Layton and Duceppe plotting well before the economic statement CTV learns
***
Update: Jokes all around from Jack Layton on Working with people who want to destroy our country. Credit: Stephen Taylor's blog
Posted by
Darryl
11
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Bloc, Conservative Party of Canada, Liberal Party, NDP


We need 15 opposition MPs with principle to cross the floor
An excellent column from Tom Brodbeck in the Winnipeg Sun. Not only would the BQ be able to demand whatever it wanted, Liberals would likely have no choice but to grant it because of their inability to finance an election that turning down the BQ demand would cause. Worse the lower the approval rating of the coalition and Liberal Prime Minister, the more united the government would be to hold power at all costs. If Conservative poll numbers go through the roof as expected under a Prime Minister Dion governing with separatist and socialist support during the time of a depression; the incentive of keeping the coalition together would only strengthen simply because of a common front to avoid an election where all opposition parties except the Bloc would likely get thrashed. This alliance is dangerous for Canada and quite frankly there should be huge public protests in Ottawa on December 8 when the vote takes place. It will be interesting to see if this coalition gives a boost to the PQ in the Quebec elections set for the same day. Imagine what Premier Pauline Marois could extort from Ottawa through BQ demands. At this point I think backing down isn't an option for either side. We need an immediate election right now so that Canadians can determine if the Conservatives should get a majority to get something done on the economy vs. the need for a public mandate on a potential government that includes separatists.
I personally think Harper made a miscalculation that backfired huge on him. Had there been an election people might have been angry about being forced into another expensive vote on partisan games. Conservative might have lost seats. Acknowledging Harper's mistake, I think the Liberals may have caused a much larger blunder than the carbon tax that will eventually have massive implications through even engaging in these coalition talks. Liberals have exposed themselves as being willing to work with separatists and socialists to take power despite the election results. That will be an election issue for sure next time. At the same time, they have given credibility to the NDP and BQ virtually guaranteeing the left split will continue in the future. You cannot say the NDP are bad for the economy and then consider joining a coalition that is considering Jack Layton as finance minister. This experiment with the Greens failed in the last election and will prove to do so again.
All Liberals who consider themselves as federalists, who backed Paul Martin's work as Finance Minister, who are against NDP economic policies, who are not on the extreme left or even those who are self-interested and represent districts such as the Western provinces where this coalition would go from significant representation to basically no representation should consider crossing the floor and joining the Conservative Party. I think the best way to avert an election a this point and move forward on the economy would be for 15 opposition MPs to join the Conservative caucus. Keith Martin, Irwin Cotler, Andre Arthur and Bill Casey would be a good start. Justin Trudeau? Ken Dryden? Ralph Goodale? Marc Garneau? Scott Brison? Are there any opposition MPs with principle still left? I can't imagine many Liberals are comfortable working with the separatists under Dion's leadership. We need you to make this parliament work and deal with this economic crisis. Consider joining the government side as independents uncomfortable with the direction of the Liberal party or simply throw your membership where it belongs (the trash) and join a party that talks and acts like a federalist party and who would never allow unions to dicate actions on the economy during these tough economic times. 50 billion dollar tax increase on corporations? I am hoping at least some of you recognize this pendign disaster.
-Darryl
***
Separatists cannot hold balance of power in Ottawa
By TOM BRODBECK
I never thought I'd see the day when the cancer that threatens the future of Canada would gain a real foothold in our Parliament.
Until now, the Bloc Quebecois -- whose only real goal is to break up the country -- has been relegated to the opposition benches of the House of Commons.
It's been troubling enough watching separatists get sworn into Parliament, occupying seats that should be the exclusive domain of people who swear their allegiance to Canada.
But we're now faced with the real possibility that the Bloc Quebecois could have a seat around the cabinet table if opposition members topple the Conservative government next week and replace it with a coalition that includes Quebec separatists.
Even former prime minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau must be spinning in his grave at the thought of separatists -- the very people he dedicated his political career to defeat -- having a say in Canada's national government.
It would be, if it happens, a historical turning point for Canada -- separatists calling the shots on how our country should be run and ultimately scheming to break it up.
It would be a major victory for Quebec separatists too, who have been plotting the demise of Canada since the 1960s and who have trampled on the rights of non-French speaking people for three decades.
What better way to fight for the independence of Quebec than to be in power in the very Parliament they seek to destroy?
And who is making it possible for separatists to invade the federal cabinet room?
Liberals and New Democrats.
So desperate are they to be in power that they would put the future of Canada at risk by inviting the Bloc Quebecois to play a role in their proposed coalition government.
RECESSION
These are the very people who purport to stand up for the unity of Canada. But now, in exchange for a short stint in government, they are willing to sell the Dominion of Canada down the St. Lawrence River.
The pretext for the move is that the Conservatives are refusing to open the spending taps further than they already have.
The Liberals and NDP claim that because Prime Minister Stephen Harper is not willing to spend as much as they believe is necessary to help Canadians through a possible recession, that government should be toppled and replaced with a coalition that includes separatists.
It's a red herring, an excuse for Liberal Leader Stephane Dion to make a final, desperate bid for the prime minister's chair and for the NDP -- who could never form government on their own -- to finally have representation around the cabinet table.
So what could the Bloc do if they played a role in a proposed coalition?
They could begin by demanding that Quebec get a substantially larger share of Canada's fiscal pie.
They could demand that Quebec's provincial government take over certain federal functions, those which fall under shared responsibility under the Constitution.
The Bloc could demand that the Clarity Act, which ensures that a clear question and a clear majority is necessary for any province to separate from Canada, be amended.
They could demand it be scrapped altogether.
The political manoeuvrings, schemes and strategies by the Bloc to advance their agenda to break up Canada would be endless should they ever get the foothold of power they seek through a coalition government.
And the NDP and Liberals should be ashamed of themselves for what they are about to do to Canada.
Posted by
Darryl
29
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Andre Arthur, Bill Casey, Conservative Party of Canada, Keith Martin, Stephen Harper, United Left in Canada
Posted by
Darryl
5
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Conservative Party of Canada, Federal Election Campaign



Potential Liberal-Socialist-Separatist Cabinet posts
Here are my predictions for Canada's new government:
Something for Governor General Michaëlle Jean to consider before deciding to call an election...
-Darryl
The Ministry
The Right Honourable Jean Chretien (Liberal appointed through the senate as co-founder of new party)
Prime Minister of Canada
The Right Honourable Ed Broadbent (NDP appointed through the senate as co-founder of new party)
Deputy Prime Minister of Canada
The Honourable Elizabeth May (Green Liberal appointed through the senate)
Leader of the Government in the Senate and Minister of the Environment
The Honourable Jack Layton (NDP)
Minister of Finance
The Honourable Gilles Duceppe (BQ)
Minister of Foreign Affairs
The Honourable Dawn Black (NDP)
Minister of National Defence
The Honourable Irwin Cotler (LIB)
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
The Honourable Stephane Dion (LIB)
Minister of National Revenue
The Honourable Denis Coderre (LIB)
Minister of Veterans Affairs
The Honourable Charlie Angus (NDP)
Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians
The Honourable John McCallum (LIB)
Minister of International Trade
The Honourable Pat Martin (NDP)
President of the Treasury Board
The Honourable Thomas Mulcair (NDP)
Minister of Labour
The Honourable Yves Lessard (BQ)
Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development
The Honourable Bernard Bigras (BQ)
Minister of International Cooperation
The Honourable Michael Ignatieff (LIB)
Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities
The Honourable Bob Rae (NDP/LIB)
Minister of Industry
The Honourable Christiane Gagnon (BQ)
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and Minister for La Francophonie
The Honourable Ujjal Dosanjh (LIB/NDP)
Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
The Honourable Ève-Mary Thaï Thi Lac (BQ)
Minister of Public Safety
The Honourable Ralph Goodale (LIB)
Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board
The Honourable Ruby Dhalla (LIB)
Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism
The Honourable Scott Brison (LIB)
Minister of Public Works and Government Services
The Honourable Michel Guimond (BQ)
Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages
The Honourable Olivia Chow (NDP)
Minister of Health
The Honourable Justin Trudeau (LIB)
Minister of Natural Resources
The Honourable Dominic LeBlanc (LIB)
Minister of Fisheries and Oceans
The Honourable Ken Dryden (LIB)
Minister of State (Sport)
The Honourable Marc Garneau (LIB)
Minister of (Science and Technology)
The Honourable Martha Hall Findlay (LIB)
Minister of State (Satus of Women)
The Honourable Buzz Hargrove (NDP/LIB Appointed through Senate)
Minister of State and Chief Government Whip
Anyone else have any predictions they want to share??? God help this nation if this coalition takes power.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
4
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Bloc, Elizabeth May, Gilles Duceppe, Green Party, Jack Layton, Liberal Party, NDP, Stephane Dion, United Left in Canada
Opposition leaders in their own words from the election campaign; Harper responds to the coalition
This is what Canadians were told by this newly proposed coalition of Liberal-NDP-BQ parties during the last election campaign that ended six weeks ago.
Dion on a NDP coalition during the election campaign
Layton on Dion as Prime Minister
Duceppe on being Prime Minister
Stephen Harper responds by defending the Government selected by Canadians
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Conservative Party of Canada, Federal Election Campaign, Liberal Party, NDP, Stephen Harper

Question of the Day: Would Canadians have given the Conservatives a majority had they known the BQ in government was the alternative?
Great opinion article today in the Winnipeg Free Press
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
4
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Bloc, Federal Election Campaign, Liberal Party, NDP

Media keeps ignoring one of the coalition partners...missing the real story
As the media cover this Liberal coup d’état, they seem to forget one of the coalition partners that are necessary to maintain the confidence of the house. A NDP and Liberal coalition means absolutely nothing and the Governor General has no right to even consider it unless the Bloc Quebecois is a formal part of the agreement guranteeing to support the Canadian government for a reasonable period of time. The Liberals have 77 seats and the NDP has 37. Together they have 114 seats, not even close to the 143 that Tories earned. An NDP-Liberal coaliton has no where near enough seats to govern and together are not even the biggest party in the House of Commons. By itself, a Liberal-NDP coalition lacks any kind of mandate and would be given no legitimacy on its own. Therefore the media needs to find out what has been promised to a party that wants to break apart our country. An explanation is required on how a party only concerned with the interest of Quebec is good to balance the affairs of the entire nation (FYI the Western provinces would go from 58 seats in the government to 20 under this arrangement. Quebec would go from 10 seats in government to 64 with the coalition) . Finally it needs to be determined if the BQ is a formal part of this coalition or is simply onside for only one confidence vote. If they are not in the coalition formally, every confidence vote will cause drama as Conservatives would have a responsibility and obligation to bring down this undemocratic coalition at all costs and on every confidence vote.
This whole process is an assault on democracy. Harper is exactly right when he says a soundly defeated Stephane Dion would rather simply take power than earn it. Liberals are not just entitled to their entitlements but feel they have a right to take power at any cost rather you vote for them or not. The willingness to work with the separatists question if they stand for anything at all. Giving socialists cabinet roles show a lack of confidence in their ability to handle the economy. Jack Layton in finance? Give your head a shake team red. The fact that this all started over their lack of ability to fundraise without the Canadian taxpayer shows the opposition care about themselves and their own partisan interests than the Canadians and economy they talk about. Canada will have no credibility preaching democracy to the Russians or Chinese if this coalition goes through with Dion installed leader despite not being elected. When did Canada become a banana republic? How will the markets react to Prime Minister Stephane Dion's Liberal Party of Toronto propped up by socialists and separatists. Liberals will ask Canadians to have confidence in Dion as Prime Minister when they lack confidence themselves in him as leader. During the last election they campaigned against the BQ and NDP and never informed the voters of any potential left wing governing coalition.
The media needs to do its job. The BQ has 49 seats and would be the second largest coalition partner in this arrangement. Are they part of this coalition or not? If so what were they promised. If not how can the GG have any confidence in Dion's ability to maintain the confidence of the house. Obviously they cannot count on any kind of support from us whatsoever. This story is not about a Prime Minister who miscalculated anymore, it is about Canada's old natural governing party selling out its values to the separatists and socialists for a couple months in power. How can anyone be proud to be a Liberal today. A sound defeat will come when Liberals eventually face a democratic election should this power grab actually take place.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
4
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Bloc, Federal Election Campaign, Liberal Party, NDP, Stephane Dion, Stephen Harper

We now have a two party system in Canada
People complain that Canadian politics is not exciting. Today, like when the PC and Alliance parties decided to unite is a game changing moment in Canadian political history regardless of the outcome of these coalition talks. While I do not expect that we will see NDP, BQ, Green and Liberal candidates decide not to run against each other in the next election; the game has fundamentally changed just by what we now know from talks that have taken place between the opposition parties.
1. Jean Chretien and Ed Broadbent are in negotiations to build an NDP/Liberal coalition that will need the support of the Bloc Quebecois.
2. By engaging in these talks at the highest levels (Dion, Layton) it is clear that both leaders agree they share a common agenda. Both are comfortable either bringing the Bloc Quebecois (a party that supports breaking up our country) into the Canadian government or allowing Duceppe to extort the government in order to maintain support on confidence matters.
3. For at least some MPs it is OK overthrowing the will of the Canadian voters and installing a Prime Minister who is not even elected by the grassroots members within his party. I am not sure if this coalition will happen, but I do know that all day Dion's caucus has been planning to get rid of him and broadcasting it to the media. How can he now lead regardless of what happens in the next couple of weeks.
4, The Liberals and Greens already had an alliance during the election and Dion even got Elizabeth May's endorsement.
5. Right now the only common agenda known among this potential coalition government is that they are united in wanting their subsidies, they want to go on a spending spree and call it a stimulus, they oppose Harper and every policy decision he makes, they want power, and they all financially cannot afford to fight an election right now.
With regards to these meetings, what is going on is not transparent. Grassroots members concerns are not taken into account. Most MPs are out of the loop and have no say. We have no idea what is being promised in these negotiations. Media do not have access. Do these arguments sound familiar? Wasn't this all initially about Harper using a budget bill to interfere with democracy? Liberals putting together a coup with socialists and separatists is what is best for Canadians according to the opposition. Brokering an alliance one week into parliament to seize power is what is needed to protect Canadian democracy?
I am not sure if it is Stephen Harper or just simply the fact there is one party on the center-right and 4 on the left; but it is clear this minority government is not going to work. Stephen Harper and the Conservatives cannot work with the opposition parties and get anything done despite this recession or potential depression. While a coalition between the Bloc-NDP-Liberals may last in the short term, rival demands will make it complicated to stick together. The only possibility of a long term coalition is if Prime Minister Dion's approval ratings are beyond low, all parties remain broke and the worsening economic situation drives up Conservative numbers. This will unite the opposition for no other purpose than to avoid the people through an election and to keep power away from the Conservatives. The West who just got in will be locked out again thanks to a backroom deal between the Liberal Party of Toronto backed by the Separatist party from Quebec. That is not in the best interest of Canadians and I do not see how this whole situation is good for unity.
It is unfortunate, but we probably need an election despite the cost and timing. Canadians have to choose between giving Conservatives a majority government to deal with the economy or otherwise provide a mandate to this madness with the left wing coalition. Conservatives won the election and we cannot maintain power let alone get any legislation passed as is evident today. The left is united and no longer have credibility attacking each other. Let us decide based on the new two party system of Conservatives vs. the Green Liberal Socialist Separatist Party. Regrettably if Canadians want their government to get anything done for them it will require an election and a majority. Regardless of if this coalition forms and regardless of how long this parliament lasts it is quite clear that nothing will get accomplished because of partisanship from all sides of the House unless attitudes change in a hurry. The Governor General should not delay the inevitable and simply allow this government to go to the people once it is defeated rather than play these games. Any other solution at this point is just lost time and wasted taxpayer dollars with no action on the economy or any other issue of the day.
Based on the events of today, everything has changed and this parliament simply cannot function any longer. The sooner there is an election the better. The left might as well unite under one banner as irreversibly each of their individual brands no longer have credibility in Ottawa. While the day was exicting, regular Canadians are the big loser today after all of this political positioning. Shame on all politicians for that.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
2
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Bloc, Federal Election Campaign, Green Party, Liberal Party, NDP, Stephane Dion, Stephen Harper, United Left in Canada
10 questions unanswered about a coalition government
1, How can Michael Ignatieff be Prime Minister without being elected by either the members of his party or the Canadian electorate?
2, What cabinet positions will the NDP demand? La Press is reporting
3, After the 1995 referendum, how can Jean Chretien plot coalition with the Bloc Quebecois?
4, If the BQ is not formally in the coalition what is their incentive to prop up the Liberals/NDP? What promises have been made that could impact the unity of this country?
5, If the Bloc is going to support the coalition on a vote by vote basis how long can this new coalition last given that they won’t be able to count on Conservative support on any confidence vote regardless of its merits?
6, Are Liberals prepared to face the Canadian public after making a side deal with the Bloc Quebecois to take power? Imagine the attack ads that will come.
7, Does anyone have confidence that Jack Layton is the right man to fix this economy?
8, If Stephane Dion is named Prime Minister will he ever give up the job?
9, How can you square threatening to bring down the government to “protect democracy” with regards to the vote subsidy and then later turn around and pull of a coup that slaps the Canadian electorate in the face by demonstrating that their vote doesn't count? I don't think anyone would debate that Dion was clearly rejected as Prime Minister six weeks ago.
10, Will Stephen Harper stay on as opposition leader should this all go down on Monday? If not who replaces him and how?
Posted by
Darryl
17
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Bloc, Conservative Party of Canada, Federal Election Campaign, Liberal Party, NDP

Text of Liberal non-confidence motion to be voted on Monday
"In light of the government's failure to recognize the seriousness of Canada's economic situation and its failure in particular to present any credible plan to stimulate the Canadian economy and to help workers and businesses in hard-pressed sectors such as manufacturing, the automotive industry and forestry, this House has lost confidence in this government and is of the opinion that a viable alternative government can be formed within the present House of Commons."
If the Governor General allows a coalition (she has the ability to go right to an election) than Stephane Dion will become Prime Minister according to CBC.
More details to come...
Posted by
Darryl
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: Federal Election Campaign, Liberal Party, Stephane Dion


Breaking News: Conservatives back down
Update: It looks like we are not out of the woods yet. Opposition still threatening to topple the government due to a "lack of stimulus package included in the bill". Coalition talks are continuing. Liberal plotting to remove Dion and replace him with Ignatieff (or Goodale or Rae) still ongoing.
Update 2: It looks like the coalition talks are ongoing but now that the public financing portion has been separated from Monday's bill it only raises the stakes that much higher. Liberals, NDP and the Bloc could proceed with coalition talks and vote against the government Monday due to it not containing a stimulus package. They could be taking a huge risk though as there is no guarantee the Governor General will allow the official opposition a chance to form a coalition. Unintended consequences could be a snap election caused by the opposition meaning they would feel the wrath of the people for making the stimulus package a 300 million dollar election campaign over the holidays. Allowing the bill to pass on Monday could expose them as being more concerned about their own election financing then their argument about an economic stimulus. Sounds like it is still a tough choice for the opposition parties. Personally I hope that if we are defeated on Monday, Jean just simply calls an election so that the people can sort out this mess - not Broadbent, Chretien and the separatists.
Update 3: (From CBC)
The federal Liberals plan to introduce a motion in the House of Commons on Monday declaring non-confidence in the minority Conservative government and proposing a governing coalition, the Canadian Press is reporting. Emissaries from the Liberals, New Democrats and Bloc Quebecois have been holding talks about forming a new government should Prime Minister Stephen Harper's minority fall.
Posted by
Darryl
2
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Conservative Party of Canada, Federal budget, Federal Election Campaign, Green Party, Liberal Party, NDP
Potential Compromise?
There might be one easy way to get out of this. Cut all public subsidies following the next election while paying out the current subsidy from the last election. Would that be acceptable to all sides?
On the coalition front it is not being revealed in the media that Ed Broadbent and Jean Chretien are trying to broker a coalition government. Would Canadians accept Liberals taking power over public election financing subsidies by joining forces with a party that wants to break up our nation?
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
9
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Bloc, Conservative Party of Canada, Federal Election Campaign, Green Party, Liberal Party, NDP



Is a Liberal-Separatist-Socialist Coalition Possible?
This scenario is starting to look more likely. Obviously there are a lot of questions about how long such a coalition could last and what the political implications would be long term for the Liberal Party. Here is how it might look.
1, Dion would not be Prime Minister. A caucus vote would take place. If that vote took place right now Michael Ignatieff would easily become leader of the Liberal party and Prime Minister under this coalition.
2, The NDP would get some cabinet posts in non-economic portfolios.
3, Elizabeth May would be potentially appointed to the senate and be given a cabinet post
4, The Bloc would support the coalition government but would not get any cabinet posts.
5, The coalition would attempt to govern as long as possible with the Conservatives in opposition.
All of this of course depends on the opposition parties voting down the economic statement and the Governor General allowing the opposition to attempt to form a coalition that can demonstrate confidence in the house. Obviously this raises more questions than answers but it is starting to become a reality. The Conservative Party has an opportunity to back down but I do not think that they will. Opposition MPs believe they can bring down the government without going to an election. It looks like a constitutional crisis.
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20081127/Tories_fiscal_081128/20081128?hub=QPeriod
Thanks for reading...
Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
10
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Bloc, Conservative Party of Canada, Federal budget, Federal Election Campaign, Liberal Party, NDP

Breaking News: Are you ready for another federal election???
Update: All three opposition parties have said they will vote against the economic plan. That means election or coalition government.
Update 2: Another possible option for the opposition would be to allow this motion to pass and remove the election financing portion in committee where the opposition parties have a majority of seats. If this is possible it is the most likely outcome.
Are you reading for another federal election??? Given that the elimination of the $1.75 per vote public financing is now part of the fall fiscal update; it will be a confidence vote. That means if opposition parties vote against the speech; we are heading for an election. Here are the three options the opposition parties now face:
1, Allow the Fall Economic Statement to pass by abstaining, holding back some MPs from voting or in the case of the NDP; potentially supporting the bill outright. Obviously that will have a long term impact on the parties that do not recieve funding from their grassroots supporters and members.
2, Vote down the government and ask the Governor General to allow Dion to form a coalition government as oppose to having another election. That would mean the NDP, Bloc and Liberals would have to work together to govern. It would mean the NDP and BQ members would have to be assigned cabinet posts. Potentially it could mean Elizabeth May would be appointed to cabinet through the senate. It would make Dion the Prime Minister while a Liberal leadership contest is ongoing. How long this coalition could last and if it could be formed at all would be a question mark.
3, Vote down the government. Forget the coalition and go right to the polls. Conservatives have the cash to fight an election right now. All the opposition parties are in debt. Harper would risk the public seeing him as partisan bully who caused an unnecessary election. Opposition parties would risk Conservatives obtaining a majority by running on the need for stability. Harper might lose power. A majority Conservative government might end public financing anyways. What everyone likely agrees on is that Canadians do not want another election, nor can the economy afford another 300 million dollar campaign.
According to CTV, here is how much these public election financing changes would impact each of the parties:
November 27, 2008
Check Against Delivery
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased today to present the Government’s Economic and Fiscal Statement, and to set out our key short-term and long-term objectives as we prepare for the next federal budget.
I present this Statement at a time of unprecedented deterioration in economic and financial systems around the world. Without a doubt, here in Canada and around the world, these are difficult times that will require difficult choices.
It is important to recognize just how quickly things have changed, Mr. Speaker, and how dramatically. The cascading effects of the international credit crisis were sudden and devastating.
An unexpected credit crunch in the summer of 2007, and a U.S. recession sparked by a plunge in the American housing market, have spread throughout the world.
Today, the International Monetary Fund expects global growth to be the weakest since 1993.
The speed at which this crisis has intensified, and the damage it has brought to countries around the world, have been extraordinary.
All countries are struggling to cope with this crisis.
The Euro area is in recession for the first time since its creation in 1999.
It has been joined by Japan.
There are signs of a prolonged downturn in the U.S., with a sharp decline in U.S. consumer spending and almost 1.2 million jobs lost since the beginning of the year.
A lengthy list of American financial institutions have either collapsed or required a bailout or takeover—Citigroup, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Washington Mutual, AIG, Wachovia—all in a matter of months.
Financial rescue efforts are underway in the U.S., and similar ones are happening in countries throughout Europe.
The crisis has laid bare some serious flaws in many aspects of the international financial system:
The mistakes of some are today being felt by all.
We have not been immune to the resulting global economic slowdown. Forecasters around the world did not predict, and could not have predicted, the full force of this economic crisis.
The volatility we are seeing in the world economy is truly historic. It is affecting Canada, driving down our economic growth expectations. Canada has not faced such severe economic tests in a generation.
Economic projections are now much lower than at the time of our last budget. Private sector forecasters expect real GDP growth of just 0.6 per cent this year and 0.3 per cent next.
The same private sector forecasters are now widely expecting a technical recession, with negative growth in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009.
No government at any level can guarantee the future. In fact, given so much uncertainty, no one could unconditionally guarantee the fiscal projections contained in today’s Statement.
We will be faced with tough choices as we prepare our next budget, in the face of the deteriorating international economy. Those choices must be part of a clear plan to protect our future.
Last week’s Speech from the Throne laid out a five-pronged plan to protect Canada’s economic security—a plan that will define the choices we make.
We were fully aware that difficult times were ahead when I presented our Economic Statement last fall.
We planned for it. We made choices to help put Canada in a stronger economic position. In fact, since 2006:
Our Government, from last year to next, will have doubled the level of federal funding for provincial, territorial and municipal infrastructure projects.
Canadians and Canadian businesses will pay nearly $31 billion less in taxes in the next fiscal year, thanks to the tax reduction measures introduced since 2006.
That’s equivalent to nearly 2 per cent of Canadian GDP.
This is a substantial fiscal stimulus—stimulus with staying power.
Unlike other countries, Canada is providing tax relief that is sustainable and permanent—tax relief that is helping Canadian families every single day.
We took action when it was necessary. Our performance has shown that it was worthwhile.
However, our actions did not insulate us completely from the rest of the world. Global conditions have deteriorated as 2008 has unfolded.
We had to take further extraordinary steps in the financial sector to respond to a global credit crunch we did not spark, yet which threatened to engulf us if we failed to act.
Once again, we had a head start over other nations. Our financial system is considered to be the world’s soundest by the World Economic Forum.
The International Monetary Fund concluded Canada’s financial system is mature, sophisticated, well managed and able to withstand sizeable shocks.
We have acted to keep it that way. We have protected its stability, so that Canadian businesses and families would continue to have access to credit.
Businesses need credit to invest or to meet their payrolls. Families need it to take out mortgages and loans.
These are basic and vital components of the Canadian economy.
We took steps to maintain the availability of longer-term credit with the purchase of mortgage pools through the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
This innovative measure is allowing Canadian financial institutions to continue lending to consumers, homebuyers and businesses at an affordable cost.
Our Government also created the Canadian Lenders Assurance Facility. The Facility offers insurance on a temporary basis on wholesale term borrowing by Canadian financial institutions.
This backstop ensures that our financial institutions are not at a competitive disadvantage internationally.
We increased the borrowing authority of Export Development Canada and the Business Development Bank of Canada.
The combined boost of nearly $4 billion that we introduced will mean more lending choices for Canadian businesses.
We announced new rules for government-guaranteed mortgages this summer to prevent a U.S.-style housing bubble, rules that are in place today.
Our sensible Canadian approach is paying off.
Our country will come out of this economic crisis in a strong position, because we are going into it in a strong position.
Faced with threats outside our borders, we answered with leadership from within. The result is a fiscal position that is the best of all G7 countries.
The next fiscal year will be difficult. But Canadians can be fully confident that we will overcome whatever hardships may lie ahead in 2009, and beyond.
Mr. Speaker, like governments, families face economic challenges beyond their control every day.
When they face challenges like those, families must adjust their priorities. Just like governments, they must make tough choices—tough, but pragmatic. They make choices that give them flexibility to weather the storm.
Their choices are made with the future in mind. To protect the future they want, they make sacrifices today.
Our Government will take the same approach. We will protect the future by maintaining strong fiscal and financial management.
We take no pleasure in saying that despite our best efforts, this may not be enough to keep a small surplus on the books.
But in situations like this, it would be misguided to simply engineer a surplus, just to be able to say we have one.
Today’s Statement lays out a plan that keeps our budget balanced for now.
However, in the weeks ahead, we will determine the extent to which we will inject additional stimulus to our economy, joining the efforts of our international partners.
Any additional actions to support the economy will have an impact on the bottom-line numbers in our next budget. These actions, or a further deterioration in global economic conditions, could result in a deficit.
We do not take the potential of a deficit lightly. The thought of a long-term structural deficit would be even more serious—one that the Government is unable to climb out of, even when the economy improves.
The days (and years, and decades) of those chronic deficits are behind us. No matter what 2009 brings, they must never return.
Our goal must be to ensure the strength of the economy—to protect jobs, to encourage investment, and to help business grow.
We must do that while protecting the long-term fiscal position of the Government, so that when the economy improves, we return quickly to balanced budgets.
Today, our Government is announcing a series of measures designed to strengthen Canada’s fiscal position in an uncertain time.
These measures will enable us to plan on a balanced budget framework, while recognizing potential downside risks.
We cannot ask Canadians to tighten their belts during tougher times without looking in the mirror.
Canadians have a right to look to government as an example. We have a responsibility to show restraint and respect for their money.
Canadian tax dollars are precious. They must not be spent frivolously or without regard to where they came from.
Canadians pay taxes so governments can provide essential services. They trust the people they elect to serve society with that money, not serve themselves.
The truth is, tax dollars have been supporting political parties for a long time.
For example, we take advantage of reimbursements on our election spending. Canadians also receive a tax credit on their donations to political parties.
This is a generous allotment of tax dollars to politicians. It ought to be sufficient for all of us. But we ask for much more, in the form of a $1.75 subsidy for every vote we receive in an election.
Canadians pay their own bills, and for some Canadians that is getting harder to do. Political parties should pay their own bills too, and not with excessive tax dollars.
Even during the best of economic times, parties should count primarily on the financial support of their own members and their own donors.
Today, our Government is eliminating the $1.75-per-vote taxpayer subsidy for politicians and their parties, effective April 1, 2009.
There will be no free ride for political parties. There never was. The freight was being paid by the taxpayer. This is the last stop on the route.
There will be no free ride for anyone else in government either.
We are directing government ministers and deputy ministers from every single department and agency of the Government to rein in their spending on travel, hospitality, conferences, exchanges and professional services.
This includes polling, consultants and external legal services.
In the broader fiscal picture, we will expand the actions under the new Expenditure Management System we put in place in 2007. We will use this systemic approach to help keep spending growth on a sustainable track.
Under this new system, the Government has been reviewing all departmental program spending. The Government already examined department spending of $13.6 billion in 2007, and is examining $25 billion in program spending this year.
For the first time in nearly 15 years, the Government is also expanding this businesslike and multi-year review to include corporate assets: Crown corporations, real property and other holdings.
The review will take a careful approach to the sale of any asset, considering market conditions and ensuring fair value can be realized for the benefit of taxpayers.
Our Government expects to save over $15 billion over the next five fiscal years under the new Expenditure Management System. This system will be an invaluable tool to help us maintain balanced budgets, along with the other steps announced today.
As indicated in last week’s Speech from the Throne, the Government is also introducing legislation to ensure predictability in federal public sector compensation.
Our Government values the contribution and hard work of our public servants. They must be fairly compensated for their work on behalf of Canadians.
We must bear in mind that their work is also paid for by Canadians.
We will introduce legislation to ensure that the pay for the public sector grows only in line with what taxpayers can afford as the economy slows.
This legislation will put in place annual public service wage increases of 2.3 per cent for 2007–08, and 1.5 per cent for the following three years.
This restraint will also apply to MPs, Senators, Cabinet Ministers and senior public servants.
The legislation would also temporarily suspend the right to strike through 2010–11.
Another issue we intend to address is the litigious, adversarial, and complaints-based approach to pay equity. Since the mid-1980s, Canadian taxpayers have paid out over $4 billion in pay equity settlements.
These settlements were the result of pay equity complaints to the Canadian Human Rights Commission. These complaints were filed after agreements on public sector wages had already been reached through collective bargaining.
New complaints continue to be filed, sometimes for the same groups that have already received past pay equity settlements. These represent large potential future costs to taxpayers.
This costly and litigious regime of "double pay equity" has been in place for too long. We are introducing legislation to make pay equity an integral part of collective bargaining.
We are also bringing certainty to the growth of Equalization. We have put its growth on a sustainable path.
A new, three-year moving average that puts growth in Equalization in line with nominal GDP growth will bring fairness and stability to both the provinces and the federal government, while reflecting changes in the Canadian economy.
We are ensuring that Equalization will continue to grow, because it is a key federal program for providing support to provinces.
We are also protecting the Canada Health Transfer and the Canada Social Transfer. Provinces must be able to plan accurately, especially when it comes to some of the largest expenditure items in their budgets: health care and social services.
These transfer payments will continue their built-in growth of 6 per cent for the Canada Health Transfer and 3 per cent for the Canada Social Transfer.
We will ensure any new measures to support the economy are carefully chosen and targeted for maximum benefit.
In preparing for the 2009 budget, we will ensure spending is as effective as possible, and aligned with Canadian priorities.
Infrastructure is an example of such worthwhile spending. Investment in infrastructure creates jobs for today and for the future. It creates essential links between communities and regions.
Next year’s increase in infrastructure spending will be our largest, and will push the total amount to over $6 billion in stimulus to the economy.
Our Government is committed to expediting our historic, $33-billion Building Canada plan to get projects moving as quickly as possible, in particular for the upcoming construction season.
We will work with provinces and territories to identify a limited number of key infrastructure projects across Canada by January 2009.
These investments will help keep Canada moving forward as the world economy slows.
Quickly deteriorating circumstances in the financial sectors in other countries have contributed to this slowdown.
Here at home we must have the flexibility to respond quickly and decisively, and protect our financial system from global risks.
Our Government is proposing that the Minister of Finance be granted additional flexibility to support financial institutions and the financial system in extraordinary circumstances.
This is consistent with the additional powers we provided the Bank of Canada earlier this year. It is also in keeping with the action plans we agreed to with our international counterparts at the G7 and G20 meetings.
These proposed measures include authority for:
These are additional tools in our tool box. I hope we never have to use them.
But the lessons of the past couple of months have shown us that we have to be ready to deal with every kind of risk, even the unlikeliest ones.
With these measures, we will be ready.
We are taking steps to help Canadian seniors. Our seniors built this country and deserve to live with dignity and respect.
Many seniors are understandably concerned about the impact of the sharp decline in the markets on their retirement savings.
Registered Retirement Income Funds, or RRIFs, and their associated withdrawal requirements are of particular concern.
Last year, our Government raised the age limit for converting a Registered Retirement Savings Plan to a RRIF from 69 to 71.
I have heard from seniors about two issues they are dealing with today:
There is no requirement under the tax rules to sell these assets to meet the RRIF minimum withdrawal requirements, and seniors should not be left with the impression that there is. Assets may be kept intact, so that they can grow in the future.
To help deal with this issue, last week I wrote to all federally regulated financial institutions. I asked these institutions to ensure that in-kind distributions are accommodated at no cost to clients, or that clients are offered another solution that achieves the same result.
Now, these are exceptional circumstances, and we are taking further action to allow RRIF holders to keep more of their savings in their RRIFs.
To help seniors cope, today I am proposing a one-time change that will allow RRIF holders to reduce their required minimum withdrawal by 25 per cent for this tax year. For example, for an individual otherwise required to withdraw $10,000 from their RRIF in 2008, the required withdrawal will be reduced to $7,500.
If the individual has already withdrawn more than $7,500, they will be permitted to recontribute the excess up to $2,500, and claim an offsetting deduction for the 2008 taxation year.
We are also addressing the immediate consequences this financial distress has dealt to Canadian workers who contribute to federally regulated pension plans.
Based on what has happened so far, and under current rules, the decline in value of these plan assets would trigger substantial payments at the worst possible time for struggling companies.
The money these companies would need to use for pension top-ups could otherwise be used for further investment and growth.
The Government is proposing to allow plans under federal jurisdiction to double the length of time required for solvency payments from 5 to 10 years.
Companies that pursue this option must meet one of two conditions:
Today’s announcement will give these companies one more option they can use to cope with these extraordinary circumstances.
To deal with longer-term pension concerns, we will soon be launching consultations on issues facing defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans, with a view to making permanent changes next year.
Since pension plans are regulated either federally or provincially, our Government will coordinate our efforts with our provincial and territorial counterparts to create a pension system able to withstand whatever future challenges come its way.
This subject will be high on the agenda when I meet with my provincial and territorial colleagues next month.
While helping Canadian workers save, we will also help the businesses that employ them, in particular with their ability to borrow.
We will increase the supply of credit available to export-oriented manufacturers, including the auto sector, as well as small and medium-sized businesses.
On top of a recent $2-billion increase to the borrowing authority of Export Development Canada, today I am announcing a $350-million equity injection that will support up to approximately $1.5 billion in increased credit for Canada’s export businesses.
The export sector has been hit hard by the financial crisis. EDC will now be able to add to the nearly $80 billion in exports and investment it helps make possible for Canadian enterprises, including $4 billion for the auto sector alone.
The Government will also inject $350 million in equity to the Business Development Bank of Canada to assist small and medium-sized companies. This new injection will increase BDC’s lending ability by about $1.5 billion, and comes on top of a $1.8-billion borrowing increase announced earlier this year.
We will also move forward quickly on the securities regulation front. Our cumbersome and unwieldy system of 13 securities regulators is a glaring flaw in Canada’s world-leading approach to promoting financial stability.
The Government will soon receive the report of the Expert Panel on Securities Regulation. The report is expected to outline the best way forward to improve the content, structure and enforcement of securities regulation in Canada.
We will act on it quickly. We invite all participants to join us in improving our regulatory system.
Mr. Speaker, this Government came to office looking years down the road. Our country is better off today thanks to exactly such an approach. Short-term problems will not distract us from continuing to focus on the horizon.
At the same time, we are far from finished confronting unheard-of global economic and financial threats. There are warning signs ahead that we must heed if we are to remain a global role model in an uncertain time.
We will address our immediate, external challenges the same way we will reach our longer-term goals: by continuing to manage tax dollars wisely, investing strictly in the essentials and focusing on what ultimately matters—the longer-term prosperity of all Canadians.
These are not easy times. But we must not forget that our country has been through plenty of hard times before, and we’ll get through these ones the same way.
Our Government will respond to the challenges of the upcoming year the same way we are seeing this year to a close, through the values Canadians themselves hold dear: prudence and restraint, combined with hard work and a focus on the future.
The greatest histories are always written in the toughest times. I believe that we’re in the midst of writing some bold new chapters in our country’s long-running success story—an unfolding account of new accomplishments by a country that is compelled to grapple with global hard times, and that will emerge even stronger because of them.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Related Documents:
The Honourable Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance, today announced in his 2008 Economic and Fiscal Statement that the Government will take actions to restrain spending, protect Canada’s hard-won fiscal advantage and reinforce the stability of our financial system amid this period of global economic uncertainty.
"Without a doubt, here in Canada and around the world, these are difficult times that will require difficult choices," said Minister Flaherty. "We cannot ask Canadians to tighten their belts during tougher times without looking in the mirror. We have a responsibility to show restraint and respect for tax dollars."
The Government will continue to manage spending responsibly. To that end, this Statement takes action to:
Minister Flaherty said the Government continues to plan on balanced budgets. However, given the fluidity of the economic situation and the rapid decline in commodity prices, a deficit cannot be ruled out.
"Our goal must be to ensure the strength of the economy—to protect jobs, to encourage investment and to help businesses grow," the Minister said. "We must do that while protecting the long-term fiscal position of the Government, so that if we must run a deficit, when the economy improves, we return quickly to balanced budgets."
While the Government has already taken major actions to strengthen and preserve the competitiveness of Canada’s world-leading financial sector, this Statement takes further measures to:
The Government will consult with provinces and territories, and all Canadians, to develop responses to short-term economic issues, while continuing to implement its long-term economic plan. The immediate priorities are to accelerate infrastructure projects, improve opportunities for workers and sectors affected by current economic conditions, strengthen our world-leading financial system in line with our G20 commitments, and improve the competitiveness of the Canadian economy.
"The next fiscal year will be difficult," said Minister Flaherty. "But Canadians can be fully confident that we will overcome whatever hardships may lie ahead in 2009 and beyond."
___________________________________
For further information, media may contact:
| Chisholm Pothier Press Secretary Office of the Minister of Finance 613-996-7861 | David Gamble Media Relations Department of Finance 613-996-8080 |
To receive e-mail notification of all news releases, please register at www.fin.gc.ca/scripts/register_e.asp.
Posted by
Darryl
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: Conservative Party of Canada, Federal budget, Federal Election Campaign, Liberal Party, NDP
Magna lays off 850 in Newmarket and Aurora
My condolences to those who lost their jobs at the Magna plants in Newmarket and Aurora yesterday. The manufacturing sector has been hit hard in my riding with Tenatronics closing recently as well. Clearly the automotive sector is facing tough times right now. Beyond the headline is 850 real people with families to support. This news is a major blow to our community and yet another example of the challenges manufacturers are facing in Ontario and beyond. I wish these workers the best of luck in finding new jobs. I also wish Magna International all the best during these tough times. They are a major employer in the region and thousands of people rely on the success of the company to support themselves and their family. Hopefully there will be some form of assistance to the auto sector soon. Threats to the industry go far beyond the big three.
-Darryl
***
VIRGINIA GALT
Globe and Mail Update
November 26, 2008 at 1:41 PM EST
Auto parts producer Magna International Inc. announced Wednesday that it will close two plants in
The company said difficult economic conditions and depressed demand for its products forced the decision to shut its plants in
The affected plants are run by Exterion, a manufacturing division of Magna International's Decoma International unit. The work currently done at the plants will be transferred to other Decoma operations.
“The difficult decision to close the facility came after a careful evaluation of the facility's financial status, future business and open capacity in other facilities,” Magna International said in a statement.
“Those factors, combined with difficult economic conditions facing the North American auto industry due to reduced domestic production and customer demands, have made Exterion operations no longer viable,” the company said.
Magna said it will try to transfer employees to other operations. Those who cannot be placed will be given notice or severance packages based on years of service at the company. Magna will also provide help to those seeking jobs with other companies.
The shutdowns will affect 350 employees in
Earlier this month, Don Walker, co-chief executive officer of Magna International, said the company was preparing for a sustained downturn.
“We want a lean and efficient operation, while not sacrificing our future, so we are stronger when the automotive market recovers,” Mr. Walker said during a conference call Nov. 4 after the company announced a loss of $215-million (U.S.) for the June-to-September period.
“If the downturn stays as difficult as it has been, I think we'll see a lot of failures in the supply industry,” Mr. Walker said at that time.
Magna International has been hit hard by the slump in demand for automobiles, both in the
Posted by
Darryl
4
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Aurora, Magna, Newmarket, Newmarket-Aurora Riding

My thoughts and prayers go out to the people of Mumbai, India and the victims of this cowardly terrorist act
Yesterday terrorists appear to have targeted Western citizens and interests in the financial capital of the world's largest democracy. My thoughts, prayers and condolences go out to the victims of this cowardly attack and also the people of India. We need to stand with India and all those opposed to terror wherever it exists. At this point it is unclear who is actually responsible for these attacks, but that should be determined soon and I suspect an appropriate response will take place. India has experienced terror before and this experience should only unite the world against the treat of terrorism that affects free people everywhere in the world. The war on terror continues and it is the responsibility of all nations to root out extremists within their own borders. Our relations with India must be strengthened and tourism and business should continue despite what took place yesterday. We cannot allow the terrorists to win through the fear they create.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Update from John Tory Leader's Dinner
Last night was a good night for the PC Party. Despite troubled economic times, approximately 450 people paid $500 to attend a fundraising dinner at Le Parc in Thornhill for the PC fund. Stephen Harper sent his greetings as did Thornhill MP Peter Kent. Peter Shurman, Frank Klees and Julia Munro did a great job hosting the event as representitives for York Region. John Tory delievered a terrific speech that focused on the economy and Dalton McGuinty's record. Some of the facts were unbelievable. Ontario second last in projected economic growth and now a have not province. Public servents making over $100,000 has increased 27% under the Ontario Liberal government. Labour costs have increased 57% under McGuinty. Spending has increased 40% under this provincial government. Corporate taxes in Ontario remain the second highest in the world. 8 million wasted on another study into tourism as opposed to an ad campaign alerting our American friends about the low dollar and potential bargains on this side of the border. Government administration costs currently sit at 1.2 billion with room for at least a 10% cut by reducing travel, using government meeting rooms instead of booking hotels and discretionary budgets out of control. No strategy for small businesses, job creation or foreign investment. Deficits despite record transfer payments from the federal government. Tory was on his game and we saw a likely preview of what our message will be in 2011. I see a lot of Liberals cheerleading the recession and trying to put the blame on Stephen Harper for the international economic crisis. They should think twice as Mr. McGuinty is equally vulnerable under that argument.
MPP representation was very strong last night at the York Region dinner. Frank Klees, Julia Munro, Peter Shurman, Tim Hudak, Randy Hillier, Elizabeth Witmer, Lisa MacLeod, John O'Toole, Joyce Savoline, Sylvia Jones, Ted Arnott and Christine Elliot were all in attendence. Former Premier Bill Davis was also on hand. I suspect there were others that I missed as well. There were no updates on any potential seat location for Mr. Tory.
Overall I think the provincial Conservative party is on the right track. Last night's fundraiser was very successful considering the economic situation right now. In February we are set to have a policy convention in Niagara Falls. The Ontario PC Party has launched a new version of their website that I believe is cutting edge. Finally it seems we are starting to gain some traction in the legislature through question period. The next election is three years away.
Given the gains that took place federally around the GTA and throughout Ontario; I think there is strong potential to get back into government in 2011. My hope is that John Tory can secure a seat as soon as possible. Congratulations to everyone responsible for organizing the event last night.
Thanks for reading...
Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
2
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Frank Klees, John Tory, PC Party of Ontario

Off to the PC Fund Leader's Dinner
Tonight at Le Parc in Thornhill is the PC Fund Leader's Dinner. John Tory will be the guest speaker. I will be attending and it should be interesting to see if there is anything new to report from the event regarding the PC Party in Ontario. I will try and post an update later tonight on what occured at the dinner.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Frank Klees, John Tory, PC Party of Ontario

Breaking News: Hillary Clinton Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton has accepted the role of Secretary of State in Barack Obama's administration. Congratulations Mr. Canon.
Details to come...
Update: Full Story from New York Times
Posted by
Darryl
3
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Hillary Clinton
Palin turkey pardon interview blooper
I feel bad about posting this, but for the record I do not blame Sarah Palin for this blooper. Clearly her staff dropped the ball on this one and as a result they should be replaced. I understand the interview was live but the camera man could have cut Palin a break and moved to a close up shot once he saw what was happening in the background. Also the guy in the background with the turkey should have used some common sense when he saw the interview taking place and was stairing right at the camera when Palin was talking. Unfortunately this is a lesson to anyone in politics on how not to do a photo op. The decision to have her speaking with those machines in the background was questionable to say the least. Clearly Palin's people let the Governor down and should be held accountable for the embarassment caused to their boss. When you consider the prank call as well, one really has to wonder about the compotence of the people surrounding Gov. Palin. She has taken several shots recently in the media - some legitimate others unfair. This type of thing is the last thing she needs and it seems her staff are making 2012 harder and harder with each passing day. I suspect there are several blogging tories who could do a better job for her and at a much cheaper rate than those currently running the show. Governor Palin deserves better than this.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
8
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Animal Rights, Sarah Palin
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Conservative Party of Canada, Speech from the Throne

Peter Milliken re-elected Speaker
It looks like MPs decided to go with experience and stability as oppose to an alternative candidate who promised better decorum. Overall I have been happy with the job performance of Peter Milliken, especially in this past minority parliament. By tradition the speaker only votes if there is a tie and in that case must vote with the government as we saw in 2005 following the confidence vote after Belinda crossed the floor. There was some talk that Conservatives would support one of their own with the hope that Milliken might retire if he wasn't re-elected, putting his Kingston and the Islands riding in play for the Conservative Party in the next election. This turned out to be unlikely after multiple Conservatives decided to run. Overall congratulations to Peter Milliken getting re-elected. I look forward to the throne speech that will take place tomorrow and also what will hopefully be a productive session of parliament. Today's vote took place by secret ballot.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Conservative Party of Canada, Federal politics, Liberal Party

Hillary Clinton would be a great choice for Secretary of State
I hope the reports here, here, here, here, here and here are correct. Hillary Clinton would be an excellent choice given her experience and relationships she and Bill have with world leaders. I hope she is in fact the Secretary of State. A meeting between her and Lawrence Canon would be great to see. It was also great to see Obama have a face to face meeting with John McCain today. I am also excited about rumours that California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger may also get a position in cabinet.
-Darryl
SIRI AGRELL
From Saturday's Globe and Mail
November 14, 2008 at 10:46 PM EST
Almost a year ago, Barack Obama was asked in a debate how he could rely on so many Bill Clinton-era advisers while still providing a break from the past, prompting his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton to burst out laughing.
Turning to face her, Mr. Obama deadpanned: “I'm looking forward to you advising me too, Hillary.”
Now president-elect, Mr. Obama it seems was not joking.
The pair took a secret meeting in
![]()
CNN quoted Democratic sources as saying Mr. Obama and Ms. Clinton had a serious discussion about the secretary of state job and that she left the meeting with the impression that it was hers if she wanted it. The Huffington Post blog went further, saying Ms. Clinton was offered the job and requested time to consider it.
But Mr. Obama also interviewed New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson for the position yesterday, media reports said.
Mr. Obama has also begun staffing his White House, transition team and economic panel with former
After a two-year battle in which each politician was accused of disrespecting the other, it appears that the Obama-Clinton rift is being repaired, one job opening at a time.
His transition chief, John Podesta, was Bill Clinton's chief of staff during the last two years of his administration. Mr. Obama's own newly hired White House chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was a senior
In fact, 31 of the 47 people named to Mr. Obama's transition team or staff have ties to the
“He's definitely playing on good advice and past expertise and the most recent Democratic administration,” said Melissa Haussman, an associate professor of political science at
Ironically, Dr. Haussman believes the new president learned that lesson from Mr. Clinton, whose own early White House staff was composed of some loyalists unprepared for the task at hand.
“They've got people with a whole lot of experience dealing with Congress, and that's something the Clinton White House was a little short on,” she said of the emerging Obama team.
While Mr. Obama's staff is drawing so heavily on administration insiders of the 1990s that Politico.com joked he is putting “the
Passed over for the vice-presidential slot, the primary runner-up campaigned for Mr. Obama during the general election and is regarded as a natural source of advice, expertise and political capital for Mr. Obama.
Already, she has been approached by Mr. Obama's wife, Michelle, for advice about raising kids in the White House. And now it seems Mr. Obama might be hoping she will help him contend with foreign policy as secretary of state.
But she is already being touted as a smart choice for the position, with an established international reputation that would help heal the country's damaged relationships abroad.
But what's in it for her?
Taking a position in cabinet means Ms. Clinton would lose her Senate seat and influence in domestic policy.
The past two secretaries of state, Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell, have been lightning rods for criticism, a situation Ms. Clinton may not be willing to endure again.
“Let's face it, as first lady and presidential candidate she was open to a lot of barbs and spears,” Dr. Haussman said. “It's a multiplicity of considerations, thinking about where her talents lie and how much does she want to put herself in a high-profile position again.”
Posted by
Darryl
7
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John McCain
Final Day at Conservative Convention
Sorry I didn't post this earlier. My flight left at 5am on Sunday morning and I left for the airport directly from the Helena and Rahim wedding social. The final day of the convention focused on the voting of policy resolutions and was open to the media and bloggers. I was sitting at the table from Newmarket-Aurora and supported most of the motions that were passed. I was very pleased to see Kara, Simon, Mark and John get elected to national council from Ontario. I was also very happy to see Don Plett get re-elected in Manitoba likely meaning a second term for President of the party. The official portion of the convention ended around 4pm. At night was the final hospitality social with Helena Guergis and Rahim Jaffer. Overall it was a great weekend and strong overall convention. I enjoyed the chance to meet so many fellow bloggers, delegates and media. It was also great how many MPs and cabinet ministers took the time to listen to the grassroots. Finally, I appreciated the hospitality of Winnipeg and I hope that this convention puts us in the position to get some additional Manibota representatives in the next election. Last time Thomas Steen came very close and this convention might put him over the top next time should he decide to run again. 2008 produced a great election and convention. I now look forward to parliament getting back to work tomorrow with the throne speech.
The best news to hear came from Irving Gerstein. The Conservative Party is already financially ready for an election at any time regardless of when it occurs. This is because of the commitment of 125,000 donors who average $115 per contribution. In contrast Liberals only have 34,000 donors and are in at least 2 million worth of debt.
Stephen Taylor did an interview with Lois Brown on his blog. You can also see a summary of motions that were passed on the same site.
-Darryl
***
Stephen Taylor from the Blogging Tories interviews Lois Brown, MP Newmarket-Aurora
Credit: www.stephentaylor.ca
***
STEVEN CHASE
Globe and Mail Update
November 15, 2008 at 7:29 PM EST
WINNIPEG — The following is an edited list of policy resolutions passed or voted down by Conservative delegates:
P-106: To encourage provinces and territories to “further experiment with different means of delivering universal health care utilizing both the public and private health sectors.” FAILED
P-110 Ottawa should work with provinces and territories to get nationwide agreement to amend labour codes to provide “at risk” workers such as prison guards and law enforcement officials and health care workers and physicians the “right to know when they have been exposed to infectious diseases.” This right would “transcend the privacy rights of the infected individual.” PASSED
P-113 Party believes that Ottawa should seek “dangerous offender” status and mandatory life sentences for any person convicted of a third serious violent offence, criminal organization offence, terrorism offence or serious drug trafficking offence. PASSED
P-114 Repeal the “faint hope” clause in the Criminal Code, thus removing the possibility of parole before 25 years for those sentenced to life in prison. PASSED
P-119 Party believes the government should take “strong action” to combat human trafficking and take a lead in developing international agreements and protocols against human trafficking. PASSED
P-202 Party reaffirms the legitimacy of the entire Charter of Rights and Freedoms including Section 13 (the notwithstanding clause). PASSED
P-203 Party supports legislation to remove authority from the Canadian Human Rights Commission and Tribunal to regulate, receive, investigate or adjudicate complaints related to Section 13 (hate messages) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. PASSED
P-207 Party supports legislation to ensure that individuals who commit violence against a pregnant woman would face additional charges if her unborn child was killed or injured during the commission of a crime against the mother. PASSED
P-213 Party supports the “full participation of women in the social, economic and cultural life of Canada” and the idea that “women must be entitled to equal pay for equal work.” PASSED
P-218 Party believes that Canada's multicultural society is a “valued reality” and accepts the need to foster understanding and equality of opportunity while expecting Canadians “to adopt Canadian common values such as equality, democracy and the rule of law.” PASSED
P-222 Party recognizes that temporary workers can be a valuable source of potential immigrants because of their work experience in Canada. Calls on government to develop pilot projects designed to address serious skills shortages in specific sectors and regions of the country that can attract temporary workers to Canada; examine ways to aid the transition of foreign workers to permanent status from temporary status and ensure that these workers receive the same protections under minimum employment standards as those afforded Canadian workers. PASSED
P-223 Government should in consultation with provinces, territories and aboriginal leaders, direct an independent audit of all social services providers to aboriginal communities to determine what if any measures of effectiveness are employed and whether the programs provided result in desired outcomes. Ottawa should also establish a three-party co-ordinating body to develop strategy for co-ordination of all programs and services provided to aboriginal communities. The Auditor General of Canada and counterparts in provinces should evaluate the actual outcomes as well as the financial accountability in audit reports on aboriginal services. PASSED
P-301 Party supports formation of a single national securities regulator with “robust enforcement powers.” PASSED
P-303 Party believes government should eliminate tax on capital gains that are reinvested. PASSED
P-305 Party supports income splitting for couples with children. PASSED
P-306 Party favours simplifying the federal tax code to reduce the complexity of tax calculations for ordinary Canadians. PASSED
P-308 Party supports right of workers to organize into unions but also respects private property and the decision of fellow workers not to participate. PASSED
P-321 Conservative government will continue to seek out bilateral and multilateral trade agreements that will improve market access for Canadian agricultural products and reduce foreign subsidies that distort trade and production. PASSED
P-101 Party believes federal and territorial governments should make joint investments to study and address climate change adaptation in the North. PASSED
P-104 Party believes government should work with provinces and territories to promote the development of ecological recycling plants using incinerators that capture waste gas and transform it into energy. PASSED
P-105 Party supports exploration and development of offshore oil and gas resources in Canadian waters including the Atlantic, Pacific and Arctic. Supports ensuring that “accurate and complete information on the risks and benefits of such development is made available to the public.” PASSED
P-111 Party supports government amending the Canada Health Act to permit the funding of complementary health services which demonstrably improve people's health. FAILED
P-122 Party believes the government should commit to providing the best possible services and benefits for veterans and their families in recognition of their service to Canada. The party is also committed to keeping the memory of Canadian veterans' achievements and sacrifices alive through the promotion of public awareness and memorials. PASSED
P-205 Party believes demonstrating Canada's presence in the Arctic requires both political and economic development in northern Canada and that government should work with territories to streamline regulatory processes; make substantial investments in the territories particularly in transportation infrastructure; and fast-track the devolution of “provincial-type” responsibilities to the territories. PASSED
P-208 A Conservative government would revamp the federal student loan program to eliminate the inclusion of parental income and assets in the assessment of loan applications. FAILED
P-209 Conservative Party supports abolishing employment insurance contributions paid by students when they have a summer job. FAILED
P-307 Conservative Party recognizes importance of innovation to creating a flourishing Canadian economy. This means providing support for businesses by ensuring low corporate and small business tax rates and enhancing tax credits for companies who do significant research and development. FAILED
P-311 The Conservative Party supports investing in scientific infrastructures specializing in polar scientific research in order to increase the body of scientific knowledge on the Arctic region. PASSED
P-312 Party continues to support exploration for fossil fuels, pipeline construction, transportation efficiencies and plant improvements to increase energy efficiencies and reduce pollutant and greenhouse gas discharges. It supports the application of nuclear energy and associated industries while reducing negative impacts on the environment. Also believes the government should support and encourage the private development of alternative sources of energy and fuels including wind, solar, geothermal sources; alternative transportation fuels such as bio-diesel from oil seed crops and methanol, ethanol or methane from biomass and organic waste; fuel cell technology and the use of hydrogen as transportation fuel. PASSED
P-316 Party supports policies and initiatives that will strengthen the viability of family operated businesses in areas of agriculture, aquaculture, fisheries and forestry. PASSED
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogging Tories, Conservative Convention, Conservative Party of Canada
Posted by
Darryl
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogging Tories, Conservative Convention, Conservative Party of Canada
Posted by
Darryl
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogging Tories, Conservative Convention
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogging Tories, Conservative Convention, Conservative Party of Canada
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogging Tories, Conservative Convention, Conservative Party of Canada
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogging Tories, Conservative Convention, Conservative Party of Canada
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogging Tories, Conservative Convention, Conservative Party of Canada
Posted by
Darryl
2
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogging Tories, Conservative Convention, Conservative Party of Canada
Posted by
Darryl
2
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogging Tories, Conservative Convention, Conservative Party of Canada
Off to Winnipeg for the Conservative Convention...
Tomorrow morning my flight leaves for Winnipeg to attend the Conservative Convention where I have blogging credentials. For those not attending, how would you like to see this conference covered? I want to make sure everyone has the opportunity to stay informed and also participate in this process. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
-Darryl
My Endorsements for the Ontario seats on National Council:
Kara Johnson
Simon Chapelle
Doug Hawkins
Mark Dotzert
Posted by
Darryl
4
comments
Links to this post

Lest we forget
Please take a couple of moments today to remember the sacrifices of our veterans and troops serving overseas today.
-Darryl
In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.
We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved, and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders Fields.
Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders Fields.
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Remembrance Day, Support the Troops
![]()
Remembrance Day should be a national holiday
I cannot think of a more important day to assign a national holiday to than Remembrance Day. It is important future generations to remember the sacrifices of our veterans as well as our current troops stationed overseas. As far as I am concerned, making Remembrance Day a national holiday is long overdue and should be considered by the current government as soon as possible. The cost of freedom was not free and it is time we honour our veterans appropriately. Please take the time tomorrow to remember our soldiers past and present. Lest we forget.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: National Holidays, Remembrance Day, Support the Troops, Veterans
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Canada's Next Prime Minister, CBC, CBC Next Great Prime Minister
Full Sarah Palin Prank Call
Les Justiciers Masques prank call Sarah Palin. I have to admit, I cannot believe it lasted as long as it did. This is pretty funny.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
10
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Sarah Palin



Liberal Party making the same mistakes, leadership heading for another bust
In Canadian politics, it seems like the Liberal Party is still stuck in 2006. Another leadership race has been kicked off. Key candidates have taken a pass. MPs haven't sat a day in the House, yet Liberals are already threatening an election they cannot afford to fight. Financing remains a serious problem. The great red machine that considers itself
If you look closely at the campaign of Barack Obama, you can see the Conservatives have been building a similar machine North of the border since 2004 with the roots prior in the Reform Party. Barack Obama had a fundraising campaign that appealed to a broad base of donors that could give what they could afford. $10, $20, $50, $100, $200, $500 or the maximum individual limit. A large numbers of individuals gave in small amounts and the Obama campaign set records in contributions. On the Republican side, Ron Paul demonstrated that the same formula could work and he pulled off a successful grassroots financing campaign of his own. Liberals are still stuck in the same era as Republicans addicted to large donations from a small amount of sources. The web, social networking sites, YouTube, and email were heavily used during the American campaign. Sophistacated voter ID systems were used to identify and get out the vote on election day. The campaign was disciplined, always on message in both the media and on the trail, and it proved to be incredably strategic in their targeting of states through internal polling and call centers. Volunteers were coordinated, large in numbers and motivated to help wherever they could. Several were bused in from stronger Democratic areas and into the swing states like
What made Obama so unique was his ability to appeal to so many first time and new voters. He brought out the African American community in record numbers and also young people for the first time as well. He positioned himself as non-partisan and has a charisma and talent for public speaking that has not been seen in recent decades. He represented generational change and the significance of being the first African American president cannot be considered lightly given the history of the
Stephen LeDrew is usually quickly dismissed, but lately he has been making sound points about the Liberal Party and what they need to do to become relevant again. Platform, fundraising, ground organization, leadership and regional concerns are all issued that have to be addressed. Given that Liberals are threatening to bring down the government over crime issues demonstrate that there will not be much time before the next election and that this parliament will continue to be disfunctional and in campaign mode. A leadership race will be held in early May and probably after that an election will take place within a year. Liberals will make the same mistakes all over again and likely hand Stephen Harper a majority next time. Liberals need to realize that rebuilding will take years and not months. They have to take a hard look in the mirror and ask what needs to be changed to regain all the ground lost since the 2004 election campaign. They must come to terms with the fact that the right has been united and the NDP and Greens are bleeding their votes from the left while the Conservative Party itself has made gains from the right of their party. The fantasy about former progressive conservatives being disgruntled or willing to vote Liberal at this point is over. Clearly a lot of the Paul Martin Liberal supporters are now voting Conservative. A leadership race will lead to more fighting and divisions within the Liberal Party. At the end of the day there is a great chance that Michael Ignatieff will win with a portion on the left feeling alienated. Otherwise Bob Rae will be elected and many on the right of the Liberal party will be left feeling uncomfortable. Worst case scenario is if they make the same mistake as in 2006 allowing a candidate that nobody wants become the compromise winner with those in the frontrunner camps sitting on their hands or taking shots anomalously through the media during the next campaign. I predict whoever wins will be the entire Liberal rebuilding process and that little else will change within the party prior to the next campaign. One thing is also clear, there is no Obama potential among Ignatieff, Rae or LeBlanc.
The world and country are changing and Liberals need to as well. They need to be proactive and not reactive. In the last campaign all they did was jump on negative media headlines about the Conservatives. Mulroney, "in and out" scheme, arts cuts, Omar Kadar, ABC Campaign, Gerry Ritz, young offenders act and other issues that were largely inside baseball to average voters. These issues took priority over the Liberals defining their vision for
Will the Chretien wing or the Martin wing prevail? Will the party move to the left with Rae or to the right with Iggy? Who is willing to pay $90,000 to raise their profile and hope that they can come up the middle in this race? With so much election fatigue following elections federally, provincially (Quebec now voting), in America, and locally; how much are people going to get excited about another Liberal leadership race with the same candidates following the Montreal race that happened only two years ago? With no money to spend and looking to do this process on the cheap; will this race make Liberals look any more ready to govern?
The candidates: Who is Out
The two most dangerous candidates have decided not to run. Justin Trudeau, although inexperienced is someone with the name recognition that could have brought some media attention and excitement to the Liberal leadership race. Maybe in the future, but this time he is out. For the second time Frank McKenna has decided the challenge of building the Liberal Party is too great for him to leave the corporate world. He was a candidate who was not from
The candidates: Who is In
Michael Ignatieff is the frontrunner right now and has the most credible team behind him. Bob Rae is obviously in the race again and may have more opportunity to grow than Ignatieff after the first ballot. Dominic Leblanc seems to have positioned himself in the media and within the party as the Dion style compromise candidate who can come up the middle.
The candidates: Who might get In despite barriers
Martha Hall Findlay, Ken Dryden and Gerard Kennedy might decide to run but both are heavily in debt. Below is a listing of all Liberal debts from the last leadership race courtesy of the Hill Times.
Liberal Leadership 2006 Candidates' Debts, Payments:
Maurizio Bevilacqua
Total loan: $515,188
Loan paid: $265,808
Unpaid claim: $19,998
Balance owed: $269,378
Scott Brison
Total loan: $200,000
Loan paid: $50,000
Unpaid claim: $95
Balance owed: $150,095
Stéphane Dion
Total loan: $905,000
Loans paid: $280,000
Unpaid claim: $2,860
Balance owed: $627,860
Ken Dryden
Total loan: $330,995
Loan paid: $0
Unpaid claim: $64,894
Balance owed: $395,890
Hedy Fry
Total loan: $153,500
Loan paid: $49,000
Unpaid claim: $0
Balance owed: $104,000
Martha Hall Findlay
Total loan: $130,000
Loan paid: $0
Unpaid claim: $54,460
Balance owed: $184,460
Michael Ignatieff
Total loan: $570,000
Loan paid: $426,500
Unpaid claim: $0
Balance owed: $143,500
Gerard Kennedy
Total loan: $451,170
Loan paid: $195,750
Unpaid claim: $66,941
Balance owed: $322,361
Joseph Volpe
Total loan: $341,556
Loan paid: $181,266
Unpaid claim: $0
Balance owed: $160,290
Obviously these debts are major barriers and are hard to pay off under the new rules. Can Martha Hall Findlay, Gerard Kennedy, and Ken Dryden afford to double down with the entry fee raised to $90,000? That really just leaves wild card candidates like Ruby Dhalla, Ralph Goodale, Ujjal Dosanjh, Martin Cauchon, Denis Coderre and David McGuinty all remain possibilities. Some of these candidates do not speak French hurting their chances of being successful. Right now it is shaping up as a three way race between Rae, Ignatieff and LeBlanc. There doesn't seem to be any outsiders left that might run either.
Finally there is a good chance Stephane Dion will lead Liberals into the next election if he continues to make the same old mistakes as last time. If I was Harper I would not back down on these crime bills. If Dion wants to charge the taxpayer another $300 million over his soft on crime stance, I would be happy to fight another election asking for a majority to allow us to get things done. I hope we do not see another session of Liberals huffing and puffing and then sitting down. Just say from the beginning you need time to rebuild and will allow this parliament to work until Liberals are willing and able to fight an election. Talking tough and abstaining is the same mistake as last time. Any election before May would be suicidal and Liberals know it. If they cannot afford to have a proper leadership convention, how can they expect to face Conservatives in a general election?
It is a shame what the Liberal Party has become. It is clear that there road to rebuilding will be long and that it will take some time to get there. In the meantime Conservatives should continue to build while Liberals continue to self destruct. I am not sure there is anyone in this race that can prevent Liberals from making the same mistakes or simply becoming relevant again. Of course we should not get cocky though as there will be tough economic issues to address and for some reason the Liberal brand always remains resiliant and strong. As a Conservative, I would like to see Bob Rae come out on top. My prediction though is that Michael Ignatieff will win this time after several ballots.
Thanks for reading...
Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: Liberal Leadership Race, Liberal Party
New Zealand elects first Conservative government in almost a decade
New Zealand on Saturday elected its first conservative government in almost a decade, ending the rule of one of the world's longest-serving elected women.
Posted by
Darryl
3
comments
Links to this post
Labels: International elections, New Zealand
Knives come out for Palin
If this is true it is very disturbing. If she does not know that Canada and Mexico are part of NAFTA; one has to wonder if she is qualified to be governor of Alaska, let alone President. Personally I think these leaks are nothing more than supporters of other candidates for 2012 trying to tear down Palin as frontrunner. Not knowing Africa is a continent seems like a stretch. One thing that is certainly true, is that Palin only had one interview for the job of VP. I have gone through multiple interviews in the past to serve tables at banquets. Having said that, a lot of people are turning on Palin now; but she deserves credit for giving McCain some great headlines for a week while at the same time providing exciement and enthusiasism to his ticket.
Now that Sarah Palin has returned to Alaska as governor, I think Stephen Harper should try and set up a meeting. We face many common issues in the North and she could be an ally to our goals with regards to arctic sovereignty in Canada as well as issues relating to energy.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
5
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Arctic Sovereignty, Conservative Party of Canada, Relations with Alaska, Stephen Harper
Canada Remembers
From the PMO YouTube channel.
Posted by
Darryl
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: Conservative Party of Canada, Remembrance Day, Stephen Harper
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Canadian relations with Europe, Conservative Party of Canada, EU, Europe, Nicolas Sarkozy, Stephen Harper

Harper appoints 27 Parliamentary Secretaries
I am not sure if this is the full listing as there are 38 cabinet ministers right now, however I do notice some of these parliamentary secretaries have responsibility for multiple departments. Below are bios and announcements from the PMO website as well as a video about the new cabinet.
-Darryl
***
Pierre Poilievre
Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister and to the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs
Nepean–Carleton (Ontario)
Pierre Poilievre was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. Mr. Poilievre was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board in February 2006.
Mr. Poilievre owned and operated a communications and market research firm before taking his seat in Parliament.
He is a member of the Royal Canadian Legion.
Mr. Poilievre studied international relations at the University of Calgary.
Ted Menzies
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance
Macleod (Alberta)
Ted Menzies was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and was re-elected in 2006 and 2008. In October 2007, Mr. Menzies was sworn in as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance. Previously, he served as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Cooperation and to the Minister of International Trade.
Mr. Menzies held the post of President of the Canadian Agri-Food and Trade Alliance and was Vice-President of the Grain Growers of Canada. He has owned and operated a farm for over 30 years.
He and his wife, Sandy, have two children.
The Hon. Jim Abbott
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Cooperation
Kootenay–Columbia (British Columbia)
Jim Abbott was first elected to the House of Commons in 1993 and re-elected in 1997, 2000, 2004, 2006 and 2008. In February 2006, Mr. Abbott was appointed Parliamentary Secretary for Canadian Heritage. In October 2007, he became a member of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada.
Mr. Abbott brings to his work as a parliamentarian a background of sales, marketing and business management with his own firm as well as with small, medium-sized and international businesses.
Mr. Abbott and his wife, Jeannette, have three children.
John Duncan
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development
Vancouver Island North (British Columbia)
John Duncan was first elected to the House of Commons in 1993 and re-elected in 1997, 2000, 2004 and 2008.
From 2006 to 2007, Mr. Duncan worked as Pacific Region Advisor to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans. From 1972 to 1993, he worked in the coastal BC forest industry.
Mr. Duncan attended the University of British Columbia and graduated with a Bachelor of Science from the Faculty of Forestry in 1972. He and his wife, Mary, have three children.
Gerald Keddy
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade
South Shore–St. Margaret's (Nova Scotia)
Gerald Keddy was first elected to the House of Commons in 1997 and re-elected in 2000, 2004, 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency in October 2007, and in March 2008, was assigned the additional post of Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade.
Prior to his career in politics, Mr. Keddy worked as a farmer, a driller in Nova Scotia’s offshore oil industry and a Christmas tree producer and exporter. He is past president of the Christmas Tree Council of Nova Scotia.
Mr. Keddy lives in New Ross, Nova Scotia, with his partner, Judy, and their children.
Deepak Obhrai
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs
Calgary East (Alberta)
Deepak Obhrai was first elected to the House of Commons in 1997 and re-elected in 2000, 2004, 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs in February 2006. In addition, he was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Cooperation in March 2008.
He is a past president of the India-Canada Association, the Monterey Community Association and the Hindu Society of Calgary, and Vice-President of the National Indo/Canadian Council.
Mr. Obhrai and his wife, Neena, have three children.
David Anderson
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources and for the Canadian Wheat Board
Cypress Hills–Grasslands (Saskatchewan)
David Anderson was first elected to the House of Commons in 2000 and re-elected in 2004, 2006 and 2008. Mr. Anderson was appointed Parliamentary Secretary for the Canadian Wheat Board in February 2006, and was assigned additional responsibilities as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources in October 2007.
Mr. Anderson graduated from the University of Regina and has a Master’s of Divinity from the Canadian Theological Seminary.
Mr. Anderson and his wife, Sheila, have two children.
Colin Carrie
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health
Oshawa (Ontario)
Colin Carrie was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry in February 2006.
Prior to entering federal politics, he was the co-owner and operator of a chiropractic clinic in the Durham Region, Ontario.
Dr. Carrie has been a vocal advocate for Hepatitis C patients and for families dealing with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder.
Dr. Carrie graduated from the University of Waterloo and from the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College where he earned a doctor of chiropractic medicine degree.
He and his wife, Elizabeth, have three children.
Brian Jean
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities
Fort McMurray–Athabasca (Alberta)
Brian Jean was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities in February 2006.
Prior to entering federal politics, he practised law and was an instructor at Keyano College, a business owner and a publisher.
He was Chair of the Alberta Summer Games and President of the Fort McMurray Downtown Business Association as well as a director of the local chamber of commerce and honorary Chair of the Children’s Health Foundation.
He has a master’s in business administration and a law degree.
Randy Kamp
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans
Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge–Mission (British Columbia)
Randy Kamp was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans in February 2006.
Prior to entering politics, he and his family lived in the Philippines where he was the regional director for an organization doing linguistic work among minority language communities.
Mr. Kamp has a bachelor’s degree in theology. He and his wife, Ruth, have three children.
Ed Komarnicki
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development and to the Minister of Labour
Souris–Moose Mountain (Saskatchewan)
Ed Komarnicki was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration in February 2006.
Prior to entering federal politics, Mr. Komarnicki was a practising lawyer and served as chair of the Law Society of Saskatchewan’s committees on professional standards, on legislation and policy, and on equity diversity. He also served as vice-chair of the society’s discipline committee.
Mr. Komarnicki and his wife have eight children.
Tom Lukiwski
Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Regina–Lumsden–Lake Centre (Saskatchewan)
Tom Lukiwski was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform in February 2006.
Prior to entering federal politics, he was general manager of the Saskatchewan Party from 1997 to 2004. In addition to operating a small business, he has been an active volunteer in his community. He served as Chair for the Peter Gzowski Fundraiser for Literacy and played key roles with the Bill Clarke fundraiser in support of the fight against Parkinson’s disease, the 1992 Labatt Brier Committee, and Skate Canada 1989. He was also a member of the marketing board of directors for the Saskatchewan Roughriders.
Mr. Lukiwski and and his wife, Diane, have two children.
Dave MacKenzie
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety
Oxford (Ontario)
Dave MacKenzie was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety in February 2006.
From 1967 to 1997, Mr. MacKenzie served as a constable, detective, inspector, deputy chief and chief of police with the Woodstock City Police. He retired from the police force in 1997.
Mr. MacKenzie is actively involved in his community and has worked extensively with the Woodstock General Hospital Foundation and the Woodstock Seniors Centre.
He and his wife, Lynda, have three children.
Rob Moore
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice
Fundy Royal (New Brunswick)
Rob Moore was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada in February 2006.
He has a bachelor of laws degree from the University of New Brunswick and he was called to the New Brunswick Bar in June 2000.
Mark Warawa
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of the Environment
Langley (British Columbia)
Mark Warawa was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of the Environment in February 2006.
Prior to entering federal politics, he was a municipal councillor and a regional district director for 13 years. Mr. Warawa has 30 years of experience as an entrepreneur.
Mr. Warawa and his wife, Diane, have five children.
Sylvie Boucher
Parliamentary Secretary for Status of Women
Beauport–Limoilou (Quebec)
Sylvie Boucher was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008. Ms. Boucher was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister and for Status of Women in October 2007. Previously, she served as Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister and for La Francophonie and Official Languages.
She has worked in the private sector, specializing in marketing and sales, and moved to politics where she assumed various roles in the Quebec National Assembly.
Ms. Boucher is an active member of a number of community groups.
Ms. Boucher has studied in various fields, including gerontology, literature, and office systems and information technology.
She has two daughters.
Dean Del Mastro
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Canadian Heritage
Peterborough (Ontario)
Dean Del Mastro was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008.
He has served on several House of Commons committees, including the standing committees on National Defence, on Finance and on Canadian Heritage.
Prior to entering federal politics, he served as Chairman of the Suzuki Canada Dealer Advisory Board, and as Vice-President of Del Mastro Motors Ltd., a company he jointly founded.
Mr. Del Mastro attended the University of Windsor where he earned his Honours Bachelor of Commerce.
Rick Dykstra
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
St. Catharines (Ontario)
Rick Dykstra was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008. Mr. Dykstra has been a member of the standing committees on Finance, and Justice and Human Rights.
Prior to entering federal politics, he was a partner in a public affairs business operating out of Niagara and Toronto. Previously, Mr. Dykstra spent five years in the Ontario provincial government and served as Director of Caucus Relations for two provincial premiers, as well as Chief of Staff to the Minister of Community and Social Services. He has also served as a member of the Niagara Parks Commission.
Mr. Dykstra has a degree in political science from Brock University, and a Master's Certificate in project management from York University. Mr. Dykstra and his wife, Kathy, are lifelong residents of St. Catharines and have three children.
Jacques Gourde
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Works and Government Services and to the Minister of National Revenue
Lotbinière–Chutes-de-la-Chaudière (Quebec)
Jacques Gourde was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008. He was named Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Labour and Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec in October 2007.
Previously, Mr. Gourde served as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board, and as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources.
Mr. Gourde has a diploma in farm management and was a producer and exporter of hay in Saint-Narcisse-de-Beaurivage. He was President of the Development Committee of Saint-Narcisse and parish council church warden for six years.
Mr. Gourde and his wife, Chantal, have five children.
Laurie Hawn
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence
Edmonton Centre (Alberta)
Laurie Hawn was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008. In October 2007, he was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence.
Prior to entering federal politics, Mr. Hawn had a distinguished career in the Royal Canadian Air Force. During his 30 years of service, he rose to the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel before retiring in 1994. He also served an additional five years as Honorary Colonel of the 417 Combat Support Squadron. Upon retirement, Mr. Hawn entered the financial services business. He is a founding member of the Investment Advisors Association of Canada.
He and his wife, Judy, have two children.
Mike Lake
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry
Edmonton─Mill Woods─Beaumont (Alberta)
Mike Lake was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008.
Mr. Lake has served as a member of the House of Commons standing committees on Human Resources, Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, and on Public Accounts.
Prior to entering federal politics, Mr. Lake worked for 10 years with the Edmonton Oilers Hockey Club where he served as National Accounts Manager, Director of Ticket Sales and Group Sales Manager. He is an active member of the Edmonton Autism Society and has mentored foster children.
Mr. Lake holds a Bachelor of Commerce (with distinction) from the University of Alberta. He and his wife, Debi, have two children.
Pierre Lemieux
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Agriculture
Glengarry–Prescott–Russell (Ontario)
Mr. Lemieux was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008. He was named Parliamentary Secretary for Official Languages in October 2007.
Mr. Lemieux began his career as an officer in the Canadian Forces where he served for 20 years before retiring at the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel. He is also a professional engineer and is certified with the Project Management Institute. After working as a manager in the high-tech sector, he started his own company, offering project management and consulting services.
Mr. Lemieux is married and has five children.
Daniel Petit
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice
Charlesbourg─Haute-Saint-Charles (Quebec)
Daniel Petit was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008.
Mr. Petit has been a member of several House of Commons committees, including the standing committees on Justice and Human Rights, and on Official Languages.
Prior to entering federal politics, he founded and was a partner of the firm Petit, Beaudoin, Société nominale d'avocats, specializing in labour and administrative law.
Mr. Petit is married with four children.
Shelly Glover
Parliamentary Secretary for Official Languages
Saint Boniface (Manitoba)
Shelly Glover was first elected to the House of Commons in 2008.
Prior to entering federal politics, Ms. Glover was a Patrol Sergeant and a 16-year veteran of the Winnipeg Police Service. In addition to supervising a team of uniformed officers, she has served as a uniformed general patrol officer, bike patrol officer, and detective in the Youth and Child Abuse Unit. She also served as the official spokesperson for the Winnipeg Police Force.
She has volunteered on various boards, including Big Sisters, the Beausejour New Arena Planning Committee and various school parent councils.
Ms. Glover majored in justice and law enforcement at the University of Winnipeg. She and her husband, Bruce, have five children.
Greg Kerr
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Veterans Affairs
West Nova (Nova Scotia)
Greg Kerr was first elected to the House of Commons in 2008.
Prior to entering federal politics, Mr. Kerr served as a member of the Government of Nova Scotia from 1978 to 1992. He served in the provincial Cabinet as the Minister of Finance; Tourism and Culture; Housing; Culture, Recreation and Fitness; and Environment. He also served as a municipal councillor for Annapolis County, Nova Scotia.
Previously, Mr. Kerr was an owner of a small beef farm and a small logging operation, and was also a high school teacher.
Mr. Kerr has a Bachelor of Arts and a Bachelor of Education from Mount Allison University. Mr. Kerr and his wife, Marcia Longmire, have two children.
Andrew Saxton
Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board
North Vancouver (British Columbia)
Andrew Saxton was first elected to the House of Commons in 2008.
Prior to entering federal politics, Mr. Saxton was CEO of King George Financial Corp., an investment firm, and was on the Board of Directors of Canaco Resources, a gold exploration company. Mr. Saxton has worked for Credit Suisse at their Switzerland, New York and Vancouver offices, and for HSBC at their Hong Kong and Singapore offices. Currently, he is a director of the provincial Heart and Stroke Foundation.
Mr. Saxton graduated with a degree in administrative and commercial studies from the University of Western Ontario.
Alice Wong
Parliamentary Secretary for Multiculturalism
Richmond (British Columbia)
Alice Wong was first elected to the House of Commons in 2008.
Prior to entering federal politics, Ms. Wong operated several family businesses, including one specializing in research and education. She has worked as manager of international programs at Kwantlen University College, coordinator of the Centre for Small Business, and manager of international projects at Vancouver Community College. She has also been a college lecturer and instructor at schools in Hong Kong and has extensive field experience in Europe, Asia and Africa.
Ms. Wong has served as a vice-president of several local community organizations and was a member on a number of local boards. She is also a guest host of current affairs programs on local Chinese and multicultural radio and television.
Ms. Wong moved to Canada 27 years ago from Hong Kong. She received her PhD in curriculum and instruction in 1993 from the University of British Columbia.
Ms. Wong and her husband, Enoch, have been married for over 25 years.
***
Posted by
Darryl
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: Cabinet Shuffle, Conservative Party of Canada, Stephen Harper
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Barack Obama
![]()
What you will be voting on in the policy convention in Winnipeg
This was leaked earlier today. I have not gone through the documents yet, but ultimately these are the policies that will be voted on at the Conservative Policy convention in Winnipeg next weekend.
-Darryl
http://www.nationalnewswatch.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=45204&Itemid=41
Posted by
Darryl
5
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Conservative Party of Canada, Conservative Policy Convention


My Reflections on the American and Canadian elections and the future under this new political landscape
October 14 Canadians went to the polls and November 4 Americans went to the polls and at the end of the day Stephen Harper of the Conservative Party and Barack Obama of the Democratic Party were easily elected to office in their respective countries.
Stephen Harper has a stronger minority at 143 seats and a stronger cabinet because of the increased talent pool. Following the Conservative convention in
Barack Obama will likely name an all-star cabinet with names like Colin Powell, Chuck Hagel, Arnold Schwarzenegger, John McCain, Michael Bloomberg, Warren Buffet, Hillary Clinton, Bill Richardson, Caroline Kennedy, Al Gore and John Kerry mentioned as possibilities. His transition is taking place right now and he will be sworn in January 20, 2009.
Both leaders have now won the prize of an economy heading for recession, a war in
The economy will be priority one and a new era has likely arrived in the international fight against climate change.
Ironically the opposition parties in the
In the
In
At the end of the day the election of Barack Obama helps Conservatives and Stephen Harper. We can now get something done without the opposition parties or media accusing us of being too close to George W. Bush. Any photo ops between Obama and Harper will look great in election brochures and television advertisements down the road. Liberals should resist the temptation, get caught up in the moment and try and rip off Obama as a quick fix. Once the hype wears off, he will face serious challenges and have real decisions to make. He may not be as popular tomorrow as he is today. On top of that Liberals already jumped on the green trend after
Yes we can to free trade. Yes we can to great relations between
Thanks for reading...
Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Barack Obama, Conservative Party of Canada, Democratic party, Liberal Party, Republican Party, Stephen Harper
Stephen Harper spoke on the telephone with U.S. president-elect Barack Obama on Thursday to congratulate him on his election victory earlier in the week, the Prime Minister's Office said.
In a statement, the PMO described the conversation as a "warm exchange," in which the two leaders "emphasized that there could be no closer friends and allies and vowed to maintain and further build upon this strong relationship."
They touched on the upcoming G-20 leaders' summit in Washington on Nov. 15 and its importance for addressing the global financial crisis.
Earlier in the day, the prime minister said Obama's election to the U.S. presidency is an "inspiring moment," and that Canada will work with the new administration as its "most reliable ally in the world."
Harper was responding to a reporter's question why his office only issued a simple, short communiqué after the Democratic candidate was named the election winner on Tuesday night.
"Obviously, the election of the first African-American president is a tremendous and truly inspiring moment, I think, in American political history," Harper said during a press conference following a meeting with economists and business leaders in Toronto.
"And I think all of us who are maybe a little bit older — I’m getting into that category — understand why that truly is when we see the changes that have occurred in their society and our society over the past couple of generations."
Harper also said he believes Obama, who has pledged to increase America's energy independence and security, will understand that the U.S. faces "major challenges" and that Canada remains "the major source of energy and the most secure source of energy."
"We have shared challenges and we will always work in full collaboration with our ally, our most important partner," he said. "It's an era of possibility."
Harper, accused by his opponents in Parliament of siding with the Bush administration in opposing international climate-change initiatives, also described Obama's stated desire to participate in global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as a "major change."
"As I have said many times in the past … it’s almost essential for Canada to manage this problem in co-operation with the United States because we share the same economy," Harper said. "We share the same continent, and we need a partner in the matters of the environment if we want to make real progress."
He said the Canadian government viewed Obama's intention to shift more soldiers and resources into Afghanistan from Iraq as "positive, and obviously consistent with Canadian policy."
Although Harper and Obama have never met face to face, the prime minister said the two had "a good conversation" in the spring and he expected to have a chance to talk to the president-elect soon.
"I anticipate talking to him in the very near future, probably today, but certainly in the next day or two," Harper said. "I look forward to that conversation, to meeting with the senator in person."
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Barack Obama, Conservative Party of Canada, Stephen Harper
George W. Bush comments on Barack Obama's victory
President Bush speaks from the White House to congrat Sen. Barack Obama and assure the U.S. of a smooth transition of office.
Posted by
Darryl
3
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Barack Obama, George Bush
![]()
![]()
Prime Minister Harper congratulates President Obama
I look forward to great relations between the two leaders and our two great nations. There are a lot of challenges that Canadians and Americans need to face together. Afghanistan, the economy, free trade and the environment are just a few of the major issues that will have to be dealt with over the next couple of years. I look forward to the first meeting between the two leaders. I also look forward to President Obama's first visit to Canada.
-Darryl
***
The Canadian Press
November 6, 2008 at 12:49 PM EST
TORONTO — Prime Minister Stephen Harper says he hopes to speak to U.S. president-elect Barack Obama as soon as today.
At a news conference in Toronto today, Mr. Harper said Mr. Obama's election victory is a “truly inspiring moment” in American political history.
He said the U.S. has undergone tremendous change in a few generations, and electing the country's first African-American president is a significant part of that.
Mr. Harper said he hopes to speak to Mr. Obama in the very near future — possibly even today — and he looks forward to meeting him in person.
The Prime Minister praised Mr. Obama for running a great election campaign and said he and his staff plan to study it.
Mr. Harper noted that Mr. Obama faces tremendous challenges in the financial crisis and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but said Canada will be there for the U.S. as its most reliable ally in the world.
3 hours ago
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Stephen Harper is congratulating U.S. president-elect Barack Obama on his decisive election win.
"I look forward to meeting with the president-elect so that we can continue to strengthen the special bond that exists between Canada and the United States," Harper said in a statement issued after the Democratic nominee clinched the presidency.
"In the weeks and months ahead, Canadian officials and diplomats will be working closely with members of president-elect Obama's transition team. Ministers in our government look forward to building a strong working relationship with their counterparts in a new Obama cabinet."
The prime minister also extended his congratulations to all the newly elected governors and members of Congress.
"Given the challenges facing the world economy," he said, "it is vital that Canadian and American legislators continue to work together on the important issues facing families on both sides of the border."
Statements from Other World Leaders:
Chinese President Hu Jintao:
"The Chinese government and I have always attached great importance to the Sino-U.S. relations. In the new historical period, I look forward to endeavor together with you … to continue to strengthen the dialogue and communication between the two countries, to enhance mutual trust and cooperation, to push the Sino-U.S. constructive cooperation relations to a new level, in order to better benefit the two people and the peoples of the world."
Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao:
"The good relationship between China and the United States is the shared hope of people of the two countries, it is also needed in the safeguarding of the peace, stability and prosperity of Asia-Pacific region and the world.
"… Through the common endeavor of both countries, the constructive cooperation relationship between China and the United States will definitely acquire new development."
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown:
"I would like to offer my sincere congratulations to Barack Obama on winning the presidency of the United States. I would also like to pay tribute to Senator McCain who fought a good campaign and has shown the characteristic dignity that has marked a lifetime of service to his country.
"The relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom is vital to our prosperity and security. Barack Obama ran an inspirational campaign, energizing politics with his progressive values and his vision for the future. I know Barack Obama and we share many values. We both have determination to show that government can act to help people fairly through these difficult times facing the global economy. And I look forward to working extremely closely with him in the coming months and years."
Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga:
"The significance of this victory will resonate with hundreds of millions of people around the world. It is indeed time for global renewal.
"The strong message of hope and a vision of a world united in dealing with global challenges delivered by the president-elect in his campaigns is admirable, timely and welcome. The perseverance and endurance that the president-elect has shown during his campaigns is an inspiration to the world.
"The people of Kenya wish the president-elect and the people of America every success in their endeavors in the years to come. There can be no doubt that America is indeed 'a nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. '"
German Chancellor Angela Merkel:
"My sincere congratulations on your historic victory in the presidential election.
"The world faces meaningful challenges at the start of your term in office. I'm convinced that through a close and trusting cooperation between the United States and Europe we will be able to confront new risks and challenges in a decisive manner and will be able to take advantage of the numerous opportunities that are opening up in our world. Rest assured that my government appreciates hugely the meaning and value of the trans-Atlantic relationship for our common future.
"I remember with pleasure our conversation during your visit to Germany last July and look forward to working together with you in the future."
Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh:
"The Iraqi government has a true desire to work and cooperate with the elected president for the best interest of the two countries to spread security and ensure Iraq's full sovereignty in a way that this will guarantee the interest of Iraqi people."
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert:
"Once again, America has proven that it is, indeed, the greatest democracy and constitutes an example for all other democracies in the world. President-elect Obama has proven his leadership and his talents to the entire world.
"… The special Israel-U.S. relationship is based on shared values and interests and is characterized by ties of close cooperation. Israel and the United States have a common desire to advance peace and stability in the Middle East. We have no doubt that the special relations that prevail between the two countries will continue to strengthen during the Obama administration."
Israeli President Shimon Peres:
"It was an American election and a worldwide choice.
"… I want to congratulate the newly-elected president: young, fresh, promising, representing a change and introducing change. The changes that I can mention — it is an opportunity to escape the present world crisis and enter into a new era of cooperation, of productive economy and of human solidarity. In a way, it is an end of racism. There is no longer any way that any white man can claim superiority, nor any black person feel discrimination. We are the same people, and this election is a great statement to that effect.
"… I also have the utmost respect for the other candidate, John McCain, who fought with great courage and stamina.
"… When President Obama was here, he asked me what he can do for Israel. My answer was: Be a great president of the United States of America. If you will be a great president of the United States of America, you will have great promise for Israel as well, and for all of the region and for all of our neighbors. Nobody should look at whose side the president is on — he just has to be on the side of peace. And if he will be on the side of peace, peace will come closer and more possible."
Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat:
Erakat said Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas congratulates Obama.
"We think that America is united behind the two-state solution and we hope that President-elect Obama will continue the engagement immediately and that he will transfer the vision of two states from a vision to a realistic political track," Erakat said.
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso:
"This is a time for a renewed commitment between Europe and the United States of America.
"I want to assure Senator Obama of the support of the European Commission and of my personal support in forging this renewed commitment to face together the many challenges ahead of us.
"We need to change the current crisis into a new opportunity. We need a new deal for a new world. I sincerely hope that with the leadership of President Obama, the United States of America will join forces with Europe to
drive this new deal. For the benefit of our societies, for the benefit of the world."
European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana:
"I think like every election, it means renewal. The ticket on which Barack Obama has run, this ticket for change — change is what we need in the world today. Many problems we have on the table, and I very much hope that we'll be able to do it together — to find a solution to them together, between the European Union and the United States.
"… I would also like to say that it will not be enough to have the European Union and the United States together. The problems of today we'll need also to incorporate other main players. I think about China, I think about the organization like the African Union and many others.
"Therefore, we have a very important day, a historical day and hope very much that the Europeans will be together also to make the utmost of this important moment."
Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh:
"I have great pleasure in conveying my heartiest congratulations on your election as the president of the United States. Your extraordinary journey to the White House will inspire people not only in your country but also around the world.
"The people of India and the United States are bound by their shared commitment to freedom, justice, pluralism, individual rights and democracy. These ideals provide a solid bedrock for friendship and strategic partnership between our two nations. We have strong ties between our peoples and I look forward to working with you to realize the enormous potential for cooperation that exists between India and the United States. Our two countries working together to address global issues and challenges will be an important factor for world peace, stability and progress."
Former South African President Nelson Mandela:
"Your victory has demonstrated that no person anywhere in the world should not dare to dream of wanting to change the world for a better place.
"We note and applaud your commitment to supporting the cause of peace and security around the world. We trust that you will also make it the mission of your presidency to combat the scourge of poverty and disease everywhere.
"We wish you strength and fortitude in the challenging days and years that lie ahead. We are sure you will ultimately achieve your dream making the United States of America a full partner in a community of nations committed to peace and prosperity for all."
Archbishop Desmond Tutu:
"It's an epoch-making event filling the whole world with hope that change is possible. It is just tremendous; it is saying to people of color that for them, the sky is the limit.
"My heartiest congratulations go to Senator Barack Obama and his partner Senator Joe Biden on their victory.
"I also want to congratulate Senator John McCain for his gracious references to Senator Obama in his conceding speech.
"We have a new spring in our walk and our shoulders are straighter. It is almost as when Nelson Mandela became president of South Africa in 1994."
French President Nicolas Sarkozy:
"In choosing you, it's the choice for change, the opening up and the optimism of the American people. While the world is in turmoil and doubt, the American people, loyal to their values that have always been the American identity, forcefully expressed their faith in progress and the future.
"This message from the American people resonates well beyond your borders. In the moment where we must face together immense challenges, your election raises immense hope in France, in Europe, and beyond, throughout the world. This open America, united and strong, will show the way anew, with its partners, by the strength of its example and its adherence to its principles.
"France and Europe, which have always been connected to the United States by ties of history, values, and friendship, will draw a new energy from this to work with America at preserving world peace and stability."
Iran's Deputy Parliament Speaker Mohammad Hossein Abutorabifard:
"Obama can change the defeated Bush policies and in so doing can play an important role in the future relations between the U.S. and Asia and the Middle East.
"… If the United States takes into consideration the realities of the world and chooses suitable policies, America can play its (proper) role in the relations between the United States and the countries of the region and theworld of Islam."
"… It seems that this election has prepared the ground for a revision in the Democrats' and Obama's future policies of the United States."
Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero:
Zapatero congratulated Obama for his "extraordinary election victory" and said it "opens the road of hope for the world in times of difficulty."
In a telegram sent to Obama, Zapatero wrote, "As prime minister of the government of Spain, I let you know of our desire to work together to search for opportunities and solutions to tackle the challenges we face.
"I am convinced, as you are, that dialogue and collaboration with governments and multilateral institutions is the best way to find the answers that we need."
Zimbabwe opposition party Movement for Democratic Change:
"Obama's victory is a victory of hope, faith, change, a restart, values and dreams which have underpinned our fight as a movement against dictatorship and the neo-fascism of Robert Mugabe.
"Obama's victory will hopefully usher in a departure from the politics of polarization, fear, unilateralism and arrogance that has defined the Bush doctrine in the last eight years. Indeed, we hope that Obama will open new avenues of dialogue of new interaction based on respect of all countries irrespective of the size of national budgets or the number of fighter jets owned.
"… We are mindful of the difficulties that lie ahead in Obama's path and the fact that this is no El Dorado, a construct that Obama himself acknowledges in his acceptance speech. Indeed it is a task that may take more than his two terms of office. Perhaps the greatest thing we have learnt from this victory is that democracy can work and that there is no alternative to the same.
"John McCain's speech was particularly humbling, instructive and inspiring. If in Africa, incumbents would accept defeat and would graciously depart from the seat of power, this would be a different continent, and indeed Zimbabwe would be a different place.
"For those of us who are still in the trenches, fighting for change and democracy across the entire African continent, this is our victory. One which for now we will savor and celebrate."
Posted by
Darryl
4
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Barack Obama, Conservative Party of Canada, Stephen Harper
Obama and McCain Speeches from Last Night
Barack Obama's historic victory speech. Barack Obama will be the 44th President of the United States of America:
Classy John McCain concession speech:
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Barack Obama, Democratic party, John McCain


Barack Obama elected President of the United States!!!
Congratulations to President Obama and the United States. Tonight is a huge night in the history of America.
Currently 133-155 with several states still to be decided
Democrats control at least 56 Senate seats and have a majority in the House
Update: Very classy speech from John McCain. Historic and moving victory speech for Barack Obama.
World reaction is positive. This win is already restoring America's image. Yesterday's win was emotional for the African American community and this election has brought out the best in America again.
The Republican Party must now start a long rebuilding process. The party is going to have to be more inclusive and return to their economic conservative roots.
At the end of the day, there was no way that McCain could have won this race given the record of George W. Bush. The focus will now shift to Sarah Palin and others as the future of the party.
Markets are flat today. The US election has not had much impact on trading thus far.
Barack Obama will become President of the United States officially on January 20.
Indiana, North Carolina and Missouri have not officially been called. Results look like an Obama win in Indiana and North Carolina with McCain picking up Missouri. If that holds, final results will be 364 to 174 in electoral college votes. Obama made gains in Ohio, Florida, Colorado, New Mexico, Virginia, Indiana, North Carolina, Nevada and Iowa.
Democrats have picked up at least 56 Senate seats. 4 races have still not been called including Al Franken in Minnesota. Elizabeth Dole was defeated easily in North Carolina.
Joe Lieberman is expected to meet with Democrats this week about his future. At a minimum expect him to lose his chairmanship. It is quite possible he will be booted from the caucus altogether.
Democrats easily carry the balance of power in the House earning at least 251 seats.
Turnout was impressive. Numbers are still coming in but it looks like over 138 million Americans voted making last night's election the highest turnout in a century. For the first time young voters cast their ballots and the results obviously had an impact based on exit polling. This race represents a generational change.
Interesting ballot initiatives:
-Arizona passes a ban on gay marriage and the hiring of illegal aliens. Florida also passes a ban on gay marriage. Initiative in California too close to call.
-Arkansas bans gays from adopting children
-Michigan votes to allow medical marijuana and stem cell research
-Massachusetts decriminalizes small amounts of weed and bans dog racing
-Nebraska ends affirmative action
-Washington allows doctor assisted suicide
-It appears all motions restricting abortion have failed
-California bans cramped cages for chickens
-California rejects making 20% of power supply renewable by 2010
-Maine ends new tax on beer
-English is now the official language of Missouri
-Several gambling measures pass except in Ohio
Overall a historic night in the United States. Congratulations to President elect Barack Obama for making history and becoming America's first African American president.
Update: CNN Projects Obama the winner
CBS Projection
Reaction in Chicago:
Party at the White House:
World Reaction:
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Barack Obama
Posted by
Darryl
8
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Barack Obama


10 Things that will impact the US Election Outcome
Frankly, I think that by 8:00pm E.S.T. tonight, Barack Obama will be declared the next president of the United States of America. This will be confirmed or denied based on several factors that will determine the outcome of tonight's historic election.
1, Turnout among young, African American, Hispanic and Native voters. Traditionally all these groups do not vote in high numbers. Many are predicting this will change based on the candidacy of Barack Obama. If any of these groups turn out in large numbers, expect some surprises in states that went red in 2004. An influx of young and African American voters could in itself be enough to win the election for Obama tonight.
2, State of Ohio. McCain must win here. If he doesn't, it is difficult to see how mathmatically he can win enough electoral college votes to reach 270. Polls in Ohio will close fairly early tonight.
3, State of Pennsylvania. This is the only blue state that McCain has any chance of flipping that Kerry won in 2004. If McCain expects to lose in any of the states Bush won in 2004, he will need Pennsylvania to make up the difference.
4, The Palin influence and Conservative turnout. Say what you want about Sarah Palin, she has energized and motivated the conservative base for McCain. This vote must turn out. If too many McCain supporters look at the polls over the past five weeks, listen to the pundits and media, and come to the conclusion that their vote will not matter; McCain is in serious trouble. Having been on losing campaigns before, I can tell you it is tough to motivate your volunteers and supporters when you are in a situation like McCain finds himself in. Many have argued that sometimes polls hurt democracy. We could see this happen tonight.
5, Independent voters. As a maverick, McCain was very appealing to independent voters and moderate Democrats. With Sarah Palin as his running mate and in order to win the Republican nomination; McCain has been criticized by some for going to far to the right and alienating his independent support. Exit polls will likely show how independent voters cast their ballots. If this number goes heavy for Obama; it will be a bad sign for Republicans and for Palin's future.
6, Florida. If it votes in favor of Barack Obama, John McCain will lose.
7. Republican states Virginia, North Carolina, Missouri, Colorado, New Mexico, Iowa, Arizona, Indiana, North Dakota, Montana, and Nevada. If Obama wins in any of these states; McCain must make up the difference somewhere. McCain is playing defence. He needs the same victory as Bush in 2004. There is not much margin for error on any of these states. Polls show Obama competitive if not leading in virtually all of these states.
8, Turnout and its impact on Senate, Congress and Governor races. Republican Alaska Senator Ted Stevens could be in trouble as a result of a recent conviction. Elizabeth Dole is in trouble in North Carolina. If we see a surge in turnout for Obama, will those votes translate to other Democrats as well. The Democratic Party is likely to control the White House, Congress and Senate. High turnout for Obama in a state like North Carolina could result in a loss for Dole. If this happens elsewhere where Republican senators are in trouble, the magic 60 number could become realistic. 60 Senators would give Democrats a filibuster proof majority in the Senate.
9, Potential Obama victory speech. Will he try and reduce expectations for his presidency should he get elected tonight? There is serious concerns that Obama supporters, Democrats and the international community have set expectations for an Obama presidency that is not realistic. History will likely be made tonight and there will be a lot of hype and excitement. Given the fiscal crisis however, too high expectations could hurt his chances to get re-elected in the long term.
10, Republican concession speeches. Will Palin run in 2012? Will Republicans look to regroup and rebuild? What might be in McCain's plans for the future? How will Republicans react to the results. If Obama loses will he try again in 2012. What will Hillary say? What will be the fallout of an Obama loss, especially if there is a perception of voting irregularities? Who will be on the next president's transition team. What will tonight's results mean for the current President George W. Bush. There has been two years of build up for this election night. There has been little talk about what the potential impact will be tomorrow. International newspapers will also be interesting as they react to the results.
Overall, I stick to my original prediction of 378-160 for Obama tonight. I also think Obama will achieve over 50% of the vote with an unusually high turnout.
Thanks for reading...
Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
3
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Barack Obama, Democratic party, John McCain, Republican Party
Obama: We have a lot of work to do
Obama warns supporters not to let up.
-Darryl
The American People are the Answer
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Barack Obama

Economist Magazine endorses Barack Obama
Economist was a strong endorsement for Obama. You can view a list of all Obama's endorsements by clicking here. Below is also a tally of all of the newspapers that have supported either Obama or McCain. Obama has a 273-142 lead in Newspaper endorsements. The Economist was impressive.
-Darryl
***
Oct 30th 2008
From The Economist print edition

IT IS impossible to forecast how important any presidency will be. Back in 2000 America stood tall as the undisputed superpower, at peace with a generally admiring world. The main argument was over what to do with the federal government’s huge budget surplus. Nobody foresaw the seismic events of the next eight years. When Americans go to the polls next week the mood will be very different. The United States is unhappy, divided and foundering both at home and abroad. Its self-belief and values are under attack.
For all the shortcomings of the campaign, both John McCain and Barack Obama offer hope of national redemption. Now America has to choose between them. The Economist does not have a vote, but if it did, it would cast it for Mr Obama. We do so wholeheartedly: the Democratic candidate has clearly shown that he offers the better chance of restoring America’s self-confidence. But we acknowledge it is a gamble. Given Mr Obama’s inexperience, the lack of clarity about some of his beliefs and the prospect of a stridently Democratic Congress, voting for him is a risk. Yet it is one America should take, given the steep road ahead.
The immediate focus, which has dominated the campaign, looks daunting enough: repairing America’s economy and its international reputation. The financial crisis is far from finished. The United States is at the start of a painful recession. Some form of further fiscal stimulus is needed, though estimates of the budget deficit next year already spiral above $1 trillion. Some 50m Americans have negligible health-care cover. Abroad, even though troops are dying in two countries, the cack-handed way in which George Bush has prosecuted his war on terror has left America less feared by its enemies and less admired by its friends than it once was.
Yet there are also longer-term challenges, worth stressing if only because they have been so ignored on the campaign. Jump forward to 2017, when the next president will hope to relinquish office. A combination of demography and the rising costs of America’s huge entitlement programmes—Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid—will be starting to bankrupt the country. Abroad a greater task is already evident: welding the new emerging powers to the West. That is not just a matter of handling the rise of India and China, drawing them into global efforts, such as curbs on climate change; it means reselling economic and political freedom to a world that too quickly associates American capitalism with Lehman Brothers and American justice with Guantánamo Bay. This will take patience, fortitude, salesmanship and strategy.
At the beginning of this election year, there were strong arguments against putting another Republican in the White House. A spell in opposition seemed apt punishment for the incompetence, cronyism and extremism of the Bush presidency. Conservative America also needs to recover its vim. Somehow Ronald Reagan’s party of western individualism and limited government has ended up not just increasing the size of the state but turning it into a tool of southern-fried moralism.
The selection of Mr McCain as the Republicans’ candidate was a powerful reason to reconsider. Mr McCain has his faults: he is an instinctive politician, quick to judge and with a sharp temper. And his age has long been a concern (how many global companies in distress would bring in a new 72-year-old boss?). Yet he has bravely taken unpopular positions—for free trade, immigration reform, the surge in Iraq, tackling climate change and campaign-finance reform. A western Republican in the Reagan mould, he has a long record of working with both Democrats and America’s allies.
That, however, was Senator McCain; the Candidate McCain of the past six months has too often seemed the victim of political sorcery, his good features magically inverted, his bad ones exaggerated. The fiscal conservative who once tackled Mr Bush over his unaffordable tax cuts now proposes not just to keep the cuts, but to deepen them. The man who denounced the religious right as “agents of intolerance” now embraces theocratic culture warriors. The campaigner against ethanol subsidies (who had a better record on global warming than most Democrats) came out in favour of a petrol-tax holiday. It has not all disappeared: his support for free trade has never wavered. Yet rather than heading towards the centre after he won the nomination, Mr McCain moved to the right.
Meanwhile his temperament, always perhaps his weak spot, has been found wanting. Sometimes the seat-of-the-pants method still works: his gut reaction over Georgia—to warn Russia off immediately—was the right one. Yet on the great issue of the campaign, the financial crisis, he has seemed all at sea, emitting panic and indecision. Mr McCain has never been particularly interested in economics, but, unlike Mr Obama, he has made little effort to catch up or to bring in good advisers (Doug Holtz-Eakin being the impressive exception).
The choice of Sarah Palin epitomised the sloppiness. It is not just that she is an unconvincing stand-in, nor even that she seems to have been chosen partly for her views on divisive social issues, notably abortion. Mr McCain made his most important appointment having met her just twice.
Ironically, given that he first won over so many independents by speaking his mind, the case for Mr McCain comes down to a piece of artifice: vote for him on the assumption that he does not believe a word of what he has been saying. Once he reaches the White House, runs this argument, he will put Mrs Palin back in her box, throw away his unrealistic tax plan and begin negotiations with the Democratic Congress. That is plausible; but it is a long way from the convincing case that Mr McCain could have made. Had he become president in 2000 instead of Mr Bush, the world might have had fewer problems. But this time it is beset by problems, and Mr McCain has not proved that he knows how to deal with them.
Is Mr Obama any better? Most of the hoopla about him has been about what he is, rather than what he would do. His identity is not as irrelevant as it sounds. Merely by becoming president, he would dispel many of the myths built up about America: it would be far harder for the spreaders of hate in the Islamic world to denounce the Great Satan if it were led by a black man whose middle name is Hussein; and far harder for autocrats around the world to claim that American democracy is a sham. America’s allies would rally to him: the global electoral college on our website shows a landslide in his favour. At home he would salve, if not close, the ugly racial wound left by America’s history and lessen the tendency of American blacks to blame all their problems on racism.
So Mr Obama’s star quality will be useful to him as president. But that alone is not enough to earn him the job. Charisma will not fix Medicare nor deal with Iran. Can he govern well? Two doubts present themselves: his lack of executive experience; and the suspicion that he is too far to the left.
There is no getting around the fact that Mr Obama’s résumé is thin for the world’s biggest job. But the exceptionally assured way in which he has run his campaign is a considerable comfort. It is not just that he has more than held his own against Mr McCain in the debates. A man who started with no money and few supporters has out-thought, out-organised and outfought the two mightiest machines in American politics—the Clintons and the conservative right.
Political fire, far from rattling Mr Obama, seems to bring out the best in him: the furore about his (admittedly ghastly) preacher prompted one of the most thoughtful speeches of the campaign. On the financial crisis his performance has been as assured as Mr McCain’s has been febrile. He seems a quick learner and has built up an impressive team of advisers, drawing in seasoned hands like Paul Volcker, Robert Rubin and Larry Summers. Of course, Mr Obama will make mistakes; but this is a man who listens, learns and manages well.
It is hard too nowadays to depict him as soft when it comes to dealing with America’s enemies. Part of Mr Obama’s original appeal to the Democratic left was his keenness to get American troops out of Iraq; but since the primaries he has moved to the centre, pragmatically saying the troops will leave only when the conditions are right. His determination to focus American power on Afghanistan, Pakistan and proliferation was prescient. He is keener to talk to Iran than Mr McCain is— but that makes sense, providing certain conditions are met.
Our main doubts about Mr Obama have to do with the damage a muddle-headed Democratic Congress might try to do to the economy. Despite the protectionist rhetoric that still sometimes seeps into his speeches, Mr Obama would not sponsor a China-bashing bill. But what happens if one appears out of Congress? Worryingly, he has a poor record of defying his party’s baronies, especially the unions. His advisers insist that Mr Obama is too clever to usher in a new age of over-regulation, that he will stop such nonsense getting out of Congress, that he is a political chameleon who would move to the centre in Washington. But the risk remains that on economic matters the centre that Mr Obama moves to would be that of his party, not that of the country as a whole.
So Mr Obama in that respect is a gamble. But the same goes for Mr McCain on at least as many counts, not least the possibility of President Palin. And this cannot be another election where the choice is based merely on fear. In terms of painting a brighter future for America and the world, Mr Obama has produced the more compelling and detailed portrait. He has campaigned with more style, intelligence and discipline than his opponent. Whether he can fulfil his immense potential remains to be seen. But Mr Obama deserves the presidency.
***
MONDAY Tally Of Newspaper Endorsements -- Obama In Landslide, at 273-142
| |
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Barack Obama, John McCain
Pictures from Lois Brown swearing in ceremony today
Congratulations again to Lois Brown! It was a pleasure and honour to share in this moment. Photos include Lois and her family. Also members of the campaign team.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: Conservative Party of Canada, Lois Brown, Newmarket and York Region Elections, Newmarket-Aurora Riding
Final Obama interview with Wolf Blitzer
Good interview in the final days on this campaign. Came across very strong on foreign policy. Bin Laden and Obama's top five priorities should he become president come up in this interview.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Barack Obama
Arnold Schwarzenegger campaigns in Ohio for John McCain
This might be helpful to McCain. Schwarzenegger draws and than pumps up a large crowd for McCain in this crucial swing state of Ohio. I really like his joke about the Liberal giveaway on Halloween. Arnold should have been on the campaign trail from the beginning.
-Darryl
Posted by
Darryl
1 comments
Links to this post
Labels: 2008 US Politics, Arnold Schwarzenegger, John McCain