to justice and for "all Pakistanis to work together for peace and national unity."

The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said Pope Benedict XVI was immediately informed of the "terrible news."

"One cannot see signs of peace in this tormented region," Lombardi said.

Sarkozy said Bhutto had paid "with her life her commitment to the service of her fellow citizens and to Pakistan's political life" and urged Pakistan's elections be held as scheduled on Jan. 8.

In Britain, where Bhutto had attended Oxford University, Prime Minister Gordon Brown said she "risked everything in her attempt to win democracy in Pakistan and she has been assassinated by cowards who are afraid of democracy."

"The terrorists must not be allowed to kill democracy in Pakistan, and this atrocity strengthens our resolve that the terrorists will not win there, here, or anywhere in the world," Brown said.

EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana said the attack "is clearly aimed at destabilizing the country." He beseeched Pakistanis to refrain from violence.

Italian Premier Romano Prodi said he was filled with grief and called Bhutto "a woman who chose to fight her battle until the end with a single weapon - the one of dialogue and political debate."

"The difficult path toward peace and democracy in that region must not be stopped, and Bhutto's sacrifice will serve as the strongest example for those who do not surrender to terrorism," Prodi said.

Chilean President Michelle Bachelet, during a speech south of Santiago, paid "sincere tribute to a woman ... who fought her entire life for a better Pakistan."

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said the "cowardly terrorist attack ... also targets the stability and democratic process of Pakistan."

In Moscow, Anatoly Safonov, Russian President Vladmir Putin's envoy on international cooperation against terrorism, expressed fears the assassination would trigger violent repercussions.

"The already unstable situation in Pakistan will be further exacerbated by this powerful factor," Safonov said, according to the Interfax news agency.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin condemned the attack, the RIA-Novosti news agency reported.

"We hope that the leadership of Pakistan will succeed in taking all measures for guaranteeing security in the country," Kamynin said.

French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, who personally knew Bhutto, said he hails her memory and called on the international community to support Pakistan and its democracy.

Sweden's Foreign Minister Carl Bildt said he had felt disgust when receiving the news of Bhutto's murder, which he called "bestial."

"I feel a strong worry for the consequences this will have for Pakistan," he said.

************

Pakistan

An assassin strikes

Dec 27th 2007
From Economist.com

The assassination of Benazir Bhutto, Pakistan’s main opposition leader, carries terrible risks


Reuters

HORRIFYING millions of frightened Pakistanis, Benazir Bhutto, the leader of the country’s biggest political party, was assassinated on Thursday December 27th. Her attacker fired gunshots into her car as she was leaving a political rally in Rawalpindi, then exploded a suicide bomb. At least 15 of Miss Bhutto’s followers were also killed.

Miss Bhutto had been campaigning in Rawalpindi, the headquarters of Pakistan’s military elite, for an election set for January 8th. It may now be postponed. Pervez Musharraf, the country’s recently demobbed president, has convened crisis talks to discuss this latest, and potentially most grievous, example of instability in Pakistan. Supporters of Miss Bhutto’s Pakistan People’s Party (PPP)—which had expected to win the election—were meanwhile reported to be gathering in angry protests across the country.

Even before Miss Bhutto’s murder, the election campaign had been bedevilled by political conflict and terrorism. The role of each of its main actors—including Miss Bhutto and Mr Musharraf—has been contested in the courts and on the streets, against a backdrop of worsening insurgency and Islamist terrorism.

Miss Bhutto had returned to Pakistan in October to lead her party, after an eight-year self-imposed exile. The event was marked by a suicide bomb attack on her homecoming parade in Karachi, which killed over 140 people. Islamists terrorists, fighting an insurgency in north-western Pakistan, had previously threatened to kill Miss Bhutto. They are probably behind her murder.

A discredited former prime minister, accused of massive corruption, Miss Bhutto had won grudging praise from many Pakistanis for her courage in defying the terrorists’ threat. For her devoted supporters—including a large majority in southern Pakistan—this confirmed Miss Bhutto as the country’s rightful ruler. She was the last surviving offspring of a revered former prime minister, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. He was hanged by a previous army ruler.

In her final political address—a few minutes before her death—Miss Bhutto alluded to the risk she was running. She said: “I put my life in danger and came here because I feel this country is in danger. People are worried. We will bring the country out of this crisis.”

In fact, Miss Bhutto’s party was not expected to win an outright majority in the election. But, under her leadership, it was likely to emerge as the biggest party in the poll. If so, Miss Bhutto would have expected to play a leading role in a coalition government, perhaps as prime minister for an unprecedented third term.

Despite the previous violence, and expectations that Mr Musharraf would rig the election, the poll had generated fragile hopes in Pakistan. After all, largely in response to popular demand—and certainly against his wish—the election campaign has seen Mr Musharraf rebrand himself as a civilian ruler. Many Pakistanis hoped that even a flawed election next month would be better than the sham democracy he had overseen for eight years as president in a general’s uniform.

These hopes have now been dashed. Despite her failings, Miss Bhutto was the unrivalled leader of Pakistan’s biggest and most secular party—an astonishingly resilient survivor of on-off military rule. It was thus that America and other western powers urged Mr Musharraf first to encourage Miss Bhutto back from exile, then to share power with her. And indeed that had looked likely, until her violent homecoming. Miss Bhutto blamed senior army officers with Jihadist sympathies for that attack.

Alas, her supporters are now likely to blame her killing on the same shadowy army elite. And with stronger possible justification: Miss Bhutto’s killer is alleged to have approached to within 20 yards of her car, carrying a gun, dressed in a police uniform. At the least, such a lapse in the security afforded to Mr Musharraf and his supporters would be unimaginable.

At a time of shock and mourning—in a country well-accustomed to both—new uncertainties weight heavily in Pakistan. One concerns the future of the PPP, which may not survive without a Bhutto at the helm. Without the PPP, or something much like it, Pakistan may have no easily imaginable secular and democratic future.

As news of Miss Bhutto’s slaying spread, Nawaz Sharif, another former prime minister, who leads the second opposition party, called for solidarity: “My heart is bleeding and I’m as grieved as you are.”

Most Canadians to pay less tax in 2008: Group


Most Canadians to pay less tax in 2008: Group
Dec 27, 2007 12:31 PM
THE CANADIAN PRESS

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation says tax cuts announced by governments this year will mean savings for most families.

The group that advocates for lower taxes says federal changes brought in in October mean individuals with an income of $45,000 will get about $223 back in retroactive savings when they file their 2007 tax return. For a two-income family, the savings double.

The amount for individuals rises to $272 when the 2008 changes come into effect.

As well, the typical household will save between $150 to $200 annually from the reduction in the GST to five per cent from six per cent that goes into effect on Jan. 1.

Families will save even more, thanks to a new child credit worth $300 per child and a higher spousal exemption.

Most of the savings come from Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's Oct. 30 mini-budget, which reduced the bottom income tax rate to 15 per cent from 15.5 per cent, retroactive to Jan. 1, 2007, and increases the basic exemption to $9,600 from $8,929.

In addition, the taxpayers federation said three provinces – Quebec, British Columbia and Newfoundland – have cut taxes, meaning households there will realize even greater savings.

The exception is New Brunswick, where provincial tax increases mean individuals earning more than $52,700 will wind up paying more tax.

Breaking News: Bhutto Assassinated in Attack on Rally



Breaking News: Bhutto Assassinated in Attack on Rally

RAWALPINDI, Islamabad — An attack on a political rally killed the Pakistani opposition leader Benazir Bhutto near the capital, Islamabad, Thursday. Witnesses said Ms. Bhutto was fired upon before the blast, and an official from her party said Ms. Bhutto was further injured by the explosion, which was apparently caused by a suicide attacker.

At least a dozen more people were killed. “At 6:16 p.m. she expired,” said Wasif Ali Khan, a member of Ms. Bhutto’s party who was at Rawalpindi General Hospital where she was taken after the attack, according to The Associated Press.

Hundreds of supporters had gathered at the rally, which was being held at Liaqut Bagh, a park that is a common venue for political rallies and speeches, in Rawalpindi, the garrison city adjacent to the capital.

Amid the confusion after the explosion, the site was littered with pools of blood. Shoes and caps of party workers were lying on the asphalt, and shards of glass were strewn about the ground.

Farah Ispahani, a party official from Ms. Bhutto’s party, said: “It is too soon to confirm the number of dead from the party’s side. Private television channels are reporting 20 dead.” Television channels were also quoting police sources as saying that at least 14 people were dead.

The attack immediately raised questions about whether parliamentary elections scheduled for January will go ahead or be postponed.

Ms. Bhutto was the target of a suicide attack in October in Karachi when she returned from exile to Pakistan. That attack, caused by two bombs exploding just seconds apart, narrowly missed Ms. Bhutto but killed scores of people, including many of her party workers.

The attack is the latest blow to Pakistan’s treacherous political situation. state of emergency

Ms. Bhutto, 54, returned to Pakistan to present herself as the answer to the nation’s troubles: a tribune of democracy in a state that has been under military rule for eight years, and the leader of the country’s largest opposition political party, founded by her father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, one of Pakistan’s most flamboyant and democratically inclined prime ministers.

But her record in power, and the dance of veils she has deftly performed since her return -- one moment standing up to General Musharraf, then next seeming to accommodate him, and never quite revealing her actual intentions -- has stirred as much distrust as hope among Pakistanis.

A graduate of Harvard and Oxford, she brought the backing of Washington and London, where she impresses with her political lineage, her considerable charm and her persona as a female Muslim leader.

But with these accomplishments, Ms. Bhutto also brought controversy, and a legacy among Pakistanis as a polarizing figure who during her two turbulent tenures as prime minister, first from 1988 to 1990 and again from 1993 to 1996, often acted imperiously and impulsively.

She faced deep questions about her personal probity in public office, which led to corruption cases against her in Switzerland, Spain and Britain, as well as in Pakistan.

Ms. Bhutto saw herself as the inheritor of her father’s mantle, often spoke of how he encouraged her to study the lives of legendary female leaders ranging from Indira Gandhi to Joan of Arc.

Following the idea of big ambition, Ms. Bhutto called herself chairperson for life of the opposition Pakistan Peoples Party, a seemingly odd title in an organization based on democratic ideals and one she has acknowledged quarreling over with her mother, Nusrat Bhutto, in the early 1990s.

Saturday night at the diplomatic reception, Ms. Bhutto showed how she could aggrandize. Three million people came out to greet her in Karachi on her return last month, she said, calling it Pakistan’s ”most historic” rally. In fact, crowd estimates were closer to 200,000, many of them provincial party members who had received small amounts of money to make the trip.

Such flourishes led questioning in Pakistan about the strength of her democratic ideals in practice, and a certain distrust, particularly amid signs of back-room deal-making with General Musharraf, the military ruler she opposed.

“She believes she is the chosen one, that she is the daughter of Bhutto and everything else is secondary,” said Feisal Naqvi, a corporate lawyer in Lahore who knew Ms. Bhutto.

When Ms. Bhutto was re-elected to a second term as Prime Minister, her style of government combined both the traditional and the modern, said Zafar Rathore, a senior civil servant at the time.

As secretary of interior, responsible for the Pakistani police force, Mr. Rathore, who is now retired, said he tried to get an appointment with Ms. Bhutto to explain the need for accountability in the force. He was always rebuffed, he said.

Finally, when he was seated next to her in a small meeting, he said to her, “I’ve been waiting to see you,” he recounted. “Instantaneously, she said: ‘I am very busy, what do you want. I’ll order it right now.’ ”

She could not understand that a civil servant might want to talk about policies, he said. Instead, he said, ”she understood that when all civil servants have access to the sovereign, they want to ask for something.”

But until her death, Ms. Bhutto ruled the party with an iron hand, jealously guarding her position, even while leading the party in absentia for nearly a decade.

Members of her party saluted her return to Pakistan, saying she was the best choice against General Musharraf. Chief among her attributes, they said, was sheer determination.

Ms. Bhutto’s marriage to Asif Ali Zardari was arranged by her mother, a fact that Ms. Bhutto has often said was easily explained, even for a modern, highly educated Pakistani woman.

To be acceptable to the Pakistani public as a politician she could not be a single woman, and what was the difference, she would ask, between such a marriage and computer dating?

Mr. Zardari is known for his love of polo and other perquisites of the good life like fine clothes, expensive restaurants, homes in Dubai and London, and an apartment in New York.

He was minister of investment in Ms. Bhutto’s second government. And it was from that perch that he made many of the deals that haunted Ms. Bhutto, and himself, in the courts.

There were accusations that the couple had illegally taken $1.5 billion from the state. It is a figure that Ms. Bhutto has vigorously contested.

Indeed, one of Ms. Bhutto’s main objectives in seeking to return to power was to restore the reputation of her husband, who was jailed for eight years in Pakistan, said Abdullah Riar, a former senator in the Pakistani Parliament and a former colleague of Ms. Bhutto’s.

“She told me, ‘Time will prove he is the Nelson Mandela of Pakistan,’ ” Mr. Riar said.

Tuesday, December 25, 2007

Merry Christmas & Happy Holidays!!!




Merry Christmas & Happy Holidays!!!


Queen and Pope Christmas Address


Queen and Pope Christmas Address





Pope Speaks of Solace for ‘Tortured Regions’


L'Osservatore Romano, HO via Associated Press

Benedict delivered his traditional “Urbi et Orbi” address from the central balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica.

Published: December 25, 2007
Alessandro Bianchi/Reuters via the Vatican

Benedict delivered his traditional “Urbi et Orbi” address from the central balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica at the Vatican on Tuesday.

VATICAN CITY (AP) -- Pope Benedict XVI issued a Christmas Day appeal Tuesday to political leaders around the globe to find the ''wisdom and courage'' to end bloody conflicts in Darfur, Iraq, Afghanistan and Congo.

Benedict delivered his traditional ''Urbi et Orbi'' speech -- Latin for ''to the city and to the world'' -- from the central balcony of St. Peter's Basilica, blessing thousands of people gathered in the square below under a brilliant winter sun.

Wearing gold-embroidered vestments and a bejeweled bishops' hat, or miter, Benedict urged the crowd to rejoice over the celebration of Jesus Christ's birth, which he said he hoped would bring consolation to all people ''who live in the darkness of poverty, injustice and war.''

He mentioned in particular those living in the ''tortured regions'' of Darfur, Somalia, northern Congo, the Eritrea-Ethiopia border, Iraq, Lebanon, Israel and the Palestinian territories, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and the Balkans.

''May the child Jesus bring relief to those who are suffering and may he bestow upon political leaders the wisdom and courage to seek and find humane, just and lasting solutions,'' he said.

Beyond those conflicts, Benedict said he was turning his thoughts this Christmas to victims of other injustices, citing women, children and the elderly, as well as refugees and victims of environmental disasters and religious and ethnic tensions.

He said he hoped Christmas would bring consolation to ''those who are still denied their legitimate aspirations for a more secure existence, for health, education, stable employment, for fuller participation in civil and political responsibilities, free from oppression and protected from conditions that offend human dignity.''

Such injustices and discrimination are destroying the internal fabric of many countries and souring international relations, he said.

In a nod to his engagement with environmental concerns, the pontiff also noted that the number of migrants and displaced people was increasing around the globe because of ''frequent natural disasters, often caused by environmental upheavals.''

The pontiff delivered his message just hours after celebrating Midnight Mass in St. Peter's Basilica.

Benedict followed his speech with his traditional Christmas Day greetings -- this year delivered in 63 different languages, including Mongolian, Finnish, Arabic, Hebrew, Swahili, Burmese, and in a new entry for 2007, Guarani, a South American Indian language.

As he finished, the bells of St. Peter's tolled and the Vatican's brightly outfitted Swiss Guards stood at attention as a band played and a crowd numbering in the tens of thousands waved national flags and cheered.

Monday, December 24, 2007

Merry Christmas from the Ontario PC Caucus

Merry Christmas from the Ontario PC Caucus



Saturday, December 22, 2007

Merry Christmas from American Presidential Candidates

Merry Christmas from American Presidential Candidates




























Christmas Greetings from Prime Minister Harper

Christmas Greetings from Prime Minister Harper



New levies proposed for iPods and memory cards




New levies proposed for iPods and memory cards

Updated Sat. Dec. 22 2007 8:52 AM ET

CTV.ca News Staff

Consumers could potentially be hit by a new tax on electronic storage devices such as iPods and blank memory cards in 2008.

The federal Copyright Board has given its approval for a special levy on iPods and other digital players because they can be used to copy movies and music.

The Canadian Private Copying Collective, the non-profit agency that represents the music industry, wants to make sure that artists get compensated.

Small tariffs are currently in place for such items as rewritable CDs and cassettes. The CPCC first requested a levy on removable electronic memory in its 2003-2004 tariff proposal.

The Copyright Board initially concluded that there was insufficient evidence to warrant a new tax; however, the CPCC noted the growing popularity of digital memory devices is cause for concern. A hearing in April will reexamine the proposed levies.

"Our surveys show the vast majority of copies that people put on their iPods come from sources other than legitimatly purchased copies," said David Basskin, the Director of the CPCC.

According to a CPCC media release, "During the period from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006, 25 per cent of all the content copied onto electronic memory cards, including cards of all formats and capacities, was music, and 14 per cent of respondents copied only music."

The proposed levies range in price including:

  • 85 cents for rewritable CDs and MiniDisc
  • $2 for 1 GB removable electronic memory cards
  • $25 for a digital audio recorder between 1 and 10 GBs
  • $75 for digital audio recorder of more than 30 GBs

Don Butcher, the Canadian Library Association's executive director, says the CLA is concerned over the proposed levies because they assume illegal behaviour on the part of consumers.

"It's almost de facto criminalizing all Canadians. We just don't think that's right. The whole issue of those tariffs on blank media makes an assumption we think is a faulty assumption," he said.

"We don't think Canadians are out there deliberately infringing on people's copy right. We think that in fact Canadians are law-abiding."

John Williamson of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation says the measures may be counterproductive.

"Normally, you do the crime and then you do the time. In this case the government is going to hit us first so people will asume it's OK to download music without paying for it," Williamson said.

The surcharge won't come into effect immediately. Retailers are fighting the tax in court, saying the Copyright Board has no right to impose an extra fee on top of the price of iPods and other audio players.

Libraries concerned about new legislation

Meanwhile, the CLA says pending copyright legislation is unbalanced and does not reflect the concerns of some 21 million library users and registered librarians across Canada.

Butcher said that in recent weeks thousands of troubled Canadians have voiced their concerns over proposed legislative reforms to the Copyright Act.

"Whether it is through library blogs, Facebook groups, or at the library front desks, we are getting the message that Canadians want a fair and balanced copyright approach," he said.

"Just one simple Facebook group on copyright gained 30,000 members in a few short weeks with another Canadian joining the group every 30 seconds. There have been public rallies in Calgary and Toronto. The government needs to listen to average Canadians."

The new legislative reforms will likely meet the demands of the Canadian Recording Industry Association by making it illegal to download or share songs on the internet without paying a fee.

Amendments would also apply to the circumvention of technologies that protect against infringement and "persons who, for infringing purposes, enable or facilitate circumvention or who, without authorization, distribute copyright material."

The CLA says these amendments make the same mistakes as the American Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

"American law makes no differentiation in penalty between a counterfeiter circumventing technical protection measures for illegal profit and an individual circumventing technical protection measures to make a single copy," a release from CLA said Friday.

The reforms to the Canadian Copyright Act were promised by the Harper government in the Speech to the Throne.

The new legislation was to be tabled earlier this month; however, the government failed to do so before Parliament took a break for the holidays.

The CLA's main point of contention hinges on user rights to access information as outlined in the 2004 Supreme Court of Canada judgment in CCH Canada Ltd. v. The Law Society of Upper Canada.

The law society was sued for providing a request-based photocopy service for its members. The high court ruled that single copies made by the library did not infringe on copyrights.

"Our challenge is with the Hollywood lobbyists and the recording industry who are trying to take rights away from ordinary Canadians," Butcher told CTV.ca on Friday.

The CLA would like to see the government address illegal behaviour rather than trying to catch up with ever-evolving digital technologies.

"It comes back to intent. When you buy a music CD, copy it six times and give it or sell it to your friends, well that's wrong. That's infringing," Butcher said.

"Downloading a music CD onto your hard drive isn't illegal, it's what you do afterwards that may or may not be illegal."

However, the CRIA says the music industry is being hit hard by the ongoing problem of what they call music piracy, the illegal peer-to-peer sharing of music files.

CRIA's figures show sales of music CDs, DVDs and other formats fell 35 per cent in the first quarter of 2007 compared with the same period a year earlier.

According to digital media measurer, Big Champagne, more than 1 billion songs are swapped for free every month on file-swapping networks.

Aside from music, Butcher advocates that digital information is essential for people with physical, learning or perceptual disabilities.

"People can take this digital information and they can copy it and manipulate it into alternate forms that people with disabilities can access. It opens up a whole world of information for those three million Canadians who can't access traditional print," he said.

With a report from CTV's Robert Fife

Government surplus shrinks by $2.7 billion




Government surplus shrinks by $2.7 billion

Updated Fri. Dec. 21 2007 1:14 PM ET

The Canadian Press

OTTAWA -- Retroactive tax cuts introduced in October by Finance Minister Jim Flaherty have had a dramatic impact on the government's budgetary bounty, reducing the accumulated surplus by $2.7 billion after recording the first monthly deficit of the current fiscal year.

The government reported Friday that its accumulated surplus for this fiscal year has shrunk to $6.6 billion for the first seven months of the fiscal year as of the end of October, down from the $9.3 billion at the end of September.

This marks the first time during the 2007-2008 fiscal year that the government has recorded a monthly deficit, and it is almost entirely due to a $2.5-billion adjustment to revenues as a result of Flaherty's Oct. 30 mini-budget.

"These measures consist of the reduction in the lowest personal income tax rate from 15.5 per cent to 15 per cent and the increase in the basic personal amount to $9,600, both effective January 1, 2007,'' the finance department reported.

The mini-budget also included cuts to corporate taxes and a reduction in the GST by one percentage point, but those measures do not go into effect until Jan. 1, 2008.

Overall, budget revenues in October decreased by $1.7 billion, or 9.2 per cent, and program spending increased by $1.7 billion, or 11.3 per cent, on higher transfer payments and departmental operating expenses.

Corporate income tax revenues rose $0.3 billion, or 12.6 per cent.

For the fiscal year so far, corporate taxes are up $3.3 billion, or 19.9 per cent, reflecting the ongoing profitability of Canada's businesses.

"The exceptionally strong growth to date also reflects tax remittance patterns last year, when corporations on average underpaid their tax liabilities during the first part of the fiscal year, but then made up this difference with significant settlement payments in February and March 2007,'' said the department.

As a result, it said the high growth rate of corporate receipts is expected to dissipate in the last quarter of the fiscal year.

The year-to-date surplus, while considerably smaller than last month, is still $200 million higher than during the same period last year when the final surplus totalled $13.8 billion.

And despite the adjustment, revenues were still $6.8 billion more than during the first seven months last year, a 5.3 per cent increase.

*********

Experts say PM's remarks suggest a tame budget

Updated Fri. Dec. 21 2007 7:44 PM ET

CTV.ca News Staff

Stephen Harper's gloomy forecast of economic turbulence in the year ahead is likely meant to cool expectations before the release of a new budget, financial experts said Friday.

Don Drummond, TD Bank Financial Group's chief economist, described Harper's remarks as "political conditioning" ahead of a tame budget next year.

"We are so used to, in Canada, to have blockbuster budgets that always have billions and billions of dollars in new spending, or billions of dollars in tax cuts, and I just don't think we're going to have that in 2008," Drummond told CTV's Mike Duffy Live.

"If you don't want to get nasty surprises when you release a document, you try to do pre-conditioning."

During year-end interviews, Harper said there would be no more federal tax relief in 2008. There would also be no major spending increases either, as the government focused on cutting debt.

He said a cautious fiscal policy would be needed to combat a global slowdown and a fragile U.S. economy, which is expected to impact Canada.

"There is no way we can be completely insulated from what is going on in the United States or in the global economy," Harper told CTV News' Chief Anchor and Senior Editor Lloyd Robertson, and Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife on Thursday.

Drummond said his expectation is that the Canadian economy will grow about 2 per cent in 2008 -- compared to the usual growth of 2.75 or 3 per cent.

"It's definitely weaker than the norm, but it's not a disaster -- certainly not a recession by any means."

Bill Robson, president and CEO of the C.D. Howe Institute, agreed that Harper overstated the expected troubles. He said if Harper limits spending now, there will be money to spend later.

"The economy is going to be feeling a little bit of a damper from the U.S., but . . . there are a lot of signs of strength," Robson told CTV's Mike Duffy Live on Friday.

Robson said that he expects the Tory's announced cut to the GST to proceed as expected in January, but new spending will be minimal. He said Harper will likely hold something back in case an election is called.

"I think he will be looking at the personal income tax side and wondering if there's something extra he can do there," said Robson. "You want to have that in your holster."

While contributors to the United States' weak economy - specifically weak housing markets and sub-prime mortgage lending -- aren't taking the same hit in Canada, Drummond said our economy will feel some of the pinch. Seventy-five per cent of Canada's exports are to the U.S., he said.

Drummond said regions such as the manufacturing hotbeds of Quebec and Ontario will be hurt worse.

Reports released Friday by Statistics Canada underlined the anticipated economic slowdown, saying Ontario's declining retail sales in October virtually offset any national sales gains.

A 0.5 per cent decline in Ontario -- which represents about 35 per cent of Canada's sales -- cooled spending growth to only 0.1 per cent for the month of October.

The International Monetary Fund says Canada's economy in 2008 will grow less than the 2.3 per cent it forecast at the end of 2007's third quarter.

Friday, December 21, 2007

Four federal byelections to be held in March


Four federal byelections to be held in March

Updated Fri. Dec. 21 2007 4:25 PM ET

CTV.ca News Staff

Four federal byelections will be held in Ontario, Saskatchewan and British Columbia early next year, Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced Friday.

The ridings -- Ontario's Toronto Centre and Willowdale, B.C.'s Vancouver Quadra and Saskatchewan's Desnethe-Missinippi-Churchill River -- will hold their byelections on Monday, March 17.

The Liberal party currently holds all four seats, and experts say they have a good chance at keeping at least three of them.

The two Ontario seats, both longtime Liberal ridings, will see high-profile Grit candidates campaigning for them.

Martha Hall Findlay, a former leadership candidate, will seek election in Willowdale.

Bob Rae, a onetime Ontario NDP premier and Liberal leadership hopeful, will be the Liberal candidate in Toronto Centre. The riding has not been represented in Parliament since Bill Graham stepped down on July 2.

On Friday, Rae welcomed Harper's announcement and said he was ready to accept the challenge.

"I have been talking to constituents about the issues that matter. I will be working to earn the confidence of voters in Toronto Centre and hope to take their concerns to Ottawa as their MP," he said in a press release.

A strong showing in the byelection is considered vital for the Liberal party, after a poor result in three Quebec byelections in September.

Liberal leader Stephane Dion has been criticized for the Liberal party's failure after it lost the riding of Outremont to NDP candidate Thomas Mulcair.

A seat held by the Bloc Quebecois was won by the Conservatives, while another was retained by the Bloc.

Dion took responsibility for the poor showing in Quebec and promised success in future elections.

"We may have a national election -- a general election, or a byelection in Saskatchewan, Ontario, and British Columbia. We intend to win these byelections or a general election," he told a press conference in September.

Of the four March byelections, the Liberals could find the northern Saskatchewan riding the most difficult to hold. The Liberal's Gary Merasty officially beat the Tory candidate by 67 votes during the 2006 election.

The Liberals are still deciding who will represent them in the byelection. One of Dion's key leadership organizers, David Orchard, is openly campaigning for the position, but has not officially received the nod.

Saskatchewan NDP MLA, Joan Beatty, the first aboriginal woman elected to the province's legislature, said she has been approached by both the Liberal and NDP parties to run in the federal election.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Bethlehem 2007 A.D.

Bethlehem 2007 A.D.


Best Ron Paul Commercial EVER! The Occupations Are Over!

Best Ron Paul Commercial EVER! The Occupations Are Over!



Burger King reigning leader in trans fats, Health Canada reports


Burger King reigning leader in trans fats, Health Canada reports

The Canadian Press

TORONTO — Popular restaurant chain Burger King has gained the dubious distinction of having the highest levels of artery-clogging, obesity-inducing trans fats in its French fries, chicken nuggets and other meals compared with its fast-food peers, according to federal data released yesterday.

The detailed, groundbreaking figures come from Health Canada's testing of leading-brand prepackaged foods such as cookies and frozen potatoes, as well as favourite treats from selected restaurants.

“Burger King seems to have been crowned in this data as the king of trans fats,” said Sally Brown, CEO of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

“Not all companies are reducing them in all products, but Burger King isn't reducing them in any products.”

Low-cost trans fats provide taste and texture in a wide range of foods and are used for frying, but they are also maligned for increasing levels of bad cholesterol and lowering those of good cholesterol.

As such, they pose a serious long-term health risk.

“Trans fats are unsafe at virtually any quantity,” said Rocco Rossi, who heads the foundation's Ontario arm.

“We are facing an unprecedented crisis in terms of rising rates of obesity, rising rates of childhood obesity that will lead to untold misery for countless Canadians in the future.”

Last year, a federal task force recommended that trans fats make up no more than 5 per cent of total fat content in all foods, including restaurant servings. A 2-per-cent limit applied to edible oils and spreadable margarines.

Burger King exceeded those levels by between 4 and almost 9 per cent in products ranging from chicken nuggets and French fries to apple turnovers and fish filets. For example, the chain's chicken nuggets contain almost 20-per-cent fat, of which more than one-third is trans fat.

In response, Burger King Restaurants of Canada called it “one of the highest priorities” for the company to make its restaurants free of added trans fat by the end of next year, starting in Calgary on Jan. 1.

“The company has also identified trans fat-free, par-fry and baked-good solutions for our products, and is currently testing these products as well,” Burger King said in a statement.

When it comes to another Canadian staple, chocolate doughnuts, companies such as Tim Hortons have cut trans fats sharply, but replaced them with saturated fats, which are only slightly less harmful to heart health.

Three-quarters of consumers are aware of the harmful effects of trans fats and will try to avoid them, a foundation survey suggests.

“We're able to vote with our mouths, as well as with our feet and our wallets,” federal Health Minister Tony Clement said. In June, the federal government asked food makers to lower trans fats to the levels recommended by the task force.

Ottawa will force the industry to meet the task force recommendations by June, 2009, if it fails to do so, Mr. Clement said.

In the interim, the data available on the government's website(www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/nutrition/gras-trans-fats/tfa-age_tc-tm_e.html) should help consumers make better food-buying decisions and manufacturers reconsider their ingredients.

“There is a huge shaming element,” said Ms. Brown, co-chairwoman of the task force.

Dave Dzisiak of Calgary-based Dow AgroSciences said omega-9 oil from crushed canola, which is plentiful in Canada, is an excellent substitute for trans and saturated fats.

“It's got all the functionality of these hydrogenated oils but it has the good health properties and the good functional properties that the food companies need,” Mr. Dzisiak said.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Dr. Henry Kissinger Endorses John McCain for President

Dr. Henry Kissinger Endorses John McCain for President




Canada's population tops 33 million


Canada's population tops 33 million

Saskatchewan growth rate overtakes Alberta

Published: Wednesday, December 19, 2007

OTTAWA - More than 33 million people now live in Canada, according to figures released Wednesday.

Statistics Canada says Saskatchewan has replaced Alberta as the fastest-growing province, with more than one million people for the first time since 2001.

The numbers are based on population counts from the 2001 Census.

A diverser and ethnic culture is seen downtown Victoria during the noon hour rush.


As of Oct. 1, 2007, Canada's population was estimated at 33,091,200, up from 115,200 from July 1, 2007. It is the strongest growth rate in six years.

Provincially, Saskatchewan, British Columbia, Ontario and Alberta had population growth rates higher than the rest of the country with Saskatchewan's population reaching a record high of 1,003,300.

Immigration also remained strong with Canada receiving an estimated 71,600 newcomers, an increase not seen in more than 30 years.

Alberta, which has typically led the provinces in population growth, has started to lose more people to other regions with provinces such as Newfoundland and Labrador and Saskatchewan benefiting the most.

The population of all four Atlantic provinces rose, but at a slower pace than the rest of Canada.
Prince Edward Island was the fastest-growing province in the Atlantic region. It also received more immigrants than ever before.

Newfoundland and Labrador's population was estimated at 507,500, up by 1,200, the highest increase since 1992.

New Brunswick also posted an increase, while Nova Scotia had the slowest population growth among the provinces of just below 1,000 people.

Manitoba, British Columbia and Ontario are the other provinces posting an immigration rate higher than the national level.

Ontario's population increased to an estimated 12,850,600, a faster growth rate than the rest of country due mainly to interprovincial migration.

However, Ontario's attraction for immigrants is declining.

The population of Quebec, the second most populous province, increased but at a slower rate than the national average.

The number of births in Quebec is still on the rise, and its rate of natural increase is second only to Alberta.

British Columbia's population hit an estimated 4,402,900, the second fastest growth-rate among the provinces, due mainly to an increase in interprovincial migration. International migration accounted for nearly 60 per cent of B.C.'s growth.

Manitoba saw a demographic increase slightly below the national rate although it is the province's strongest increase since 1983 due to strong influx of immigrants.

The only territory to post a faster demographic growth rate than the rest of the country was the Yukon, where the population reached 31,100.

Statistics Canada says the Northwest Territories was the only jurisdiction to record a decline in population, largely because of interprovincial migration while Nunavut posted one of the smallest population increases in its brief history. Without its strong birth rate, Nunavut's population would have declined.

Lieberman: McCain can reunite our country


Lieberman: McCain can reunite our country

  • Story Highlights
  • Sen. Joe Lieberman was Democrats' vice presidential nominee in 2000
  • Lieberman broke with Democrats and became an Independent
  • McCain picked up endorsements from The Des Moines Register, The Boston Globe
  • McCain tied for second among GOP candidates in New Hampshire

(CNN) -- Sen. Joe Lieberman is crossing party lines and endorsing Republican Sen. John McCain for president.

art.mcca.leber.cnn.jpg

Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Connecticut, is endorsing Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, for president.

"Being a Republican is important. Being a Democrat is important. But you know what's more important than that? The interest and well-being of the United States of America," the Democrat-turned Independent said in announcing his decision Monday morning in New Hampshire.

"Let's put the United States first again, and John McCain is the man as president who will help us do that," he said.

Lieberman, the Democrats' vice presidential nominee in 2000, said the next president needs to "break through the reflexive partisanship that is poisoning our politics today and stopping us from getting anything done in Washington." VideoWatch Lieberman explain his move »

In accepting Lieberman's backing, McCain said, "It is one of the great honors of my political career to have known him, to have worked with him and to have received his endorsement."

The Connecticut senator decided to endorse McCain because he considers him "the most capable to be commander in chief on day one of his administration, and the most capable of uniting the country so that we can prevail against Islamic extremism," a Lieberman aide said earlier.

The Lieberman aide insists the senator does not see this as a "commentary on or an endorsement of the Republican Party, only the person."

The endorsement could help emphasize McCain's experience on national security issues, demonstrate his ability to work across party lines and perhaps help persuade Independent voters in New Hampshire to support his 2008 presidential bid, as many of them did during his first campaign in 2000.

McCain also picked up key endorsements this weekend from two of the most influential papers for voters in Iowa and New Hampshire, The Des Moines Register and The Boston Globe.

Lieberman, who broke with the Democratic Party over Iraq, won re-election as an Independent after losing the party's Senate nomination to an anti-war challenger in 2006.

Don't Miss

He still caucuses with the Democrats, giving them their razor-thin majority in the chamber. Lieberman chairs the Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee, and he still attends weekly Democratic strategy meetings.

But his adviser said the endorsement appears to be a "hangover" from the 2006 race, when top Democrats backed the Democratic nominee, Ned Lamont, rather than support Lieberman's Independent candidacy.

"I have the greatest respect for Joe, but I simply have to disagree with his decision to endorse Senator McCain," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, told CNN in a written statement.

Lieberman's office called Reid's office Sunday to inform the Democratic leader of his decision to endorse a Republican, a Reid spokesman said.

In response to the endorsement, Al From, founder and CEO of the Democratic Leadership Council, said, "I am very saddened by Senator Lieberman's choice, and profoundly disagree with it. We need to elect a Democratic president in 2008."

Lieberman and McCain co-sponsored the 2002 resolution that authorized the U.S. invasion of Iraq the following March, and Lieberman has remained a supporter of the nearly 5-year-old war in Iraq at a time when Democratic leaders are trying to bring the conflict to an end.

He had not planned to endorse anyone until after the primary season, but McCain asked for his endorsement a few days after the two men returned from a Thanksgiving trip to Iraq together, the aide said.

A CNN/WMUR poll released last week found McCain tied for second in the New Hampshire, which hosts the first primary of the 2008 presidential race in January.

advertisement

He and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani both rated 19 percent support among New Hampshire Republicans, while Mitt Romney, the former governor of neighboring Massachusetts, led the race with 32 percent.

The poll of 354 likely Republican primary voters was conducted from December 6 through December 10. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percentage points. E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend

Putin: Time Person of the Year 2007


A Tsar Is Born



No one is born with a stare like Vladimir Putin's. The Russian President's pale blue eyes are so cool, so devoid of emotion that the stare must have begun as an affect, the gesture of someone who understood that power might be achieved by the suppression of ordinary needs, like blinking. The affect is now seamless, which makes talking to the Russian President not just exhausting but often chilling. It's a gaze that says, I'm in charge.

Related Articles

TIME's Interview with Vladimir Putin

At his dacha outside Moscow, the Russian President spoke candidly about corruption, religion and how he thinks the war in Iraq should end

Why We Chose Putin

At significant cost to the principles that free nations prize, he's brought Russia roaring back to the table of world power

Related Article

Talking with Vladimir Putin

Read the full transcript of the Russian President's interview with TIME


This may explain why there is so little visible security at Putin's dacha, Novo-Ogarevo, the grand Russian presidential retreat set inside a birch- and fir-forested compound west of Moscow. To get there from the capital requires a 25-minute drive through the soul of modern Russia, past decrepit Soviet-era apartment blocks, the mashed-up French Tudor-villa McMansions of the new oligarchs and a shopping mall that boasts not just the routine spoils of affluence like Prada and Gucci but Lamborghinis and Ferraris too.

When you arrive at the dacha's faux-neoclassical gate, you have to leave your car and hop into one of the Kremlin's vehicles that slowly wind their way through a silent forest of snow-tipped firs. Aides warn you not to stray, lest you tempt the snipers positioned in the shadows around the compound. This is where Putin, 55, works. (He lives with his wife and two twentysomething daughters in another mansion deeper in the woods.) The rooms feel vast, newly redone and mostly empty. As we prepare to enter his spacious but spartan office, out walk some of Russia's most powerful men: Putin's chief of staff, his ideologist, the speaker of parliament—all of them wearing expensive bespoke suits and carrying sleek black briefcases. Putin, who rarely meets with the foreign press, then gives us 3 1⁄2 hours of his time, first in a formal interview in his office and then upstairs over an elaborate dinner of lobster-and-shiitake-mushroom salad, "crab fingers with hot sauce" and impressive vintages of Puligny-Montrachet and a Chilean Cabernet.

Vladimir Putin gives a first impression of contained power: he is compact and moves stiffly but efficiently. He is fit, thanks to years spent honing his black-belt judo skills and, these days, early-morning swims of an hour or more. And while he is diminutive—5 ft. 6 in. (about 1.7 m) seems a reasonable guess—he projects steely confidence and strength. Putin is unmistakably Russian, with chiseled facial features and those penetrating eyes. Charm is not part of his presentation of self—he makes no effort to be ingratiating. One senses that he pays constant obeisance to a determined inner discipline. The successor to the boozy and ultimately tragic Boris Yeltsin, Putin is temperate, sipping his wine only when the protocol of toasts and greetings requires it; mostly he just twirls the Montrachet in his glass. He eats little, though he twitchily picks the crusts off the bread rolls on his plate.

Putin grudgingly reveals a few personal details between intermittent bites of food: He relaxes, he says, by listening to classical composers like Brahms, Mozart, Tchaikovsky. His favorite Beatles song is Yesterday. He has never sent an e-mail in his life. And while he grew up in an officially atheist country, he is a believer and often reads from a Bible that he keeps on his state plane. He is impatient to the point of rudeness with small talk, and he is in complete control of his own message.

He is clear about Russia's role in the world. He is passionate in his belief that the dissolution of the Soviet Union was a tragedy, particularly since overnight it stranded 25 million ethnic Russians in "foreign" lands. But he says he has no intention of trying to rebuild the U.S.S.R. or re-establish military or political blocs. And he praises his predecessors Yeltsin and Mikhail Gorbachev for destroying a system that had lost the people's support. "I'm not sure I could have had the guts to do that myself," he tells us. Putin is, above all, a pragmatist, and has cobbled together a system—not unlike China's—that embraces the free market (albeit with a heavy dose of corruption) but relies on a strong state hand to keep order.

Like President George W. Bush, he sees terrorism as one of the most profound threats of the new century, but he is wary of labeling it Islamic. "Radicals," he says, "can be found in any environment." Putin reveals that Russian intelligence recently uncovered a "specific" terrorist threat against both Russia and the U.S. and that he spoke by phone with Bush about it.

What gets Putin agitated—and he was frequently agitated during our talk—is his perception that Americans are out to interfere in Russia's affairs. He says he wants Russia and America to be partners but feels the U.S. treats Russia like the uninvited guest at a party. "We want to be a friend of America," he says. "Sometimes we get the impression that America does not need friends" but only "auxiliary subjects to command." Asked if he'd like to correct any American misconceptions about Russia, Putin leans forward and says, "I don't believe these are misconceptions. I think this is a purposeful attempt by some to create an image of Russia based on which one could influence our internal and foreign policies. This is the reason why everybody is made to believe...[Russians] are a little bit savage still or they just climbed down from the trees, you know, and probably need to have...the dirt washed out of their beards and hair." The veins on his forehead seem ready to pop.

Elected Emperor

Putin has said that next spring, at the end of his second term as President, he will assume the nominally lesser role of Prime Minister. In fact, having nominated his loyal former chief of staff (and current Deputy Prime Minister) Dmitri Medvedev to succeed him as President, Putin will surely remain the supreme leader, master of Russia's destiny, which will allow him to complete the job he started. In his eight years as President, he has guided his nation through a remarkable transformation. He has restored stability and a sense of pride among citizens who, after years of Soviet stagnation, rode the heartbreaking roller coaster of raised and dashed expectations when Gorbachev and then Yeltsin were in charge. A basket case in the 1990s, Russia's economy has grown an average of 7% a year for the past five years. The country has paid off a foreign debt that once neared $200 billion. Russia's rich have gotten richer, often obscenely so. But the poor are doing better too: workers' salaries have more than doubled since 2003. True, this is partly a result of oil at $90 a barrel, and oil is a commodity Russia has in large supply. But Putin has deftly managed the windfall and spread the wealth enough so that people feel hopeful.

Russia's revival is changing the course of the modern world. After decades of slumbering underachievement, the Bear is back. Its billionaires now play on the global stage, buying up property, sports franchises, places at élite schools. Moscow exerts international influence not just with arms but also with a new arsenal of weapons: oil, gas, timber. On global issues, it offers alternatives to America's waning influence, helping broker deals in North Korea, the Middle East, Iran. Russia just made its first shipment of nuclear fuel to Iran—a sign that Russia is taking the lead on that vexsome issue, particularly after the latest U.S. intelligence report suggested that the Bush Administration has been wrong about Iran's nuclear-weapons development. And Putin is far from done. The premiership is a perch that will allow him to become the longest-serving statesman among the great powers, long after such leaders as Bush and Tony Blair have faded from the scene.

But all this has a dark side. To achieve stability, Putin and his administration have dramatically curtailed freedoms. His government has shut down TV stations and newspapers, jailed businessmen whose wealth and influence challenged the Kremlin's hold on power, defanged opposition political parties and arrested those who confront his rule. Yet this grand bargain—of freedom for security—appeals to his Russian subjects, who had grown cynical over earlier regimes' promises of the magical fruits of Western-style democracy. Putin's popularity ratings are routinely around 70%. "He is emerging as an elected emperor, whom many people compare to Peter the Great," says Dimitri Simes, president of the Nixon Center and a well-connected expert on contemporary Russia.

Putin's global ambitions seem straightforward. He certainly wants a seat at the table on the big international issues. But more important, he wants free rein inside Russia, without foreign interference, to run the political system as he sees fit, to use whatever force he needs to quiet seething outlying republics, to exert influence over Russia's former Soviet neighbors. What he's given up is Yeltsin's calculation that Russia's future requires broad acceptance on the West's terms. That means that on big global issues, says Strobe Talbott, president of the Brookings Institution and former point man on Russia policy for the Clinton Administration, "sometimes Russia will be helpful to Western interests, and sometimes it will be the spoiler."

Up from the Ruins

How do Russians see Putin? For generations they have defined their leaders through political jokes. It's partly a coping mechanism, partly a glimpse into the Russian soul. In the oft told anecdotes, Leonid Brezhnev was always the dolt, Gorbachev the bumbling reformer, Yeltsin the drunk. Putin, in current punch lines, is the despot. Here's an example: Stalin's ghost appears to Putin in a dream, and Putin asks for him help running the country. Stalin says, "Round up and shoot all the democrats, and then paint the inside of the Kremlin blue." "Why blue?" Putin asks. "Ha!" says Stalin. "I knew you wouldn't ask me about the first part."

Putin himself is sardonic but humorless. In our hours together, he didn't attempt a joke, and he misread several of our attempts at playfulness. As Henry Kissinger, who has met and interacted with Russian leaders since Brezhnev, puts it, "He does not rely on personal charm. It is a combination of aloofness, considerable intelligence, strategic grasp and Russian nationalism" (see Kissinger interview).

To fully understand Putin's accomplishments and his appeal, one has to step back into the tumult of the 1990s. At the end of 1991, just a few months after Yeltsin dramatically stood on a tank outside the parliament in Moscow to denounce—and deflate—a coup attempt by hard-liners, the Soviet Union simply ceased to exist. Yeltsin took the reins in Russia and, amid great hope and pledges of help from around the world, promised to launch an era of democracy and economic freedom. I arrived in Moscow a week later, beginning a three-year stint as a Russia correspondent.

I retain three indelible images from that time. The first: the legions of Ivy League—and other Western-educated "experts" who roamed the halls of the Kremlin and the government, offering advice, all ultimately ineffective, on everything from conducting free elections to using "shock therapy" to juice the economy to privatizing state-owned assets. The second: the long lines of impoverished old women standing in the Moscow cold, selling whatever they could scrounge from their homes—a silver candleholder, perhaps, or just a pair of socks. The third, more familiar image: a discouraged and embattled Yeltsin in 1993 calling in Russian-army tanks to shell his own parliament to break a deadlock with the defiant legislature when everything he was trying to do was going wrong.

Yeltsin bombed his way out of the threat of civil war and managed to hang on to power, but Russia was left hobbled. Virtually every significant asset—oil, banks, the media—ended up in the hands of a few "oligarchs" close to the President. Corruption and crime were rampant; the cities became violent. Paychecks weren't issued; pensions were ignored. Russia in 1998 defaulted on its foreign debt. The ruble and the financial markets collapsed, and Yeltsin was a spent force. "The '90s sucked," says Stephen Sestanovich, a Columbia University professor who was the State Department's special adviser for the new Independent States of the former Soviet Union under President Bill Clinton. "Putin managed to play on the resentment that Russians everywere were feeling." Indeed, by the time Putin took over in late 1999, there was nowhere to fall but up.

Path to Power

That Russia needed fixing was acknowledged by all. But how was it that Putin got the call? What was it that lifted him to power, and to the dacha in Novo-Ogarevo?

Putin's rise continues to perplex even devoted Kremlin observers. He was born into humble circumstances in St. Petersburg in 1952. His father had fought in World War II and later labored in a train-car factory. Putin's mother, a devout Orthodox Christian, had little education and took on a series of menial jobs. The family lived in a drab fifth-floor walk-up in St. Petersburg; Putin had to step over swarms of rats occupying the entranceway on his way to school. Putin's only ancestor of note was his paternal grandfather, who had served as a cook for both Lenin and Stalin, though there's no sign that this gave his family any special status or connections.

Putin describes his younger self as a poor student and a "hooligan." Small for his age, he got roughed by his contemporaries. So he took up sambo—a Soviet-era blend of judo and wrestling—and later just judo. From all accounts, he devoted himself to the martial art, attracted by both its physical demands and its contemplative philosophical core. "It's respect for your elders and opponents," he says in First Person, his question-and-answer memoir published in 2000. "It's not for weaklings."

It was the KGB that rescued Putin from obscurity—and turned the child into the man. Putin had begun to apply himself to schoolwork, and in 1975, during his senior year at Leningrad State University, he was approached by an impressive stranger who said, "I need to talk to you about your career assignment. I wouldn't like to specify exactly what it is yet." Putin, who had dreamed of becoming a spy, was intrigued. Within months he was being trained in counterintelligence. By the mid-1980s he was assigned to East Germany, where he worked undercover, pursuing intelligence on nato and German politicians. He was in Dresden, not Berlin where the action was, and probably would have been only a bit player in the Le Carré version of the cold war. But when the Berlin Wall came down in 1989, so did Putin's KGB career. As angry crowds moved on the local KGB headquarters, Putin and his colleagues feverishly burned files that detailed agents' names and networks—so much paper, he recalls in the memoir, that "the furnace burst." Then he slipped into the crowd and watched as the newly liberated mobs sacked the detested building. Within two years, he left the KGB altogether.

Putin's big break was a friend's introduction to Anatoli Sobchak, the liberal mayor of St. Petersburg, who was happy to bring in an intelligent, no-nonsense outsider to help push his reformist agenda. Putin ran the office that registered businesses and promoted foreign investment. He was responsible for ensuring that President Clinton's visit to the city in 1996 went smoothly—it was the first time American officials saw Putin in action. But later that year, Sobchak, damaged by a perception of ineffectiveness and rumors of corruption, lost his re-election bid. As Putin tells us at the dacha, as a member of the losing team, he was suddenly untouchable. "Nobody would hire me there," he says.

So Putin headed to Moscow. What transpired next seemed to Kremlin watchers as unlikely as Chauncey Gardiner's unwitting rise to power in the Jerzy Kosinski novel Being There. Although Putin often says that he had no connections when he arrived in the capital in mid-1996, he had several powerful allies who landed him work in the Kremlin. He became deputy to the head of Yeltsin's general-affairs department. Within two years he was asked to head the FSB, the spy-agency successor to the disbanded KGB. Putin, in his memoir, says he received a call out of the blue asking him to head to the airport to meet Russia's Prime Minister, Sergei Kirienko. Kirienko offered congratulations. When Putin asked why, he replied, "The decree is signed. You have been appointed director of the FSB." Then, in August 1999, Putin was named Prime Minister. It's a grand title, but it doesn't come with much security: Putin was Yeltsin's fifth Prime Minister in 17 months. But Putin did far better than survive; within four months a declining Yeltsin asked Putin to take over as acting President. Putin tells us he initially declined but that Yeltsin raised it again, saying, "Don't say no." By the last day of 1999 Putin was running the country.

We ask if it had ever occurred to Putin that history would place him in such a role. "It never occurred to me," he says. "It still surprises me."

Experts generally believe that Putin won Yeltsin's endorsement because he was competent, because he wasn't part of any of the major Moscow factions competing for power and because his KGB past gave him a source of authority. But they also widely assume that he made a deal with Yeltsin and his family: in return for Yeltsin's endorsement, Putin would not pursue corruption charges against the outgoing President and his relatives, despite the rumors that surrounded the family's dealings. It's impossible to verify, but neither Yeltsin, who died this year, nor his well-connected daughter Tatyana Dyachenko was ever a subject of public investigation (though Putin quickly fired her from her position as a Kremlin image consultant). Indeed, Putin's first decree guaranteed Yeltsin and his family immunity from such probes. Putin explains things to us this way: "Mr. Yeltsin realized that I would be totally sincere and would spare no effort to fulfill my duties and would be honest and see that the interest of the country could be secured." Eight years on, one can't help seeing a parallel with the latest maneuverings in the Kremlin: just as Yeltsin rewarded Putin for his loyalty, now Putin is doing the same for his anointed successor, Medvedev. There is already a new Putin joke: Putin goes to a restaurant with Medvedev and orders a steak. The waiter asks, "And what about the vegetable?" Putin answers, "The vegetable will have steak too."

Taking Control

Putin is no vegetable. In 1999, when he assumed the role of acting President, he was a relative unknown. It was his response to a Chechen rebel incursion in the Russian republic of Dagestan in the North Caucasus that quickly set him on a path toward national glory. Alexei Gromov, who has served with Putin as press secretary since he came to power, remembers being in the room when Putin told his wife Lyudmila that he was preparing to go on a New Year's Eve trip to the war zone to meet with the troops. She was worried about his safety and went along with him. In the end, the trip may have been no more than a calculated, if risky, photo op, but it was effective. Russians met their new leader and admired his courage and energy.

The following year Putin stepped up Russia's invasion of the breakaway republic of Chechnya. Rambo-style, he promised a quick and decisive victory, reiterating his earlier pledge to defeat enemy fighters "even in the toilet." Grozny, Chechnya's capital, was all but obliterated; Russia reassumed power and installed a puppet leader. Despite heartbreaking subsequent Chechen terrorist attacks—including a 2004 assault on a school in Beslan, North Ossetia, where 339 civilians, most of them children, were killed—Russians by and large admire Putin for drawing the line in the south. Having watched Eastern Europe and the Soviet republics slip from Moscow's grip, Russians were happy to keep Chechnya—even a bombed-out Chechnya—in the fold.

To the West, meanwhile, Putin was a mystery. Russia watchers debated endlessly: Was he a pro-Western reformer? (He had worked for Sobchak.) Or a hard-liner? (He was a career KGB man.) Yet just as 9/11 helped define President Bush, so did external challenges allow Putin to grow into a leader. His first steps on the world stage were tentative. His global coming-out had occurred in Auckland at a 1999 meeting of heads of apec (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) nations. Sestanovich, who was traveling with President Clinton, remembers meeting Putin at Clinton's hotel suite. "He seemed rodentlike," says Sestanovich, "like an overgrown summer intern." But Clinton was willing to work with him. Putin tells us how, at an apec dinner at which he was feeling somewhat lost, Clinton crossed the room past other world leaders and leaned down to talk to him. "Volodya," Clinton said, using the familiar form of the name Vladimir, "I suggest we walk out together from this room." Putin rose to his feet, and the two men strolled out together. "Everyone applauded," Putin recalls. "I will remember that forever." It was Putin's only sign of softness during the 3 1⁄2 hours we spoke.

Clinton was not the only American who found something to like about Putin. Two years later, in a line that has haunted him ever since, President Bush declared that he had looked inside Putin's soul. It was their first meeting, at a summit in Slovenia, and Bush said, "I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy...I was able to get a sense of his soul." We ask Putin to return the favor, to describe what he has sensed of the U.S. President's soul. He declines to get personal. "I have a very good personal relationship with Mr. Bush," he says. "He is a very reliable partner, a man of honor."

The terrorist attacks on 9/11 provided Putin with another defining moment. He was one of the first world leaders to offer condolences and help to President Bush. That probably led the U.S. to back off from stridently criticizing the Chechnya adventure. But the initial shared objectives between Putin and the Bush Administration did not last. Putin strongly opposed America's invasion of Iraq and established Russia as a steady voice of opposition to Bush's adventure, demanding that decisions on Iraq be made at the U.N. (where Russia, of course, has Security Council veto power). America's occupation of Iraq has affirmed Putin's sense that he was right. "If one looks at the map of the world, it's difficult to find Iraq, and one would think it rather easy to subdue such a small country," Putin tell us. "But this undertaking is enormous. Iraq is a small but very proud nation." The debacle in Iraq plays into what is perhaps Putin's most cherished foreign-policy dictum: that nations shouldn't interfere in one another's affairs. And what that really means, of course, is that no one should interfere in Russia's affairs.

Another Putin joke: Putin and Bush are fishing on the Volga River. After half an hour Bush complains, "Vladimir, I'm getting bitten like crazy by mosquitoes, but I haven't seen a single one bothering you." Putin: "They know better than that."

A Ruthless Streak

Now that Putin has solidified his grip on power, he no longer seems overly concerned with courting Western approval. Despite a chorus of disapproving clucks from the West, Putin has shackled the press, muted the opposition, jailed tycoons who don't pledge fealty. In Russia this has been a terrible time to be a democrat, a journalist, an independent businessman. Just ask Garry Kasparov. The chess grandmaster—the highest-rated player of all time—is a far cry from stereotypically dysfunctional champions like Bobby Fischer. Kasparov has a keen political mind and a lively sense of humor. For years he has fought an increasingly lonely struggle as a democratic activist facing an uncompromising state. On Nov. 24, while holding a political rally in Moscow, he was arrested on a technicality and spent five days at Moscow's Petrovka 38 jail.

A week or so after Kasparov's release, we are sitting in Moscow's Cosmos Hotel, where he is taking part in a human-rights meeting. Assembled is a ragtag group of Russian activists, and here Kasparov is a star. (Even here his two bodyguards sandwich him whenever he walks about.) Unlike many of Putin's other critics, who seem fearful of chastising their leader openly, Kasparov isn't cowed. "Putin wants to rule like Stalin but live like Abramovich," he says, referring to Roman Abramovich, the billionaire Russian oil trader who owns London's Chelsea soccer team. "Putin's system is more like Mafia than democracy."

Putin's administration has blocked democrats like Kasparov from participating effectively in politics by making it all but impossible for them to meet the entry requirements. The President, in our discussion, routinely suggests that Kasparov is a stooge of the West because he spoke to the foreign press in English after his arrest. "If you aspire to be a leader of your own country, you must speak your own language, for God's sake," he says. Kasparov recently gave up his long-shot race for President.

Dmitri Muratov also knows the difficulties of life in the Putin era. A softspoken, heavyset man whose neatly trimmed beard is turning gray, Muratov is the editor in chief of Novaya Gazeta, a Moscow newspaper, published twice a week, with a reputation for pursuing tough investigative pieces. In the past seven years, three of his journalists have been murdered; all were looking into corruption and wrongdoing. After the third murder, Muratov decided to close the 14-year-old paper to avoid putting any other journalist at risk. But his staff talked him out of it. The paper is perpetually harassed by officials around the country, but, Muratov notes with a weary smile, "we're still alive."

The last of Muratov's journalists to die, Anna Politkovskaya, was shot in the elevator of her apartment building last year on Oct. 7. Alexander Litvinenko, a former FSB officer turned government critic living in London, accused Putin of sanctioning the killing. Within weeks, Litvinenko himself was dead too, killed by radiation poisoning from a mysterious dose of polonium 210. (Britain wants to charge a former KGB officer, Andre Lugovoy, who has just been elected to Russia's parliament, with the killing. He denies it, and Russian law prevents the extradition of Russian citizens.)

Muratov, for his part, doesn't know who ordered his journalists' killings. He says only that he blames "corruption," which has flourished during Putin's eight years.

Although few Russians seem to think Putin himself is corrupt, it is commonly believed that he is surrounded by business and political heavies who are amassing millions in payoffs. Indeed, if anything can bring him down, it may well be graft. As long as living standards rise, people are more likely to forgive the perception that officials are getting obscenely rich by demanding illicit payoffs. But if the economy stops growing—if the price of oil falls back to earth—Putin will face a challenge, whether from the masses in the streets or from military and civilian challengers.

One insider, who asked that his identity be protected, spelled out for us just one example of how the game is played, detailing the payments a prospective regional governor has to make to political bagmen in Moscow in order to get the Kremlin's nod for the post. For wealthier regions, such an endorsement can cost as much as $20 million, money that the politicians raise quietly from corporate "sponsors" that expect special treatment in return. The amount of money flowing to kingmakers in the Kremlin, in other words, is staggering.

When we ask about the view that he is surrounded by corrupt officials, Putin turns testy: "If you are so confident, then I presume you know the names and the systems and the tools...Write to us." As for Politkovskaya, who had been investigating policy failures and human-rights abuses in Chechnya when she was killed—and who authored the 2004 book Putin's Russia: Life in a Failing Democracy—Putin says he believes she was murdered by a provocateur to cast suspicion on his administration.

For all the attention the outside world pays to such cases, formal polls make it clear that within Russia, Putin's critics are in the minority. For every journalist distressed at the rollback of freedoms, there are scores of Russians who quietly applaud Putin's efforts to reassert stability. Once a year, when Putin takes phone calls from citizens around the country, tens of thousands of people try to get through. Listening to the calls, however screened and rehearsed they may be, one is struck by the ardor of the appeals to the President to get things done and by the broad range of information at Putin's fingertips. (A woman who lives on an island off Vladivostok complained about the local ferry service. Putin told her a bridge will soon be built to link the island to the mainland.)

Certainly life in Russia today is better than it has been for years. The stores are stocked with goods. The once worthless ruble is a genuine currency, strengthening against the dollar these days. Crime persists, but the cities are not as rough as in previous years.

And then there are the President's loudest and most visible defenders: members of Nashi (Ours, in Russian), the cultish pro-Putin youth movement. In mid-December, about 20,000 of the Nashi faithful from all over Russia gathered for a rally by the Kremlin walls to celebrate the recent victory of Putin's United Russia Party in elections to the parliament. From the stage, speakers, rock singers and rappers declared their patriotism and love for the President. A banner read, into the future with putin! Someone introduced Dasha, a 10-year-old member of Mishki (Bear Cubs), the new children's division of Nashi. "I love Russia," said Dasha. "I love teddy bears. I love Putin. Together we will win!"

I went to Nashi's Moscow headquarters a few days later and met with Lyubov Serikova, a pretty 22-year-old redhead from Russia's Chuvash Republic who is a rising star in the organization. She was thrilled with the recent election and credited Nashi with helping thwart an unnamed enemy's attempt to launch an "orange revolution" in Russia. Her world seemed conspiratorial, and she echoed Putin's own statements: those who run against the President were trying to bring the country down. Putin, she said, "has made Russia a leading country in just a few years."

When we finish talking, I take a look at an official Nashi poster hanging outside her office, which excoriates U.S. policies. It's reminiscent of Soviet-era propaganda with its non sequitur acceleration of hysteria: "Tomorrow there will be war in Iran. The day after tomorrow Russia will be governed externally!" But this is no fringe group. Putin frequently visits Nashi's training camps and meets with its leaders. And from there he sometimes launches anti-Western tirades, including a recent blast at London authorities who are demanding the extradition of the suspected killer of Litvinenko.

Putin's mission is not to win over the West. It is to restore to Russians a sense of their nation's greatness, something they have not known for years. This is not idle dreaming. When historians talk about Putin's place in Russian history, they draw parallels with Stalin or the Tsars. Putin, one can't stress enough, is not a Stalin. There are no mass purges in Russia today, no broad climate of terror. But Putin is reconstituting a strong state, and anyone who stands in his way will pay for it. "Putin has returned to the mechanism of one-man rule," says Talbott of the Brookings Institution. "Yet it's a new kind of state, with elements that are contemporary and elements from the past."

And there's plenty that could go wrong. The depth of corruption, the pockets of militant unrest, the ever present vulnerability of the economy to swings in commodity prices—all this threatens to unravel the gains that have been made. But Putin has played his own hand well. As Prime Minister, he is set to see out the rest of the drama of Russia's re-emergence. And almost no one in Russia is in a position to stop him. If he succeeds, Russia will become a political competitor to the U.S. and to rising nations like China and India. It will be one of the great powers of the new world.

Back at the dacha, with snow falling lightly outside, our dinner and discussion continue. Putin has been irritable throughout, a grudging host. Suddenly, at 10 o'clock, he stands and abruptly ends the evening. "We've finished eating, there's nothing more on the table, so let's call it a day," he declares. Actually, the main course (choice of sturgeon or veal) and dessert ("bird's milk" cake)—lovingly printed in gold ink on the prepared menu cards—haven't yet been served. The Russian President's brusqueness is jarring. Have our questions angered him? Bored him? Does he have another appointment? It's not clear. "Bye bye," says Putin—in English—as he walks briskly out of the room. The work of rebuilding Russia, apparently, is never done.

with reporting by Yuri Zarakhovich and Dario Thuburn/Moscow

http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/personoftheyear/article/0,28804,1690753_1690757_1690766-1,00.html

*******

Update: Al Gore finishes second place

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Yulia Tymoshenko Restored as Prime Minister




Yulia Tymoshenko Restored as Prime Minister

Published: December 18, 2007

KIEV, Dec 18 (Reuters) - Ukraine's parliament on Tuesday restored Yulia Tymoshenko as prime minister, sealing a political comeback for a leading figure from the former Soviet country's 2004 "Orange Revolution".

Tymoshenko, who confronted a powerful coalition led by outgoing prime minister Viktor Yanukovich, won 226 votes in the chamber, the exact number required to take office.

Tymoshenko, known for her stirring oratory in the 2004 pro-Western "Orange Revolution" and who was premier for seven months before being sacked by President Viktor Yushchenko in 2005, heads an "orange" coalition of her own bloc and his Our Ukraine party.

Speaker Arseniy Yatsenyuk grinned broadly as his vote, the last to be counted in the chamber, gave Tymoshenko the numbers she needed to win the ballot.

A beaming Tymoshenko, wearing her traditional peasant braid and a white suit, was quickly surrounded by applauding supporters.

Tymoshenko says she will uphold the ideals of the 2004 Revolution which pledged to move Ukraine closer to the West and eventually seek membership of the European Union and NATO.

She has said her priorities will be to clean up corruption still rampant in Ukraine 16 years after independence from Soviet rule and proceed with vital economic, judicial and political reforms including a "clean" privatisation programme.

Tymoshenko, now backed again by Yushchenko, fell short by a single vote last week, plunging the assembly into tumult. She blamed the outcome on tampering with the electronic voting system, though officials found no evidence. (Writing by Ron Popeski; Editing by Keith Weir)

Canada commits $300M in aid for Palestinians


Canada commits $300M in aid for Palestinians

Updated Mon. Dec. 17 2007 5:15 PM ET

CTV.ca News Staff

Canada is committing $300 million over the next five years to help the Palestinian government, led by President Mahmoud Abbas, achieve success in its negotiations for peace with Israel.

Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier made the announcement Monday at the Conference of Donors for the Palestinian Territories in Paris.

"Our funding is not unconditional," said Bernier. "We will need to see demonstrable progress in negotiations by both sides, as well as progress in Palestinian democratic reforms."

Bernier said the $300 million will be used to help build "security, governance and prosperity."

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice pledged $555 million for 2008. However, about $400 million is yet to be approved by the U.S. Congress.

The EU said it would give $650 million in 2008 and Norway pledged $140 million a year for three years. Britain, France and Germany announced a combined $1.08 billion for three years.

In total, Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad is seeking $5.6 billion, from 2008 to 2010, from the 90 countries gathered at the conference.

Michael Hudson, director of Georgetown University's Centre for Contemporary Arab Studies, said a total of $7.4 billion has been pledged -- surpassing the target.

"Once you get that good news, you have to ask, 'Where is it going to be used, and how will it be used?'" he told CTV Newsnet on Monday.

There will be less benefit from the money than expected, he said. Seventy per cent of it will pay off debts incurred by the Palestinian Authority.

"That doesn't leave much for new development or infrastructure improvement," he said.

"It is likely that the bulk of it is going to go to the West Bank, and it is intended certainly politically to sort of upgrade the credibility of the Palestinian Authority president, Mr. Abbas," Hudson said.

The United States and the EU may try to limit the amount of money sent to the Hamas-led Gaza Strip, he said.

"There is a huge disconnect there when you consider there are perhaps one million Palestinians living in the strip and their condition is terrible."

Resumption of peace talks

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon encouraged donors to "invest now, invest generously, and remain steadfast in their financial commitments over the next 36 months.''

The conference follows the long-awaited resumption of peace talks between the Palestinian and Israeli governments last month in Annapolis, Maryland.

"The Israelis and Palestinians have committed to negotiations to be concluded in one year. While ambitious, I believe this is attainable," said Bernier.

On Monday, Abbas demanded, "without exception," that Israel:

  • remove roadblocks quickly
  • stop building its separation barrier in the West Bank
  • freeze settlement expansion

Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere also pressured Israel to ease Palestinian travel restrictions in the West Bank and Gaza.

"It is hard to see how the Palestinians can make reasonable progress without improved access in their territories,'' said Stoere, a conference co-chairman.

Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said the Palestinian reform plan was "a serious effort to build the basis for a responsible Palestinian state that the Palestinian people so deserve and that peace so needs."

She said Israel was committed to its part in the peace negotiations, "including in relation to settlement activities.''

Aside from economic aid, leaders are also discussing how to deal with the situation in Gaza -- where Hamas forces now run the territory.

With files from The Associated Press

Paul 'pleasantly surprised' at $6 million fundraising haul




Paul 'pleasantly surprised' at $6 million fundraising haul



*Story Highlights
*Ron Paul's campaign says it brought in more than $6 million in 24 hours
*Campaign will spend money on airtime, direct mailing efforts in early voting states
*Paul: "It looks to me like money talks, and I like to say ideas talk"
*Paul ranks low in most national polls of the GOP presidential field

DES MOINES, Iowa (CNN) -- GOP presidential hopeful Ron Paul said his campaign has raised so much money that even his most optimistic supporters are surprised.
art.paul.gi.jpg

Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul's campaign says it plans to beef up staff in Florida and other states.

"It's nice to know that we are comfortable and can pay the bills," the Texas congressman said at a press conference Monday.

Paul, who ranks low in Republican polls, said he was disappointed that his fundraising efforts -- not his policies -- had gained so much attention.

"It looks to me like money talks, and I like to say ideas talk ... [and that it's] my position on foreign policy and the monetary system that should have gotten the attention of the media," he said.

The campaign -- which said it raked in more than $6 million Sunday -- plans to beef up staff in Florida and other states voting in February 5's "Super Tuesday" contests, when more than 20 states will hold primaries or caucuses, a spokesman for the Paul camp said.

The campaign also will spend money on airtime in the early-voting states of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada.
Don't Miss

* Election Center 2008
* Poll shows shake-up in GOP race
* Paul supporters raise millions in 'money bomb'

Paul said the money raised Sunday -- the 234th anniversary of the Boston Tea Party -- was "a pleasant surprise for me and a shocker for some other people." Paul's supporters staged a re-enactment Sunday of the 1773 Colonial protest against British tea taxes as part of their fundraising efforts.

The campaign said it has raised more than $18 million this quarter. Video Watch Paul describe his fundraising prowess »

"Toward the end it was difficult to keep up with all the accounting," Paul said.

Sunday's totals, raised by supporters acting independently of Paul's campaign, follow a similar November effort that the campaign said brought in $4.3 million, but the figures won't be independently confirmed until Federal Election Commission reports are filed at the end of the year. The $6 million sum is one of the largest single-day fundraising totals in U.S. history.

Paul also drew a distinction between himself and other GOP presidential candidates by adding that his funds did not come from "powerful special interests."

"In our case, it came from individuals who were concerned about what was happening," Paul said, "and I have offered an alternative both economically speaking, monetarily, as well as in foreign policy.

"I believe this is the reason they have come and joined the campaign."

The average donation during Sunday's drive was $102, according to the campaign.

According to reports filed with the FEC, as of last quarter, the Paul campaign received more than $8 million in contributions from individuals. About half of that came from donations of $200 or less.

Paul spoke Monday to a room where members of the press outnumbered supporters gathered, but the journalists' presence didn't stop the candidate from criticizing the media for focusing on candidates with money.

Paul, who ran for president as a Libertarian in 1988, is the sole Republican candidate to call for a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq. He shows up in the low single digits in national polls of the GOP field.
advertisement

But a CNN/WMUR poll in New Hampshire, released last week, found Paul drawing 7 percent support among Republicans in that first primary state -- and he broke double digits with 11 percent in a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll in South Carolina, home of another early contest. The New Hampshire poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percentage points, and the margin of error for the South Carolina survey is plus or minus 4 percentage points.

Earlier this year, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's presidential exploratory committee said it had pulled in around $6.5 million in a 24-hour period, though that haul included both actual donations and pledges for future donations. The current record belongs to Democrat John Kerry, whose presidential campaign received $5.7 million in a single day during the 2004 race. E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend

Good Christmas Huckabee Ad

Good Christmas Huckabee Ad



Putin moves to cement grip on power


Putin moves to cement grip on power

President says he'll serve as prime minister to hand-picked successor; analysts fear he'll turn bureaucratic post into one of authority

From Tuesday's Globe and Mail

MOSCOW — Russian President Vladimir Putin said yesterday he would agree to serve as prime minister, putting to rest any doubts he will exit the political stage upon his scheduled retirement in three months.

The announcement came just a week after his hand-picked successor, Dmitry Medvedev, urged Mr. Putin to stay on in Russian political life because his people still need him.

It signals a dramatic realignment of the political landscape in Russia, where it is virtually unheard of to have two leaders sharing power. It also raises the prospect that Mr. Putin will use his unchallenged popularity to turn the largely bureaucratic role of prime minister into the true centre of authority in Russia. Few observers feel Mr. Medvedev - a staunch, long-time loyalist - would resist Mr. Putin's incursion.

"The ruling team does not want to leave the scene," said Russian political analyst Lilia Shevtsova of the Carnegie Moscow Center.

Ms. Shevtsova predicted Mr. Putin will move quickly to increase the prime minister's powers, but noted the emergence of "two centres of gravity" could cause a political crisis.

"The political elites and the ruling class will be at a loss as to what centre of gravity to support, which boat to choose, which movie to see. This opens a totally unknown chapter," she said. "It also can bring disaster and paralysis."

Mr. Putin, who is widely loved in Russia, has been dropping hints for months that he had no immediate plans to exit politics even though he is bound by law to step down after two presidential terms.

This month, he transformed Russia's parliamentary elections into a referendum on his eight-year leadership, telling Russians a sweep for his party would be interpreted as a nod to stay in power.

Last week, Mr. Putin backed Mr. Medvedev, a soft-spoken former law professor, to succeed him as their party's presidential candidate, effectively guaranteeing him the post.

Mr. Medvedev, 42, accepted, but made a televised plea to his long-time mentor, urging him to head the government. The request unleashed a frenzy of speculation about the prospect of two leaders at Russia's helm.

Since the fall of communism in 1991, the Russian presidency has been a powerful post, responsible for the military and foreign policy. The president can also appoint and fire a prime minister.

Even before he first made his pitch to his boss to stay on in politics, it was widely viewed that as president Mr. Medvedev would defer to Mr. Putin. The two have worked together for 17 years, but Mr. Medvedev has no power base of his own and owes his entire career to Mr. Putin.

Although his résumé looks good - he is first deputy prime minister and chairman of the board of Gazprom, the powerful state-owned gas monopoly - Mr. Medvedev is viewed as a Putin loyalist first and an average manager.

"He is very weak," said Stanislav Belkovsky, director of Moscow's National Strategy Institute. "He has a terrible time with decisions."

Mr. Medvedev, who has no background in the secret service or military, is seen as a comparative liberal in the West, but others say this is a façade.

"He's no liberal. He's Putin's closest subordinate," said political analyst Nikolai Petrov, of the Carnegie Moscow Center. "He was always working for Putin.

"He's very loyal and he's very weak, which is good for many players. It's possible to influence him. It's possible to keep the system without any major changes."

Mr. Petrov, however, noted that Mr. Medvedev could grow into the president's job once he builds his own team and cultivates his own loyalists.

The analyst also said he believes Mr. Putin is clinging to power to protect himself from attacks from enemies once he's out of the Kremlin and no longer immune from prosecution.

Mr. Putin's announcement yesterday stole some of the thunder from what was supposed to be the first step in Mr. Medvedev's political coronation. Instead, all eyes remained on Mr. Putin.

"[We] shouldn't be ashamed or afraid of transferring the key powers of the country, the destiny of Russia to the hands of such a man," Mr. Putin added in his speech.

The party's vote, on the surface, had all the trappings of a U.S.-styled political convention, but lacked the suspense.

Mr. Medvedev was the lone candidate. After brief speeches by Mr. Medvedev and Mr. Putin, delegates voted 478-1 in his favour, with no debate.

For his part, Mr. Medvedev vowed not to stray from the economic and political reforms Mr. Putin initiated eight years ago. The only way this will be possible, he added, would be with Mr. Putin as prime minister.

Russian opinion polls show more than 50 per cent of Russians are ready to vote for anyone chosen by Mr. Putin.

Ms. Shevtsova, meanwhile, said she's bracing for more twists in Russia's ongoing political saga as the March presidential elections near.

"Life will be interesting. This is not the end of the game. This is only the first act of the game."

RUSSIA'S DUAL EXECUTIVE

Russia's 1993 constitution created a dual executive consisting of a president and prime minister. Here are some of the powers held by each office.

President

The president defines the basic directions of domestic and foreign policy. He or she appoints and dismisses prime ministers and may dismiss the whole government. The president also has extensive powers over military policy, is commander-in-chief of the armed forces and is empowered to declare national or regional states of martial law.

Prime minister

The prime minister submits to the president nominations for all subordinate government positions. He or she carries out administration in line with the constitution and laws and presidential decrees. Government ministries execute several policies such as credit and monetary, defence, foreign and state security.

Source: countrystudies.us/russia

PM announces Canada’s new Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan

PM announces Canada’s new Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan

17 December 2007
Ottawa, Ontario

Prime Minister Stephen Harper today announced the Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan, a comprehensive set of proposed new measures that will make Canadians safer by legislating tougher federal government regulation of food, health, and consumer products.

Speaking at the Salvation Army Christmas Toy Depot in Ottawa, Prime Minister Harper noted that there has been a sharp rise in the number of product recalls involving unsafe toys, food and drugs in recent years. “Canadians rightly expect their federal government to police the safety of the products they bring into their homes,” the Prime Minister said. “Today, I’m pleased to announce a plan that will significantly enhance our ability to do just that.”

The proposed legislation, to be introduced in the New Year, will transform the government’s approach to regulating product safety. For the first time in Canada, instead of merely reacting to problems, the regulations will be designed to prevent them. New measures will include:

  • Mandatory product recalls when companies fail to act on legitimate safety concerns.
  • Making importers responsible for the safety of goods they bring into Canada.
  • Increasing maximum fines under the Food and Drug Act from $5,000 up to current international standards.
  • Better safety information for consumers and guidance to industries on building safety throughout their supply chains.

    “The Food and Product Safety Action Plan delivers on our Government’s commitment to building a stronger, safer, better Canada,” said Prime Minister Harper. “This plan will benefit all Canadians: it will improve our safety and health, reward responsible industry players, and enhance Canada’s reputation abroad as a country whose product safety standards are second to none.”

    The Government will begin engaging consumer and industry stakeholders on how best to proceed with the Food and Consumer Safety Action Plan in the New Year.
  • Monday, December 17, 2007

    Russia makes first nuclear fuel shipment to Iran's Bushehr plant


    Russia makes first nuclear fuel shipment to Iran's Bushehr plant

    Associated Press

    MOSCOW — Russia has made its first shipment of nuclear fuel to Iran's Bushehr plant, which is at the centre of the international tensions over Tehran's nuclear program, the Foreign Ministry said Monday.

    Iran contends the nuclear power plant operation in Bushehr is strictly for civilian purposes, but many critics suspect Tehran intends to use the plant as part of an alleged effort to develop nuclear weapons.

    Construction at Bushehr had been frequently delayed. Officials said the delays were due to payment disputes, but many observers suggested Russia also was unhappy with Iran's resistance to international pressure to make its nuclear program more open and to assure the international community that it was not developing nuclear arms.

    "All fuel that will be delivered will be under the control and guarantees of the International Atomic Energy Agency for the whole time it stays on Iranian territory," the Foreign Ministry said in a statement. "Moreover, the Iranian side gave additional written guarantees that the fuel will be used only for the Bushehr nuclear power plant."

    Iran’s nuclear power plant in Bushehr, about 1,200 kilometres south of Tehran. Raheb Homavandi/Reuters

    Enlarge Image

    Iran’s nuclear power plant in Bushehr, about 1,200 kilometres south of Tehran. (Raheb Homavandi/Reuters)

    Recent

    The Globe and Mail

    Russia announced last week that its construction disputes with Iran had been resolved and said fuel deliveries would begin about a half year before Bushehr was expected to go into service.

    Iran confirmed that it had received the shipment, the official Iranian news agency IRNA reported.

    "The first nuclear fuel shipment for the Bushehr atomic power plant arrived in Iran Monday," IRNA quoted Iranian Vice-President Gholam Reza Aghazadeh as saying.

    Two weeks ago, a U.S. National Intelligence Estimate report concluded that Iran had halted efforts to develop nuclear weapons in 2003 and that the program had been frozen through at least the middle of this year.

    Although Russia has resisted drives to impose sanctions on Iran, it also repeatedly has urged Tehran to co-operate with the Vienna, Austria-based IAEA to resolve concerns over the nuclear program.

    Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov underlined that position last week after a meeting in Moscow with his Iranian counterpart Manouchehr Mottaki.

    Mr. Lavrov said resolving the controversy is possible "solely on the basis of the nuclear nonproliferation treaty, IAEA rules and principles and, certainly, with Iran proving its right to the peaceful use of nuclear energy."

    Officials at Atomstryexport, the Russian contractor for Bushehr, raised the prospect last week of creating a Russian-Iranian joint venture "to ensure security" at the Bushehr plant, according to the RIA-Novosti agency.

    That could indicate Russian interest in ensuring that enriched uranium at the plant is not stolen or diverted. Depleted fuel rods also could be reprocessed into plutonium.

    Sunday, December 16, 2007

    Tim Jones wins Liberal nomination




    Tim Jones wins Liberal nomination



    Tim Jones has won the Liberal nomination and will now face off against Conservative Lois Brown, Green Glenn Hubbers, Dorian Baxter and an NDP candidate to be named later in Newmarket-Aurora. Unofficial results have Jones winning 76% of the total votes cast. At this point I do not know when the NDP have scheduled their nomination but they should have to nominate a candidate soon. A federal election will likely take place in February around the budget time. Belinda Stronach will remain the MP for Newmarket-Aurora until the government falls and will then leave politics to return to Magna International. Congratulations go out to both Tim Jones and Gus Khouri for their nomination campaigns and willingness to put their names forward to participate in Canada's democratic process.

    -Darryl

    Saturday, December 15, 2007

    Newmarket Aurora Liberal Nomination this Sunday


    Update:

    The weather is bad...but the show must go on. For those who attended the Conservative nomination meeting at Dinardos last year, many members remember the terrible weather conditions that prevented some people from not being able to vote. Today Liberals will battle roads covered in a foot of snow to vote for either Tim Jones or Gus Khouri. To my knowledge the event has NOT been canceled at this point. Those watching the Bills game right now can get a pretty good idea of what the conditions are like today. Results coming soon...

    Current Weather Conditions:

    Light snow

    -9

    °C

    Light snow



    -Darryl





    Results coming soon...

    Tim Jones:
    Gus Khouri:
    Total Votes:



    Who is going to replace Belinda Stronach and become the Liberal candidate in the next federal election in Newmarket-Aurora? Tomorrow night Gus Khouri faces off against Tim Jones at 2pm at Dinardos in Aurora. Like with the Conservative nomination locally, expect weather to play a major role in the outcome. 16cm of snow are expected to fall in Newmarket starting tonight. Results will be posted here as soon as they are made available.

    Websites:

    www.gusonthehill.ca

    www.tim-jones.ca

    www.nafla.ca

    ********


    Newmarket Aurora Liberal Nomination this Sunday


    Sunday, December 16, 2007
    2PM - 5:30PM

    Di Nardo's - The Mansion
    400 Industrial Parkway, South
    Aurora, ON L4G 6W7

    Cut-off date for eligibility to vote at the meeting: November 28, 2007.
    Nominations close date: December 12, 2007.

    Candidates nominated to date are displayed here by last name in alphabetical order. The short biographies below were prepared by the candidates.


    *************


    Tim Jones

    Tim Jones has been in public service all his life. He began his career in Montreal where he served as the youth representative for the Hampstead Municipal and Recreational Association. He worked 6 years for the Town’ of Hampstead followed by a 25 year career with the City of North York in Parks and Recreation.

    In 1978, he won a seat on Aurora Council where he served as Councillor for 16 consecutive years and then successfully ran for Mayor of the Town of Aurora, serving for 12 more years. As Mayor, he also served as a Regional Councillor in the Region of York chairing the powerful Administration and Finance Committee.

    Tim is a founding co-chairperson of the York Region Character Community Council. He is a member of the Ontario Municipal Management Institute, (CMM3).

    He has helped to raise over $600,000 through Tennis and Golf tournaments, with proceeds going to Southlake Regional Health Care Centre, the Safety Village of York Region and many other local charities.

    Tim was awarded with the Queen’s Jubilee Medal by the Federal Government and was recognized with the Paul Harris Fellow from the Rotary Club for his community work.


    Gus Khouri

    I was born on July 2nd 1983 in Beirut, Lebanon. My family lived between Saudi Arabia and Lebanon for the first six years of my life until we made our new home in Newmarket, Ontario.

    In Newmarket, my family settled in the Savage Road area at Yonge & Mulock and we now live nearby at Bathurst & Mulock. I attended St. Paul’s and St. Nicholas’ Catholic Elementary Schools and then Sacred Heard Catholic High School.

    I later attended the University of Ottawa where I studied Mechanical Engineering and Business Management.

    Since April 2007, I have worked in engineering sales for International Safety Systems Inc., which is an industrial safety supplier for the regional manufacturing industry.

    In my spare time, I am prototyping an upright human mobility device (essentially an upright electronic wheel chair that can go up and down stairs) for Mechanilife Systems Incorporated – a company I founded in 2005.

    I have been heavily involved with the Young Liberals of Canada, the Ontario Young Liberals and the Ontario General Election (Oct. 10). My activities in this capacity have been both in Newmarket-Aurora and out.

    Baird regrets 'watered down' climate deal



    Baird regrets 'watered down' climate deal

    Updated Sat. Dec. 15 2007 1:39 PM ET

    The Canadian Press

    BALI, Indonesia -- With international climate talks teetering toward collapse, countries rallied Saturday to a last-ditch agreement that they would strive for a new global climate-change treaty over the next two years.

    Consensus at a United Nations summit arrived after a day of high drama in which the United States drew boos for threatening to reject a deal and an angry Chinese delegation led a revolt by developing countries.

    Last-minute compromise resulted in a so-called "Bali Road map'' -- a two-year plan to seek a treaty that would replace the Kyoto Protocol in 2012.

    Delegates who had hoped to launch the talks with clear targets in hand were disappointed by a deal that eschewed mention of hard numbers and replaced them with fuzzy references to reducing greenhouse gases.

    Canada helped gut some of the substance from Saturday's deal and then expressed regret when the final agreement was ultimately watered down even more than it had hoped.

    But Environment Minister John Baird hailed the talks as a positive first step toward an effective global climate treaty.

    "We were naturally disappointed in the language that weakened and watered down the agreement,'' Baird said.

    "But it's better than no agreement.''

    He said he was disappointed that the deal was almost completely stripped of any reference to numbers and targets that could have been the starting point for the discussion.

    Canada sided with the U.S. and Japan in a small group of wealthy non-European countries that removed specific references to emissions targets for developed countries by 2020.

    The treaty was also stripped of references to longer-term targets -- targets Baird said he had been prepared to accept.

    But Baird said the Bali conference achieved its primary goals of launching negotiations, getting all countries to agree to basic parameters, and setting a 2009 deadline date.

    Instead of clear targets Saturday's document said countries recognize that "deep cuts in global emissions'' will be required, and it called for a "long-term global goal for emissions reductions.''

    Near-collapse

    Even that mushy consensus came close to collapsing.

    A Chinese negiotiator pounded his fist into a table and drew cheers from other developing countries when he angrily rejected an earlier draft amid complaints that poorer countries had been sidelined in 11th-hour discussions.

    The talks then appeared doomed when the U.S. rejected a subsequent compromise.

    But the chorus of boos that rained down on the American delegation was replaced by cheers when in a stunning about-face U.S. negotiator Paula Dobriansky declared she would accept the deal.

    "We've listened very closely to many of our colleagues,'' she announced to a jubilant auditorium.

    "We will go forward and join consensus.''

    The hall erupted in an ovation for a U.S. delegation that had been cast throughout the summit as a climate culprit. Canada, Japan, and a small group of other countries were also frequent targets of criticism.

    Liberal Leader Stephane Dion hailed the global agreement as an encouraging development in the fight against climate change. But he regretted the role played by Canada's government.

    "If Canada would have shown more leadership it would have been better than that,'' he said.

    "If Canada would have been with Europe instead of being in the same bed as President (George W.) Bush, it would have been better.''

    Canada and its allies steadfastly rejected clear references in the main summit text to a goal for developed countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25 to 45 per cent from 1990 levels by 2020.

    Baird said Canada could never reach that target.

    He dismissed the European-sponsored objective as unattainable, arguing that Canada would need to slash emissions by 38 to 53 per cent within only 12 years to reach that target.

    It's a position that earned Canada the scorn of environmentalists in Bali, with one spoof newspaper ad depicting Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Bush, and Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda in a mock movie poster as stars on an environmental Titanic.

    Environmentalists said they were pleased a deal had been salvaged. But they continued to question the role Canada played in Bali. Steven Guilbeault of Equiterre said the Canadian delegation showed no leadership at the summit -- with regrettable consequences.

    "We could have had a historic agreement here in Bali,'' he said.

    "We have to go home with a watered-down agreement.''

    The UN chief on climate change, Yvo de Boer, hailed the deal as a collapse of the "Berlin Wall'' between countries committed to fighting global warming and those content to sit on the sidelines.

    Gov't vs. environmentalists

    But that spirit of collaboration did not ease a bitter dispute between the Canadian government and its own country's environmentalists, who engaged in open warfare throughout the summit.

    Baird refused to meet with green groups in Bali and his delegation worked actively to discredit them.

    Government officials drew attention to some having partisan ties to the Liberal party. They also planted suggestions in journalists' ears that green groups contributed to global warming by arriving at Bali in such large numbers on greenhouse-gas-spewing airplanes.

    The environmentalists swung back repeatedly.

    Their tactics ranged from conventional means like petitions, to more covert efforts like putting Canadian media in touch with foreign diplomats who criticized their country's performance.

    They even tried sleep-deprivation tactics with one Canadian official. The cellphone number of an aide to Harper was plastered on the Internet, and he was bombarded with hundreds of crank-calls and text messages throughout the wee hours Saturday.

    Green groups also put Baird on the defensive by informing Canadian media any time the minister left a meeting. He found himself fending off suggestions that he skipped critical talks late Thursday.

    Saturday's developments came after marathon negotiations overnight, which first settled a battle between Europe and the U.S. over whether the document should mention specific goals for rich countries' obligations to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

    Upcoming talks may help determine for years to come how well the world can control climate change, and how severe the consequences of global warming will be.

    In a separate agreement among Kyoto signatories, Baird was among the few voices calling for the 2020 targets to be removed.

    A dozen countries then rose to take a slap at Canada's position and Baird eventually agreed to leave the target in the final text -- even though he repeated later that Canada can never meet it.

    As for developing countries, the final document instructs negotiators to consider incentives and other means to encourage poorer countries to curb, on a voluntary basis, growth in their emissions.

    The explosive growth of greenhouse emissions in China, India and other developing countries could negate any cutbacks in the developed world.

    The Bali conference had been charged with launching negotiations for a regime of deeper emissions reductions to succeed the Kyoto deal, which requires 37 industrial countries to cut output of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases by five per cent below 1990 levels by 2012.

    Earlier, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon had expressed frustration over the last-minute dispute over the Bali document and urged more than 180 national delegations to swiftly adopt it.

    The U.S. has come under intense criticism in Bali, including from former vice-president Al Gore, over the Bush administration's opposition to mandatory emission cuts.

    But all parties acknowledged that negotiations cannot succeed without the involvement of the United States, the world's worst emitter of greenhouse gases.

    For years, the rest of the world has sought to bring the Americans into the framework of international mandates. At this point, however, many seem resigned to waiting for a change in White House leadership after next November's election.

    In a series of landmark reports this year, the UN's network of climate scientists warned of severe consequences -- from rising seas, droughts, severe weather, species extinction and other effects -- without sharp cutbacks in emissions of the industrial, transportation and agricultural gases blamed for warming.

    To avoid the worst, the Nobel Prize-winning panel said, emissions should be reduced by 25 per cent to 40 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020.

    The Kyoto signatories have accepted that goal, and the numbers were written into early versions of the Bali conference's draft decision statement -- not as a binding target, but as a suggestion in the document's preamble.

    Late Reversal by U.S. Yields Climate Plan



    Late Reversal by U.S. Yields Climate Plan

    Published: December 16, 2007

    NUSA DUA, Indonesia — In a tumultuous final session at international climate talks in which the United States delegates were booed and hissed, the world’s nations committed Saturday to negotiating a new accord by 2009 that, in theory, would set the world on a course toward halving emissions of heat-trapping gases by 2050.


    The dramatic finish to the negotiations came after a last-minute standoff during a day of see-saw emotions, with the co-organizer of the conference, Yvo de Boer, fleeing the podium at one point as he held back tears and the representative from Papua New Guinea telling the American delegation to lead, follow or “please get out of the way.”

    The standoff started when developing countries demanded the United States agree that the eventual pact not only measure poorer countries’ steps, but also the effectiveness of financial aid and technological assistance from wealthier ones.

    The United States did capitulate in that open session, which many observers and delegates said included more public acrimony and emotion than any of the treaty conferences since 1992, when countries drafted the ailing original climate pact, the Framework Convention on Climate Change.

    In a broader sense, the closing session of the two-week negotiation here was the culmination of a profound shift over the course of months by the Bush administration from insisting that the 1992 treaty, signed by President Bush’s father, was sufficient on its own to avoid dangerous human interference with the climate.

    In 2005 talks in Montreal, for example, the American negotiating team walked out of one session, rejecting any talk of formal negotiations over new steps to improve on that pact.

    But since then, the science, and politics, of climate have shifted dramatically.

    This year, a set of four reports emerged from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, each cementing more clearly than ever that humans were warming the world, and that unabated emissions would lead to centuries of disrupted climate patterns, rising seas and ecological and social harm.

    Along with the science came the Oscar-winning film “An Inconvenient Truth;” Hurricane Katrina, which while not linked to global warming in itself, was a vivid and effective icon; and spiking oil prices, adding urgency to calls for moving away from fossil fuels. Finally, the Supreme Court rejected the Bush administration’s contention that carbon dioxide was not a pollutant under the purview of the Environmental Protection Agency.

    In May, President Bush signaled the change in his stance most powerfully when he announced his own parallel set of meetings with the countries accounting for 85 percent of greenhouse gas emissions. In Bali, European delegates threatened to pull out of those talks unless the Bush delegation agreed to keep some semblance of concrete targets in the outline for the next two years of talks.

    Those targets remain in the agreement — including a possible cut in rich countries’ emissions of up to 40 percent by 2020 and overall emissions cut in half by 2050 — but they are now a footnote to the nonbinding preamble, not a main feature of the negotiating “road map.”

    In all of this, the Bush administration did not, in the end, have to shift overall from its most staunchly defended goal, which was that it would only agree to a comprehensive new accord that maintained flexibility, allowing nations to agree on a rough goal for global emissions, but using any mix of means at the national level to get there.

    The most tense and emotional moments of the two-week conference came during the morning and early afternoon Saturday, 24 hours after a deal was supposed to have been reached.

    Delegates said seven years of pent up frustrations over the Bush administration’s standoffish attitude toward global-warming agreements spilled out into the final, public session of the meeting, particularly over the issue of the role of developing nations.

    The delegate from Uganda urged the American negotiators to change their minds. “I would like to beg them,” said Maria Mutagamba, minister of environment.

    Delegates piled on, cheering speakers who criticized the United States and booing the leader of the American delegation, Undersecretary of State Paula J. Dobriansky, when she spoke.

    “I’ve been following these negotiations for 20 years and I’ve never seen anything like this,” said Alden Meyer, the director of policy at the Union of Concerned Scientists, an American nonprofit group.

    As so often happens in such complex worldwide negotiations, the last-minute standoff that inspired such emotions would look trivial to an outside observer.

    The dispute centered on the placement of the three words: “measurable, reportable and verifiable.” It was significant because it focused on the role developing countries should have in combating climate change.


    The United States is pushing for developing countries to take a more active role in reducing greenhouse emissions. India submitted a last-minute amendment that, by shifting the placement of those three words, attempted to sharpen the distinction between poor and rich countries in the text and thus, in the eyes of many delegates, play down the role of poorer countries.

    Delegates from several developing countries spoke in support of the change. The European Union representative also backed the change “as a sign of the spirit of the cooperation.”

    But the United States delegation voiced its disapproval.

    “The formulation that has been put forward we cannot accept because it does represent a significant change in the balance that many of us have worked toward over the last week,” Ms. Dobriansky said. Loud boos echoed among the thousands of delegates in the convention hall.

    When the delegate from Papua New Guinea, Kevin Conrad, asked to speak, opposition to the United States had reached a crescendo.

    “We seek your leadership,” he said referring to the United States. “But if for some reason you are not willing to lead, leave it to the rest of us. Please, get out of the way.”

    South Africa, Mali, Brazil, Jamaica, Uganda and Tanzania followed with statements supporting India’s position or that of developing countries more generally.

    None of America’s traditional allies came to its defense, including Japan, which offered a noncommittal statement that amounted to an abstention.

    Ms. Dobriansky then spoke again.

    “We came here to Bali because we want to go forward as part of a new framework, we believe we have a shared vision and we want to move that forward, we want a success here in Bali,” she said. “We will go forward and join consensus.”

    The room erupted in lengthy applause, realizing that a deal was at hand.

    Kapil Sibal, the Indian minister of science and technology, thanked the United States for “coming on board.”

    Xie Zhenhua, China’s lead delegate at the conference, took the floor and welcomed on the United States “onto this bus.”

    But he quickly added: “The United States is not in the driver’s seat.”

    *********




    Isolated Canada grudgingly accepts Bali deal

    Globe and Mail Update

    NUSA DUA, Indonesia — After a failed attempt to block an agreement, Canada found itself isolated at the Bali conference Saturday and grudgingly accepted a new accord to set a target of 25 to 40 per cent for cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions by wealthy countries by the end of the next decade.

    Environment Minister John Baird spoke against the ambitious target, but found himself virtually alone. Only Russia supported him – so he withdrew his objection, sparking a lengthy burst of applause from other countries.

    Mr. Baird also failed in his attempt to gain commitments by China, India and other developing nations to reduce their fast-growing emissions.

    “We weren't pleased with the language that weakened and watered-down the agreement that was adopted here, but it's better than no agreement,” he told reporters later.

    “There are 190 countries represented here in Bali, and 38 of them agreed to take on national binding targets today,” he said. “We've just got to work on some of the other 150.”

    The developments came on a day of high drama and tension at the Bali conference as the 190 countries worked overtime to reach two major agreements after 15 days of negotiations.

    The first agreement, applying to all 190 countries, was softened significantly to satisfy the opposition of the United States. The agreement proclaims that “deep cuts” will be required in global emissions of greenhouse gases to respond to the “urgency” of the global warming crisis.

    But this agreement fails to mention any specific targets, leaving that issue for negotiations over the next two years. The European Union had pressed hard for the targets, but had to give up on the issue when the U.S. refused to accept it.

    This broader agreement nearly collapsed at the last minute today when India and China insisted on stronger promises by wealthy countries to help provide “green” technology to the developing nations. When the tougher language was added to the agreement, the United States refused to accept the deal – sparking a wave of criticism from almost every other nation at the conference. Finally the U.S. flip-flopped and accepted the language, allowing the deal to go ahead.

    “I think the exciting part is that America is on board, which is a good thing,” Mr. Baird said. “We've said we need to get all the big emitters on board – the United States, China and India. The good news is that we came out with one of the three. We've got two years to negotiate and maybe we'll get the other two on board.”

    Conference delegates openly jeered the United States when it tried to oppose the promises sought by the developing nations. Then speaker after speaker demanded that the U.S. must not be allowed to kill the deal single-handedly.

    “What we witnessed today was incredible drama,” said Alden Meyer, director of strategy and policy at the Union of Concerned Scientists. “I've been following the climate negotiations for 20 years and I've never seen anything like it. These talks came to the brink of collapse. Then there was a brilliant strategy to unite the world to call on the United States to rejoin the international community and take on this problem.

    The second agreement, later in the day, set targets for deep cuts in emissions – but it applied only to the 38 wealthy countries that have ratified the Kyoto accord, the 1997 agreement that set moderate targets for emission cuts by the wealthy nations.

    The United States has not ratified Kyoto, so it was not represented in negotiations on this agreement – although environmentalists said Canada was doing the bidding of the U.S. by opposing the deal.

    “In the end, we're thankful that Canada listened to most countries here, and listened to Canadians who wanted action, not obstruction and not following the lead of George Bush,” said Quebec-based environmentalist Steven Guilbeault.

    Mr. Baird said he was not at all worried by the widespread criticism of Canada's stance at the Bali conference. “We came here to say things that a lot of people were thinking,” he said. “There is a certain price of leadership, and I don't apologize for that.”



    ****************



    Six Weeks, Musharraf Lifts State of Emergency



    After Six Weeks, Musharraf Lifts State of Emergency

    Published: December 16, 2007

    ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — President Pervez Musharraf lifted the six-week old state of emergency and restored the Constitution on Saturday, after passing a flurry of constitutional amendments and decrees to ensure that his recent actions would not be challenged by any court.

    In a national address on state television, Mr. Musharraf said that Pakistan had been in extreme danger and that imposing the emergency had been “unavoidable.” Since then, he said, the situation had largely improved, armed militants had been pushed back in the northwest of the country, and free and fair elections would be held across the country on Jan. 8. “Today I am feeling very happy that all the promises that I have made to the people, to the country have been fulfilled,” he said. The removal of the state of emergency restores fundamental rights like the right of assembly and freedom of movement three weeks ahead of parliamentary elections, and it would ensure that elections are free and fair, said the acting law minister, Afzal Haider.

    Mr. Musharraf also took the oaths of 14 new Supreme Court judges Saturday afternoon, permanently replacing the Supreme Court he dismissed on Nov. 3.

    In repealing the state of emergency, which many here described as de facto martial law, Mr. Musharraf has completed a number of steps demanded by his critics at home and abroad, and by the Bush administration, to return the country to the path to democracy. On Nov. 28, he resigned his military post of chief of army staff, ending eight years of military rule.

    Yet the lifting of emergency rule will not resolve the tensions in the country, in particular between the judiciary and the president. Mr. Musharraf’s recent decrees have effectively muzzled the press, curbed the judiciary and made him impregnable before the Parliament and the courts. But, according to a letter sent to news organizations by a group of former ambassadors and foreign secretaries, those decrees have created deep divisions in society and will further destabilize the country.

    Members of civil society, the media, and the legal fraternity would not accept Mr. Musharraf’s latest moves, said Wajihuddin Ahmed, a former Supreme Court judge who led a challenge to Mr. Musharraf’s Oct. 6 re-election. “Surely they will express themselves in times to come,” he said.

    Mr. Musharraf said in his executive order restoring the Constitution that any provision made during the last six weeks of emergency rule “shall not be called in question by or before any court.”

    A second order revoking the proclamation of emergency states that any future presidential order regarding the issue could also not be challenged in any court. Presidential orders usually lapse after three months unless ratified by Parliament, but if issued under a state of emergency, they automatically become law.

    Mr. Musharraf also issued six constitutional amendments late Friday night that strengthen his legal position regarding his re-election and his dismissal of the Supreme Court. Three amendments cleared away restrictions raised by lawyers challenging Mr. Musharraf’s eligibility to run for another term. Another confirmed that the former judges of the Supreme Court could no longer continue in their jobs, and that the newly installed judges would replace them.

    The amendments came under rapid criticism from all sides. Mr. Ahmed said they were unconstitutional and were aimed solely at securing Mr. Musharraf’s personal position. “A more brazen exercise of executive power I have not seen,” he said.

    “He has been able to consolidate his position as an ‘elected’ president of the country and disband the Supreme Court,” said Rasul Baksh Rais, a political analyst at Lahore University of Management Sciences. “But the political troubles of Pervez Musharraf are not going to end.”

    Five judges of the former Supreme Court, including the former Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry, remained incommunicado, under house arrest in their official houses close to the president’s office. The four senior lawyers, who have headed the campaign to challenge Mr. Musharraf’s re-election, are also under house arrest.

    Lawyers across the country are boycotting the courts and refusing to work before judges who took a new oath under the emergency, virtually paralyzing judicial proceedings.

    Concern about the general stability of the country prompted 23 former ambassadors and foreign secretaries to sign a statement this week calling for Mr. Musharraf to reverse all the steps he has taken since imposing emergency rule. They pointed out the previous Supreme Court ruled the state of emergency illegal before it was dismissed and its judges place under house arrest.

    “These steps which amount to martial law are unconstitutional and illegal,” their statement said. “Besides undermining the rule of law and delivering a severe blow to the independence of the judiciary, they have dangerously destabilized the country.” Mr. Musharraf also signed an ordinance Friday giving him, as chairman of the National Command Authority, overall responsibility for safeguarding Pakistan’s nuclear material and establishments. The move was only formalizing a system of control set up five years ago, said a military spokesman, Maj. Gen. Waheed Arshad. Analysts agreed it did not represent anything new but said it was another sign of Mr. Musharraf securing a continued prominent role for himself as president.

    General Arshad reported that three civilians and two army personnel were killed by a suicide bomber on a bicycle Saturday at the gate of an army garrison in the northwestern town of Nowshera. Six people were wounded. It was the third suicide bombing in the country in two days.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/16/world/asia/16pakistan.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

    Friday, December 14, 2007

    Stéphane Dion’s Inconvenient Truth




    Stéphane Dion’s Inconvenient Truth
    December 11, 2007

    One subject you can be sure Stéphane Dion will not be talking about during the UN climate change conference in Bali is how his Liberal Party presided over a massive increase in greenhouse gas emissions while they were in power. Fortunately other Liberals have been far more forthcoming on the subject.

    According to senior Chrétien advisor Eddie Goldenberg, the Liberal government signed the Kyoto Protocol without ever having a plan to implement it.

    According to two former Liberal environment ministers, David Anderson and Christine Stewart, the Chrétien cabinet, which included Mr. Dion, never made the environment a priority.

    During Stéphane Dion’s time as environment minister, Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions rose to 33% over Kyoto targets.

    During his time as environment minister, Canada’s air quality rankings fell to next-to-last in the OECD.

    And Stéphane Dion’s own deputy leader has summed up the Liberal record on the environment when he simply stated, “Stéphane, we didn’t get it done.”

    The Dion Liberal record on the environment is a record of failure. It doesn’t matter that Stéphane Dion mouthed the right words. It doesn’t matter that he named his dog Kyoto. What matters are results, and neither he nor his party have any to speak of.

    Leadership means learning from your mistakes. Stéphane Dion should learn from his.

    No results at home. Hypocrisy abroad. Stéphane Dion is not a leader and he’s not worth the risk.

    http://www.conservative.ca/EN/2459/95078

    Dion Forgets His Fossil Award

    Dion Forgets His Fossil Award
    December 14, 2007


    Despite promising that he would never attack the Canadian government while attending the Bali conference, Stephane Dion continues to play his partisan games and make his cheap political attacks at the conference. Yet his latest attack once again highlights Dion’s hypocrisy even more – with Dion bringing up the “Fossil Awards” (https://www.liberal.ca/bali_e.aspx, December 13, 2007), apparently hoping that no one will point out that Dion himself received his own “Fossil of the Day” award:

    The facts:

    • In December 2005, environmental groups awarded the Liberal government with the “Fossil of the Day” award at the Montreal conference that was being chaired by Stephane Dion (ECO, December 2, 2005, and ECO, December 3, 2005)

    Message from John Tory


    Message from John Tory


    Dear Darryl,

    The Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario is a proud organization, with an incredible record of past successes and endless opportunities for the future.

    Quite simply, the campaign we ran in 2007 fell well short of expectations, and did not live up to our party's legacy of success. We do however have a lot we can be proud of. Working with you, I'm very proud that we managed to erase the party's monstrous $10.5 million debt from 2003 and get the party into financial shape to fight the election. We had a great slate of candidates and a committed hard-working team of volunteers around the province who were the backbone of our campaign effort.

    I am committed to leading the renewal of our Party over the next four years should you give me the chance. I am writing today to ask you for that opportunity and to ask you to vote no during the leadership review vote in February.

    There is nothing quite like a defeat in a general election to put into perspective why it is one chooses public life. I sought the leadership of our party in 2004 because I believed then – as I do now – that Ontario deserves better.

    Dalton McGuinty's Liberals are a party that will say whatever it takes to hold onto power.

    If it sounds good before an election to promise no new tax increases, they'll say it. If it sounds good before an election to say they'll control spending and the size of government, they'll say it. If they believe it will help them win votes to promise lower health care wait times, they'll say it. Unfortunately, we know it's just empty talk.

    We believe in trust, competence and fairness. They believe in spin.

    Despite this, on October 10th, the people of Ontario delivered a verdict that was extremely disappointing and obviously not what we had hoped to achieve. As party leader, I take full responsibility for that outcome.

    And I will not shy away from that. Whether in my career as a Chief Executive Officer of two of Canada's largest communications companies, or as head of the Canadian Football League or one of the many charities I've been proud to serve, accountability always rests with the leader.

    I have spent the better part of the last two months travelling to every corner of our province – visiting 13 cities so far – to meet with literally hundreds of party members like you.

    I've been as open and honest as I possibly could be about what I think went wrong. We fell short of our goal and I allowed one issue to halt our momentum. We didn't do a good enough job of clearly defining who we are. And notwithstanding consistent efforts to focus on issues of importance to hard-working taxpayers, we didn't adequately get across what we had to offer to the people of Ontario. I apologize to you for these mistakes and commit to you that they will not happen again.

    On the issue of the faith-based education policy specifically, I have heard from party members that they believe the issue has been clearly dealt with by the voters and accordingly, we should not deal with it further. I agree. The voters rendered a clear verdict which I accept and this issue will not be part of any future platform while I am the Leader of this Party.

    The election loss shone a bright, if painful, spotlight on those some of those other areas that I, as leader, and we, as a party, need to reform, renew and reinvigorate.

    In the past two months, I have met with hundreds of grassroots Conservatives. I have listened, I have learned, and these are the top renewal and rebuilding priorities you have told me to address:

    1. POLICY

    The grassroots must have a final say on the Party's platform. It must be a platform which is concise, clearly distinct from those of our opponents and consistent with Progressive Conservative principles. It must come from a process which includes all Conservatives

    2. RIDING SUPPORT

    The Party's financial crisis after 2003 took a heavy toll on support for ridings whether database, communications or basic organization. This is basic support ridings need to be ready for 2011.

    3. ORGANIZATION & CAMPAIGN READINESS

    Too many ridings saw good candidates end up without adequate local support. We have to get back to basics on membership, money and training. We have to look at new techniques. This will require new full-time staff to help organize and train the volunteers so crucial to local success.

    4. PARTY FINANCES

    Continue to show strong leadership on internal accountability and fundraising. You want us to keep in place the tough measures I introduced to oversee spending and you want us to stay on top when it comes to fundraising.

    5. LEADERSHIP

    Listen and learn. Then listen some more. Keep working hard but work smarter. More time listening to the grassroots. Become a better communicator. When you do a $250/ticket fundraiser, try to schedule a lower priced ticket event too. Include a listening event with grassroots party people on every tour. Make sure the Leader's office is staffed by people who know the Party, listen to the Party and respond to its needs.

    These are some of the things you have told me must be done to clearly demonstrate we have learned from our mistakes. That must include me as your leader.

    I heard you loud and clear and I will work flat out on these things, I will keep my word to you and I won't shy away from accountability to you.

    I am committed to putting every ounce of energy into this Party that's needed to put it back where it belongs – in government. We are a professional, talented organization with the best people of any political party. I have learned there are much better ways to harness that tremendous advantage we have and that's exactly what I intend to do over the next four years.

    Yours sincerely,


    John Tory
    Leader, PC Party of Ontario

    Gus Khouri on Insights with Pam McDonald

    Gus Khouri on Insights with Pam McDonald

    Newmarket-Aurora Liberals nominate their candidate on Sunday. Here is a recent interview that Pam McDonald did with one of the nominees Gus Khouri. Gus is running against Tim Jones in a race to replace Belinda Stronach who is retiring from politics. Gus or Tim will face Dorian Baxter, Lois Brown, Glenn Hubbers and an NDP candidate yet to be named.







    China trade keeps surging





    China trade keeps surging

    Globe and Mail Update

    Canadian trade with China has surged in the last decade, surpassing the United Kingdom and Japan in 2003 to snag the No. 2 trading partner spot after the United States.

    Trade with China reached $42.1-billion last year, up 384 per cent from $8.7-billion in 1997, according to a report released Friday by Statistics Canada. As of last year, it accounted for 5 per cent of Canada's world trade.

    “The growth in Canada's merchandise trade with China reflects the emergence of China as a global economic force over the past decade,” said Jafar Khondaker, the author of the report.

    China has burst onto the world stage in the last 10 years, shifting the global economic balance with its sheer size and voracious appetite for commodities and raw materials. Since joining the World Trade Organization in 2001, it has doubled its share of global manufacturing output.

    Ten years ago, China was the world's seventh-largest economy. By 2005, it had surpassed France, Britain and Italy but still lagged the U.S., Japan and Germany.

    China's arrival as a major economic, export and consumer powerhouse has triggered a resource boom, raised global commodity prices and increased demand for Canada's vast natural resources.

    Although Canadian shipments of goods to China have taken off in the early part of this year, Canada still imports far more from China than it exports.

    Imports from China were five times higher in 2006 than in 1997 while exports to the country tripled, the report said. As a result, Canada's trade deficit with China has expanded to $26.8 billion last year from $3.9-billion.

    “A significant part of Canada-China trade can be related to the globalization of production,” Mr. Khondaker said, noting the increasing prevalence of two-way trade of the same commodity groups between the two countries.

    As of last year, two-way trade accounted for over 45 per cent of exports and 57 per cent of imports. The types of goods the two countries are exchanging include organic and inorganic chemicals, plastic and rubber materials, iron and steel, industrial and agricultural machinery and equipment, electronics, automotive equipment and parts, optical, photo, medical and surgical instruments, wood products, paper and paperboard and fish products.

    The commodity mix of exports to China have remained relatively unchanged in the last decade, the report said. Wood pulp topped the list, making up 15 per cent of the total, followed by organic chemicals, nickel articles, copper, and machinery like reactors and boilers. Plastic articles, fertilizer and fish and seafood were also major exports to China.

    The main exception to this stability was wheat, which was Canada's largest export to China in 1997, accounting for 30 per cent of exports. By last year, it averaged only 6 per cent.

    What kinds of Chinese goods are making their way into Canada? Imports of Chinese machinery, like boilers and reactors, have picked up in the last decade and now account for 20.8 per cent of the total.

    Other top imports noted in the report are computers and computer parts, auto parts, cell phones and parts, TV, audio and video equipment, hand tools, and household appliances.

    Jafar Khondaker... it is basically what has happened in the last decade, how trade has changed? there is nothing that has compared trade from ten years ago. all of the numbers have been previously released, this uses customs-based data. these are two different concepts - Balance of payments and customs. - BoP has adjustments made for various reasons - how countries release their data. But customs data comes from customs, so this is not published by Statscan....the reason is that data from customs - trade between Cda and China. The breakdown part is new.

    By 2003, China became Cda's second-largest trading partner. It might have - there was a report published three weeks ago in Canadian Economic Observer - they may have mentioned it.

    As of last year, it accounted for 5 per cent of Canada's world trade. The U.S. accounts for -

    Thursday, December 13, 2007

    New Argentina president says U.S. allegations ‘garbage'


    New Argentina president says U.S. allegations ‘garbage'

    Associated Press

    BUENOS AIRES — Argentina's new president reacted angrily Thursday to U.S. charges that a suitcase full of Venezuelan cash seized by customs was intended to finance her campaign, calling it an example of “garbage in international politics.”

    President Cristina Fernandez also suggested that anyone who might think a female president is more easily influenced is wrong.

    The disclosure came Wednesday in a Miami court hearing for a criminal complaint against four men arrested and charged with being illegal Venezuelan agents who attempted a cover-up.

    U.S. prosecutors said a suitcase filled with nearly $800,000 was a campaign contribution to Fernandez, who was inaugurated this week as Argentina's first popularly elected female president. They said recorded conversations of those involved indicate the scheme reached to the highest levels of the Venezuelan government.

    Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's government called it a “fabricated scandal.”

    Ms. Fernandez said she remains undeterred in her quest to deepen “relations with all Latin American nations and also friendship with ... Venezuela.”

    “This president may be a woman but she's not going to allow herself to be pressured,” said Ms. Fernandez, alluding to the scandal. She called it an example of “garbage in international politics.”

    She also took a jab at U.S. officials, complaining that “more than friendly nations, they want countries ... subordinated” to them.

    In Washington, the State Department declined to comment on the specifics of the case, but said it had been aware of the investigation and renewed U.S. concerns about alleged attempts by the Chavez government to meddle in other Latin American countries.

    “We have talked about their interference in the affairs of other countries. They have tried to insert themselves into various elections throughout the region and in several cases it has backfired,” spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters, citing the specific example of Peru.

    Venezuelan Foreign Minister Nicolas Maduro called the charges “a desperate effort by the United States government using ... the judicial branch for a political, psychological, media war against the progressive governments of the continent.”

    In Buenos Aires, Argentine Justice Minister Anibal Fernandez called the charges punishment for the government's good relations with Chavez.

    He noted that Ms. Fernandez has promised even stronger trade and energy ties with Venezuela than her husband, former President Nestor Kirchner. “What is happening is stupidity, and in the current framework, I think it is a reprisal that arises from the United Sates' attitude toward Venezuela,” he told government news agency Telam.

    The allegations of campaign funding sent clandestinely from Caracas to Buenos Aires will give new ammunition to Chavez's critics who accuse him of meddling in other Latin American countries and using oil money to bolster alliances.

    The revelations will also put Cristina Fernandez on the defensive just days after she was sworn in.

    The complaint said “neither the true source nor the intended recipient of those cash funds had been disclosed.” Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas Mulvihill said in court, however, that the FBI recorded a conversation in which one of those arrested said the Fernandez campaign was the intended recipient of the money, which was seized by Argentine customs authorities in August.

    Charged with failing to register with the U.S. as agents of a foreign power were Venezuelans Moises Roman Majonica, 36; Franklin Duran, 40; and Carlos Kauffmann, 35; and Uruguayan citizen Rodolfo Wanseele, 40. All were arrested Tuesday night and will remain in custody pending a bail hearing Monday.

    If convicted, they face up to 10 years in federal prison and $250,000 in fines.

    The Venezuelan-American man who carried the suitcase, Guido Alejandro Antonini Wilson, was not charged. Argentina asked the U.S. in August to extradite him on fraud charges, but the new case suggests the Miami businessman has gone from suspect to key witness.

    Kenneth L. Wainstein, Assistant U.S. Attorney General for National Security, said the complaint “outlines an alleged plot by agents of the Venezuelan government to manipulate an American citizen in Miami in an effort to keep the lid on a burgeoning international scandal.”

    Prosecutors said in court that evidence against the men includes FBI recordings of conversations between some of them and senior officials in Venezuela's office of the vice president, intelligence service and justice ministry.

    In repeated conversations with Mr. Antonini, the four allegedly sought to keep secret the Venezuelan source of the money.

    The criminal complaint said Mr. Duran told Mr. Antonini the matter was being handled at “the top of the Venezuelan government.” It said another suspect, Mr. Kauffmann, told him his “future actions might put the life of Mr. Antonini's children at risk.”

    The complaint said during one conversation with Mr. Antonini, Mr. Duran identified the person who took the cash aboard a plane chartered by Argentina's state energy company as an assistant to the chief executive officer of Venezuela's state oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela SA.

    Officials have said Mr. Antonini was accompanied by Argentine officials and three low-level PDVSA employees, including the son of the top PDVSA official in Argentina. That manager stepped down as a result.

    The attorney for Mr. Duran and Mr. Kauffmann, Michael Hacker, said his clients are innocent and “have led squeaky-clean lives.”

    Wednesday, December 12, 2007

    N.L. quietly signs on to equalization deal


    N.L. quietly signs on to equalization deal

    Charles Mandel , CanWest News Service

    Published: Tuesday, December 11, 2007

    It looks as if a political compromise came out of the meeting between Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams last week.

    Without any fanfare, the province said Monday it's ready to sign a side deal on equalization.

    But the premier's political opponents warned Tuesday that if Williams takes the deal, it will undermine further negotiations with Harper over the hotly disputed Atlantic accord. Williams claims the accord is worth $10 billion to the province.

    Newfoundland-Labrador premier Danny Williams

    Newfoundland-Labrador premier Danny Williams


    Yvonne Jones, the Newfoundland Liberal leader, said the province doesn't have any choice but to sign the equalization deal. "In doing so, they're probably going to weaken their hand going into the future to try to negotiate the terms and conditions of the deal they had on the table," she said.

    If the province signs the deal in March, it will provide Newfoundland with $66.5 million in cash this fiscal year.

    While the annual deal would exclude non-renewable resource revenues, it imposes a cap on the amount of equalization a province can receive.

    It was one of two potential equalization deals on offer.

    Tom Marshall, the provincial Conservative finance minister, said Newfoundland didn't like either option, but had to choose the "best of two bad deals."

    Nor does the potential deal mean the battle between "Steve" - as Williams has taken to calling the prime minister - and the premier is over.

    Far from it.

    Marshall reiterated that Newfoundland still expects Harper to honour his promise to keep his word on the accord or the provincial party would move ahead with its threatened campaign - asking Canadians to vote for "Anybody But Harper."

    Loyola Hearn, the federal fisheries minister and the MP for St. John's South-Mount Pearl, scoffed at Marshall's threat. "Newfoundlanders are not stunned," he said.

    "They can see through Williams. They now realize the game he's been playing. The proof of the pudding is in the eating and minister Marshall laid the pudding on the table (Monday) and everybody sees how the province is doing."

    On Monday, Marshall announced the province expects to see an $882-million budget surplus this fiscal year, in part because of high oil prices and offshore production increases.

    Hearn pointed out that Newfoundland is likely to become a "have" province by 2009 because of oil and gas revenues and that a year-to-year deal would work in Newfoundland's favour rather than signing a long-term accord.

    Marshall disputed that signing the equalization deal would cause a loss of face in further bargaining. He called equalization a program just like any other federal program. "It's just like the Ecotrust program. It's just like any other program that we're entitled to get our share as does every other province."

    Newfoundland NDP leader Lorraine Michael noted that Marshall is taking the heat over the side deal - something that Williams criticized Nova Scotia Premier Rodney MacDonald for accepting in October - while Williams himself could not be reached for comment.

    "It seems to me it's all about trying to keep the spotlight off the premier and the fact that he seems to be changing his tactics a bit," Michael said. "Judging by the fact that Harper didn't blink says to me that Danny didn't really have that much power."

    Alex Maryland, an assistant professor of political science at Memorial University in St. John's, said the side deal would not erode the confidence of citizens in Williams. "He could say what he wants about the situation and I think people just tend to believe him.

    "They're certainly going to place more trust in him than in the prime minister."

    Al Gore Accepts Nobel Peace Prize

    Al Gore Accepts Nobel Peace Prize





    Al Gore on CBC the Hour:



    Dogs of War

    Dogs of War


    Death Grip: Inside Pro Wrestling

    Death Grip: Inside Pro Wrestling












    Brian Mulroney, Karlheinz Schreiber: Airbus Affair

    Brian Mulroney, Karlheinz Schreiber: Airbus Affair

















    Tuesday, December 11, 2007

    McGuinty gets support from provincial rivals in Commons seat battle


    McGuinty gets support from provincial rivals in Commons seat battle


    TORONTO — Premier Dalton McGuinty secured all-party support yesterday for a resolution asking the federal government to amend proposed legislation so that Ontario gets its "fair share" of seats in the Commons.

    Mr. McGuinty said the federal bill, C-22, is unfair because it violates the principle of representation by population and ensures the continued under-representation of Ontario in Ottawa.

    "Ontarians are proud Canadians," the Premier told the legislature. "We will always work in partnership with our fellow Canadians to build a stronger Ontario and a stronger Canada at the same time, but we expect to be treated as full partners all the time and that starts with fair representation in the people's house, the Parliament of Canada."

    Norm Sterling, speaking on behalf of the Progressive Conservative Party, said his caucus supported the resolution despite reservations about how the McGuinty government handled seat distribution within the Ontario Legislature. Similarly, New Democratic Party MPP Michael Prue said his party accepted the government's argument that C-22 punished Ontario by not giving it the number of seats that its population warranted.

    The resolution takes up a notch an issue that has been simmering since last spring, when the federal Conservative government introduced legislation to change the formula for readjusting Commons seats among the provinces. The new formula would be implemented after the 2011 census.

    The battle flared last month when Conservative House Leader Peter Van Loan called Mr. McGuinty "the small man of Confederation" for his criticism of Bill C-22.

    Ontario's situation would improve under the new formula, but not to the same extent as that of the two western provinces. Ontario now has 106 seats in the 308-seat Commons, compared with 36 for British Columbia and 28 for Alberta. Under the proposed legislation, Ontario would get 116 seats in a 330-seat chamber, while B.C. would get 43 and Alberta 33.

    Poll highlights unease over U.S. foreign policy


    Poll highlights unease over U.S. foreign policy

    Respondents felt Canada's decision not to join the Iraq war was a greater achievement than participating in the Afghan mission

    From Tuesday's Globe and Mail

    A new poll suggests when it comes to their country's role in the world, Canadians really are from Venus, not Mars.

    A typical Canadian feels that the country's proudest moment was a decision not to go to war in Iraq, that its foreign policy is too heavily influenced by the United States, that we are fighting in Afghanistan mainly at the behest of Washington and that climate change and the rich-poor gap are a bigger threat to world security than terrorism or weapons of mass destruction.

    The results put Canadian public opinion sharply at odds with the views of the United States, Canada's closest ally and economic partner. They may also be a blow to the more muscular foreign policy of Prime Minister Stephen Harper.