Sunday, November 30, 2008

Layton and Duceppe plotting well before the economic statement CTV learns


Layton and Duceppe plotting coalition well before the economic statement CTV learns.


Truth kills lack of stimulus argument. CTV stikes again! The opposition was plotting to overthrow elected government from the beginning. Power needs to be earned not taken in countries that have a democracy. The self serving power grab has been exposed for what it really is.


"Let's just say we have strategies. This whole thing would not have happened if the moves hadn't been made with the Bloc a long time ago and locked them in early," Layton says. "Because, you couldn't put three people together in one or three hours. The first part was done a long time ago"


Any talk of putting Canadians first from these three opposition parties is a total joke. They want power rather you vote for them or not. It is time for an election to take these new facts to the Canadian public. Some people have some explaining to do and must be held accountable for this.

-Darryl


CTV strikes again.

***

Update: Jokes all around from Jack Layton on Working with people who want to destroy our country. Credit: Stephen Taylor's blog


We need 15 opposition MPs with principle to cross the floor



We need 15 opposition MPs with principle to cross the floor

An excellent column from Tom Brodbeck in the Winnipeg Sun. Not only would the BQ be able to demand whatever it wanted, Liberals would likely have no choice but to grant it because of their inability to finance an election that turning down the BQ demand would cause. Worse the lower the approval rating of the coalition and Liberal Prime Minister, the more united the government would be to hold power at all costs. If Conservative poll numbers go through the roof as expected under a Prime Minister Dion governing with separatist and socialist support during the time of a depression; the incentive of keeping the coalition together would only strengthen simply because of a common front to avoid an election where all opposition parties except the Bloc would likely get thrashed. This alliance is dangerous for Canada and quite frankly there should be huge public protests in Ottawa on December 8 when the vote takes place. It will be interesting to see if this coalition gives a boost to the PQ in the Quebec elections set for the same day. Imagine what Premier Pauline Marois could extort from Ottawa through BQ demands. At this point I think backing down isn't an option for either side. We need an immediate election right now so that Canadians can determine if the Conservatives should get a majority to get something done on the economy vs. the need for a public mandate on a potential government that includes separatists.

I personally think Harper made a miscalculation that backfired huge on him. Had there been an election people might have been angry about being forced into another expensive vote on partisan games. Conservative might have lost seats. Acknowledging Harper's mistake, I think the Liberals may have caused a much larger blunder than the carbon tax that will eventually have massive implications through even engaging in these coalition talks. Liberals have exposed themselves as being willing to work with separatists and socialists to take power despite the election results. That will be an election issue for sure next time. At the same time, they have given credibility to the NDP and BQ virtually guaranteeing the left split will continue in the future. You cannot say the NDP are bad for the economy and then consider joining a coalition that is considering Jack Layton as finance minister. This experiment with the Greens failed in the last election and will prove to do so again.

All Liberals who consider themselves as federalists, who backed Paul Martin's work as Finance Minister, who are against NDP economic policies, who are not on the extreme left or even those who are self-interested and represent districts such as the Western provinces where this coalition would go from significant representation to basically no representation should consider crossing the floor and joining the Conservative Party. I think the best way to avert an election a this point and move forward on the economy would be for 15 opposition MPs to join the Conservative caucus. Keith Martin, Irwin Cotler, Andre Arthur and Bill Casey would be a good start. Justin Trudeau? Ken Dryden? Ralph Goodale? Marc Garneau? Scott Brison? Are there any opposition MPs with principle still left? I can't imagine many Liberals are comfortable working with the separatists under Dion's leadership. We need you to make this parliament work and deal with this economic crisis. Consider joining the government side as independents uncomfortable with the direction of the Liberal party or simply throw your membership where it belongs (the trash) and join a party that talks and acts like a federalist party and who would never allow unions to dicate actions on the economy during these tough economic times. 50 billion dollar tax increase on corporations? I am hoping at least some of you recognize this pendign disaster.
-Darryl

***

Separatists cannot hold balance of power in Ottawa

By TOM BRODBECK

I never thought I'd see the day when the cancer that threatens the future of Canada would gain a real foothold in our Parliament.

Until now, the Bloc Quebecois -- whose only real goal is to break up the country -- has been relegated to the opposition benches of the House of Commons.

It's been troubling enough watching separatists get sworn into Parliament, occupying seats that should be the exclusive domain of people who swear their allegiance to Canada.

But we're now faced with the real possibility that the Bloc Quebecois could have a seat around the cabinet table if opposition members topple the Conservative government next week and replace it with a coalition that includes Quebec separatists.

Even former prime minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau must be spinning in his grave at the thought of separatists -- the very people he dedicated his political career to defeat -- having a say in Canada's national government.


It would be, if it happens, a historical turning point for Canada -- separatists calling the shots on how our country should be run and ultimately scheming to break it up.

It would be a major victory for Quebec separatists too, who have been plotting the demise of Canada since the 1960s and who have trampled on the rights of non-French speaking people for three decades.

What better way to fight for the independence of Quebec than to be in power in the very Parliament they seek to destroy?

And who is making it possible for separatists to invade the federal cabinet room?

Liberals and New Democrats.

So desperate are they to be in power that they would put the future of Canada at risk by inviting the Bloc Quebecois to play a role in their proposed coalition government.

RECESSION

These are the very people who purport to stand up for the unity of Canada. But now, in exchange for a short stint in government, they are willing to sell the Dominion of Canada down the St. Lawrence River.

The pretext for the move is that the Conservatives are refusing to open the spending taps further than they already have.

The Liberals and NDP claim that because Prime Minister Stephen Harper is not willing to spend as much as they believe is necessary to help Canadians through a possible recession, that government should be toppled and replaced with a coalition that includes separatists.

It's a red herring, an excuse for Liberal Leader Stephane Dion to make a final, desperate bid for the prime minister's chair and for the NDP -- who could never form government on their own -- to finally have representation around the cabinet table.

So what could the Bloc do if they played a role in a proposed coalition?

They could begin by demanding that Quebec get a substantially larger share of Canada's fiscal pie.

They could demand that Quebec's provincial government take over certain federal functions, those which fall under shared responsibility under the Constitution.

The Bloc could demand that the Clarity Act, which ensures that a clear question and a clear majority is necessary for any province to separate from Canada, be amended.

They could demand it be scrapped altogether.

The political manoeuvrings, schemes and strategies by the Bloc to advance their agenda to break up Canada would be endless should they ever get the foothold of power they seek through a coalition government.

And the NDP and Liberals should be ashamed of themselves for what they are about to do to Canada.

The privilege to govern must be earned, not taken....donate now!




The privilege to govern must be earned, not taken.

November 29, 2008

Dear Mr. Wolk,

The Liberal Party was completely rejected by Canadians in the last election. They received their lowest share of the popular vote since Confederation.

Now the Liberals are trying to take power through the back door.

As you read this letter, the Liberals are holding secret negotiations with the socialist NDP and the separatist Bloc Québécois to overturn the wishes of Canadian voters and take power.

They want to take power and impose on Canadians a Prime Minister without a personal mandate, a Liberal-NDP Coalition not one voter has ever endorsed and have it all backstopped by the separatist Bloc Québécois who simply want to destroy the country.

We need your help to ensure that they do not succeed!

Senior Liberal insiders are trying to fool Canadians into thinking their scheme has something to do with the economy.

But it is clear the Liberals do not care about the economy. They only care about re-gaining power and re-gaining their entitlements. They've learned nothing since being turfed out of office over the sponsorship scandal.

On October 14th, Canadians passed judgment on the Liberals.

The Liberals have no mandate to lead a government.

The Liberals have no mandate to cut a deal with the NDP.

And the Liberals certainly do not have a mandate to cut a deal with the separatists who want to destroy our country.

This backroom deal is so unprecedented and so undemocratic that Canadians must have their say.

This is Canada. The privilege to govern must be earned, not taken. We cannot let this happen.

When an election occurs - and it must - the Conservative Party will have to wage the fight of its life.

We now know we are no longer competing just with the Official Opposition. We are competing against a coordinated campaign between Liberals, socialists and separatists to impose their agenda on Canadians.

I am asking you to make an emergency donation of $200 or $100 - whatever you can afford to protect Canada's future and protect Canada's democracy from being hijacked by politicians who care about nothing more than power and entitlements.

In the last election, Conservatives stood together and spoke out loud and clear about the kind of Canada they wanted.

Now we must stand together once again to ensure that the wishes of the voters are respected.

Time is of the essence. Please respond immediately.

Sincerely,


Irving Gerstein,C.M., O.Ont
Chair, Conservative Fund Canada

PS: We also need you to write letters to the editor, call Talk Radio and let the Liberals and NDP know what you think of their plan to overturn the Government without seeking the consent of Canadians.

Darryl's note: Watch how easily this is done opposition parties. If you want to make a contribution to stop this coalition...please click here! The taxpayer shouldn't always be on the hook for funding of political parties.

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Meet Canada's New Government - Cabinet post predictions




Potential Liberal-Socialist-Separatist Cabinet posts

Here are my predictions for Canada's new government:

Something for Governor General Michaëlle Jean to consider before deciding to call an election...
-Darryl


The Ministry

The Right Honourable Jean Chretien (Liberal appointed through the senate as co-founder of new party)
Prime Minister of Canada

The Right Honourable Ed Broadbent (NDP appointed through the senate as co-founder of new party)
Deputy Prime Minister of Canada

The Honourable Elizabeth May (Green Liberal appointed through the senate)
Leader of the Government in the Senate and Minister of the Environment

The Honourable Jack Layton (NDP)
Minister of Finance

The Honourable Gilles Duceppe (BQ)
Minister of Foreign Affairs

The Honourable Dawn Black (NDP)
Minister of National Defence

The Honourable Irwin Cotler (LIB)
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

The Honourable Stephane Dion (LIB)
Minister of National Revenue

The Honourable Denis Coderre (LIB)
Minister of Veterans Affairs

The Honourable Charlie Angus (NDP)
Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians

The Honourable John McCallum (LIB)
Minister of International Trade

The Honourable Pat Martin (NDP)
President of the Treasury Board

The Honourable Thomas Mulcair (NDP)
Minister of Labour

The Honourable Yves Lessard (BQ)
Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development

The Honourable Bernard Bigras (BQ)
Minister of International Cooperation

The Honourable Michael Ignatieff (LIB)
Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities

The Honourable Bob Rae (NDP/LIB)
Minister of Industry

The Honourable Christiane Gagnon (BQ)
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and Minister for La Francophonie

The Honourable Ujjal Dosanjh (LIB/NDP)
Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

The Honourable Ève-Mary Thaï Thi Lac (BQ)
Minister of Public Safety

The Honourable Ralph Goodale (LIB)
Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board

The Honourable Ruby Dhalla (LIB)
Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism

The Honourable Scott Brison (LIB)
Minister of Public Works and Government Services

The Honourable Michel Guimond (BQ)
Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages

The Honourable Olivia Chow (NDP)
Minister of Health

The Honourable Justin Trudeau (LIB)
Minister of Natural Resources

The Honourable Dominic LeBlanc (LIB)
Minister of Fisheries and Oceans

The Honourable Ken Dryden (LIB)
Minister of State (Sport)

The Honourable Marc Garneau (LIB)
Minister of (Science and Technology)

The Honourable Martha Hall Findlay (LIB)
Minister of State (Satus of Women)

The Honourable Buzz Hargrove (NDP/LIB Appointed through Senate)
Minister of State and Chief Government Whip

Anyone else have any predictions they want to share??? God help this nation if this coalition takes power.
-Darryl

Opposition leaders in their own words from the election campaign; Harper responds to the coalition

Opposition leaders in their own words from the election campaign; Harper responds to the coalition

This is what Canadians were told by this newly proposed coalition of Liberal-NDP-BQ parties during the last election campaign that ended six weeks ago.

Dion on a NDP coalition during the election campaign



Layton on Dion as Prime Minister



Duceppe on being Prime Minister



Stephen Harper responds by defending the Government selected by Canadians

Question of the Day: Would Canadians have given the Conservatives a majority had they known the BQ in government was the alternative?


Question of the Day: Would Canadians have given the Conservatives a majority had they known the BQ in government was the alternative?

Great opinion article today in the Winnipeg Free Press
-Darryl

Media keeps ignoring one of the coalition partners...missing the real story


Media keeps ignoring one of the coalition partners...missing the real story

As the media cover this Liberal coup d’état, they seem to forget one of the coalition partners that are necessary to maintain the confidence of the house. A NDP and Liberal coalition means absolutely nothing and the Governor General has no right to even consider it unless the Bloc Quebecois is a formal part of the agreement guranteeing to support the Canadian government for a reasonable period of time. The Liberals have 77 seats and the NDP has 37. Together they have 114 seats, not even close to the 143 that Tories earned. An NDP-Liberal coaliton has no where near enough seats to govern and together are not even the biggest party in the House of Commons. By itself, a Liberal-NDP coalition lacks any kind of mandate and would be given no legitimacy on its own. Therefore the media needs to find out what has been promised to a party that wants to break apart our country. An explanation is required on how a party only concerned with the interest of Quebec is good to balance the affairs of the entire nation (FYI the Western provinces would go from 58 seats in the government to 20 under this arrangement. Quebec would go from 10 seats in government to 64 with the coalition) . Finally it needs to be determined if the BQ is a formal part of this coalition or is simply onside for only one confidence vote. If they are not in the coalition formally, every confidence vote will cause drama as Conservatives would have a responsibility and obligation to bring down this undemocratic coalition at all costs and on every confidence vote.

This whole process is an assault on democracy. Harper is exactly right when he says a soundly defeated Stephane Dion would rather simply take power than earn it. Liberals are not just entitled to their entitlements but feel they have a right to take power at any cost rather you vote for them or not. The willingness to work with the separatists question if they stand for anything at all. Giving socialists cabinet roles show a lack of confidence in their ability to handle the economy. Jack Layton in finance? Give your head a shake team red. The fact that this all started over their lack of ability to fundraise without the Canadian taxpayer shows the opposition care about themselves and their own partisan interests than the Canadians and economy they talk about. Canada will have no credibility preaching democracy to the Russians or Chinese if this coalition goes through with Dion installed leader despite not being elected. When did Canada become a banana republic? How will the markets react to Prime Minister Stephane Dion's Liberal Party of Toronto propped up by socialists and separatists. Liberals will ask Canadians to have confidence in Dion as Prime Minister when they lack confidence themselves in him as leader. During the last election they campaigned against the BQ and NDP and never informed the voters of any potential left wing governing coalition.

The media needs to do its job. The BQ has 49 seats and would be the second largest coalition partner in this arrangement. Are they part of this coalition or not? If so what were they promised. If not how can the GG have any confidence in Dion's ability to maintain the confidence of the house. Obviously they cannot count on any kind of support from us whatsoever. This story is not about a Prime Minister who miscalculated anymore, it is about Canada's old natural governing party selling out its values to the separatists and socialists for a couple months in power. How can anyone be proud to be a Liberal today. A sound defeat will come when Liberals eventually face a democratic election should this power grab actually take place.
-Darryl

We now have a two party system in Canada


We now have a two party system in Canada

People complain that Canadian politics is not exciting. Today, like when the PC and Alliance parties decided to unite is a game changing moment in Canadian political history regardless of the outcome of these coalition talks. While I do not expect that we will see NDP, BQ, Green and Liberal candidates decide not to run against each other in the next election; the game has fundamentally changed just by what we now know from talks that have taken place between the opposition parties.

1. Jean Chretien and Ed Broadbent are in negotiations to build an NDP/Liberal coalition that will need the support of the Bloc Quebecois.

2. By engaging in these talks at the highest levels (Dion, Layton) it is clear that both leaders agree they share a common agenda. Both are comfortable either bringing the Bloc Quebecois (a party that supports breaking up our country) into the Canadian government or allowing Duceppe to extort the government in order to maintain support on confidence matters.

3. For at least some MPs it is OK overthrowing the will of the Canadian voters and installing a Prime Minister who is not even elected by the grassroots members within his party. I am not sure if this coalition will happen, but I do know that all day Dion's caucus has been planning to get rid of him and broadcasting it to the media. How can he now lead regardless of what happens in the next couple of weeks.

4, The Liberals and Greens already had an alliance during the election and Dion even got Elizabeth May's endorsement.

5. Right now the only common agenda known among this potential coalition government is that they are united in wanting their subsidies, they want to go on a spending spree and call it a stimulus, they oppose Harper and every policy decision he makes, they want power, and they all financially cannot afford to fight an election right now.

With regards to these meetings, what is going on is not transparent. Grassroots members concerns are not taken into account. Most MPs are out of the loop and have no say. We have no idea what is being promised in these negotiations. Media do not have access. Do these arguments sound familiar? Wasn't this all initially about Harper using a budget bill to interfere with democracy? Liberals putting together a coup with socialists and separatists is what is best for Canadians according to the opposition. Brokering an alliance one week into parliament to seize power is what is needed to protect Canadian democracy?

I am not sure if it is Stephen Harper or just simply the fact there is one party on the center-right and 4 on the left; but it is clear this minority government is not going to work. Stephen Harper and the Conservatives cannot work with the opposition parties and get anything done despite this recession or potential depression. While a coalition between the Bloc-NDP-Liberals may last in the short term, rival demands will make it complicated to stick together. The only possibility of a long term coalition is if Prime Minister Dion's approval ratings are beyond low, all parties remain broke and the worsening economic situation drives up Conservative numbers. This will unite the opposition for no other purpose than to avoid the people through an election and to keep power away from the Conservatives. The West who just got in will be locked out again thanks to a backroom deal between the Liberal Party of Toronto backed by the Separatist party from Quebec. That is not in the best interest of Canadians and I do not see how this whole situation is good for unity.

It is unfortunate, but we probably need an election despite the cost and timing. Canadians have to choose between giving Conservatives a majority government to deal with the economy or otherwise provide a mandate to this madness with the left wing coalition. Conservatives won the election and we cannot maintain power let alone get any legislation passed as is evident today. The left is united and no longer have credibility attacking each other. Let us decide based on the new two party system of Conservatives vs. the Green Liberal Socialist Separatist Party. Regrettably if Canadians want their government to get anything done for them it will require an election and a majority. Regardless of if this coalition forms and regardless of how long this parliament lasts it is quite clear that nothing will get accomplished because of partisanship from all sides of the House unless attitudes change in a hurry. The Governor General should not delay the inevitable and simply allow this government to go to the people once it is defeated rather than play these games. Any other solution at this point is just lost time and wasted taxpayer dollars with no action on the economy or any other issue of the day.

Based on the events of today, everything has changed and this parliament simply cannot function any longer. The sooner there is an election the better. The left might as well unite under one banner as irreversibly each of their individual brands no longer have credibility in Ottawa. While the day was exicting, regular Canadians are the big loser today after all of this political positioning. Shame on all politicians for that.

-Darryl

Friday, November 28, 2008

10 questions unanswered about a coalition government


10 questions unanswered about a coalition government


1, How can Michael Ignatieff be Prime Minister without being elected by either the members of his party or the Canadian electorate?


2, What cabinet positions will the NDP demand? La Press is reporting Layton wants 1/3 of cabinet seats including finance and the environment?


3, After the 1995 referendum, how can Jean Chretien plot coalition with the Bloc Quebecois?


4, If the BQ is not formally in the coalition what is their incentive to prop up the Liberals/NDP? What promises have been made that could impact the unity of this country?


5, If the Bloc is going to support the coalition on a vote by vote basis how long can this new coalition last given that they won’t be able to count on Conservative support on any confidence vote regardless of its merits?


6, Are Liberals prepared to face the Canadian public after making a side deal with the Bloc Quebecois to take power? Imagine the attack ads that will come.


7, Does anyone have confidence that Jack Layton is the right man to fix this economy?


8, If Stephane Dion is named Prime Minister will he ever give up the job?


9, How can you square threatening to bring down the government to “protect democracy” with regards to the vote subsidy and then later turn around and pull of a coup that slaps the Canadian electorate in the face by demonstrating that their vote doesn't count? I don't think anyone would debate that Dion was clearly rejected as Prime Minister six weeks ago.


10, Will Stephen Harper stay on as opposition leader should this all go down on Monday? If not who replaces him and how?

Text of Liberal non-confidence motion to be voted on Monday


Text of Liberal non-confidence motion to be voted on Monday


"In light of the government's failure to recognize the seriousness of Canada's economic situation and its failure in particular to present any credible plan to stimulate the Canadian economy and to help workers and businesses in hard-pressed sectors such as manufacturing, the automotive industry and forestry, this House has lost confidence in this government and is of the opinion that a viable alternative government can be formed within the present House of Commons."

If the Governor General allows a coalition (she has the ability to go right to an election) than Stephane Dion will become Prime Minister according to CBC.

More details to come...

Breaking News: Conservatives back down...still no guarantee Monday vote will pass



Breaking News: Conservatives back down

Update: It looks like we are not out of the woods yet. Opposition still threatening to topple the government due to a "lack of stimulus package included in the bill". Coalition talks are continuing. Liberal plotting to remove Dion and replace him with Ignatieff (or Goodale or Rae) still ongoing.

Update 2: It looks like the coalition talks are ongoing but now that the public financing portion has been separated from Monday's bill it only raises the stakes that much higher. Liberals, NDP and the Bloc could proceed with coalition talks and vote against the government Monday due to it not containing a stimulus package. They could be taking a huge risk though as there is no guarantee the Governor General will allow the official opposition a chance to form a coalition. Unintended consequences could be a snap election caused by the opposition meaning they would feel the wrath of the people for making the stimulus package a 300 million dollar election campaign over the holidays. Allowing the bill to pass on Monday could expose them as being more concerned about their own election financing then their argument about an economic stimulus. Sounds like it is still a tough choice for the opposition parties. Personally I hope that if we are defeated on Monday, Jean just simply calls an election so that the people can sort out this mess - not Broadbent, Chretien and the separatists.

Update 3: (From CBC)

The federal Liberals plan to introduce a motion in the House of Commons on Monday declaring non-confidence in the minority Conservative government and proposing a governing coalition, the Canadian Press is reporting. Emissaries from the Liberals, New Democrats and Bloc Quebecois have been holding talks about forming a new government should Prime Minister Stephen Harper's minority fall.


More to come...

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/545220

http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5j-vaw1H_MNCsBEEmjJaOuSu_dRSQ

Potential Compromise?


Potential Compromise?

There might be one easy way to get out of this. Cut all public subsidies following the next election while paying out the current subsidy from the last election. Would that be acceptable to all sides?

On the coalition front it is not being revealed in the media that Ed Broadbent and Jean Chretien are trying to broker a coalition government. Would Canadians accept Liberals taking power over public election financing subsidies by joining forces with a party that wants to break up our nation?

-Darryl

Is a Liberal-Separatist-Socialist Coalition Possible?




Is a Liberal-Separatist-Socialist Coalition Possible?

This scenario is starting to look more likely. Obviously there are a lot of questions about how long such a coalition could last and what the political implications would be long term for the Liberal Party. Here is how it might look.

1, Dion would not be Prime Minister. A caucus vote would take place. If that vote took place right now Michael Ignatieff would easily become leader of the Liberal party and Prime Minister under this coalition.

2, The NDP would get some cabinet posts in non-economic portfolios.

3, Elizabeth May would be potentially appointed to the senate and be given a cabinet post

4, The Bloc would support the coalition government but would not get any cabinet posts.

5, The coalition would attempt to govern as long as possible with the Conservatives in opposition.

All of this of course depends on the opposition parties voting down the economic statement and the Governor General allowing the opposition to attempt to form a coalition that can demonstrate confidence in the house. Obviously this raises more questions than answers but it is starting to become a reality. The Conservative Party has an opportunity to back down but I do not think that they will. Opposition MPs believe they can bring down the government without going to an election. It looks like a constitutional crisis.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20081127/Tories_fiscal_081128/20081128?hub=QPeriod

Thanks for reading...

Darryl

Thursday, November 27, 2008

Breaking News: Are you ready for another federal election???


Breaking News: Are you ready for another federal election???

Update: All three opposition parties have said they will vote against the economic plan. That means election or coalition government.

Update 2: Another possible option for the opposition would be to allow this motion to pass and remove the election financing portion in committee where the opposition parties have a majority of seats. If this is possible it is the most likely outcome.

Are you reading for another federal election??? Given that the elimination of the $1.75 per vote public financing is now part of the fall fiscal update; it will be a confidence vote. That means if opposition parties vote against the speech; we are heading for an election. Here are the three options the opposition parties now face:

1, Allow the Fall Economic Statement to pass by abstaining, holding back some MPs from voting or in the case of the NDP; potentially supporting the bill outright. Obviously that will have a long term impact on the parties that do not recieve funding from their grassroots supporters and members.

2, Vote down the government and ask the Governor General to allow Dion to form a coalition government as oppose to having another election. That would mean the NDP, Bloc and Liberals would have to work together to govern. It would mean the NDP and BQ members would have to be assigned cabinet posts. Potentially it could mean Elizabeth May would be appointed to cabinet through the senate. It would make Dion the Prime Minister while a Liberal leadership contest is ongoing. How long this coalition could last and if it could be formed at all would be a question mark.

3, Vote down the government. Forget the coalition and go right to the polls. Conservatives have the cash to fight an election right now. All the opposition parties are in debt. Harper would risk the public seeing him as partisan bully who caused an unnecessary election. Opposition parties would risk Conservatives obtaining a majority by running on the need for stability. Harper might lose power. A majority Conservative government might end public financing anyways. What everyone likely agrees on is that Canadians do not want another election, nor can the economy afford another 300 million dollar campaign.

According to CTV, here is how much these public election financing changes would impact each of the parties:

  • Conservatives: $10 million
  • Liberals: $7.7 million
  • NDP: $4.9 million
  • Bloc Quebecois: $2.6 million
  • Green Party: $1.8 million
While the Conservatives would lose the largest amount of money from public subsidies, their strong grassroots fundraising efforts would allow them to maintain a strong advantage over the opposition parties. According to CTV, the following is a percentage of total funding each of the national parties recieve from Elections Canada:
  • Conservatives: 37%
  • Liberals: 63%
  • NDP: 57%
  • Bloc Quebecois: 86%
  • Green Party: 65%
The next move is now in the hands of the opposition parties. Personally I would be happy to fight an election on eliminating the 2.6 million dollars that forces taxpayers to fund breaking up our country by funding the separatists. I would also be happy to make the pitch to Canadians that the Conservative Party needs a majority government to avoid the instability of a minority government during these difficult economic times. Finally I would be tempted to go one more time against Dion now as oppose to waiting for Ignatieff in May. For now the government has maintained a small surplus but that could change in the next fiscal year when some form of stimulus package will be introduced.

Expect a lot of drama as a vote on this takes place over the next few days. At the end of the day I expect the opposition parties to back down, but at this point I cannot rule out another election in the next few days. If an election does take place, it will be interesting to see how the public reacts to this issue. A poll on CTV's website asks, "Should the government slash public funding for federal parties?". So far 7459 votes have been cast and 80% agree with the position of Jim Flaherty vs. 20% who oppose this idea. Canadian politics should get interesting over the next few days and weeks.
-Darryl

***

November 27, 2008

The Honourable James M. Flaherty, P.C., M.P.
Minister of Finance

Check Against Delivery


Mr. Speaker, I am pleased today to present the Government’s Economic and Fiscal Statement, and to set out our key short-term and long-term objectives as we prepare for the next federal budget.

I present this Statement at a time of unprecedented deterioration in economic and financial systems around the world. Without a doubt, here in Canada and around the world, these are difficult times that will require difficult choices.

It is important to recognize just how quickly things have changed, Mr. Speaker, and how dramatically. The cascading effects of the international credit crisis were sudden and devastating.

An unexpected credit crunch in the summer of 2007, and a U.S. recession sparked by a plunge in the American housing market, have spread throughout the world.

Today, the International Monetary Fund expects global growth to be the weakest since 1993.

The speed at which this crisis has intensified, and the damage it has brought to countries around the world, have been extraordinary.

All countries are struggling to cope with this crisis.

The Euro area is in recession for the first time since its creation in 1999.

It has been joined by Japan.

There are signs of a prolonged downturn in the U.S., with a sharp decline in U.S. consumer spending and almost 1.2 million jobs lost since the beginning of the year.

A lengthy list of American financial institutions have either collapsed or required a bailout or takeover—Citigroup, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Washington Mutual, AIG, Wachovia—all in a matter of months.

Financial rescue efforts are underway in the U.S., and similar ones are happening in countries throughout Europe.

The crisis has laid bare some serious flaws in many aspects of the international financial system:

  • Non-bank institutions that were not properly regulated and were relying on borrowed money;
  • Financial institutions lacking enough capital to withstand the financial market turmoil; and
  • A dangerously short-sighted tendency to underestimate risk in good times.

The mistakes of some are today being felt by all.

We have not been immune to the resulting global economic slowdown. Forecasters around the world did not predict, and could not have predicted, the full force of this economic crisis.

Forecasts

The volatility we are seeing in the world economy is truly historic. It is affecting Canada, driving down our economic growth expectations. Canada has not faced such severe economic tests in a generation.

Economic projections are now much lower than at the time of our last budget. Private sector forecasters expect real GDP growth of just 0.6 per cent this year and 0.3 per cent next.

The same private sector forecasters are now widely expecting a technical recession, with negative growth in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009.

No government at any level can guarantee the future. In fact, given so much uncertainty, no one could unconditionally guarantee the fiscal projections contained in today’s Statement.

We will be faced with tough choices as we prepare our next budget, in the face of the deteriorating international economy. Those choices must be part of a clear plan to protect our future.

Last week’s Speech from the Throne laid out a five-pronged plan to protect Canada’s economic security—a plan that will define the choices we make.

  • Along with our international partners, we will reform global finance;
  • Here at home, we will ensure sound budgeting;
  • We will secure jobs for families and communities;
  • We will expand investment and trade; and
  • We will make government more effective.

What We’ve Done to Prepare—Early Action and Stimulus

We were fully aware that difficult times were ahead when I presented our Economic Statement last fall.

We planned for it. We made choices to help put Canada in a stronger economic position. In fact, since 2006:

  • We have reduced the federal debt by $37 billion;
  • We have reduced taxes by almost $200 billion over 2007–08 and the following five years;
  • We will have reduced the tax rate on new business investment, leading to the lowest level in the G7 by 2010;
  • We have made historic investments in job-creating infrastructure; and
  • We have invested in science and technology, education and training.

Our Government, from last year to next, will have doubled the level of federal funding for provincial, territorial and municipal infrastructure projects.

Canadians and Canadian businesses will pay nearly $31 billion less in taxes in the next fiscal year, thanks to the tax reduction measures introduced since 2006.

That’s equivalent to nearly 2 per cent of Canadian GDP.

This is a substantial fiscal stimulus—stimulus with staying power.

Unlike other countries, Canada is providing tax relief that is sustainable and permanent—tax relief that is helping Canadian families every single day.

We took action when it was necessary. Our performance has shown that it was worthwhile.

However, our actions did not insulate us completely from the rest of the world. Global conditions have deteriorated as 2008 has unfolded.

We had to take further extraordinary steps in the financial sector to respond to a global credit crunch we did not spark, yet which threatened to engulf us if we failed to act.

Once again, we had a head start over other nations. Our financial system is considered to be the world’s soundest by the World Economic Forum.

The International Monetary Fund concluded Canada’s financial system is mature, sophisticated, well managed and able to withstand sizeable shocks.

We have acted to keep it that way. We have protected its stability, so that Canadian businesses and families would continue to have access to credit.

Businesses need credit to invest or to meet their payrolls. Families need it to take out mortgages and loans.

These are basic and vital components of the Canadian economy.

We took steps to maintain the availability of longer-term credit with the purchase of mortgage pools through the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.

This innovative measure is allowing Canadian financial institutions to continue lending to consumers, homebuyers and businesses at an affordable cost.

Our Government also created the Canadian Lenders Assurance Facility. The Facility offers insurance on a temporary basis on wholesale term borrowing by Canadian financial institutions.

This backstop ensures that our financial institutions are not at a competitive disadvantage internationally.

We increased the borrowing authority of Export Development Canada and the Business Development Bank of Canada.

The combined boost of nearly $4 billion that we introduced will mean more lending choices for Canadian businesses.

We announced new rules for government-guaranteed mortgages this summer to prevent a U.S.-style housing bubble, rules that are in place today.

Our sensible Canadian approach is paying off.

Our country will come out of this economic crisis in a strong position, because we are going into it in a strong position.

Faced with threats outside our borders, we answered with leadership from within. The result is a fiscal position that is the best of all G7 countries.

The next fiscal year will be difficult. But Canadians can be fully confident that we will overcome whatever hardships may lie ahead in 2009, and beyond.

Fiscal Position

Mr. Speaker, like governments, families face economic challenges beyond their control every day.

When they face challenges like those, families must adjust their priorities. Just like governments, they must make tough choices—tough, but pragmatic. They make choices that give them flexibility to weather the storm.

Their choices are made with the future in mind. To protect the future they want, they make sacrifices today.

Our Government will take the same approach. We will protect the future by maintaining strong fiscal and financial management.

We take no pleasure in saying that despite our best efforts, this may not be enough to keep a small surplus on the books.

But in situations like this, it would be misguided to simply engineer a surplus, just to be able to say we have one.

Today’s Statement lays out a plan that keeps our budget balanced for now.

However, in the weeks ahead, we will determine the extent to which we will inject additional stimulus to our economy, joining the efforts of our international partners.

Any additional actions to support the economy will have an impact on the bottom-line numbers in our next budget. These actions, or a further deterioration in global economic conditions, could result in a deficit.

We do not take the potential of a deficit lightly. The thought of a long-term structural deficit would be even more serious—one that the Government is unable to climb out of, even when the economy improves.

The days (and years, and decades) of those chronic deficits are behind us. No matter what 2009 brings, they must never return.

Our goal must be to ensure the strength of the economy—to protect jobs, to encourage investment, and to help business grow.

We must do that while protecting the long-term fiscal position of the Government, so that when the economy improves, we return quickly to balanced budgets.

Today, our Government is announcing a series of measures designed to strengthen Canada’s fiscal position in an uncertain time.

These measures will enable us to plan on a balanced budget framework, while recognizing potential downside risks.

The Road Ahead—New Actions

Fiscal

We cannot ask Canadians to tighten their belts during tougher times without looking in the mirror.

Canadians have a right to look to government as an example. We have a responsibility to show restraint and respect for their money.

Canadian tax dollars are precious. They must not be spent frivolously or without regard to where they came from.

Canadians pay taxes so governments can provide essential services. They trust the people they elect to serve society with that money, not serve themselves.

The truth is, tax dollars have been supporting political parties for a long time.

For example, we take advantage of reimbursements on our election spending. Canadians also receive a tax credit on their donations to political parties.

This is a generous allotment of tax dollars to politicians. It ought to be sufficient for all of us. But we ask for much more, in the form of a $1.75 subsidy for every vote we receive in an election.

Canadians pay their own bills, and for some Canadians that is getting harder to do. Political parties should pay their own bills too, and not with excessive tax dollars.

Even during the best of economic times, parties should count primarily on the financial support of their own members and their own donors.

Today, our Government is eliminating the $1.75-per-vote taxpayer subsidy for politicians and their parties, effective April 1, 2009.

There will be no free ride for political parties. There never was. The freight was being paid by the taxpayer. This is the last stop on the route.

There will be no free ride for anyone else in government either.

We are directing government ministers and deputy ministers from every single department and agency of the Government to rein in their spending on travel, hospitality, conferences, exchanges and professional services.

This includes polling, consultants and external legal services.

In the broader fiscal picture, we will expand the actions under the new Expenditure Management System we put in place in 2007. We will use this systemic approach to help keep spending growth on a sustainable track.

Under this new system, the Government has been reviewing all departmental program spending. The Government already examined department spending of $13.6 billion in 2007, and is examining $25 billion in program spending this year.

For the first time in nearly 15 years, the Government is also expanding this businesslike and multi-year review to include corporate assets: Crown corporations, real property and other holdings.

The review will take a careful approach to the sale of any asset, considering market conditions and ensuring fair value can be realized for the benefit of taxpayers.

Our Government expects to save over $15 billion over the next five fiscal years under the new Expenditure Management System. This system will be an invaluable tool to help us maintain balanced budgets, along with the other steps announced today.

As indicated in last week’s Speech from the Throne, the Government is also introducing legislation to ensure predictability in federal public sector compensation.

Our Government values the contribution and hard work of our public servants. They must be fairly compensated for their work on behalf of Canadians.

We must bear in mind that their work is also paid for by Canadians.

We will introduce legislation to ensure that the pay for the public sector grows only in line with what taxpayers can afford as the economy slows.

This legislation will put in place annual public service wage increases of 2.3 per cent for 2007–08, and 1.5 per cent for the following three years.

This restraint will also apply to MPs, Senators, Cabinet Ministers and senior public servants.

The legislation would also temporarily suspend the right to strike through 2010–11.

Another issue we intend to address is the litigious, adversarial, and complaints-based approach to pay equity. Since the mid-1980s, Canadian taxpayers have paid out over $4 billion in pay equity settlements.

These settlements were the result of pay equity complaints to the Canadian Human Rights Commission. These complaints were filed after agreements on public sector wages had already been reached through collective bargaining.

New complaints continue to be filed, sometimes for the same groups that have already received past pay equity settlements. These represent large potential future costs to taxpayers.

This costly and litigious regime of "double pay equity" has been in place for too long. We are introducing legislation to make pay equity an integral part of collective bargaining.

We are also bringing certainty to the growth of Equalization. We have put its growth on a sustainable path.

A new, three-year moving average that puts growth in Equalization in line with nominal GDP growth will bring fairness and stability to both the provinces and the federal government, while reflecting changes in the Canadian economy.

We are ensuring that Equalization will continue to grow, because it is a key federal program for providing support to provinces.

We are also protecting the Canada Health Transfer and the Canada Social Transfer. Provinces must be able to plan accurately, especially when it comes to some of the largest expenditure items in their budgets: health care and social services.

These transfer payments will continue their built-in growth of 6 per cent for the Canada Health Transfer and 3 per cent for the Canada Social Transfer.

We will ensure any new measures to support the economy are carefully chosen and targeted for maximum benefit.

In preparing for the 2009 budget, we will ensure spending is as effective as possible, and aligned with Canadian priorities.

Infrastructure is an example of such worthwhile spending. Investment in infrastructure creates jobs for today and for the future. It creates essential links between communities and regions.

Next year’s increase in infrastructure spending will be our largest, and will push the total amount to over $6 billion in stimulus to the economy.

Our Government is committed to expediting our historic, $33-billion Building Canada plan to get projects moving as quickly as possible, in particular for the upcoming construction season.

We will work with provinces and territories to identify a limited number of key infrastructure projects across Canada by January 2009.

These investments will help keep Canada moving forward as the world economy slows.

Pensions, Credit and the Financial Sector

Quickly deteriorating circumstances in the financial sectors in other countries have contributed to this slowdown.

Here at home we must have the flexibility to respond quickly and decisively, and protect our financial system from global risks.

Our Government is proposing that the Minister of Finance be granted additional flexibility to support financial institutions and the financial system in extraordinary circumstances.

This is consistent with the additional powers we provided the Bank of Canada earlier this year. It is also in keeping with the action plans we agreed to with our international counterparts at the G7 and G20 meetings.

These proposed measures include authority for:

  • Funding in the unlikely event there is a draw on the Canadian Lenders Assurance Facility;
  • Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation to establish a bridge bank to help preserve critical banking functions;
  • An increase in the borrowing limit of CDIC to $15 billion to reflect the growth of insured deposits, the first increase since 1992;
  • The power to direct CDIC to undertake key resolution measures to ensure financial stability when necessary; and
  • The legal ability to inject capital into a federally regulated financial institution to support financial stability, on terms that would protect taxpayers.

These are additional tools in our tool box. I hope we never have to use them.

But the lessons of the past couple of months have shown us that we have to be ready to deal with every kind of risk, even the unlikeliest ones.

With these measures, we will be ready.

We are taking steps to help Canadian seniors. Our seniors built this country and deserve to live with dignity and respect.

Many seniors are understandably concerned about the impact of the sharp decline in the markets on their retirement savings.

Registered Retirement Income Funds, or RRIFs, and their associated withdrawal requirements are of particular concern.

Last year, our Government raised the age limit for converting a Registered Retirement Savings Plan to a RRIF from 69 to 71.

I have heard from seniors about two issues they are dealing with today:

  • The impression among some that assets in RRIFs must be sold in order to meet withdrawal requirements; and
  • The recent steep drop in market value of some of those assets.

There is no requirement under the tax rules to sell these assets to meet the RRIF minimum withdrawal requirements, and seniors should not be left with the impression that there is. Assets may be kept intact, so that they can grow in the future.

To help deal with this issue, last week I wrote to all federally regulated financial institutions. I asked these institutions to ensure that in-kind distributions are accommodated at no cost to clients, or that clients are offered another solution that achieves the same result.

Now, these are exceptional circumstances, and we are taking further action to allow RRIF holders to keep more of their savings in their RRIFs.

To help seniors cope, today I am proposing a one-time change that will allow RRIF holders to reduce their required minimum withdrawal by 25 per cent for this tax year. For example, for an individual otherwise required to withdraw $10,000 from their RRIF in 2008, the required withdrawal will be reduced to $7,500.

If the individual has already withdrawn more than $7,500, they will be permitted to recontribute the excess up to $2,500, and claim an offsetting deduction for the 2008 taxation year.

We are also addressing the immediate consequences this financial distress has dealt to Canadian workers who contribute to federally regulated pension plans.

Based on what has happened so far, and under current rules, the decline in value of these plan assets would trigger substantial payments at the worst possible time for struggling companies.

The money these companies would need to use for pension top-ups could otherwise be used for further investment and growth.

The Government is proposing to allow plans under federal jurisdiction to double the length of time required for solvency payments from 5 to 10 years.

Companies that pursue this option must meet one of two conditions:

  • The agreement of pension plan members and retirees by the end of 2009; or
  • The securing of a letter of credit to cover the 5-year difference to protect pensioners.

Today’s announcement will give these companies one more option they can use to cope with these extraordinary circumstances.

To deal with longer-term pension concerns, we will soon be launching consultations on issues facing defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans, with a view to making permanent changes next year.

Since pension plans are regulated either federally or provincially, our Government will coordinate our efforts with our provincial and territorial counterparts to create a pension system able to withstand whatever future challenges come its way.

This subject will be high on the agenda when I meet with my provincial and territorial colleagues next month.

While helping Canadian workers save, we will also help the businesses that employ them, in particular with their ability to borrow.

We will increase the supply of credit available to export-oriented manufacturers, including the auto sector, as well as small and medium-sized businesses.

On top of a recent $2-billion increase to the borrowing authority of Export Development Canada, today I am announcing a $350-million equity injection that will support up to approximately $1.5 billion in increased credit for Canada’s export businesses.

The export sector has been hit hard by the financial crisis. EDC will now be able to add to the nearly $80 billion in exports and investment it helps make possible for Canadian enterprises, including $4 billion for the auto sector alone.

The Government will also inject $350 million in equity to the Business Development Bank of Canada to assist small and medium-sized companies. This new injection will increase BDC’s lending ability by about $1.5 billion, and comes on top of a $1.8-billion borrowing increase announced earlier this year.

We will also move forward quickly on the securities regulation front. Our cumbersome and unwieldy system of 13 securities regulators is a glaring flaw in Canada’s world-leading approach to promoting financial stability.

The Government will soon receive the report of the Expert Panel on Securities Regulation. The report is expected to outline the best way forward to improve the content, structure and enforcement of securities regulation in Canada.

We will act on it quickly. We invite all participants to join us in improving our regulatory system.

Conclusion

Mr. Speaker, this Government came to office looking years down the road. Our country is better off today thanks to exactly such an approach. Short-term problems will not distract us from continuing to focus on the horizon.

At the same time, we are far from finished confronting unheard-of global economic and financial threats. There are warning signs ahead that we must heed if we are to remain a global role model in an uncertain time.

We will address our immediate, external challenges the same way we will reach our longer-term goals: by continuing to manage tax dollars wisely, investing strictly in the essentials and focusing on what ultimately matters—the longer-term prosperity of all Canadians.

These are not easy times. But we must not forget that our country has been through plenty of hard times before, and we’ll get through these ones the same way.

Our Government will respond to the challenges of the upcoming year the same way we are seeing this year to a close, through the values Canadians themselves hold dear: prudence and restraint, combined with hard work and a focus on the future.

The greatest histories are always written in the toughest times. I believe that we’re in the midst of writing some bold new chapters in our country’s long-running success story—an unfolding account of new accomplishments by a country that is compelled to grapple with global hard times, and that will emerge even stronger because of them.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.


***

Government of Canada Maintains Strong and Responsible Economic Leadership

Related Documents:


The Honourable Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance, today announced in his 2008 Economic and Fiscal Statement that the Government will take actions to restrain spending, protect Canada’s hard-won fiscal advantage and reinforce the stability of our financial system amid this period of global economic uncertainty.

"Without a doubt, here in Canada and around the world, these are difficult times that will require difficult choices," said Minister Flaherty. "We cannot ask Canadians to tighten their belts during tougher times without looking in the mirror. We have a responsibility to show restraint and respect for tax dollars."

The Government will continue to manage spending responsibly. To that end, this Statement takes action to:

  • Eliminate the taxpayer subsidy for politicians and their parties.
  • Reduce the cost and ensure the effectiveness of government operations.
  • Ensure sustainable federal public sector wage rates and modernize the pay equity regime. This will also apply to MPs, Senators, Cabinet Ministers and senior public servants.
  • Put Equalization on a sustainable growth path.

Minister Flaherty said the Government continues to plan on balanced budgets. However, given the fluidity of the economic situation and the rapid decline in commodity prices, a deficit cannot be ruled out.

"Our goal must be to ensure the strength of the economy—to protect jobs, to encourage investment and to help businesses grow," the Minister said. "We must do that while protecting the long-term fiscal position of the Government, so that if we must run a deficit, when the economy improves, we return quickly to balanced budgets."

While the Government has already taken major actions to strengthen and preserve the competitiveness of Canada’s world-leading financial sector, this Statement takes further measures to:

  • Support the financial system in extraordinary circumstances.
  • Provide solvency funding relief to federally regulated private pension plans.
  • Enhance credit availability through Crown agencies for Canadian businesses affected by the global credit crisis.
  • Reduce the required minimum withdrawal amounts for Registered Retirement Income Funds by 25 per cent for 2008.

The Government will consult with provinces and territories, and all Canadians, to develop responses to short-term economic issues, while continuing to implement its long-term economic plan. The immediate priorities are to accelerate infrastructure projects, improve opportunities for workers and sectors affected by current economic conditions, strengthen our world-leading financial system in line with our G20 commitments, and improve the competitiveness of the Canadian economy.

"The next fiscal year will be difficult," said Minister Flaherty. "But Canadians can be fully confident that we will overcome whatever hardships may lie ahead in 2009 and beyond."

___________________________________
For further information, media may contact:

Chisholm Pothier
Press Secretary
Office of the Minister of Finance
613-996-7861
David Gamble
Media Relations
Department of Finance
613-996-8080

To receive e-mail notification of all news releases, please register at www.fin.gc.ca/scripts/register_e.asp.

Magna lays off 850 in Newmarket and Aurora


Magna lays off 850 in Newmarket and Aurora

My condolences to those who lost their jobs at the Magna plants in Newmarket and Aurora yesterday. The manufacturing sector has been hit hard in my riding with Tenatronics closing recently as well. Clearly the automotive sector is facing tough times right now. Beyond the headline is 850 real people with families to support. This news is a major blow to our community and yet another example of the challenges manufacturers are facing in Ontario and beyond. I wish these workers the best of luck in finding new jobs. I also wish Magna International all the best during these tough times. They are a major employer in the region and thousands of people rely on the success of the company to support themselves and their family. Hopefully there will be some form of assistance to the auto sector soon. Threats to the industry go far beyond the big three.
-Darryl


***

Magna to close two Ontario parts plants

Globe and Mail Update

Auto parts producer Magna International Inc. announced Wednesday that it will close two plants in Ontario, affecting 850 employees.

The company said difficult economic conditions and depressed demand for its products forced the decision to shut its plants in Aurora and Newmarket and consolidate operations.

The affected plants are run by Exterion, a manufacturing division of Magna International's Decoma International unit. The work currently done at the plants will be transferred to other Decoma operations.

“The difficult decision to close the facility came after a careful evaluation of the facility's financial status, future business and open capacity in other facilities,” Magna International said in a statement.

“Those factors, combined with difficult economic conditions facing the North American auto industry due to reduced domestic production and customer demands, have made Exterion operations no longer viable,” the company said.

Magna said it will try to transfer employees to other operations. Those who cannot be placed will be given notice or severance packages based on years of service at the company. Magna will also provide help to those seeking jobs with other companies.

The shutdowns will affect 350 employees in Aurora and 500 in Newmarket. They produce fascias, fenders and body side panels for Chrysler and General Motors vehicles.

Earlier this month, Don Walker, co-chief executive officer of Magna International, said the company was preparing for a sustained downturn.

“We want a lean and efficient operation, while not sacrificing our future, so we are stronger when the automotive market recovers,” Mr. Walker said during a conference call Nov. 4 after the company announced a loss of $215-million (U.S.) for the June-to-September period.

“If the downturn stays as difficult as it has been, I think we'll see a lot of failures in the supply industry,” Mr. Walker said at that time.

Magna International has been hit hard by the slump in demand for automobiles, both in the United States and Europe. Between 80 and 85 per cent of Magna's North American business is generated by the Big Three auto makers, who are seeking a $25-billion bailout from the U.S. government.

My thoughts and prayers go out to the people of Mumbai, India and the victims of this cowardly terrorist act


My thoughts and prayers go out to the people of Mumbai, India and the victims of this cowardly terrorist act

Yesterday terrorists appear to have targeted Western citizens and interests in the financial capital of the world's largest democracy. My thoughts, prayers and condolences go out to the victims of this cowardly attack and also the people of India. We need to stand with India and all those opposed to terror wherever it exists. At this point it is unclear who is actually responsible for these attacks, but that should be determined soon and I suspect an appropriate response will take place. India has experienced terror before and this experience should only unite the world against the treat of terrorism that affects free people everywhere in the world. The war on terror continues and it is the responsibility of all nations to root out extremists within their own borders. Our relations with India must be strengthened and tourism and business should continue despite what took place yesterday. We cannot allow the terrorists to win through the fear they create.
-Darryl

Update from John Tory Leader's Dinner


Update from John Tory Leader's Dinner

Last night was a good night for the PC Party. Despite troubled economic times, approximately 450 people paid $500 to attend a fundraising dinner at Le Parc in Thornhill for the PC fund. Stephen Harper sent his greetings as did Thornhill MP Peter Kent. Peter Shurman, Frank Klees and Julia Munro did a great job hosting the event as representitives for York Region. John Tory delievered a terrific speech that focused on the economy and Dalton McGuinty's record. Some of the facts were unbelievable. Ontario second last in projected economic growth and now a have not province. Public servents making over $100,000 has increased 27% under the Ontario Liberal government. Labour costs have increased 57% under McGuinty. Spending has increased 40% under this provincial government. Corporate taxes in Ontario remain the second highest in the world. 8 million wasted on another study into tourism as opposed to an ad campaign alerting our American friends about the low dollar and potential bargains on this side of the border. Government administration costs currently sit at 1.2 billion with room for at least a 10% cut by reducing travel, using government meeting rooms instead of booking hotels and discretionary budgets out of control. No strategy for small businesses, job creation or foreign investment. Deficits despite record transfer payments from the federal government. Tory was on his game and we saw a likely preview of what our message will be in 2011. I see a lot of Liberals cheerleading the recession and trying to put the blame on Stephen Harper for the international economic crisis. They should think twice as Mr. McGuinty is equally vulnerable under that argument.

MPP representation was very strong last night at the York Region dinner. Frank Klees, Julia Munro, Peter Shurman, Tim Hudak, Randy Hillier, Elizabeth Witmer, Lisa MacLeod, John O'Toole, Joyce Savoline, Sylvia Jones, Ted Arnott and Christine Elliot were all in attendence. Former Premier Bill Davis was also on hand. I suspect there were others that I missed as well. There were no updates on any potential seat location for Mr. Tory.

Overall I think the provincial Conservative party is on the right track. Last night's fundraiser was very successful considering the economic situation right now. In February we are set to have a policy convention in Niagara Falls. The Ontario PC Party has launched a new version of their website that I believe is cutting edge. Finally it seems we are starting to gain some traction in the legislature through question period. The next election is three years away.

Given the gains that took place federally around the GTA and throughout Ontario; I think there is strong potential to get back into government in 2011. My hope is that John Tory can secure a seat as soon as possible. Congratulations to everyone responsible for organizing the event last night.

Thanks for reading...

Darryl

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Off to the PC Fund Leader's Dinner


Off to the PC Fund Leader's Dinner

Tonight at Le Parc in Thornhill is the PC Fund Leader's Dinner. John Tory will be the guest speaker. I will be attending and it should be interesting to see if there is anything new to report from the event regarding the PC Party in Ontario. I will try and post an update later tonight on what occured at the dinner.
-Darryl

Friday, November 21, 2008

Breaking News: Hillary Clinton Secretary of State


Breaking News: Hillary Clinton Secretary of State

Hillary Clinton has accepted the role of Secretary of State in Barack Obama's administration. Congratulations Mr. Canon.

Details to come...

Update: Full Story from New York Times

Palin turkey pardon interview blooper

Palin turkey pardon interview blooper

I feel bad about posting this, but for the record I do not blame Sarah Palin for this blooper. Clearly her staff dropped the ball on this one and as a result they should be replaced. I understand the interview was live but the camera man could have cut Palin a break and moved to a close up shot once he saw what was happening in the background. Also the guy in the background with the turkey should have used some common sense when he saw the interview taking place and was stairing right at the camera when Palin was talking. Unfortunately this is a lesson to anyone in politics on how not to do a photo op. The decision to have her speaking with those machines in the background was questionable to say the least. Clearly Palin's people let the Governor down and should be held accountable for the embarassment caused to their boss. When you consider the prank call as well, one really has to wonder about the compotence of the people surrounding Gov. Palin. She has taken several shots recently in the media - some legitimate others unfair. This type of thing is the last thing she needs and it seems her staff are making 2012 harder and harder with each passing day. I suspect there are several blogging tories who could do a better job for her and at a much cheaper rate than those currently running the show. Governor Palin deserves better than this.
-Darryl

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Full Text: Speech from the Throne 11/19/2008


Protecting Canada's Future - Text of Speech from the Throne

19 November 2008
Honourable Senators,
Members of the House of Commons,
Ladies and gentlemen,

Two hundred and fifty years ago, on October 2, 1758, the first parliamentary assembly of its kind in Canada was held in Nova Scotia. It is worth solemnly remembering in this Chamber the historic significance of that event.

Because today, we are free to reach our full potential thanks to the efforts of women and men, young and old, who established democracy in this country, where anything is possible.

This country is made up of every hope we cherish, every dream we pursue, every project we realize.

Upholding the ideal of democracy that we embody in the world is a responsibility that each of us bears.

As the great-great-granddaughter of slaves, I know just how precious this legacy is to the citizens of this country. They have again and again expressed their pride in this legacy to me, through their words and deeds, over the past three years.

In these uncertain economic times, it is more important than ever that our spirit of solidarity prevails and reaches beyond our borders, so that Canada represents not only a hope of renewal, but also a promise for the future.

Today, in this democratic tradition, the representatives of the Canadian people gather for the 40th time in this great nation’s history to open a new federal Parliament.

For over 140 years, since the era of Queen Victoria, Sir John A. Macdonald, Sir George-Etienne Cartier and the other Fathers of Confederation, the Parliament of Canada has assembled to deliberate upon the great issues of the day.

This institution thus represents one of the longest and most unblemished records of peaceful, democratic self-government anywhere on Earth.

The people spoke once again in a general election on October 14th, and entrusted this Government with a renewed and strengthened mandate.

At the same time, the people also chose to elect a minority Parliament. And in a parliamentary democracy such as ours, the government must always be responsible and accountable to the people’s representatives.

Our Government is mindful of both the privilege and the responsibility with which we have been entrusted.

This is a time of extraordinary global economic challenge and uncertainty. The world’s financial system faces pressures not seen for many generations. Governments around the world have taken unprecedented steps to restore confidence in the face of a global economic slowdown.

As Canadians watch these developments unfold, they rightly wonder about what they might mean here at home, for their jobs, their savings and their families’ well-being. Canadians know that, as Canada is a trading nation in the global economy, these events—while originating outside our borders—will nevertheless reverberate here.

In the face of this uncertainty, just as when faced with difficulties before, Canadians will prevail.

Canada was founded on the belief that, by joining our strength in confederation, our united country would be able to meet and rise above any challenge set before us.

From the explorers and pioneers to the settlers and railroad builders, this vast country was built by people who took tremendous risks and braved unforgiving elements for the prospect of a better future.

The dawn of a new century saw new challenges. In a war that ended ninety years ago last week, our young country came of age on battlefields whose names echo across our history—Ypres, Vimy, Passchendaele. The generation that followed overcame the Depression and again confronted the devastation of war. The achievements of these generations are marked not only by monuments to their bravery and sacrifices, but also by their legacy in forging Canada as one of the most peaceful and prosperous nations on Earth.

We know that Canadians will face the problems of today with the same spirit of determination and resolve as those who came before us faced the challenges of their generation. And like them, we know that we will emerge stronger than ever.

In this time of global economic instability, we can be reassured that the hard work of millions of Canadians has laid a solid foundation for our country. We have pursued policies different from those of many of our trading partners. We have paid down debt and kept spending under control. We have set public pensions on a sound footing and refinanced important programs such as health care and post-secondary education. Our banks are among the strongest and best regulated in the world. Canadian households and businesses have been prudent and avoided taking on the excessive debt witnessed elsewhere.

Embarking on its renewed mandate, our Government is committed to providing the strong leadership that Canadians expect. It will protect Canadians in difficult times. It will work with Canadians to secure our future prosperity. It will support Canadian workers and businesses in their pursuit of a better future. And our Government will continue its pursuit of distinctly Canadian policies that will contribute to a better economy.

Our Government has a clear approach to Canada’s economic security. It will work with its partners to help address the current international crisis. It will maintain a prudent course for the country’s finances. It will take action to support the economy today while building a stronger economy for the future.

As our Government dedicates its efforts over the months ahead to supporting the Canadian economy, so too does it rededicate itself to working in partnership with others to achieve this goal. Canadians expect federal and provincial governments to work together to steer us through the current economic turmoil and, ultimately, build a stronger Canada. To this end, First Ministers met on November 10th and will meet again in the new year.

Reforming Global Finance

The first order of business must be to put the international financial system on a sounder footing. Just as these troubles began beyond our borders, so will their solution demand that Canada engage its partners and allies around the world.

Canada will use its experience in developing a strong model of financial regulation to help lead the world in the repair and strengthening of the international financial system. The Prime Minister and Minister of Finance began this important work on November 15th, joining the leaders of the G20 in Washington, D.C., to re-examine and renew the rules and institutions that underpin the global financial system.

The financial sector exists to serve the economy. Without sound financial institutions, loans would not be available for home ownership. Businesses would be cut off from the credit needed to expand and hire new workers. By choking off financing to the global economy, the credit crisis has dramatically weakened the prospects of growth. Canada will play a leading role to help resolve the crisis, maintain free and open markets, and advance Canada’s interests.

The credit crisis has also underlined the dangers of a fragmented financial regulatory system. To further strengthen financial oversight in Canada, our Government will work with the provinces to put in place a common securities regulator.

Ensuring Sound Budgeting

Canada’s relative success in weathering the global economic turmoil thus far can be attributed in no small measure to our country’s solid fiscal fundamentals, the best among all major industrialized countries.

A strong fiscal foundation is not an end in itself, but it is the bedrock on which a resilient economy is built. Responsible budgets, significant debt repayment, and declining corporate and personal income taxes have provided an important competitive advantage. As Canada navigates today’s economic uncertainties, it is even more important that we keep our sights fixed on responsible fiscal management.

The Minister of Finance will provide details on our Government’s approach to economic and fiscal management in the Economic and Fiscal Statement to be delivered next week.

Ongoing, unsustainable deficits are quite rightly unacceptable to Canadians. These structural deficits must never return. At the same time, in a historic global downturn, it would be misguided to commit to a balanced budget in the short term at any cost, because that cost would ultimately be borne by Canadian families.

Hard decisions will be needed to keep federal spending under control and focused on results. Grants, contributions and capital expenditures will be placed under the microscope of responsible spending. Departments will have the funding they need to deliver essential programs and services, and no more. Our Government will engage Parliament and encourage members to take a more active role in scrutinizing spending and suggesting areas for restraint.

Our Government is also committed to responsible fiscal management of public sector compensation, and will table legislation to ensure sustainable compensation growth in the federal Public Service.

Our Government will ensure that the provinces receive the generous transfer payments planned for health care and social programs. We will ensure that Equalization payments also grow, but that they do not grow more quickly than our economy as a whole.

Any new measures to support the economy will also be carefully chosen and targeted for maximum benefit.

Securing Jobs for Families and Communities

Global turbulence is translating into real challenges for Canada. Our Government understands the pressures on ordinary hard-working Canadians and the businesses that provide them with jobs.

Canada’s economy will only remain as strong as its workers and families. Our Government will strengthen Canada’s workforce for the future by continuing to support student financial assistance and taking measures to encourage skilled trades and apprenticeships. Our Government will also work with the provinces to make the recognition of foreign credentials a priority, attract top international students to Canada and increase the uptake of immigrant settlement programs.

Our Government will also take steps to ensure that Aboriginal Canadians fully share in economic opportunities, putting particular emphasis on improving education for First Nations in partnership with the provinces and First Nations communities.

Our Government will support workers facing transition. It will ensure that existing programs and services are as effective as possible in meeting the needs of Canadians. Targeted help will be available to those who need it the most.

Our Government has already cut taxes to lower costs for business and help them compete and create jobs. To further reduce the cost pressures on Canadian business, our Government will take measures to encourage companies to invest in new machinery and equipment.

The Canadian manufacturing sector, particularly the automotive and aerospace industries, has been under increasing strain. Our Government will provide further support for these industries.

Canada’s traditional industries, such as fisheries, mining and forestry, sustain the economic well-being of many regions and communities. Our Government will continue to assist these industries through measures aimed at marketing Canadian products abroad and helping businesses to innovate.

Our Government will continue to support Canada’s farmers by ensuring freedom of choice for grain marketing in Western Canada and strongly supporting our supply-managed sectors at home and in international negotiations.

Public infrastructure is vital not only to create jobs for today, but also to create the links between communities and regions to help generate jobs for the future. Our Government is committed to expediting our Building Canada plan to ensure that projects are delivered as quickly as possible.

Expanding Investment and Trade

Canada’s prosperity depends not just on meeting the challenges of today, but on building the dynamic economy that will create opportunities and better jobs for Canadians in the future. As one of our greatest hockey legends has observed, we need “to skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been.”

Building a more dynamic economy will require new ideas and new investment. Our Government understands that advances in science and technology are essential to strengthen the competitiveness of Canada’s economy. Our Government will start at home, working with industry to apply the best Canadian scientific and technological know-how to create innovative business solutions. It will invest in new world-class research facilities.

Our Government will also expand the opportunities for Canadian firms to benefit from foreign investment and knowledge, while taking steps to safeguard consumers and our national security. Our Government will proceed with legislation to modernize our competition and investment laws, implementing many of the recommendations of the Competition Policy Review Panel.

Cultural creativity and innovation are vital not only to a lively Canadian cultural life, but also to Canada’s economic future. Our Government will proceed with legislation to modernize Canada’s copyright laws and ensure stronger protection for intellectual property.

Both investment and trade matter to Canada’s prosperity. Our Government is committed to seeking out new opportunities for Canadians and to promoting global prosperity through free trade. It will work with the new administration in the United States in addressing shared challenges, especially during the current economic downturn, and seek opportunities to enhance North American competitiveness. New trade agreements will be pursued in Asia and the Americas, as well as with the European Union, to open markets for Canadian firms. Our Government will proceed with legislation to ratify the results of trade negotiations that have been concluded with the European Free Trade Association, Peru, Colombia and Jordan.

Our Government will continue to invest in expanding gateways on our Atlantic and Pacific coasts, and in vital border corridors such as the Detroit River International Crossing, to ensure that Canadian goods and services can reach markets in Europe, Asia and the United States.

Better positioning Canada to compete for investment and market opportunities will require action at home. A fragmented regulatory environment for internal trade and commerce has for too long restricted the flow of labour and investment across the country. Our Government will work with the provinces to remove barriers to internal trade, investment and labour mobility by 2010.

Making Government More Effective

Part of a solid economic and fiscal foundation is the sound management of government. To make Canada’s national government more effective, our Government is committed to reform and streamline the way it does business.

Our Government will pursue innovative reforms to the administration of programs and services, drawing on the successful experiences of other governments around the world. It will build partnerships with third parties and the private sector to deliver better services at a lower overall cost.

Our Government will review all program spending carefully to make sure that spending is as effective as possible and aligned with Canadians’ priorities.

Our Government will cut the red tape faced by the private and not-for-profit sectors when doing business with the government.

Fixing procurement will be a top priority. Simpler and streamlined processes will make it easier for businesses to provide products and services to the government and will deliver better results for Canadians. Military procurement in particular is critical: Canada cannot afford to have cumbersome processes delay the purchase and delivery of equipment needed by our men and women in uniform.

Our Government will also strengthen and improve the management of Canada’s federal agencies, boards, commissions and Crown corporations to achieve greater cost-effectiveness and accountability.

Securing Our Energy Future

Energy is vitally important to our country. Our geography and climate mean that Canadians depend on affordable and reliable energy. The development of our rich energy resources is an important source of wealth and Canadian jobs.

Our Government will support the development of cleaner energy sources. The natural gas that lies beneath Canada’s North represents both an untapped source of clean fuel and an unequalled avenue to creating economic opportunities for northern people. Our Government will reduce regulatory and other barriers to extend the pipeline network into the North.

These measures will bring jobs to northern Canada and create employment across the country, just as they will bring new energy supplies to markets in southern Canada and throughout the world. Economic development in Canada’s North, led by a new stand-alone agency, is a key element of our Northern Strategy.

Nuclear energy is a proven technology, capable of reliable, large-scale output. In Canada and around the world, energy authorities are investing in nuclear power to meet both energy security and climate change goals. Our Government will ensure that Canada’s regulatory framework is ready to respond should the provinces choose to advance new nuclear projects.

Tackling Climate Change and Preserving Canada’s Environment

Our Government understands that Canada’s economic prosperity cannot be sustained without a healthy environment, just as environmental progress cannot be achieved without a healthy economy. Our Government will continue its realistic, responsible approach to addressing the challenge of climate change.

Our Government has committed to reducing Canada’s total greenhouse gas emissions by 20 percent by 2020. We will meet this goal while also ensuring that Canada’s actions going forward remain comparable to what our partners in the United States, Europe and other industrialized countries undertake. We will work with the provincial governments and our partners to develop and implement a North America-wide cap and trade system for greenhouse gases and an effective international protocol for the post-2012 period.

To meet the challenge posed by climate change, we will also need to make greater use of technologies that do not emit greenhouse gases. Our Government will set an objective that 90 percent of Canada’s electricity needs be provided by non-emitting sources such as hydro, nuclear, clean coal or wind power by 2020. In support of this ambitious national goal, our Government will continue to provide support for biofuels, wind and other energy alternatives.

To ensure protection of our vital resources, our Government will bring in legislation to ban all bulk water transfers or exports from Canadian freshwater basins.

Our Government will work with all parties in Parliament to introduce sensible policies that can help consumers and improve our environmental well-being, such as increasing incentives for energy-saving home retrofits.

Helping All Canadians Participate

Canada is built on a promise of opportunity, the chance to work hard, raise a family and make a better life. Today, it is more important than ever to deliver on this promise, and ensure that all Canadians share in the promise of this land, regardless of cultural background, gender, age, disability or official language. This Government will break down barriers that prevent Canadians from reaching their potential.

Many working-age Canadians are faced with the dual pressure of holding down a job and caring for their family. Increasing numbers of Canadians are taking care of elderly parents while also raising young children. Our Government is committed to supporting working families and helping make ends meet.

Our Government will improve the Universal Child Care Benefit and take measures to increase access to maternity and parental benefits under Employment Insurance.

We will act to help families caring for loved ones with disabilities and to assist Canadians buying their first home.

Some Canadians face other barriers to participation in the economy and society, whether in the form of homelessness or debilitating illness. Our Government will extend the Homelessness Partnering Strategy and help more Canadians find affordable housing. It will take creative measures to tackle major heart, lung and neurological diseases and to build on the work of the Mental Health Commission.

Keeping Canadians Safe

In times of uncertainty as in times of prosperity, Canadians need to be assured that they are safe in their homes and communities.

Canadians look to governments to ensure that the justice system is working effectively and that Canadians are safe. Our Government will take tough action against crime and work with partners to improve the administration of justice. Serious offences will be met with serious penalties. Legal provisions will be strengthened in key areas, such as youth crime, organized crime and gang violence. Gun laws will be focused on ending smuggling and stronger penalties for gun crimes, not at criminalizing law-abiding firearms owners. More broadly, Canada’s criminal justice system will be made more efficient. Citizens need to know that justice is served, and that it is served swiftly.

Safety and security also mean that Canadians must be assured that the food on their dinner table, the toys they buy their children, and the medicines on which they rely are safe. Our Government will follow through with legislation providing better oversight of food, drug and consumer products. It will strengthen the power to recall products and increase penalties for violators. It will also move quickly to launch an independent investigation of this summer’s listeria outbreak and act quickly upon its findings.

National security is the most fundamental duty of any national government to its citizens. Our Government will table a national security statement to explain how we intend to balance the new threats and challenges to national security that we face with the need for oversight, accountability and the protection of civil liberties.
Contributing to Global Security

Our national security depends on global security. Our Government believes that Canada’s aspirations for a better and more secure world must be matched by vigorous and concrete actions on the world stage.

Security ultimately depends upon a respect for freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law. Where these values are imperilled, the safety and prosperity of all nations are imperilled. Canada must have the capacity and willingness to stand for what is right, and to contribute to a better and safer world.

Our Government is transforming Canada’s engagement in Afghanistan to focus on reconstruction and development, and to prepare for the end of our military mission there in 2011. The hard work and heroic sacrifices of Canada’s men and women in the field—military, diplomatic and development—will leave the people of Afghanistan the lasting legacy of a more secure, more peaceful and better governed country.

Our Government will also continue to rebuild and arm the Canadian Forces with the best possible equipment. We will renew all of our major air, sea and surface fleets over the next two decades, creating new, high-technology jobs in Canada in the process.

Canada’s international assistance will continue to increase and will be spent more effectively in the promotion of development goals. A new, non-partisan democracy promotion agency will also be established to support the peaceful transition to democracy in repressive countries and help emerging democracies build strong institutions.

Building Stronger Institutions

Canada’s institutions are the cornerstone of our democracy, our freedom and our prosperity.

Parliament is Canada’s most important national institution. It is the only forum in which all Canadians, through their elected representatives, have a voice in the governance of the nation. Parliament should be an expression of our highest ideals and deepest values, our greatest hopes and grandest dreams for the future of our children. Our Government believes these ideals can only be achieved if Parliament truly reflects the character and aspirations of the Canadian people.

Our Government will introduce legislation to move toward representation by population in the House of Commons for Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta. Legislation will also be introduced to allow for nominees to the Senate to be selected by voters, to serve fixed terms of not longer than eight years, and for the Senate to be covered by the same ethics regime as the House of Commons.

The Public Service of Canada is a key national institution. Public servants inspect our food and police our borders. They deliver programs and services to millions of Canadians in every region of this country, from our largest cities to the most remote Arctic communities. Drawing on the recommendations of the Prime Minister’s Advisory Committee on the Public Service, our Government is committed to the continued renewal of the Public Service.

Our Government will also take steps to strengthen the Canadian confederation. It will respect the jurisdiction of the provinces and territories and will enshrine its principles of federalism in a Charter of Open Federalism. The federal spending power will be constrained so that any new shared-cost program in an area of exclusive provincial responsibility will require the consent of the majority of the provinces to proceed, and that non-participating provinces can opt out with compensation, provided that they implement compatible programs or initiatives.

Conclusion

Canadians have renewed their confidence in our Government. They have placed their trust in their representatives. And they have asked us to work together to meet the challenges before our country.

Our Government is committed to Canada’s continued success at this time of global economic instability. All its energy will be directed to addressing the challenges Canadian families, businesses and workers face, both today and in the future. It will continue to establish effective policies that give a competitive advantage to this country. It will strengthen the institutions that keep Canadians safe, secure and prosperous. And it will work in partnership—with its allies, with the provinces and territories, with industry and with the millions of Canadian families—to keep Canada the true North, strong and free.

Canadians have faced times of uncertainty and renewal before and have always emerged a stronger and more united people. Gathered here in this Chamber, we remember the men and women who went before us and the legacy of freedom and prosperity that they have bequeathed to us. It is now our duty to protect and enhance this legacy for those who will follow us.

Honourable Members of the Senate and Commons, yours is a most important task. May Divine Providence guide you in your deliberations.

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Peter Milliken re-elected Speaker


Peter Milliken re-elected Speaker

It looks like MPs decided to go with experience and stability as oppose to an alternative candidate who promised better decorum. Overall I have been happy with the job performance of Peter Milliken, especially in this past minority parliament. By tradition the speaker only votes if there is a tie and in that case must vote with the government as we saw in 2005 following the confidence vote after Belinda crossed the floor. There was some talk that Conservatives would support one of their own with the hope that Milliken might retire if he wasn't re-elected, putting his Kingston and the Islands riding in play for the Conservative Party in the next election. This turned out to be unlikely after multiple Conservatives decided to run. Overall congratulations to Peter Milliken getting re-elected. I look forward to the throne speech that will take place tomorrow and also what will hopefully be a productive session of parliament. Today's vote took place by secret ballot.
-Darryl

Monday, November 17, 2008

Hillary Clinton would be a great choice for Secretary of State


Hillary Clinton would be a great choice for Secretary of State

I hope the reports here, here, here, here, here and here are correct. Hillary Clinton would be an excellent choice given her experience and relationships she and Bill have with world leaders. I hope she is in fact the Secretary of State. A meeting between her and Lawrence Canon would be great to see. It was also great to see Obama have a face to face meeting with John McCain today. I am also excited about rumours that California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger may also get a position in cabinet.
-Darryl


Secretary of state job Clinton's, if she wants it, reports say

From Saturday's Globe and Mail

Almost a year ago, Barack Obama was asked in a debate how he could rely on so many Bill Clinton-era advisers while still providing a break from the past, prompting his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton to burst out laughing.

Turning to face her, Mr. Obama deadpanned: “I'm looking forward to you advising me too, Hillary.”

Now president-elect, Mr. Obama it seems was not joking.

The pair took a secret meeting in Chicago this week, and Washington is abuzz with rumours that the New York senator will be tapped as his secretary of state.

The Globe and Mail

CNN quoted Democratic sources as saying Mr. Obama and Ms. Clinton had a serious discussion about the secretary of state job and that she left the meeting with the impression that it was hers if she wanted it. The Huffington Post blog went further, saying Ms. Clinton was offered the job and requested time to consider it.

But Mr. Obama also interviewed New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson for the position yesterday, media reports said.

Mr. Obama has also begun staffing his White House, transition team and economic panel with former Clinton administration insiders.

After a two-year battle in which each politician was accused of disrespecting the other, it appears that the Obama-Clinton rift is being repaired, one job opening at a time.

His transition chief, John Podesta, was Bill Clinton's chief of staff during the last two years of his administration. Mr. Obama's own newly hired White House chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was a senior Clinton adviser before winning a seat in the House of Representatives.

In fact, 31 of the 47 people named to Mr. Obama's transition team or staff have ties to the Clinton administration.

“He's definitely playing on good advice and past expertise and the most recent Democratic administration,” said Melissa Haussman, an associate professor of political science at Carleton University who worked on Ms. Clinton's presidential campaign. “The fact that Obama is inheriting problems that are the worst facing any president in the 20th century, he knows he's got to be prepared.”

Ironically, Dr. Haussman believes the new president learned that lesson from Mr. Clinton, whose own early White House staff was composed of some loyalists unprepared for the task at hand.

“They've got people with a whole lot of experience dealing with Congress, and that's something the Clinton White House was a little short on,” she said of the emerging Obama team.

While Mr. Obama's staff is drawing so heavily on administration insiders of the 1990s that Politico.com joked he is putting “the Clinton band back together,” the most symbolic gesture would be a high-profile position for Ms. Clinton.

Passed over for the vice-presidential slot, the primary runner-up campaigned for Mr. Obama during the general election and is regarded as a natural source of advice, expertise and political capital for Mr. Obama.

Already, she has been approached by Mr. Obama's wife, Michelle, for advice about raising kids in the White House. And now it seems Mr. Obama might be hoping she will help him contend with foreign policy as secretary of state.

But she is already being touted as a smart choice for the position, with an established international reputation that would help heal the country's damaged relationships abroad.

But what's in it for her?

Taking a position in cabinet means Ms. Clinton would lose her Senate seat and influence in domestic policy.

The past two secretaries of state, Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell, have been lightning rods for criticism, a situation Ms. Clinton may not be willing to endure again.

“Let's face it, as first lady and presidential candidate she was open to a lot of barbs and spears,” Dr. Haussman said. “It's a multiplicity of considerations, thinking about where her talents lie and how much does she want to put herself in a high-profile position again.”

Final Day at Conservative Convention











Final Day at Conservative Convention

Sorry I didn't post this earlier. My flight left at 5am on Sunday morning and I left for the airport directly from the Helena and Rahim wedding social. The final day of the convention focused on the voting of policy resolutions and was open to the media and bloggers. I was sitting at the table from Newmarket-Aurora and supported most of the motions that were passed. I was very pleased to see Kara, Simon, Mark and John get elected to national council from Ontario. I was also very happy to see Don Plett get re-elected in Manitoba likely meaning a second term for President of the party. The official portion of the convention ended around 4pm. At night was the final hospitality social with Helena Guergis and Rahim Jaffer. Overall it was a great weekend and strong overall convention. I enjoyed the chance to meet so many fellow bloggers, delegates and media. It was also great how many MPs and cabinet ministers took the time to listen to the grassroots. Finally, I appreciated the hospitality of Winnipeg and I hope that this convention puts us in the position to get some additional Manibota representatives in the next election. Last time Thomas Steen came very close and this convention might put him over the top next time should he decide to run again. 2008 produced a great election and convention. I now look forward to parliament getting back to work tomorrow with the throne speech.

The best news to hear came from Irving Gerstein. The Conservative Party is already financially ready for an election at any time regardless of when it occurs. This is because of the commitment of 125,000 donors who average $115 per contribution. In contrast Liberals only have 34,000 donors and are in at least 2 million worth of debt.

Stephen Taylor did an interview with Lois Brown on his blog. You can also see a summary of motions that were passed on the same site.
-Darryl

***

Stephen Taylor from the Blogging Tories interviews Lois Brown, MP Newmarket-Aurora



Credit: www.stephentaylor.ca

***

Tory policy: What passed, what didn't

Globe and Mail Update

WINNIPEG — The following is an edited list of policy resolutions passed or voted down by Conservative delegates:

P-106: To encourage provinces and territories to “further experiment with different means of delivering universal health care utilizing both the public and private health sectors.” FAILED

P-110 Ottawa should work with provinces and territories to get nationwide agreement to amend labour codes to provide “at risk” workers such as prison guards and law enforcement officials and health care workers and physicians the “right to know when they have been exposed to infectious diseases.” This right would “transcend the privacy rights of the infected individual.” PASSED

P-113 Party believes that Ottawa should seek “dangerous offender” status and mandatory life sentences for any person convicted of a third serious violent offence, criminal organization offence, terrorism offence or serious drug trafficking offence. PASSED

P-114 Repeal the “faint hope” clause in the Criminal Code, thus removing the possibility of parole before 25 years for those sentenced to life in prison. PASSED

P-119 Party believes the government should take “strong action” to combat human trafficking and take a lead in developing international agreements and protocols against human trafficking. PASSED

P-202 Party reaffirms the legitimacy of the entire Charter of Rights and Freedoms including Section 13 (the notwithstanding clause). PASSED

P-203 Party supports legislation to remove authority from the Canadian Human Rights Commission and Tribunal to regulate, receive, investigate or adjudicate complaints related to Section 13 (hate messages) of the Canadian Human Rights Act. PASSED

P-207 Party supports legislation to ensure that individuals who commit violence against a pregnant woman would face additional charges if her unborn child was killed or injured during the commission of a crime against the mother. PASSED

P-213 Party supports the “full participation of women in the social, economic and cultural life of Canada” and the idea that “women must be entitled to equal pay for equal work.” PASSED

P-218 Party believes that Canada's multicultural society is a “valued reality” and accepts the need to foster understanding and equality of opportunity while expecting Canadians “to adopt Canadian common values such as equality, democracy and the rule of law.” PASSED

P-222 Party recognizes that temporary workers can be a valuable source of potential immigrants because of their work experience in Canada. Calls on government to develop pilot projects designed to address serious skills shortages in specific sectors and regions of the country that can attract temporary workers to Canada; examine ways to aid the transition of foreign workers to permanent status from temporary status and ensure that these workers receive the same protections under minimum employment standards as those afforded Canadian workers. PASSED

P-223 Government should in consultation with provinces, territories and aboriginal leaders, direct an independent audit of all social services providers to aboriginal communities to determine what if any measures of effectiveness are employed and whether the programs provided result in desired outcomes. Ottawa should also establish a three-party co-ordinating body to develop strategy for co-ordination of all programs and services provided to aboriginal communities. The Auditor General of Canada and counterparts in provinces should evaluate the actual outcomes as well as the financial accountability in audit reports on aboriginal services. PASSED

P-301 Party supports formation of a single national securities regulator with “robust enforcement powers.” PASSED

P-303 Party believes government should eliminate tax on capital gains that are reinvested. PASSED

P-305 Party supports income splitting for couples with children. PASSED

P-306 Party favours simplifying the federal tax code to reduce the complexity of tax calculations for ordinary Canadians. PASSED

P-308 Party supports right of workers to organize into unions but also respects private property and the decision of fellow workers not to participate. PASSED

P-321 Conservative government will continue to seek out bilateral and multilateral trade agreements that will improve market access for Canadian agricultural products and reduce foreign subsidies that distort trade and production. PASSED

P-101 Party believes federal and territorial governments should make joint investments to study and address climate change adaptation in the North. PASSED

P-104 Party believes government should work with provinces and territories to promote the development of ecological recycling plants using incinerators that capture waste gas and transform it into energy. PASSED

P-105 Party supports exploration and development of offshore oil and gas resources in Canadian waters including the Atlantic, Pacific and Arctic. Supports ensuring that “accurate and complete information on the risks and benefits of such development is made available to the public.” PASSED

P-111 Party supports government amending the Canada Health Act to permit the funding of complementary health services which demonstrably improve people's health. FAILED

P-122 Party believes the government should commit to providing the best possible services and benefits for veterans and their families in recognition of their service to Canada. The party is also committed to keeping the memory of Canadian veterans' achievements and sacrifices alive through the promotion of public awareness and memorials. PASSED

P-205 Party believes demonstrating Canada's presence in the Arctic requires both political and economic development in northern Canada and that government should work with territories to streamline regulatory processes; make substantial investments in the territories particularly in transportation infrastructure; and fast-track the devolution of “provincial-type” responsibilities to the territories. PASSED

P-208 A Conservative government would revamp the federal student loan program to eliminate the inclusion of parental income and assets in the assessment of loan applications. FAILED

P-209 Conservative Party supports abolishing employment insurance contributions paid by students when they have a summer job. FAILED

P-307 Conservative Party recognizes importance of innovation to creating a flourishing Canadian economy. This means providing support for businesses by ensuring low corporate and small business tax rates and enhancing tax credits for companies who do significant research and development. FAILED

P-311 The Conservative Party supports investing in scientific infrastructures specializing in polar scientific research in order to increase the body of scientific knowledge on the Arctic region. PASSED

P-312 Party continues to support exploration for fossil fuels, pipeline construction, transportation efficiencies and plant improvements to increase energy efficiencies and reduce pollutant and greenhouse gas discharges. It supports the application of nuclear energy and associated industries while reducing negative impacts on the environment. Also believes the government should support and encourage the private development of alternative sources of energy and fuels including wind, solar, geothermal sources; alternative transportation fuels such as bio-diesel from oil seed crops and methanol, ethanol or methane from biomass and organic waste; fuel cell technology and the use of hydrogen as transportation fuel. PASSED

P-316 Party supports policies and initiatives that will strengthen the viability of family operated businesses in areas of agriculture, aquaculture, fisheries and forestry. PASSED

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Convention festivities continue





























































Convention festivities continue

Yesterday was the session on policy and national council. Several motions were debated in the constitution session for the party. Other resolutions were voted on in the various policy sessions. I was not able to vote or attend the policy portions of the convention but did not hear of any divisive or controversial issues that were passed yesterday. My impression from the hospitality suites was that this party is united, in great spirits and proud of everyone's success throughout the country. Today there will be another session on the party constitution and also in the 3 areas of policy.

National council speeches were interesting in Ontario. We have some great candidates who want to represent the party in Ontario. Today voting will take place at lunch for the four spots with results announced at 4pm.

Laureen Harper will also have some sort of volunteer awards presentation today. Later this evening is the Helena Guergis and Rahim Jaffer traditional wedding social.

Yesterday was an interesting day. Prime Minister Stephen Harper held a scrum prior to leaving for Washington. Lawrence Cannon, Tony Clement and Jim Prentice were also made available for the media and bloggers.

Last night there was two great hospitality suites. Paul Brandt performed and was excellent if you like country music. Patrick Brown and the Canada-India suite was very well attended. The prarie social at United Tavern was cold but fun. Overall I have enjoyed meeting so many great people throughout this weekend. MPs and cabinet ministers have gone out of their way to meet delegates and hear from the grassroots. Meeting Preston Manning was probably the highlight from yesterday. Overall I am looking forward to seeing what today brings. I am not looking forward to my 5am flight tomorrow though.
P.S. No need to worry. We found Ken Wakeman.
-Darryl

Friday, November 14, 2008

Other blogging perspectives


Other blogging perspectives



I have had the opportunity to meet Trusty Tory and also Stephen Taylor. Please visit their blogs for alternative blogging perspectives and full convention coverage. Both of these bloggers are very nice people. I met them prior to the Harper speech. Friday I had the opportunity to meet Roy who had lunch with the Prime Minister. I am told for two minutes he praised bloggers and the Blogging Tories. I also met Andrew Prescott as well last night. There was also a Liberal blogger covering the event Danielle Takacs. It is great to see so many bloggers here at this convention.




http://torydrroy.blogspot.com/



Liberal Perspective

http://danielletakacs.blogspot.com/


If there are others here from the Blogging Tories, please add your link to the comment section.

-Darryl


Convention agenda for today


Convention agenda for today


Today is the day to discuss the party constitution as well as policy. Resolutions will be discussed with regards to Canada's economy, Canada's social and democatic framework and protecting Canada's health and safety. These will take place until 3pm. I will try and report what was decided but it might be difficult with the resolutions divided into three different rooms. At 1:30 pm there will be national council speeches. At 2:30 there will be MP presentations on raising money and getting more votes. Later tonight Paul Brandt will be performing and there will likely be a few more hospitality suites afterwards. Sometime around 10pm I am hoping the Prime Minister comes into the media room for a scrum. Timing might be difficult though as he has a full day ahead of him in Washington, DC. I will try and have another post later tonight if possible.

-Darryl

Victory Party at the Hospitality Suites


Victory Party at the Hospitality Suites

We are here to discuss policy, but it would be impossible to ignore the fact that our victory in the last election and growth since the party merged needs to be celebrated. Hospitality suites were hosted by Don Plett (who I endorse for President), Jim Flaherty, Canada-Israel committee and Peter Van Loan who hosted a public safety suite. Hanging out with Lois Brown, I could tell she is well liked and respected among the majority of MPs and delegates. She is representing our riding very well. Peter Kent, Paul Calandra and Peter Van Loan were all on hand for the festivities. As a political junkie, it is a lot of fun to have the chance to have a beer with various cabinet ministers, bloggers, fellow government relations consultants, key regional organizers, MPs, those campaigning for positions on national council and fellow committed volunteers who have worked so hard at the grassroots level to make this victory possible. Everyone was in great spirits and a good time was had by all. It is clear to me that this party is united and excited about the future of our country. We are younger, more diverse and committed to Conservative values. Thank you to all that hosted such great hospitality suites last night. Highlights for me included meeting Tim Powers, Brad Lavigne, speaking with Flaherty, meeting Laureen Harper, hanging out with York Region MPs and seeing so many cabinet ministers accessible to delegates. I am looking forward to another round tonight.
P.S. Has anyone seen Ken Wakeman from Newmarket-Aurora???? We seem to have lost him. Ken is a committed Conservative who would be great in local politics. If you are in Winnipeg my friend call my cell. Pictured above: Elmer the Safety Elephant takes a photo with Newmarket-Aurora MP Lois Brown.
-Darryl

Stephen Harper's Keynote Address




















































Stephen Harper's Keynote Address

Stephen Taylor posted the full speech at this blog. To view the full version click here. Prior to the speech I had the opportunity to meet Mr. Taylor in person. It was an honour to shake his hand as this guy has done great things for our party as far as the online tools go. The blogging tories are well represented here. The site was created by Taylor.
Stephen Fletcher introduced the Prime Minister and Shelly Glover/Christian Paradis had a terrific warm up act. Prior to the Prime Minister speaking, Laureen Harper had the chance to share some stories about Stephen Harper as a father and husband. Later in the night I had the opportunity to meet Laureen in person. She is very friendly and is a big asset to our party. Stephen Harper had a terrific speech and the mood was upbeat among delegates. It is clear our party has come a long way since our last policy convention in Montreal.

The optics of the room were also beautiful. Some pictures are included of Harper speaking in front of delegates and the overall feel of the room. Prior to the speeches there were circus performances and a music act. Stephen Harper shook a lot of hands before and after the speech. I was happy to congratulate him on a stronger mandate and shake his hand as well.

-Darryl

Jason Kenney is a star in this party











Jason Kenney is a star in this party


It is no secret that Jason Kenney worked extremely hard over the past few years to find a way to reach out to new conservative supporters within Canada's cultural communities. Yesterday, Jason Kenney held a great seminar along with Alice Wong and Bob Dechert. Obviously in the last election, it is quite clear that the Conservative Party made huge gains in ridings with large multicultural populations. After talking about strategies on how we can continue to improve our outreach efforts, an opportunity was given to those who wanted to share best practices or who had tips on how we can imporve. The session was well attended and was taken seriously by delegates. John Tory was also in attendance and that was great to see. Jason Kenney just got promoted to minister of Citizenship and Immigration. The promotion was very well deserved as he played a big role in our success particularly in the GTA and around Vancouver. I think these strategies will be crucial to getting a majority next time. Ridings in Vancouver, Richmond Hill, Brampton, Mississauga and even Toronto itself could be big gains next time. Even at this convention I can see a far more diverse crowd than past events. That is great news for the party.




-Darryl

Conservative Party treating bloggers well
















Conservative Party treating bloggers well










I was very happy to arrive in Winnipeg for the Conservative Party convention and am also very impressed with the level of access the party has provided to bloggers. Basically we are treated like media. When I arrived at the media filing room, a scrum was taking place with Jim Flaherty on the economy. It was a neat experience to see that live. Last night Jim Flaherty had an Irish themed hospitality suite. There was a great opportunity for Conservative members to discuss the economy with the minister directly. Today Jim Flaherty and Stephen Harper are off Washington for the G20 summit. Also at the event was Christine Elliot who is an MPP and wife of Jim Flaherty. I was happy to have had the opportunity to discuss the implications of a Barack Obama presidency with Mr. Flaherty. I would like to thank Ryan Sparrow and the Conservative party for providing bloggers with an atmosphere that shows they take this medium seriously. I am very glad to have been chosen to take advantage of this opportunity.





-Darryl

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Welcome to Winnipeg


Welcome to Winnipeg


I just arrived at my hotel after flying in from Toronto. On the plane were several MPs as well as supporters from ridings around the GTA. Several people were taking the policy debates seriously as there were some spirited discussions around me.


I have not been to the convention center yet, although I am looking forward to going there shortly. This conference has a different feeling than the past policy conference in Montreal. First of all our party is in government. Second, I don't sense any of the concerns from the previous convention regarding the merger of the Canadian Alliance and the Progressive Conservative parties.


The highlight tonight will be the address from Stephen Harper just prior to heading to Washington for the G20 economic summit. Of course the policy portion will be important and a good chance to survey some of the grassroots membership on where they stand on various issues.


Tonight there are several interesting hospitality events. Helena Geurgis and Rahim Jaffer are holding a "traditional" Manitoba wedding social later this weekend. Tickets will cost $10 with proceeds going to charity. There are hospitality suites being hosted by the Canadian Private Copying Collective, Canada-India Foundation and various national council candidates. There is also a prarie style party tomorrow night.


Early today Jason Kenney spoke. He is holding a cultural event later today with the Outreach caucus. The Manning Centre for Democracy will be making a presentation later today. Earlier today before I got here, there was an event put on by the Canada-Israel Committee and a breakfast with Monte Solberg.


Country singer Paul Brandt is performing tomorrow night.


Overall I am looking forward to the policy resolutions, hospitality suites, networking with other committed volunteers and of course meeting members of our caucus. I am not sure what having blogging credentials entails, but I hope I am able to provide some good coverage once I get to the convention centre. Check back for frequent updates.


Reading the Hill Times on the plane I found out that Lawrence Cannon has been appointed Deputy PM. Congratulations.

In my hotel room I see that Ignatieff has officially entered the race. Warren Kinsella is supporting him. My initial reaction is a yawn.

-Darryl

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Off to Winnipeg for the Conservative Convention...

Off to Winnipeg for the Conservative Convention...

Tomorrow morning my flight leaves for Winnipeg to attend the Conservative Convention where I have blogging credentials. For those not attending, how would you like to see this conference covered? I want to make sure everyone has the opportunity to stay informed and also participate in this process. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
-Darryl


My Endorsements for the Ontario seats on National Council:

Kara Johnson
Simon Chapelle
Doug Hawkins
Mark Dotzert

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Lest we forget


Lest we forget

Please take a couple of moments today to remember the sacrifices of our veterans and troops serving overseas today.
-Darryl


In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved, and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders Fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders Fields.

- John McCrae



Monday, November 10, 2008

Remembrance Day should be a national holiday


Remembrance Day should be a national holiday

I cannot think of a more important day to assign a national holiday to than Remembrance Day. It is important future generations to remember the sacrifices of our veterans as well as our current troops stationed overseas. As far as I am concerned, making Remembrance Day a national holiday is long overdue and should be considered by the current government as soon as possible. The cost of freedom was not free and it is time we honour our veterans appropriately. Please take the time tomorrow to remember our soldiers past and present. Lest we forget.
-Darryl

Audition to be Canada's Next Great Prime Minister

Audition to be Canada's Next Great Prime Minister

Apply online at http://www.cbc.ca/nextprimeminister
Note: Deadline is November 15




Enter the Competition -- You Could Win $50,000!
That's right! Four finalists will be chosen to compete on national TV for the title of Canada's Next Great Prime Minister. The winner will receive $50,000 and a paid internship at Magna International, The Dominion Institute and the Canada-US Fulbright program.

If you successfully complete the challenges, you are guaranteed an interview with the judging panel and a chance to qualify as a semi-finalist!

Enter now!

1. Create a video
We're looking for Canada's Next Great Prime Minister -- someone with great ideas and an incredible ability to move the masses. The first step is to create a video so we can see you in action. Your video should include:

* Your name, age, city and province
* Your answer to the question: What would you do to make Canada a stronger country socially, economically and/or politically?
* Videos must be 3-5 minutes in length
* Upload your video to YouTube. Make sure it's embeddable!
* Please see our judging guidelines. They'll give you a sense of what we're looking for.
* Deadline: November 15, 2008 - Be smart, don't delay! Get your videos in EARLY!

The contest is open to Canadians aged 18 to 25 as of April 1, 2009.

You can also check out last year's top ten best audition videos. Just remember though, the question is different this year. We want to know, "What would you do to make Canada a stronger country socially, economically and/or politically?"

NEW! Web Winner!
The person with the most popular audition video will automatically qualify as one of our eight semi-finalists and attend the Boot Camp in Toronto. For complete details, visit the Web Winner page. The winner receives travel to and accommodation in Toronto!

The winner will be announced on January 16, 2009. Good luck!

2. Complete the entry form
Tell us about yourself, the URL of your video and agree to the terms of the competition. Click here to fill out the entry form now.

Sunday, November 09, 2008

Full Sarah Palin Prank Call

Full Sarah Palin Prank Call

Les Justiciers Masques prank call Sarah Palin. I have to admit, I cannot believe it lasted as long as it did. This is pretty funny.
-Darryl



Liberal Party making the same mistakes, leadership heading for another bust




Liberal Party making the same mistakes, leadership heading for another bust

In Canadian politics, it seems like the Liberal Party is still stuck in 2006. Another leadership race has been kicked off. Key candidates have taken a pass. MPs haven't sat a day in the House, yet Liberals are already threatening an election they cannot afford to fight. Financing remains a serious problem. The great red machine that considers itself Canada's natural governing party is fighting for survival and relevance West of Ontario and in most of Quebec. Its traditional strongholds like new Canadians and the GTA are threatened by Conservatives. Since being in opposition, the party has failed to generate any meaningful new policy ideas and is consumbed by internal political battles as oppose to solutions that address the challenges everyday Canadians face. Even after the historic win of Barack Obama, Liberals seemed silent and without reaction to the victory that will have an impact on Canadian politics. The issue of leadership is important, but for the Liberal Party of Canada, it should be the least of concerns.

If you look closely at the campaign of Barack Obama, you can see the Conservatives have been building a similar machine North of the border since 2004 with the roots prior in the Reform Party. Barack Obama had a fundraising campaign that appealed to a broad base of donors that could give what they could afford. $10, $20, $50, $100, $200, $500 or the maximum individual limit. A large numbers of individuals gave in small amounts and the Obama campaign set records in contributions. On the Republican side, Ron Paul demonstrated that the same formula could work and he pulled off a successful grassroots financing campaign of his own. Liberals are still stuck in the same era as Republicans addicted to large donations from a small amount of sources. The web, social networking sites, YouTube, and email were heavily used during the American campaign. Sophistacated voter ID systems were used to identify and get out the vote on election day. The campaign was disciplined, always on message in both the media and on the trail, and it proved to be incredably strategic in their targeting of states through internal polling and call centers. Volunteers were coordinated, large in numbers and motivated to help wherever they could. Several were bused in from stronger Democratic areas and into the swing states like Virginia, Florida, Ohio and elsewhere that turned out to be competitive this election cycle. In 2006, Harper had the benefit of the sponsorship scandal to run on the message of change. In 2008, George W. Bush deserves credit for becoming such an obvious target for change in America. The Conservative campaign has put together a similar infrastructure in terms of their ability to raise money, manage the message and use technology to identify and get out the vote. Obama ran a 30 minute commercial on several networks in prime time. The first ad that Conservatives ran to define Stephane Dion took place during the Superbowl. The Obama and Harper campaigns are what a modern political campaign now looks like and is an example of what has become expected by the media and general public.

What made Obama so unique was his ability to appeal to so many first time and new voters. He brought out the African American community in record numbers and also young people for the first time as well. He positioned himself as non-partisan and has a charisma and talent for public speaking that has not been seen in recent decades. He represented generational change and the significance of being the first African American president cannot be considered lightly given the history of the United States. Being able to fill stadiums and NHL hockey arenas is completely unheard of in Canada. From the Liberal Party perspective, they are at square one in terms of trying to implement these Obama campaign strategies. Conservatives have the benefit of learning and tweaking their existing organization based on what was witnessed South of the border. I think the next priority for Conservatives in Canada should be working to build something similar to the 50 state strategy Obama put together for our 308 ridings. We are close to a majority and should make ourselves competitive in every seat we do not hold within the next two election cycles. Ground organization is crucial as is appealing to new voters.

Stephen LeDrew is usually quickly dismissed, but lately he has been making sound points about the Liberal Party and what they need to do to become relevant again. Platform, fundraising, ground organization, leadership and regional concerns are all issued that have to be addressed. Given that Liberals are threatening to bring down the government over crime issues demonstrate that there will not be much time before the next election and that this parliament will continue to be disfunctional and in campaign mode. A leadership race will be held in early May and probably after that an election will take place within a year. Liberals will make the same mistakes all over again and likely hand Stephen Harper a majority next time. Liberals need to realize that rebuilding will take years and not months. They have to take a hard look in the mirror and ask what needs to be changed to regain all the ground lost since the 2004 election campaign. They must come to terms with the fact that the right has been united and the NDP and Greens are bleeding their votes from the left while the Conservative Party itself has made gains from the right of their party. The fantasy about former progressive conservatives being disgruntled or willing to vote Liberal at this point is over. Clearly a lot of the Paul Martin Liberal supporters are now voting Conservative. A leadership race will lead to more fighting and divisions within the Liberal Party. At the end of the day there is a great chance that Michael Ignatieff will win with a portion on the left feeling alienated. Otherwise Bob Rae will be elected and many on the right of the Liberal party will be left feeling uncomfortable. Worst case scenario is if they make the same mistake as in 2006 allowing a candidate that nobody wants become the compromise winner with those in the frontrunner camps sitting on their hands or taking shots anomalously through the media during the next campaign. I predict whoever wins will be the entire Liberal rebuilding process and that little else will change within the party prior to the next campaign. One thing is also clear, there is no Obama potential among Ignatieff, Rae or LeBlanc.

The world and country are changing and Liberals need to as well. They need to be proactive and not reactive. In the last campaign all they did was jump on negative media headlines about the Conservatives. Mulroney, "in and out" scheme, arts cuts, Omar Kadar, ABC Campaign, Gerry Ritz, young offenders act and other issues that were largely inside baseball to average voters. These issues took priority over the Liberals defining their vision for Canada. The carbon tax was political suicide because it was introduced a few months after the green issue was overtaken by the economy. Other Liberal platforms sounded like the promises of yesterday and not the future. For example Liberals have been hammering on Kyoto for years, but with Obama soon to come to power with likely a new attitude on the issue from Washington; it is Harper that is going to be in a position to work with Obama and take credit for advocating a position on climate change that includes the United States and other large polluters. Obama opposes Kyoto and very few countries will reach their targets. Kyoto is dead and Liberals need to move on with the world. The economic position of the country makes Liberal promises such as national childcare seem irresponsible. The Liberal position on Quebec and their brand of federalism now seems outdated. Canada has become more conservative in recent years while the Liberal part has been moving further to the left. If they do not get their act together soon, they will be left ignored on the sidelines while others manage the changing political realities. Liberals need a generational change, but will come back with one of the candidates that was a runner up last time and has the resources to get into this race. What is needed is a candidate who can redefine and take Liberalism into the 21st century.


Will the Chretien wing or the Martin wing prevail? Will the party move to the left with Rae or to the right with Iggy? Who is willing to pay $90,000 to raise their profile and hope that they can come up the middle in this race? With so much election fatigue following elections federally, provincially (Quebec now voting), in America, and locally; how much are people going to get excited about another Liberal leadership race with the same candidates following the Montreal race that happened only two years ago? With no money to spend and looking to do this process on the cheap; will this race make Liberals look any more ready to govern?

The candidates: Who is Out

The two most dangerous candidates have decided not to run. Justin Trudeau, although inexperienced is someone with the name recognition that could have brought some media attention and excitement to the Liberal leadership race. Maybe in the future, but this time he is out. For the second time Frank McKenna has decided the challenge of building the Liberal Party is too great for him to leave the corporate world. He was a candidate who was not from Toronto and who had the economic credentials and the potential to bring the party back to the center by moving right. John Manley for the second time also decided not to run, a candidate who likely faced backlash for agreeing to be on the Afghanistan panel appointed by Stephen Harper and for lacking charisma despite the strong experience on his resume. Scott Brison and Carolyn Bennett have already said they are out as well this time. Joe Volpe is unlikely to try again after his performance last time. I can't see Hedy Fry in again either. After leading Ontario into "have not" status I would think Dalton McGuinty is going to stay right where he is. Same goes for Gordon Campbell in B.C.

The candidates: Who is In

Michael Ignatieff is the frontrunner right now and has the most credible team behind him. Bob Rae is obviously in the race again and may have more opportunity to grow than Ignatieff after the first ballot. Dominic Leblanc seems to have positioned himself in the media and within the party as the Dion style compromise candidate who can come up the middle.

The candidates: Who might get In despite barriers

Martha Hall Findlay, Ken Dryden and Gerard Kennedy might decide to run but both are heavily in debt. Below is a listing of all Liberal debts from the last leadership race courtesy of the Hill Times.

Liberal Leadership 2006 Candidates' Debts, Payments:


Maurizio Bevilacqua

Total loan: $515,188

Loan paid: $265,808

Unpaid claim: $19,998

Balance owed: $269,378


Scott Brison

Total loan: $200,000

Loan paid: $50,000

Unpaid claim: $95

Balance owed: $150,095


Stéphane Dion

Total loan: $905,000

Loans paid: $280,000

Unpaid claim: $2,860

Balance owed: $627,860


Ken Dryden

Total loan: $330,995

Loan paid: $0

Unpaid claim: $64,894

Balance owed: $395,890


Hedy Fry

Total loan: $153,500

Loan paid: $49,000

Unpaid claim: $0

Balance owed: $104,000

Martha Hall Findlay

Total loan: $130,000

Loan paid: $0

Unpaid claim: $54,460
Balance owed: $184,460


Michael Ignatieff

Total loan: $570,000

Loan paid: $426,500

Unpaid claim: $0

Balance owed: $143,500


Gerard Kennedy

Total loan: $451,170

Loan paid: $195,750

Unpaid claim: $66,941

Balance owed: $322,361


Joseph Volpe

Total loan: $341,556

Loan paid: $181,266

Unpaid claim: $0

Balance owed: $160,290


Obviously these debts are major barriers and are hard to pay off under the new rules. Can Martha Hall Findlay, Gerard Kennedy, and Ken Dryden afford to double down with the entry fee raised to $90,000? That really just leaves wild card candidates like Ruby Dhalla, Ralph Goodale, Ujjal Dosanjh, Martin Cauchon, Denis Coderre and David McGuinty all remain possibilities. Some of these candidates do not speak French hurting their chances of being successful. Right now it is shaping up as a three way race between Rae, Ignatieff and LeBlanc. There doesn't seem to be any outsiders left that might run either.

Finally there is a good chance Stephane Dion will lead Liberals into the next election if he continues to make the same old mistakes as last time. If I was Harper I would not back down on these crime bills. If Dion wants to charge the taxpayer another $300 million over his soft on crime stance, I would be happy to fight another election asking for a majority to allow us to get things done. I hope we do not see another session of Liberals huffing and puffing and then sitting down. Just say from the beginning you need time to rebuild and will allow this parliament to work until Liberals are willing and able to fight an election. Talking tough and abstaining is the same mistake as last time. Any election before May would be suicidal and Liberals know it. If they cannot afford to have a proper leadership convention, how can they expect to face Conservatives in a general election?

It is a shame what the Liberal Party has become. It is clear that there road to rebuilding will be long and that it will take some time to get there. In the meantime Conservatives should continue to build while Liberals continue to self destruct. I am not sure there is anyone in this race that can prevent Liberals from making the same mistakes or simply becoming relevant again. Of course we should not get cocky though as there will be tough economic issues to address and for some reason the Liberal brand always remains resiliant and strong. As a Conservative, I would like to see Bob Rae come out on top. My prediction though is that Michael Ignatieff will win this time after several ballots.

Thanks for reading...

Darryl

Saturday, November 08, 2008

New Zealand elects first Conservative government in almost a decade

New Zealand elects first Conservative government in almost a decade

New Zealand on Saturday elected its first conservative government in almost a decade, ending the rule of one of the world's longest-serving elected women.

Knives come out for Palin


Knives come out for Palin

If this is true it is very disturbing. If she does not know that Canada and Mexico are part of NAFTA; one has to wonder if she is qualified to be governor of Alaska, let alone President. Personally I think these leaks are nothing more than supporters of other candidates for 2012 trying to tear down Palin as frontrunner. Not knowing Africa is a continent seems like a stretch. One thing that is certainly true, is that Palin only had one interview for the job of VP. I have gone through multiple interviews in the past to serve tables at banquets. Having said that, a lot of people are turning on Palin now; but she deserves credit for giving McCain some great headlines for a week while at the same time providing exciement and enthusiasism to his ticket.

Now that Sarah Palin has returned to Alaska as governor, I think Stephen Harper should try and set up a meeting. We face many common issues in the North and she could be an ally to our goals with regards to arctic sovereignty in Canada as well as issues relating to energy.
-Darryl

Canada Remembers

Canada Remembers

From the PMO YouTube channel.


Canada, European Union to seek closer economic partnership

Canada, European Union to seek closer economic partnership


In the current global economic climate, we agreed that closer economic cooperation with key partners is becoming more important than ever.


Harper appoints 27 Parliamentary Secretaries


Harper appoints 27 Parliamentary Secretaries

I am not sure if this is the full listing as there are 38 cabinet ministers right now, however I do notice some of these parliamentary secretaries have responsibility for multiple departments. Below are bios and announcements from the PMO website as well as a video about the new cabinet.
-Darryl

***

PM appoints experienced team of Parliamentary Secretaries to provide leadership in the House of Commons

7 November 2008
Ottawa, Ontario


Prime Minister Stephen Harper today appointed a new team of Parliamentary Secretaries who will have the responsibility for helping guide the Government’s agenda inside the House of Commons.

“In a time of global economic instability, it is essential that the government’s legislative responsibilities are managed consistently and competently,” said the Prime Minister. “Today, we are appointing a team of Parliamentary Secretaries with the right combination of skills and experience to ensure our governing agenda remains on track.”

Parliamentary Secretaries are responsible for assisting members of the Cabinet with their parliamentary responsibilities. As part of these responsibilities, Parliamentary Secretaries frequently represent their Minister in Parliamentary committees and work closely with Members of Parliament in the House of Commons.

“When Parliament resumes, our government will act decisively to protect Canadian families and businesses during this global storm,” said the Prime Minister. “Serving as a Parliamentary Secretary is a big responsibility, and I have tremendous confidence that this is the right team for the job.”

Parliamentary Secretaries

Pierre Poilievre

Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister and to the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs

Nepean–Carleton (Ontario)

Pierre Poilievre was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. Mr. Poilievre was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board in February 2006.

Mr. Poilievre owned and operated a communications and market research firm before taking his seat in Parliament.

He is a member of the Royal Canadian Legion.

Mr. Poilievre studied international relations at the University of Calgary.


Ted Menzies

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance

Macleod (Alberta)

Ted Menzies was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and was re-elected in 2006 and 2008. In October 2007, Mr. Menzies was sworn in as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance. Previously, he served as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Cooperation and to the Minister of International Trade.

Mr. Menzies held the post of President of the Canadian Agri-Food and Trade Alliance and was Vice-President of the Grain Growers of Canada. He has owned and operated a farm for over 30 years.

He and his wife, Sandy, have two children.


The Hon. Jim Abbott

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Cooperation

Kootenay–Columbia (British Columbia)

Jim Abbott was first elected to the House of Commons in 1993 and re-elected in 1997, 2000, 2004, 2006 and 2008. In February 2006, Mr. Abbott was appointed Parliamentary Secretary for Canadian Heritage. In October 2007, he became a member of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada.

Mr. Abbott brings to his work as a parliamentarian a background of sales, marketing and business management with his own firm as well as with small, medium-sized and international businesses.

Mr. Abbott and his wife, Jeannette, have three children.


John Duncan

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development

Vancouver Island North (British Columbia)

John Duncan was first elected to the House of Commons in 1993 and re-elected in 1997, 2000, 2004 and 2008.

From 2006 to 2007, Mr. Duncan worked as Pacific Region Advisor to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans. From 1972 to 1993, he worked in the coastal BC forest industry.

Mr. Duncan attended the University of British Columbia and graduated with a Bachelor of Science from the Faculty of Forestry in 1972. He and his wife, Mary, have three children.

Gerald Keddy

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade

South Shore–St. Margaret's (Nova Scotia)

Gerald Keddy was first elected to the House of Commons in 1997 and re-elected in 2000, 2004, 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency in October 2007, and in March 2008, was assigned the additional post of Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade.

Prior to his career in politics, Mr. Keddy worked as a farmer, a driller in Nova Scotia’s offshore oil industry and a Christmas tree producer and exporter. He is past president of the Christmas Tree Council of Nova Scotia.

Mr. Keddy lives in New Ross, Nova Scotia, with his partner, Judy, and their children.


Deepak Obhrai

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs

Calgary East (Alberta)

Deepak Obhrai was first elected to the House of Commons in 1997 and re-elected in 2000, 2004, 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs in February 2006. In addition, he was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Cooperation in March 2008.

He is a past president of the India-Canada Association, the Monterey Community Association and the Hindu Society of Calgary, and Vice-President of the National Indo/Canadian Council.

Mr. Obhrai and his wife, Neena, have three children.



David Anderson

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources and for the Canadian Wheat Board

Cypress Hills–Grasslands (Saskatchewan)

David Anderson was first elected to the House of Commons in 2000 and re-elected in 2004, 2006 and 2008. Mr. Anderson was appointed Parliamentary Secretary for the Canadian Wheat Board in February 2006, and was assigned additional responsibilities as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources in October 2007.

Mr. Anderson graduated from the University of Regina and has a Master’s of Divinity from the Canadian Theological Seminary.

Mr. Anderson and his wife, Sheila, have two children.


Colin Carrie

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health

Oshawa (Ontario)

carrie_s.jpgColin Carrie was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry in February 2006.

Prior to entering federal politics, he was the co-owner and operator of a chiropractic clinic in the Durham Region, Ontario.

Dr. Carrie has been a vocal advocate for Hepatitis C patients and for families dealing with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder.

Dr. Carrie graduated from the University of Waterloo and from the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College where he earned a doctor of chiropractic medicine degree.

He and his wife, Elizabeth, have three children.



Brian Jean

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities

Fort McMurray–Athabasca (Alberta)

Brian Jean was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities in February 2006.

Prior to entering federal politics, he practised law and was an instructor at Keyano College, a business owner and a publisher.

He was Chair of the Alberta Summer Games and President of the Fort McMurray Downtown Business Association as well as a director of the local chamber of commerce and honorary Chair of the Children’s Health Foundation.

He has a master’s in business administration and a law degree.


Randy Kamp

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans

Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge–Mission (British Columbia)

Randy Kamp was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans in February 2006.

Prior to entering politics, he and his family lived in the Philippines where he was the regional director for an organization doing linguistic work among minority language communities.

Mr. Kamp has a bachelor’s degree in theology. He and his wife, Ruth, have three children.

Ed Komarnicki

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development and to the Minister of Labour

Souris–Moose Mountain (Saskatchewan)

Ed Komarnicki was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration in February 2006.

Prior to entering federal politics, Mr. Komarnicki was a practising lawyer and served as chair of the Law Society of Saskatchewan’s committees on professional standards, on legislation and policy, and on equity diversity. He also served as vice-chair of the society’s discipline committee.

Mr. Komarnicki and his wife have eight children.


Tom Lukiwski

Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Regina–Lumsden–Lake Centre (Saskatchewan)

Tom Lukiwski was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform in February 2006.

Prior to entering federal politics, he was general manager of the Saskatchewan Party from 1997 to 2004. In addition to operating a small business, he has been an active volunteer in his community. He served as Chair for the Peter Gzowski Fundraiser for Literacy and played key roles with the Bill Clarke fundraiser in support of the fight against Parkinson’s disease, the 1992 Labatt Brier Committee, and Skate Canada 1989. He was also a member of the marketing board of directors for the Saskatchewan Roughriders.

Mr. Lukiwski and and his wife, Diane, have two children.


Dave MacKenzie

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety

Oxford (Ontario)

Dave MacKenzie was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety in February 2006.

From 1967 to 1997, Mr. MacKenzie served as a constable, detective, inspector, deputy chief and chief of police with the Woodstock City Police. He retired from the police force in 1997.

Mr. MacKenzie is actively involved in his community and has worked extensively with the Woodstock General Hospital Foundation and the Woodstock Seniors Centre.

He and his wife, Lynda, have three children.


Rob Moore

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice

Fundy Royal (New Brunswick)

Rob Moore was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada in February 2006.

He has a bachelor of laws degree from the University of New Brunswick and he was called to the New Brunswick Bar in June 2000.



Mark Warawa

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of the Environment

Langley (British Columbia)

Mark Warawa was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006 and 2008. He was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of the Environment in February 2006.

Prior to entering federal politics, he was a municipal councillor and a regional district director for 13 years. Mr. Warawa has 30 years of experience as an entrepreneur.

Mr. Warawa and his wife, Diane, have five children.


Sylvie Boucher

Parliamentary Secretary for Status of Women

Beauport–Limoilou (Quebec)

Sylvie Boucher was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008. Ms. Boucher was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister and for Status of Women in October 2007. Previously, she served as Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister and for La Francophonie and Official Languages.

She has worked in the private sector, specializing in marketing and sales, and moved to politics where she assumed various roles in the Quebec National Assembly.

Ms. Boucher is an active member of a number of community groups.

Ms. Boucher has studied in various fields, including gerontology, literature, and office systems and information technology.

She has two daughters.


Dean Del Mastro

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Canadian Heritage

Peterborough (Ontario)

Dean Del Mastro was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008.

He has served on several House of Commons committees, including the standing committees on National Defence, on Finance and on Canadian Heritage.

Prior to entering federal politics, he served as Chairman of the Suzuki Canada Dealer Advisory Board, and as Vice-President of Del Mastro Motors Ltd., a company he jointly founded.

Mr. Del Mastro attended the University of Windsor where he earned his Honours Bachelor of Commerce.


Rick Dykstra

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

St. Catharines (Ontario)

Rick Dykstra was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008. Mr. Dykstra has been a member of the standing committees on Finance, and Justice and Human Rights.

Prior to entering federal politics, he was a partner in a public affairs business operating out of Niagara and Toronto. Previously, Mr. Dykstra spent five years in the Ontario provincial government and served as Director of Caucus Relations for two provincial premiers, as well as Chief of Staff to the Minister of Community and Social Services. He has also served as a member of the Niagara Parks Commission.

Mr. Dykstra has a degree in political science from Brock University, and a Master's Certificate in project management from York University. Mr. Dykstra and his wife, Kathy, are lifelong residents of St. Catharines and have three children.


Jacques Gourde

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Works and Government Services and to the Minister of National Revenue

Lotbinière–Chutes-de-la-Chaudière (Quebec)

Jacques Gourde was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008. He was named Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Labour and Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec in October 2007.

Previously, Mr. Gourde served as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board, and as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources.

Mr. Gourde has a diploma in farm management and was a producer and exporter of hay in Saint-Narcisse-de-Beaurivage. He was President of the Development Committee of Saint-Narcisse and parish council church warden for six years.

Mr. Gourde and his wife, Chantal, have five children.


Laurie Hawn

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence

Edmonton Centre (Alberta)

Laurie Hawn was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008. In October 2007, he was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence.

Prior to entering federal politics, Mr. Hawn had a distinguished career in the Royal Canadian Air Force. During his 30 years of service, he rose to the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel before retiring in 1994. He also served an additional five years as Honorary Colonel of the 417 Combat Support Squadron. Upon retirement, Mr. Hawn entered the financial services business. He is a founding member of the Investment Advisors Association of Canada.

He and his wife, Judy, have two children.


Mike Lake

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry

Edmonton─Mill Woods─Beaumont (Alberta)

Mike Lake was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008.

Mr. Lake has served as a member of the House of Commons standing committees on Human Resources, Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, and on Public Accounts.

Prior to entering federal politics, Mr. Lake worked for 10 years with the Edmonton Oilers Hockey Club where he served as National Accounts Manager, Director of Ticket Sales and Group Sales Manager. He is an active member of the Edmonton Autism Society and has mentored foster children.

Mr. Lake holds a Bachelor of Commerce (with distinction) from the University of Alberta. He and his wife, Debi, have two children.


Pierre Lemieux

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Agriculture

Glengarry–Prescott–Russell (Ontario)

Mr. Lemieux was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008. He was named Parliamentary Secretary for Official Languages in October 2007.

Mr. Lemieux began his career as an officer in the Canadian Forces where he served for 20 years before retiring at the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel. He is also a professional engineer and is certified with the Project Management Institute. After working as a manager in the high-tech sector, he started his own company, offering project management and consulting services.

Mr. Lemieux is married and has five children.


Daniel Petit

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice

Charlesbourg─Haute-Saint-Charles (Quebec)

Daniel Petit was first elected to the House of Commons in 2006 and re-elected in 2008.

Mr. Petit has been a member of several House of Commons committees, including the standing committees on Justice and Human Rights, and on Official Languages.

Prior to entering federal politics, he founded and was a partner of the firm Petit, Beaudoin, Société nominale d'avocats, specializing in labour and administrative law.

Mr. Petit is married with four children.


Shelly Glover

Parliamentary Secretary for Official Languages

Saint Boniface (Manitoba)

Shelly Glover was first elected to the House of Commons in 2008.

Prior to entering federal politics, Ms. Glover was a Patrol Sergeant and a 16-year veteran of the Winnipeg Police Service. In addition to supervising a team of uniformed officers, she has served as a uniformed general patrol officer, bike patrol officer, and detective in the Youth and Child Abuse Unit. She also served as the official spokesperson for the Winnipeg Police Force.

She has volunteered on various boards, including Big Sisters, the Beausejour New Arena Planning Committee and various school parent councils.

Ms. Glover majored in justice and law enforcement at the University of Winnipeg. She and her husband, Bruce, have five children.


Greg Kerr

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Veterans Affairs

West Nova (Nova Scotia)

Greg Kerr was first elected to the House of Commons in 2008.

Prior to entering federal politics, Mr. Kerr served as a member of the Government of Nova Scotia from 1978 to 1992. He served in the provincial Cabinet as the Minister of Finance; Tourism and Culture; Housing; Culture, Recreation and Fitness; and Environment. He also served as a municipal councillor for Annapolis County, Nova Scotia.

Previously, Mr. Kerr was an owner of a small beef farm and a small logging operation, and was also a high school teacher.

Mr. Kerr has a Bachelor of Arts and a Bachelor of Education from Mount Allison University. Mr. Kerr and his wife, Marcia Longmire, have two children.


Andrew Saxton

Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board

North Vancouver (British Columbia)

Andrew Saxton was first elected to the House of Commons in 2008.

Prior to entering federal politics, Mr. Saxton was CEO of King George Financial Corp., an investment firm, and was on the Board of Directors of Canaco Resources, a gold exploration company. Mr. Saxton has worked for Credit Suisse at their Switzerland, New York and Vancouver offices, and for HSBC at their Hong Kong and Singapore offices. Currently, he is a director of the provincial Heart and Stroke Foundation.

Mr. Saxton graduated with a degree in administrative and commercial studies from the University of Western Ontario.


Alice Wong

Parliamentary Secretary for Multiculturalism

Richmond (British Columbia)

Alice Wong was first elected to the House of Commons in 2008.

Prior to entering federal politics, Ms. Wong operated several family businesses, including one specializing in research and education. She has worked as manager of international programs at Kwantlen University College, coordinator of the Centre for Small Business, and manager of international projects at Vancouver Community College. She has also been a college lecturer and instructor at schools in Hong Kong and has extensive field experience in Europe, Asia and Africa.

Ms. Wong has served as a vice-president of several local community organizations and was a member on a number of local boards. She is also a guest host of current affairs programs on local Chinese and multicultural radio and television.

Ms. Wong moved to Canada 27 years ago from Hong Kong. She received her PhD in curriculum and instruction in 1993 from the University of British Columbia.

Ms. Wong and her husband, Enoch, have been married for over 25 years.

***

New Cabinet





New Cabinet charged with protecting Canadas future in a time of global economic instability

Friday, November 07, 2008

CNN Takes A Look At The Campaign That Made History

CNN Takes A Look At The Campaign That Made History

Great recap of the 2008 Presidential campaign from the primaries to election night. It clearly was a historic and exciting election. Great video montage that was put together.
-Darryl



What you will be voting on in the policy convention in Winnipeg


What you will be voting on in the policy convention in Winnipeg

This was leaked earlier today. I have not gone through the documents yet, but ultimately these are the policies that will be voted on at the Conservative Policy convention in Winnipeg next weekend.
-Darryl


http://www.nationalnewswatch.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=45204&Itemid=41

My Reflections on the American and Canadian elections and the future under this new political landscape




My Reflections on the American and Canadian elections and the future under this new political landscape

October 14 Canadians went to the polls and November 4 Americans went to the polls and at the end of the day Stephen Harper of the Conservative Party and Barack Obama of the Democratic Party were easily elected to office in their respective countries.

Stephen Harper has a stronger minority at 143 seats and a stronger cabinet because of the increased talent pool. Following the Conservative convention in Winnipeg, Parliament will return on November 18.

Barack Obama will likely name an all-star cabinet with names like Colin Powell, Chuck Hagel, Arnold Schwarzenegger, John McCain, Michael Bloomberg, Warren Buffet, Hillary Clinton, Bill Richardson, Caroline Kennedy, Al Gore and John Kerry mentioned as possibilities. His transition is taking place right now and he will be sworn in January 20, 2009.

Both leaders have now won the prize of an economy heading for recession, a war in Afghanistan and international pressure to do something about the environment. Both leaders must now face the same issues such as how to deal with China, Russia and Pakistan. There are wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The Israel and Palestine conflict remains an ongoing issue. Threats of nuclear proliferation and terrorism still exist. There are emerging economies such as India and Brazil that offer both opportunity and threats to Western economies. Genocide is going on in Sudan and Congo. Even within the Americas, we have issues with Haiti, Cuba and Venezuela. Today the world is a small place and we are all integrated together as part of the global economy. As we have seen from the US financial crisis, what happens South of the border can have a huge impact in Canada and around the world.

The economy will be priority one and a new era has likely arrived in the international fight against climate change. Kyoto is dead and Obama will attempt to lead the world towards a new agreement once he becomes president. Healthcare will be interesting with Stephen Harper supporting universal healthcare in Canada while Barack Obama tries to bring universal healthcare to America. Already we have seen the Conservative government reach out to Barack Obama by proposing solutions on the environment file in a way that acknowledges the current state of the economy. Stephen Harper stuck to his principles that he would not sign an international climate change treaty that did not include the United States and other major polluters. Obama has set ambitious domestic targets and will want to show global leadership on the issue. This is Stephen Harper’s chance to act as a bridge between Europe and America while demonstrating that Canada too has a big role to play. NAFTA may come up as an issue, but Canada has signaled it will play the energy card in negotiations and could also open up the issue of fresh water. Issues with NAFTA from the perspective of the Americans could have more to do with Mexico such as labour and environmental standards as oppose to Canada where those standards are already in place. Obama has also promised to become energy independent from the Middle East and Hugo Chavez. To reach that goal, Canadian oil will be necessary. Together a strengthened Conservative Party in Canada will have to work with a strengthened Democratic Party in the United States. Both the Conservative Party and Democratic Party seem to want to show that they are moving closer to the centre. In Canada Conservatives are moving from the right while Democrats are doing the same from the left. There is every reason to believe right now that both Obama and Harper should be re-elected, but in politics things turn on a dime. Expect these two leaders to have good relations as both have an interest in a strong relationship between Canada and the United States as well as overall prosperity in North America.

Ironically the opposition parties in the United States and Canada have a lot in common right now as well. Neither the Republicans nor the Liberals have a leader and in both cases all of the frontrunners have some major baggage. Both the Republicans and the Liberals are having trouble fundraising while facing opponents who are earning a huge advantage with small donations from a high volume of people. The Liberals and Republicans have not found away to use the internet to their advantage at this point. Both the Liberals and Republicans are not national parties on the political map following the most recent elections and have shrunk to their very core base. Both have a sense of entitlement to power, offer out of touch platforms, lack principle and have a history of corruption and scandal during their time in power. Stephen Harper in 2006 and Barack Obama in 2008 were both elected on platforms of change and will now govern. Liberals and Republicans must change internally before they offer a credible government in waiting alternative to Conservatives and Democrats. Liberals will fight amongst themselves as Ignatieff and Rae divide the party. Republicans will have the same battles between those who Sarah Palin and others who would like to see anyone else. In both cases leadership is only a small part of the overall problems with these parties. Taking responsibility for losing and doing what it takes to win again is what really matters. Liberals blame CTV while Republicans point the finger at CNN. Building membership, picking a new leader, coming up with an appealing platform, improving fundraising and putting together a campaign machine is easier said then done. Both Liberals and Republicans have neglected the grassroots. The rebuilding process is more likely to take years not months. I predict both Republicans and Liberals will likely not have their acts together by the time the next election occurs and will face opponents that likely will have strong records to run on. For Liberals it will be difficult to watch Harper perform where he performs best on the world stage as a statesman. Every meeting between Obama and Harper will be a reminder to both Liberals and Republicans that they lack relevance and are not in power.

In the United States, this election is historic because Barack Obama is now the first African American elected president, young people voted in huge numbers creating generational change and two women in both the Republican and Democratic parties played crucial roles in the 2008 presidential race. Obama’s honeymoon will be short and domestic issues will be pressing. Americans want health care. Social security is becoming a major issue. The deficit and increasing debt threatens inflation. Consumer confidence, credit availability, employment, GDP growth, housing prices and individual savings are all going down. Manufacturing jobs are being outsourced to China and elsewhere and America is running a huge trade deficit. There will be pressure for protectionism. He must find away to get the troops out of Iraq both safely and responsibly as promised. Guantanamo Bay will be shut down as promised. Finally Obama has promised energy independence, action on the environment, tax cuts for the Middle Class and Canadian style healthcare. That will be tough to achieve in his first term. He has also promised to go after Bin Laden and add significant troops to win the war in Afghanistan. He will need allies and Canada with Stephen Harper as leader will be his most reliable ally. Even among America’s enemies and rivals such as Castro, Chavez, Kim Jong Il, Dmitri Medvedev, Hu Jintao and Ahmadinejad; reaction thus far has been positive to Obama’s victory. Already it looks like Obama has healed some of the American image lost under George W. Bush. Obama will bring change to American policy on many issues that will impact Canada. His election victory will give Stephen Harper an opportunity improve his image as a moderate and portray his party as being close to the center.

In Canada the agenda will likely be continuing the course of the last two years. Dept repayment and tax cuts if there is a surplus. Controlled spending. Balanced budgets. Tough on crime stance. Leadership on the world stage. A focus on native land claims. Working towards a climate change agreement that includes China, India and the United States. Limited interference in provincial and municipal jurisdictions. Expanding free trade agreements. Managing the mission in Afghanistan until 2011. A focus on families and Canadians who work hard and play by the rules. Attempts at democratic reform including the Senate. Dealing with needs in healthcare, infrastructure and poverty reduction. Harper was largely elected to maintain the status quo during these uncertain times. Obama is more likely to find a friend who is pro-American as oppose to a rival that is pro-Bush or Republican leaning. With Obama enjoying the support of 75% of Canadians, Stephen Harper is likely to benefit from Obama's popularity as the two are seen together engaged in heavily staged press conferences and photo ops on the world stage and during visits. He is unlikely to make time for Liberal leadership contenders should he make a Canadian visit early in his presidency. Obama may face filibusters in the senate as he failed to get an absolute majority of 60 seats. Harper must deal with a minority government and the reality that an election can occur at any time.

At the end of the day the election of Barack Obama helps Conservatives and Stephen Harper. We can now get something done without the opposition parties or media accusing us of being too close to George W. Bush. Any photo ops between Obama and Harper will look great in election brochures and television advertisements down the road. Liberals should resist the temptation, get caught up in the moment and try and rip off Obama as a quick fix. Once the hype wears off, he will face serious challenges and have real decisions to make. He may not be as popular tomorrow as he is today. On top of that Liberals already jumped on the green trend after Elizabeth May’s second place showing in London. The result of that decision was Stephane Dion and electoral disaster. Liberals shouldn’t make the same mistake twice. The Star also had a good article taking a closer look at Obama’s positions on Kyoto, gay marriage and other issues. Their conclusion was that if Obama was involved in Canadian politics, he would barely qualify as a red tory. In terms of the Obama campaign, all parties could learn from it and implement some of the strategies, especially those used online in future elections. What Obama brings is change and a new reality to international and American politics. On November 18, the Conservative Party and Stephen Harper will set out a vision for governing in this new political climate with a speech from the throne that will be an automatic confidence vote.

Yes we can to free trade. Yes we can to great relations between Canada and the United States. Yes we can to victory with our NATO partners in Afghanistan. Yes we can to tax cuts for the middle class. Yes we can on the environment. Yes we Can on the arctic. Yes we Can to turning around this economy. Yes we can to tough diplomacy with our enemies. Yes we can to facing tough challenges that are not yet evident. Yes we Can to the best possible relations between Stephen Harper and Barack Obama for their mutual benefit. President Obama and Prime Minister Harper have a lot of mutual challenges that must be worked on together. I have no doubt that both have the leadership qualities to guide their nations through these difficult times. Barack Obama and Stephen Harper have far more in common than issues that divide them.

Thanks for reading...

Darryl

Thursday, November 06, 2008

Harper, Obama have 'warm exchange' in congratulations call: PMO


Harper, Obama have 'warm exchange' in congratulations call: PMO


These leaders have far more in common than most people think. I am quite sure relations will be strong between these two great leaders. Tuesday will prove to be a great day for both Canada and the United States. It is likely that they will have an opportunity to meet at the G20 summit where Bush has invited Obama to attend. I must say that the positive reaction among the world community, American citizens and world leaders if far greater than I expected. Barack Obama becoming President of the United States is inspirational and demonstrates that America truly is a land of opportunity. I fully expect a warm relationship between Harper and Obama. The media focusing on "NAFTA-gate" is really not relevant as it appears that there is no hard feelings from what went on in the primaries. I think Stephen Harper and the new Conservative cabinet have done a great job in protecting and promoting our interests with the incoming American administration.
-Darryl

Harper, Obama have 'warm exchange' in congratulations call: PMO

PM welcomes Obama victory as 'era of possibility'

Last Updated: Thursday, November 6, 2008 | 5:15 PM ET Comments113Recommend48

Stephen Harper spoke on the telephone with U.S. president-elect Barack Obama on Thursday to congratulate him on his election victory earlier in the week, the Prime Minister's Office said.

In a statement, the PMO described the conversation as a "warm exchange," in which the two leaders "emphasized that there could be no closer friends and allies and vowed to maintain and further build upon this strong relationship."

They touched on the upcoming G-20 leaders' summit in Washington on Nov. 15 and its importance for addressing the global financial crisis.

Earlier in the day, the prime minister said Obama's election to the U.S. presidency is an "inspiring moment," and that Canada will work with the new administration as its "most reliable ally in the world."

Harper was responding to a reporter's question why his office only issued a simple, short communiqué after the Democratic candidate was named the election winner on Tuesday night.

"Obviously, the election of the first African-American president is a tremendous and truly inspiring moment, I think, in American political history," Harper said during a press conference following a meeting with economists and business leaders in Toronto.

"And I think all of us who are maybe a little bit older — I’m getting into that category — understand why that truly is when we see the changes that have occurred in their society and our society over the past couple of generations."

Harper also said he believes Obama, who has pledged to increase America's energy independence and security, will understand that the U.S. faces "major challenges" and that Canada remains "the major source of energy and the most secure source of energy."

"We have shared challenges and we will always work in full collaboration with our ally, our most important partner," he said. "It's an era of possibility."

PM notes 'major change' in environmental approach

Harper, accused by his opponents in Parliament of siding with the Bush administration in opposing international climate-change initiatives, also described Obama's stated desire to participate in global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as a "major change."

"As I have said many times in the past … it’s almost essential for Canada to manage this problem in co-operation with the United States because we share the same economy," Harper said. "We share the same continent, and we need a partner in the matters of the environment if we want to make real progress."

He said the Canadian government viewed Obama's intention to shift more soldiers and resources into Afghanistan from Iraq as "positive, and obviously consistent with Canadian policy."

Although Harper and Obama have never met face to face, the prime minister said the two had "a good conversation" in the spring and he expected to have a chance to talk to the president-elect soon.

"I anticipate talking to him in the very near future, probably today, but certainly in the next day or two," Harper said. "I look forward to that conversation, to meeting with the senator in person."

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

George W. Bush comments on Barack Obama's victory

George W. Bush comments on Barack Obama's victory

President Bush speaks from the White House to congrat Sen. Barack Obama and assure the U.S. of a smooth transition of office.

Prime Minister Harper congratulates President Obama



Prime Minister Harper congratulates President Obama

I look forward to great relations between the two leaders and our two great nations. There are a lot of challenges that Canadians and Americans need to face together. Afghanistan, the economy, free trade and the environment are just a few of the major issues that will have to be dealt with over the next couple of years. I look forward to the first meeting between the two leaders. I also look forward to President Obama's first visit to Canada.
-Darryl

***

Harper says Obama election 'truly inspiring'

The Canadian Press

TORONTO — Prime Minister Stephen Harper says he hopes to speak to U.S. president-elect Barack Obama as soon as today.

At a news conference in Toronto today, Mr. Harper said Mr. Obama's election victory is a “truly inspiring moment” in American political history.

He said the U.S. has undergone tremendous change in a few generations, and electing the country's first African-American president is a significant part of that.

Mr. Harper said he hopes to speak to Mr. Obama in the very near future — possibly even today — and he looks forward to meeting him in person.

The Prime Minister praised Mr. Obama for running a great election campaign and said he and his staff plan to study it.

Mr. Harper noted that Mr. Obama faces tremendous challenges in the financial crisis and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but said Canada will be there for the U.S. as its most reliable ally in the world.



***

Prime minister congratulates Obama, warns of need for mutual co-operation

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Stephen Harper is congratulating U.S. president-elect Barack Obama on his decisive election win.

"I look forward to meeting with the president-elect so that we can continue to strengthen the special bond that exists between Canada and the United States," Harper said in a statement issued after the Democratic nominee clinched the presidency.

"In the weeks and months ahead, Canadian officials and diplomats will be working closely with members of president-elect Obama's transition team. Ministers in our government look forward to building a strong working relationship with their counterparts in a new Obama cabinet."

The prime minister also extended his congratulations to all the newly elected governors and members of Congress.

"Given the challenges facing the world economy," he said, "it is vital that Canadian and American legislators continue to work together on the important issues facing families on both sides of the border."


Statements from Other World Leaders:


Chinese President Hu Jintao:
"The Chinese government and I have always attached great importance to the Sino-U.S. relations. In the new historical period, I look forward to endeavor together with you … to continue to strengthen the dialogue and communication between the two countries, to enhance mutual trust and cooperation, to push the Sino-U.S. constructive cooperation relations to a new level, in order to better benefit the two people and the peoples of the world."

Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao:
"The good relationship between China and the United States is the shared hope of people of the two countries, it is also needed in the safeguarding of the peace, stability and prosperity of Asia-Pacific region and the world.

"… Through the common endeavor of both countries, the constructive cooperation relationship between China and the United States will definitely acquire new development."

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown:
"I would like to offer my sincere congratulations to Barack Obama on winning the presidency of the United States. I would also like to pay tribute to Senator McCain who fought a good campaign and has shown the characteristic dignity that has marked a lifetime of service to his country.

"The relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom is vital to our prosperity and security. Barack Obama ran an inspirational campaign, energizing politics with his progressive values and his vision for the future. I know Barack Obama and we share many values. We both have determination to show that government can act to help people fairly through these difficult times facing the global economy. And I look forward to working extremely closely with him in the coming months and years."

Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga:
"The significance of this victory will resonate with hundreds of millions of people around the world. It is indeed time for global renewal.

"The strong message of hope and a vision of a world united in dealing with global challenges delivered by the president-elect in his campaigns is admirable, timely and welcome. The perseverance and endurance that the president-elect has shown during his campaigns is an inspiration to the world.

"The people of Kenya wish the president-elect and the people of America every success in their endeavors in the years to come. There can be no doubt that America is indeed 'a nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. '"

German Chancellor Angela Merkel:
"My sincere congratulations on your historic victory in the presidential election.

"The world faces meaningful challenges at the start of your term in office. I'm convinced that through a close and trusting cooperation between the United States and Europe we will be able to confront new risks and challenges in a decisive manner and will be able to take advantage of the numerous opportunities that are opening up in our world. Rest assured that my government appreciates hugely the meaning and value of the trans-Atlantic relationship for our common future.

"I remember with pleasure our conversation during your visit to Germany last July and look forward to working together with you in the future."

Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh:
"The Iraqi government has a true desire to work and cooperate with the elected president for the best interest of the two countries to spread security and ensure Iraq's full sovereignty in a way that this will guarantee the interest of Iraqi people."

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert:
"Once again, America has proven that it is, indeed, the greatest democracy and constitutes an example for all other democracies in the world. President-elect Obama has proven his leadership and his talents to the entire world.

"… The special Israel-U.S. relationship is based on shared values and interests and is characterized by ties of close cooperation. Israel and the United States have a common desire to advance peace and stability in the Middle East. We have no doubt that the special relations that prevail between the two countries will continue to strengthen during the Obama administration."

Israeli President Shimon Peres:
"It was an American election and a worldwide choice.

"… I want to congratulate the newly-elected president: young, fresh, promising, representing a change and introducing change. The changes that I can mention — it is an opportunity to escape the present world crisis and enter into a new era of cooperation, of productive economy and of human solidarity. In a way, it is an end of racism. There is no longer any way that any white man can claim superiority, nor any black person feel discrimination. We are the same people, and this election is a great statement to that effect.

"… I also have the utmost respect for the other candidate, John McCain, who fought with great courage and stamina.

"… When President Obama was here, he asked me what he can do for Israel. My answer was: Be a great president of the United States of America. If you will be a great president of the United States of America, you will have great promise for Israel as well, and for all of the region and for all of our neighbors. Nobody should look at whose side the president is on — he just has to be on the side of peace. And if he will be on the side of peace, peace will come closer and more possible."

Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat:
Erakat said Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas congratulates Obama.

"We think that America is united behind the two-state solution and we hope that President-elect Obama will continue the engagement immediately and that he will transfer the vision of two states from a vision to a realistic political track," Erakat said.

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso:
"This is a time for a renewed commitment between Europe and the United States of America.

"I want to assure Senator Obama of the support of the European Commission and of my personal support in forging this renewed commitment to face together the many challenges ahead of us.

"We need to change the current crisis into a new opportunity. We need a new deal for a new world. I sincerely hope that with the leadership of President Obama, the United States of America will join forces with Europe to
drive this new deal. For the benefit of our societies, for the benefit of the world."

European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana:
"I think like every election, it means renewal. The ticket on which Barack Obama has run, this ticket for change — change is what we need in the world today. Many problems we have on the table, and I very much hope that we'll be able to do it together — to find a solution to them together, between the European Union and the United States.

"… I would also like to say that it will not be enough to have the European Union and the United States together. The problems of today we'll need also to incorporate other main players. I think about China, I think about the organization like the African Union and many others.

"Therefore, we have a very important day, a historical day and hope very much that the Europeans will be together also to make the utmost of this important moment."

Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh:
"I have great pleasure in conveying my heartiest congratulations on your election as the president of the United States. Your extraordinary journey to the White House will inspire people not only in your country but also around the world.

"The people of India and the United States are bound by their shared commitment to freedom, justice, pluralism, individual rights and democracy. These ideals provide a solid bedrock for friendship and strategic partnership between our two nations. We have strong ties between our peoples and I look forward to working with you to realize the enormous potential for cooperation that exists between India and the United States. Our two countries working together to address global issues and challenges will be an important factor for world peace, stability and progress."

Former South African President Nelson Mandela:
"Your victory has demonstrated that no person anywhere in the world should not dare to dream of wanting to change the world for a better place.

"We note and applaud your commitment to supporting the cause of peace and security around the world. We trust that you will also make it the mission of your presidency to combat the scourge of poverty and disease everywhere.

"We wish you strength and fortitude in the challenging days and years that lie ahead. We are sure you will ultimately achieve your dream making the United States of America a full partner in a community of nations committed to peace and prosperity for all."

Archbishop Desmond Tutu:
"It's an epoch-making event filling the whole world with hope that change is possible. It is just tremendous; it is saying to people of color that for them, the sky is the limit.

"My heartiest congratulations go to Senator Barack Obama and his partner Senator Joe Biden on their victory.

"I also want to congratulate Senator John McCain for his gracious references to Senator Obama in his conceding speech.

"We have a new spring in our walk and our shoulders are straighter. It is almost as when Nelson Mandela became president of South Africa in 1994."

French President Nicolas Sarkozy:
"In choosing you, it's the choice for change, the opening up and the optimism of the American people. While the world is in turmoil and doubt, the American people, loyal to their values that have always been the American identity, forcefully expressed their faith in progress and the future.

"This message from the American people resonates well beyond your borders. In the moment where we must face together immense challenges, your election raises immense hope in France, in Europe, and beyond, throughout the world. This open America, united and strong, will show the way anew, with its partners, by the strength of its example and its adherence to its principles.

"France and Europe, which have always been connected to the United States by ties of history, values, and friendship, will draw a new energy from this to work with America at preserving world peace and stability."

Iran's Deputy Parliament Speaker Mohammad Hossein Abutorabifard:
"Obama can change the defeated Bush policies and in so doing can play an important role in the future relations between the U.S. and Asia and the Middle East.

"… If the United States takes into consideration the realities of the world and chooses suitable policies, America can play its (proper) role in the relations between the United States and the countries of the region and theworld of Islam."

"… It seems that this election has prepared the ground for a revision in the Democrats' and Obama's future policies of the United States."

Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero:
Zapatero congratulated Obama for his "extraordinary election victory" and said it "opens the road of hope for the world in times of difficulty."

In a telegram sent to Obama, Zapatero wrote, "As prime minister of the government of Spain, I let you know of our desire to work together to search for opportunities and solutions to tackle the challenges we face.

"I am convinced, as you are, that dialogue and collaboration with governments and multilateral institutions is the best way to find the answers that we need."

Zimbabwe opposition party Movement for Democratic Change:
"Obama's victory is a victory of hope, faith, change, a restart, values and dreams which have underpinned our fight as a movement against dictatorship and the neo-fascism of Robert Mugabe.

"Obama's victory will hopefully usher in a departure from the politics of polarization, fear, unilateralism and arrogance that has defined the Bush doctrine in the last eight years. Indeed, we hope that Obama will open new avenues of dialogue of new interaction based on respect of all countries irrespective of the size of national budgets or the number of fighter jets owned.

"… We are mindful of the difficulties that lie ahead in Obama's path and the fact that this is no El Dorado, a construct that Obama himself acknowledges in his acceptance speech. Indeed it is a task that may take more than his two terms of office. Perhaps the greatest thing we have learnt from this victory is that democracy can work and that there is no alternative to the same.

"John McCain's speech was particularly humbling, instructive and inspiring. If in Africa, incumbents would accept defeat and would graciously depart from the seat of power, this would be a different continent, and indeed Zimbabwe would be a different place.

"For those of us who are still in the trenches, fighting for change and democracy across the entire African continent, this is our victory. One which for now we will savor and celebrate."

Obama and McCain Speeches from Last Night

Obama and McCain Speeches from Last Night

Barack Obama's historic victory speech. Barack Obama will be the 44th President of the United States of America:




Classy John McCain concession speech:

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Barack Obama elected President of the United States!!!



Barack Obama elected President of the United States!!!

Congratulations to President Obama and the United States. Tonight is a huge night in the history of America.

Currently 133-155 with several states still to be decided
Democrats control at least 56 Senate seats and have a majority in the House

Update: Very classy speech from John McCain. Historic and moving victory speech for Barack Obama.

World reaction is positive. This win is already restoring America's image. Yesterday's win was emotional for the African American community and this election has brought out the best in America again.

The Republican Party must now start a long rebuilding process. The party is going to have to be more inclusive and return to their economic conservative roots.

At the end of the day, there was no way that McCain could have won this race given the record of George W. Bush. The focus will now shift to Sarah Palin and others as the future of the party.

Markets are flat today. The US election has not had much impact on trading thus far.

Barack Obama will become President of the United States officially on January 20.

Indiana, North Carolina and Missouri have not officially been called. Results look like an Obama win in Indiana and North Carolina with McCain picking up Missouri. If that holds, final results will be 364 to 174 in electoral college votes. Obama made gains in Ohio, Florida, Colorado, New Mexico, Virginia, Indiana, North Carolina, Nevada and Iowa.

Democrats have picked up at least 56 Senate seats. 4 races have still not been called including Al Franken in Minnesota. Elizabeth Dole was defeated easily in North Carolina.

Joe Lieberman is expected to meet with Democrats this week about his future. At a minimum expect him to lose his chairmanship. It is quite possible he will be booted from the caucus altogether.

Democrats easily carry the balance of power in the House earning at least 251 seats.

Turnout was impressive. Numbers are still coming in but it looks like over 138 million Americans voted making last night's election the highest turnout in a century. For the first time young voters cast their ballots and the results obviously had an impact based on exit polling. This race represents a generational change.

Interesting ballot initiatives:

-Arizona passes a ban on gay marriage and the hiring of illegal aliens. Florida also passes a ban on gay marriage. Initiative in California too close to call.
-Arkansas bans gays from adopting children
-Michigan votes to allow medical marijuana and stem cell research
-Massachusetts decriminalizes small amounts of weed and bans dog racing
-Nebraska ends affirmative action
-Washington allows doctor assisted suicide
-It appears all motions restricting abortion have failed
-California bans cramped cages for chickens
-California rejects making 20% of power supply renewable by 2010
-Maine ends new tax on beer
-English is now the official language of Missouri
-Several gambling measures pass except in Ohio

Overall a historic night in the United States. Congratulations to President elect Barack Obama for making history and becoming America's first African American president.

Update: CNN Projects Obama the winner



CBS Projection



Reaction in Chicago:



Party at the White House:



World Reaction:

YES WE CAN AMERICA!!!!!

10 Things that will impact the US Election Outcome



10 Things that will impact the US Election Outcome

Frankly, I think that by 8:00pm E.S.T. tonight, Barack Obama will be declared the next president of the United States of America. This will be confirmed or denied based on several factors that will determine the outcome of tonight's historic election.

1, Turnout among young, African American, Hispanic and Native voters. Traditionally all these groups do not vote in high numbers. Many are predicting this will change based on the candidacy of Barack Obama. If any of these groups turn out in large numbers, expect some surprises in states that went red in 2004. An influx of young and African American voters could in itself be enough to win the election for Obama tonight.

2, State of Ohio. McCain must win here. If he doesn't, it is difficult to see how mathmatically he can win enough electoral college votes to reach 270. Polls in Ohio will close fairly early tonight.

3, State of Pennsylvania. This is the only blue state that McCain has any chance of flipping that Kerry won in 2004. If McCain expects to lose in any of the states Bush won in 2004, he will need Pennsylvania to make up the difference.

4, The Palin influence and Conservative turnout. Say what you want about Sarah Palin, she has energized and motivated the conservative base for McCain. This vote must turn out. If too many McCain supporters look at the polls over the past five weeks, listen to the pundits and media, and come to the conclusion that their vote will not matter; McCain is in serious trouble. Having been on losing campaigns before, I can tell you it is tough to motivate your volunteers and supporters when you are in a situation like McCain finds himself in. Many have argued that sometimes polls hurt democracy. We could see this happen tonight.

5, Independent voters. As a maverick, McCain was very appealing to independent voters and moderate Democrats. With Sarah Palin as his running mate and in order to win the Republican nomination; McCain has been criticized by some for going to far to the right and alienating his independent support. Exit polls will likely show how independent voters cast their ballots. If this number goes heavy for Obama; it will be a bad sign for Republicans and for Palin's future.

6, Florida. If it votes in favor of Barack Obama, John McCain will lose.

7. Republican states Virginia, North Carolina, Missouri, Colorado, New Mexico, Iowa, Arizona, Indiana, North Dakota, Montana, and Nevada. If Obama wins in any of these states; McCain must make up the difference somewhere. McCain is playing defence. He needs the same victory as Bush in 2004. There is not much margin for error on any of these states. Polls show Obama competitive if not leading in virtually all of these states.

8, Turnout and its impact on Senate, Congress and Governor races. Republican Alaska Senator Ted Stevens could be in trouble as a result of a recent conviction. Elizabeth Dole is in trouble in North Carolina. If we see a surge in turnout for Obama, will those votes translate to other Democrats as well. The Democratic Party is likely to control the White House, Congress and Senate. High turnout for Obama in a state like North Carolina could result in a loss for Dole. If this happens elsewhere where Republican senators are in trouble, the magic 60 number could become realistic. 60 Senators would give Democrats a filibuster proof majority in the Senate.

9, Potential Obama victory speech. Will he try and reduce expectations for his presidency should he get elected tonight? There is serious concerns that Obama supporters, Democrats and the international community have set expectations for an Obama presidency that is not realistic. History will likely be made tonight and there will be a lot of hype and excitement. Given the fiscal crisis however, too high expectations could hurt his chances to get re-elected in the long term.

10, Republican concession speeches. Will Palin run in 2012? Will Republicans look to regroup and rebuild? What might be in McCain's plans for the future? How will Republicans react to the results. If Obama loses will he try again in 2012. What will Hillary say? What will be the fallout of an Obama loss, especially if there is a perception of voting irregularities? Who will be on the next president's transition team. What will tonight's results mean for the current President George W. Bush. There has been two years of build up for this election night. There has been little talk about what the potential impact will be tomorrow. International newspapers will also be interesting as they react to the results.

Overall, I stick to my original prediction of 378-160 for Obama tonight. I also think Obama will achieve over 50% of the vote with an unusually high turnout.

Thanks for reading...

Darryl

Obama: We have a lot of work to do

Obama: We have a lot of work to do

Obama warns supporters not to let up.
-Darryl



The American People are the Answer

Economist Magazine endorses Barack Obama


Economist Magazine endorses Barack Obama

Economist was a strong endorsement for Obama. You can view a list of all Obama's endorsements by clicking here. Below is also a tally of all of the newspapers that have supported either Obama or McCain. Obama has a 273-142 lead in Newspaper endorsements. The Economist was impressive.
-Darryl

***

It's time

Oct 30th 2008
From The Economist print edition

America should take a chance and make Barack Obama the next leader of the free world


AP

IT IS impossible to forecast how important any presidency will be. Back in 2000 America stood tall as the undisputed superpower, at peace with a generally admiring world. The main argument was over what to do with the federal government’s huge budget surplus. Nobody foresaw the seismic events of the next eight years. When Americans go to the polls next week the mood will be very different. The United States is unhappy, divided and foundering both at home and abroad. Its self-belief and values are under attack.

For all the shortcomings of the campaign, both John McCain and Barack Obama offer hope of national redemption. Now America has to choose between them. The Economist does not have a vote, but if it did, it would cast it for Mr Obama. We do so wholeheartedly: the Democratic candidate has clearly shown that he offers the better chance of restoring America’s self-confidence. But we acknowledge it is a gamble. Given Mr Obama’s inexperience, the lack of clarity about some of his beliefs and the prospect of a stridently Democratic Congress, voting for him is a risk. Yet it is one America should take, given the steep road ahead.

Thinking about 2009 and 2017

The immediate focus, which has dominated the campaign, looks daunting enough: repairing America’s economy and its international reputation. The financial crisis is far from finished. The United States is at the start of a painful recession. Some form of further fiscal stimulus is needed, though estimates of the budget deficit next year already spiral above $1 trillion. Some 50m Americans have negligible health-care cover. Abroad, even though troops are dying in two countries, the cack-handed way in which George Bush has prosecuted his war on terror has left America less feared by its enemies and less admired by its friends than it once was.

Yet there are also longer-term challenges, worth stressing if only because they have been so ignored on the campaign. Jump forward to 2017, when the next president will hope to relinquish office. A combination of demography and the rising costs of America’s huge entitlement programmes—Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid—will be starting to bankrupt the country. Abroad a greater task is already evident: welding the new emerging powers to the West. That is not just a matter of handling the rise of India and China, drawing them into global efforts, such as curbs on climate change; it means reselling economic and political freedom to a world that too quickly associates American capitalism with Lehman Brothers and American justice with Guantánamo Bay. This will take patience, fortitude, salesmanship and strategy.

At the beginning of this election year, there were strong arguments against putting another Republican in the White House. A spell in opposition seemed apt punishment for the incompetence, cronyism and extremism of the Bush presidency. Conservative America also needs to recover its vim. Somehow Ronald Reagan’s party of western individualism and limited government has ended up not just increasing the size of the state but turning it into a tool of southern-fried moralism.

The selection of Mr McCain as the Republicans’ candidate was a powerful reason to reconsider. Mr McCain has his faults: he is an instinctive politician, quick to judge and with a sharp temper. And his age has long been a concern (how many global companies in distress would bring in a new 72-year-old boss?). Yet he has bravely taken unpopular positions—for free trade, immigration reform, the surge in Iraq, tackling climate change and campaign-finance reform. A western Republican in the Reagan mould, he has a long record of working with both Democrats and America’s allies.

If only the real John McCain had been running

That, however, was Senator McCain; the Candidate McCain of the past six months has too often seemed the victim of political sorcery, his good features magically inverted, his bad ones exaggerated. The fiscal conservative who once tackled Mr Bush over his unaffordable tax cuts now proposes not just to keep the cuts, but to deepen them. The man who denounced the religious right as “agents of intolerance” now embraces theocratic culture warriors. The campaigner against ethanol subsidies (who had a better record on global warming than most Democrats) came out in favour of a petrol-tax holiday. It has not all disappeared: his support for free trade has never wavered. Yet rather than heading towards the centre after he won the nomination, Mr McCain moved to the right.

Meanwhile his temperament, always perhaps his weak spot, has been found wanting. Sometimes the seat-of-the-pants method still works: his gut reaction over Georgia—to warn Russia off immediately—was the right one. Yet on the great issue of the campaign, the financial crisis, he has seemed all at sea, emitting panic and indecision. Mr McCain has never been particularly interested in economics, but, unlike Mr Obama, he has made little effort to catch up or to bring in good advisers (Doug Holtz-Eakin being the impressive exception).

The choice of Sarah Palin epitomised the sloppiness. It is not just that she is an unconvincing stand-in, nor even that she seems to have been chosen partly for her views on divisive social issues, notably abortion. Mr McCain made his most important appointment having met her just twice.

Ironically, given that he first won over so many independents by speaking his mind, the case for Mr McCain comes down to a piece of artifice: vote for him on the assumption that he does not believe a word of what he has been saying. Once he reaches the White House, runs this argument, he will put Mrs Palin back in her box, throw away his unrealistic tax plan and begin negotiations with the Democratic Congress. That is plausible; but it is a long way from the convincing case that Mr McCain could have made. Had he become president in 2000 instead of Mr Bush, the world might have had fewer problems. But this time it is beset by problems, and Mr McCain has not proved that he knows how to deal with them.

Is Mr Obama any better? Most of the hoopla about him has been about what he is, rather than what he would do. His identity is not as irrelevant as it sounds. Merely by becoming president, he would dispel many of the myths built up about America: it would be far harder for the spreaders of hate in the Islamic world to denounce the Great Satan if it were led by a black man whose middle name is Hussein; and far harder for autocrats around the world to claim that American democracy is a sham. America’s allies would rally to him: the global electoral college on our website shows a landslide in his favour. At home he would salve, if not close, the ugly racial wound left by America’s history and lessen the tendency of American blacks to blame all their problems on racism.

So Mr Obama’s star quality will be useful to him as president. But that alone is not enough to earn him the job. Charisma will not fix Medicare nor deal with Iran. Can he govern well? Two doubts present themselves: his lack of executive experience; and the suspicion that he is too far to the left.

There is no getting around the fact that Mr Obama’s résumé is thin for the world’s biggest job. But the exceptionally assured way in which he has run his campaign is a considerable comfort. It is not just that he has more than held his own against Mr McCain in the debates. A man who started with no money and few supporters has out-thought, out-organised and outfought the two mightiest machines in American politics—the Clintons and the conservative right.

Political fire, far from rattling Mr Obama, seems to bring out the best in him: the furore about his (admittedly ghastly) preacher prompted one of the most thoughtful speeches of the campaign. On the financial crisis his performance has been as assured as Mr McCain’s has been febrile. He seems a quick learner and has built up an impressive team of advisers, drawing in seasoned hands like Paul Volcker, Robert Rubin and Larry Summers. Of course, Mr Obama will make mistakes; but this is a man who listens, learns and manages well.

It is hard too nowadays to depict him as soft when it comes to dealing with America’s enemies. Part of Mr Obama’s original appeal to the Democratic left was his keenness to get American troops out of Iraq; but since the primaries he has moved to the centre, pragmatically saying the troops will leave only when the conditions are right. His determination to focus American power on Afghanistan, Pakistan and proliferation was prescient. He is keener to talk to Iran than Mr McCain is— but that makes sense, providing certain conditions are met.

Our main doubts about Mr Obama have to do with the damage a muddle-headed Democratic Congress might try to do to the economy. Despite the protectionist rhetoric that still sometimes seeps into his speeches, Mr Obama would not sponsor a China-bashing bill. But what happens if one appears out of Congress? Worryingly, he has a poor record of defying his party’s baronies, especially the unions. His advisers insist that Mr Obama is too clever to usher in a new age of over-regulation, that he will stop such nonsense getting out of Congress, that he is a political chameleon who would move to the centre in Washington. But the risk remains that on economic matters the centre that Mr Obama moves to would be that of his party, not that of the country as a whole.

He has earned it

So Mr Obama in that respect is a gamble. But the same goes for Mr McCain on at least as many counts, not least the possibility of President Palin. And this cannot be another election where the choice is based merely on fear. In terms of painting a brighter future for America and the world, Mr Obama has produced the more compelling and detailed portrait. He has campaigned with more style, intelligence and discipline than his opponent. Whether he can fulfil his immense potential remains to be seen. But Mr Obama deserves the presidency.

http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displayStory.cfm?story_id=12516666&source=features_box_main


***

MONDAY Tally Of Newspaper Endorsements -- Obama In Landslide, at 273-142

By Greg Mitchell and Dexter Hill Published: November 03, 2008 12:25 PM ET Monday NEW YORK (Updated Monday) We're into election eve! And the Obama-Biden ticket maintains its strong lead in the race for daily newspaper endorsements. The Democratic team now leads by 273 to 142, a nearly 2-1 margin and an even wider spread in the circulation of those papers -- see full tally below as of today. The circulation of the Obama-backing papers stands at over 21 million, compared with McCain's 7 million. McCain has slightly closed the gap with editorials from smaller papers arriving this past weekend. But he lost Newsday in New York and the Arizona Daily Star in his home state. Obama's lopsided margin, including most of the major papers that have decided so far, is in stark contrast to John Kerry barely edging George W. Bush in endorsements of dailies in 2004 by 213 to 205. We've greatly added below to the separate lopsided lists of weekly and college papers. They are not counted in the tally of dailies. Well over 50 papers have now switched to Obama from Bush in 2004, with less than half a dozen flipping to McCain. The latest: the daily in Dick Cheney's hometown of Casper, Wyoming and the Clarion-Ledger in Jackson, Mississippi. In addition, several top papers that went for Bush in 2004 have now chosen not to endorse this year, the latest being the Indianapolis Star in key swing state Indiana. The Chicago Tribune endorsed Obama--the first Democrat that it has backed in its long history. Three of the top five dailies in deep red state Texas switched from Bush to Obama this time. Please send any endorsements you see or make (that are not listed below) to: gmitchell@editorandpublisher.com. For more coverage on the media and the campaign, go to our new blog: The E&P Pub As always, we include in brackets below who the paper went with in 2004 with B=Bush and K=Kerry. The >>> signals the latest additions. (B) = Bush; (K) = Kerry; (N) = No Endorsement in 2004 BARACK OBAMA 273 newspapers total More than 22,000,000 circulation total ALABAMA (7) >>> The Anniston Star (K) >>> The Daily Home (Talladega) >>> The Decatur Daily Montgomery Advertiser (K): 45,060 >>> The Selma Times-Journal TimesDaily (Florence): 29,200 The Tuscaloosa News (K): 32,768 ALASKA (1) Anchorage Daily News (K): 62,893 ARIZONA (1) >>>Arizona Daily Star (Tucson) (K) ARKANSAS (1) >>> Benton County Daily Record (Bentonville) CALIFORNIA (30) The Argus (Fremont) (K): 26,749 Contra Costa Times (Walnut Creek) (K): 183,086 Daily Breeze (Torrance) (B): 66,599 The Daily Democrat (Woodland): 8,883 Daily News (Los Angeles) (K): 137,344 The Daily Review (Hayward) (K): 30,704 The Fresno Bee (K): 150,334 Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (Ontario) (B): 53,903 La Opinion (Los Angeles) (K): 114,892 Los Angeles Times (N): 773,884 Marin Independent-Journal (K): 31,909 Merced Sun-Star (K): 15,015 The Modesto Bee (K): 78,001 The Monterey County Herald (K): 28,933 The Oakland Tribune (K): 96,535 Pasadena Star-News (B): 27,894 The Press Democrat (Santa Rosa): 78,022 Press-Telegram (Long Beach) (B): 85,595 The Reporter (Vacaville) (B): 17,751 San Gabriel Valley Tribune (B): 40,051 San Mateo Daily Journal: 14,800 Tahoe Daily Tribune: 7,723 The Record (Stockton) (B): 57,486 The Sacramento Bee (K): 288,755 San Bernardino County Sun (B): 54,315 San Francisco Chronicle (K): 370,345 San Jose Mercury News (K): 234,772 San Mateo County Times (K): 25,982 Santa Cruz Sentinel (K): 23,290 Tri-Valley Herald (Pleasanton) (B): 29,759 COLORADO (9) Aspen Daily News (K): 12,500 >>> The Aspen Times Aurora Sentinel (K): 46,000 Cortez Journal (K): 6,700 Daily Camera (Boulder) (K): 28,994 The Denver Post (B): 225,193 Durango Herald (K): 8,870 Fort Collins Coloradoan (K): 26,312 Vail Daily: 10,525 CONNECTICUT (5) The Day (New London) (K): 34,730 The Hartford Courant (B): 168,158 New Haven Register (B): 72,613 >>> The News-Times (Danbury) Norwich Bulletin (K): 22,121 DELAWARE (1) The News Journal (Wilmington) (K): 110,171 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (1) The Washington Post (K): 673,180 FLORIDA (12) Daytona Beach News-Journal (K): 99,627 Florida Today (Melbourne) (K): 79,499 The Gainesville Sun (K): 44,658 The Ledger (Lakeland) (B): 65,948 The Miami Herald (K): 240,223 Naples Daily-News (B): 66,272 Orlando Sentinel (K): 227,593 The Palm Beach Post (West Palm Beach) (K): 164,474 Pensacola News Journal: 57,069 St. Petersburg Times (K): 316,007 Sarasota Herald-Tribune (K): 114,904 South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Ft. Lauderdale) (K): 218,286 GEORGIA (3) The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (K): 326,907 Columbus Ledger-Enquirer (B): 42,830 The Macon Telegraph (K): 56,510 HAWAII (1) Honolulu Star-Bulletin (K): 64,305 IDAHO (1) The Idaho Statesman (Boise) (K): 61,927 ILLINOIS (8) Chicago Tribune (B): 541,663 Chicago Sun-Times (K): 312,274 Daily Herald (Arlington Heights) (K): 143,152 Herald & Review (Decatur) (B): 34,480 Lake County News-Sun (Waukegan) (B): 16,899 The Pantagraph (Bloomington-Normal) (B): 47,764 The Register-Mail (Galesburg): 13,344 Rockford Register Star (K): 55,913 INDIANA (5) >>> The Herald Bulletin (Anderson) Journal and Courier (Lafayette-West Lafayette) (K): 34,545 The Journal Gazette (Fort Wayne) (K): 64,304 Palladium-Item (Richmond) (B): 15,453 The Star Press (Muncie): 31,512 IOWA (6) The Des Moines Register (K): 138,472 Globe-Gazette (Mason City)(B): 17,666 The Hawk Eye (Burlington) (K): 18,921 Iowa City Press-Citizen (K): 13,352 The Ottumwa Courier: 16,904 Quad-City Times (Davenport) (K): 51,890 KANSAS (2) The Hays Daily News: 12,414 The Hutchinson News (K): 31,019 KENTUCKY (3) The Ledger Independent (Maysville): 9,074 Lexington Herald-Leader (K):109,624 The Courier-Journal (Louisville) (K): 215,328 LOUISIANA (2) The Times (Shreveport): 52,267 The Times-Picayune (New Orleans) (N): 179,834 MAINE (4) Bangor Daily News (K): 55,627 >>> Kennebec Journal (Augusta) (K) Portland Press Herald (K): 64,938 The Times-Record (Brunswick ) (K): 9,317 MARYLAND (3) >>> The Daily Times (Salisbury) >>> The Star-Democrat (Easton) (B) The Sun (Baltimore) (K): 232,360 MASSACHUSETTS (12) The Berkshire Eagle (Pittsfield) (K): 26,427 The Boston Globe (K): 350,605 Cape Cod Times (Hyannis) (B): 49,832 Daily Hampshire Gazette (Northampton): 18,001 >>> The Enterprise (Brockton) North Adams Transcript: 5,949 The Patriot Ledger The Recorder (Greenfield): 13,578 The Salem News: 29,125 >>> Sentinel & Enterprise (Fitchburg) The Standard-Times (New Bedford) (K): 30,306 Telegram & Gazette (Worcester) (K): 81,437 MICHIGAN (11) The Bay City Times (K): 30,183 Battle Creek Enquirer (K): 20,854 The Daily Tribune (Royal Oak): 9,396 Detroit Free Press (K): 308,944 The Flint Journal (K): 76,288 The Lansing State Journal (K): 58,948 Livingston County Daily Press & Argus (Howell) (K): 13,131 The Muskegon Chronicle (K): 41,114 >>> Petoskey News-Review (K) The Saginaw News (K): 39,143 Traverse City Record-Eagle (K): 27,797 MINNESOTA (5) Albert Lea Tribune: 6,315 Post-Bulletin (Rochester): 44,631 St. Cloud Times (K): 25,868 Star Tribune (Minneapolis) (K): 321,964 Winona Daily News MISSISSIPPI (2) >>> The Commercial Dispatch (Columbus) >>>Clarion-Ledger (Jackson) MISSOURI (5) Columbia Daily Tribune (K): 18,131 The Joplin Globe (B): 26,700 The Kansas City Star (K): 252,785 St. Louis Post-Dispatch (K): 255,057 >>> West Plains Daily Quill (K) MONTANA (3) Billings Gazette (K): 45,530 >>> Independent Record (Helena) >>> The Montana Standard (Butte) NEVADA (2) Las Vegas Sun (K): 174,341 Reno Gazette-Journal (K): 57,423 NEW HAMPSHIRE (5) Concord Monitor (K): 19,885 The Conway Daily Sun (Conway-North Conway)(N): 16,100 The Keene Sentinel (K): 12,119 Nashua Telegraph (K): 24,272 Portsmouth Herald (K): 11,658 NEW JERSEY (10) Asbury Park Press (Neptune-Asbury Park) (B): 140,882 >>> Courier News (Bridgewater) Courier-Post (Camden-Cherry Hill): 66,617 >>> Daily Record (Parsippany) The Gloucester County Times (Woodbury) (K): 23,189 Home News Tribune (East Brunswick): 49,076 The New Jersey Herald (Newton) (B): 14,660 The Record (Hackensack) (K): 163,329 The Star-Ledger (Newark) (K): 345,130 The Times (Trenton) (K): 54,745 NEW MEXICO (3) Las Cruces Sun-News (B): 21,341 The Daily Times (Farmington) (B): 17,485 The Santa Fe New Mexican (K): 25,249 NEW YORK (16) The Buffalo News (K): 178,365 Daily Freeman (Kingston) (N): 17,909 Daily News (New York City) (B): 703,137 The Daily Star (Oneonta) (K): 14,391 el Diario (K): 53,856 Hoy (New York City): 35,410 The Journal-News (White Plains) (K): 108,092 >>> Niagara Gazette (Niagara Falls) >>> Union-Sun & Journal (Lockport) >>>Newsday (Melville) The New York Times (K): 1,077,256 The Post-Standard (Syracuse): 110,061 The Post-Star (Glens Falls) (K): 30,265 Poughkeepsie Journal (B): 37,265 Rochester Democrat and Chronicle (K): 145,913 The Times Herald-Record (Middletown): 75,745 Times Union (Albany) (K): 89,256 NORTH CAROLINA (6) The Asheville Citizen-Times (K): 50,160 The Charlotte Observer (K): 210,616 The Daily Reflector (Greenville) (K): 21,703 The Herald-Sun (Durham) (N): 32,845 The News & Observer (Raleigh) (K): 176,083 Star-News (Wilmington) (K): 47,620 OHIO (13) Akron Beacon Journal (K): 119,929 The Blade (Toledo) (K): 119,901 Dayton Daily News (K): 116,690 >>> The Independent (Massillon) JournalNews (Hamilton) (B): 19,432 Middletown Journal: 17,285 News Journal (Mansfield) (B): 28,272 Telegraph-Forum (Bucyrus): 5,969 The Repository (Canton) (B): 65,789 The Times-Reporter (Dover-New Philadelphia) (B): 22,428 Springfield News-Sun (K): 24,684 The Plain Dealer (Cleveland) (N): 330,280 Vindicator (Youngstown) (B): 56,412 OKLAHOMA (2) Muskogee Daily Phoenix & Times-Democrat (K): 14,816 The Norman Transcript: 12,921 OREGON (8) The Ashland Daily Tidings: 5,010 Corvallis Gazette-Times: 12,092 East Oregonian (Pendleton) (K): 9,071 The Daily Astorian (Astoria) (K): 8,263 Mail Tribune (Medford) (K): 30,349 The Oregonian (Portland) (K): 304,399 The Register-Guard (Eugene) (K): 67,400 Statesman Journal (Salem) (K): 47,152 PENNSYLVANIA (21) Beaver County Times (K): 38,654 >>> The Courier-Express (Du Bois) The Daily Item (Sunbury) (N): 24,879 The Daily Review (Towanda): 7,900 The Delaware County Daily Times (Primos-Upper Darby): 42,879 Erie Times-News (B): 55,397 The Express-Times (Easton) (B): 44,561 >>> The Herald (Sharon) Herald-Standard (Uniontown) (K): 24,341 Intelligencer Journal (Lancaster): 46,357 The Mercury (Pottstown): 21,186 >>> New Castle News Observer-Reporter (Washington) (K): 31,755 The Patriot-News (Harrisburg): 95,588 The Philadelphia Daily News: 107,269 The Philadelphia Inquirer (K): 334,150 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (K): 214,374 Pocono Record (Stroudsburg): 18,276 Times Leader (Wilkes-Barre) (K): 38,229 The Times-Tribune (Scranton): 52,711 York Daily Record (B): 47,969 RHODE ISLAND (1) The Providence Journal (B): 139,055 TENNESSEE (3) Chattanooga Times (K): 71,716 The Commercial Appeal (Memphis) (K): 146,961 The Tennessean (Nashville) (K): 161,131 TEXAS (8) Austin American-Statesman (B): 170,309 The Eagle (Bryan-College Station): 21,654 Fort Worth Star-Telegram (B): 207,045 Houston Chronicle (B): 494,131 Longview News-Journal (K): 27,590 The Lufkin Daily News (K): 12,225 >>> Marshall News Messenger San Angelo Standard-Times: 24,919 UTAH (1) The Salt Lake Tribune (B): 121,699 VERMONT (4) Bennington Banner (K): 6,502 Brattleboro Reformer (K): 8,814 The Burlington Free Press (K): 41,901 Valley News (White River Junction) (K): 16,430 VIRGINIA (1) The News Leader (Staunton) (B): 17,238 WASHINGTON (11) The Columbian (Vancouver) (B): 44,623 >>> The Daily World (Aberdeen) The News Tribune (Tacoma) (K): 111,778 The Olympian (Olympia) (K): 30,755 Seattle Post-Intelligencer (K): 129,563 The Seattle Times (K): 220,883 The Sun (Bremerton): 28,792 Tri-City Herald (Pasco-Kennewick-Richland) (K): 40,830 Walla Walla Union-Bulletin (K): 13,624 The Wenatchee World: 22,579 Yakima Herald-Republic (B): 38,077 WEST VIRGINIA (3) Charleston Gazette (K): 48,061 The Herald-Dispatch (Huntington) (K): 27,463 Times West Virginian (Fairmont): 10,415 WISCONSIN (9) The Capital Times (Madison) (K): 16,335 The Chippewa Herald (Chippewa Falls) (B): 6,720 Kenosha News (K): 24,535 La Crosse Tribune (K): 31,759 >>> Marshfield News-Herald (11,332) Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (K): 217,755 Stevens Point Journal: 11,234 The Wausau Daily Herald (K): 20,828 Wisconsin State Journal (Madison) (B): 87,930 JOHN McCAIN 142 newspapers total More than 7,543,919 circulation total ALABAMA (6) The Birmingham News (B): 140,438 >>> Clanton Advertiser >>> Demopolis Times >>> The Dothan Eagle >>> The Gadsden Times Press-Register (Mobile) (B): 99,433 ALASKA (1) >>> Juneau Empire ARIZONA (2) The Arizona Republic (Phoenix) (B): 413,332 The Daily Courier (Prescott): 17,800 ARKANSAS (2) >>> Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock) Southwest Times Record (Fort Smith) (B): 40,231 CALIFORNIA (11) The Bakersfield Californian (B) 59,433 >>> Chico Enterprise-Record >>> The Daily Independent (Ridgecrest) The Desert Sun (Palm Springs-Palm Desert) (B): 53,091 >>> The Eureka Reporter The Examiner (San Francisco) (B): 80,000 Napa Valley Register (B): 16,283 North County Times (Escondido-Oceanside): 88,786 The Press-Enterprise (Riverside) (B): 164,189 The San Diego Union-Tribune (B): 288,669 >>> Times-Herald (Vallejo) COLORADO (3) The Daily Sentinel (Grand Junction) (B): 31,349 The Pueblo Chieftain (B): 49,169 Daily Times-Call (Longmont) (B): 21,127 CONNECTICUT (3) Connecticut Post (Bridgeport) (B): 76,014 The Register Citizen (Torrington) (B): 8,217 >>> Rebuplican-American (Waterbury) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (2) The Washington Examiner (N): 100,073 The Washinton Times (B): 93,763 FLORIDA (4) The Bradenton Herald (K): 48,618 Cape Coral Daily Breeze: 2,015 Palatka Daily News: 11,000 The Tampa Tribune: 220,522 GEORGIA (2) The Augusta Chronicle (B): 68,434 Savannah Morning News (B): 47,709 IDAHO (1) The Times-News (Twin Falls) (B): 20,325 ILLINOIS (4) Kane County Chronicle (St. Charles): 12,564 Morris Daily Herald (Morris): 7,258 The News-Gazette (Champaign-Urbana) (B): 42,302 Northwest Herald (Crystal Lake) (B): 36,594 INDIANA (1) >>> The Times (Munster) IOWA (4) >>> The Gazette (Cedar Rapids – Marion) The Messenger (Fort Dodge) (B): 16,355 Times-Republican (Marshalltown): 9,349 Sioux City Journal (B): 41,096 KANSAS (1) Lawrence Journal-World: 18,946 KENTUCKY (3) >>> The Advocate-Messenger (Danville) >>> The Daily Independent (Ashland) Daily News (Bowling Green) (B): 21,240 MAINE (1) Sun Journal (Lewiston): (B): 34,035 MARYLAND (1) The Baltimore Examiner (N): 50,000 MASSACHUSETTS (3) Boston Herald (B): 182,350 The Eagle-Tribune (Lawrence) (B): 46,281 The Sun (Lowell) (B): 44,439 MICHIGAN (4) The Detroit News: 188,171 The Grand Rapids Press (B): 128,930 Jackson Citizen Patriot (B): 30,825 >>> The Macomb Daily (Mount Clemens) The Oakland Press (Pontiac) (B): 66,422 MINNESOTA (6) The Journal (New Ulm) (B): 7,920 The Daily Globe (Worthington): 9,109 The Daily Journal (International Falls): 3,703 >>> Duluth News Tribune The Pioneer (Bemidji) (B): 9,018 Republican Eagle (Red Wing): 6,837 MISSOURI (1) The Sunday News Tribune (Jefferson City): 17,890 NEBRASKA (4) Lincoln Journal Star (B): 78,350 McCook Daily Gazette: 5,903 Norfolk Daily News: 16,492 Omaha World-Herald (B): 178,545 NEVADA (2) Elko Daily Free Press (B): 8,485 Las Vegas Review-Journal (B): 174,341 NEW HAMPSHIRE (3) Eagle Times (Claremont): 7,903 Foster’s Daily Democrat (Dover) (B): 22,547 New Hampshire Union Leader (Manchester) (B): 51,782 NEW MEXICO (3) >>> Albuquerque Journal Roswell Daily Record: 11,700 >>> Silver City Daily Press & Independent NEW YORK (1) New York Post (B): 702,488 NORTH CAROLINA (2) >>> The Hickory Daily Record >>> Winston-Salem Journal NORTH DAKOTA (3) >>> The Bismarck Tribune The Forum (Fargo) (B): 48,303 >>> Minot Daily News OHIO (8) >>> The Advertiser-Tribune (Tiffin) The Cincinnati Enquirer (B): 212,369 The Columbus Dispatch (B): 199,524 The Courier (Findlay) (B): 22,319 The Marietta Times: 10,645 The Morning Journal (Lorain): 25,334 The News-Herald (Lake County-Willoughby) (B): 36,948 The Tribune Chronicle (Warren): 29,364 OKLAHOMA (4) Enid News & Eagle (B): 17,323 Examiner-Enterprise (Bartlesville): 18,400 The Oklahoman (Oklahoma City) (B): 201,771 >>> Tulsa World OREGON (4) Albany Democrat-Herald: 16,891 Baker City Herald: 3,151 The Bulletin (Bend) (B): 32,455 Daily Courier (Grants Pass) (B): 16,178 PENNSYLVANIA (6) Lancaster New Era: 40,068 Public Opinion (Chambersburg) (N): 16,679 The Sentinel (Lewistown) (B): 11,863 Times-Observer (Warren): 10,313 The Tribune-Democrat (Johnstown): 37,673 >>> Tribune-Review (Greensburg) SOUTH CAROLINA (4) The Greenville News (B): 81,010 Herald-Journal (Spartanburg) (B): 42,380 >>> The Post and Courier The State (Columbia) (B): 101,010 SOUTH DAKOTA (2) Argus Leader (Sioux Falls) (B): 48,960 The Daily Republic (Mitchell) (B): 12,742 TENNESSEE (4) Chattanooga Free Press (B): 71,716 The Jackson Sun (K): 32,121 Knoxville News Sentinel (B): 117,262 The Leaf-Chronicle (Clarksville) (B): 20,354 TEXAS (12) Amarillo Globe-News (B): 44,764 The Beaumont Enterprise (B): 45,684 Corpus Christi Caller-Times (K): 53,368 The Dallas Morning News (B): 368,313 The Galveston County Daily News: 26,933 Kerrville Daily Times: 8,971 Lubbock Avalanche-Journal (B): 49,094 New Braunfels Herald-Zeitung: 8,599 >>> The Paris News San Antonio Express-News (B): 225,447 Tyler Morning Telegraph: 35,598 Wichita Falls Times Record News (N): 28,888 VIRGINIA (10) Bristol Herald-Courier (B): 38,068 >>> Culpeper Star-Exponent Danville Register & Bee (B): 19,830 Daily News-Record (Harrisonburg): 30,908 Daily Press (Newport News-Hampton) (K): 91,508 >>> The Daily Progress (Charlottesville) The News & Advance (Lynchburg) (B): 33,931 The News-Virginian (Waynesboro): 7,478 Richmond Times-Dispatch (B): 175,265 The Winchester Star (B): 20,218 WASHINGTON (2) The Chronicle (Centralia-Chehalis): 13,912 The Spokesman-Review (Spokane) (B): 89,779 WEST VIRGINIA (2) >>> The Intelligencer (Wheeling) Wheeling News-Register (B): 12,821 WISCONSIN (2) Beloit Daily News (B): 14,193 Green Bay Press-Gazette: 53,600 WEEKLIES & OTHER BARACK OBAMA (91) Alibi (Albuquerque) Arkansas Times (Little Rock) Athens News (Ohio) Austin Chronicle Baltimore City Paper Boston Phoenix Boulder Weekly C-Ville Weekly (Charlottesville, VA) Charleston City Paper Chico News & Review City Pulse (Lansing) The Colorado Daily Colorado Springs Independent Cincinnati CityBeat City Newspaper (Rochester, NY) The Columbia Independent (New York) Creative Loafing (Atlanta) Creative Loafing (Charlotte) Creative Loafing (Sarasota) Creative Loafing (Tampa) The Economist EPG News Eugene Weekly Falls Church News-Press (Virginia) Financial Times (daily) Gunnison Country Times (Colorado) Hunterdon Review (Clinton, NJ) Independent Weekly (North Carolina) Indian Country Today Jackson Free Press (Mississippi) Las Vegas CityLife Las Vegas Weekly Long Island Press Los Angeles CityBeat >>> Lynden Tribune (Washington) The Mac Weekly (Macalester College) Memphis Flyer Metro Pulse Metro Santa Cruz Metro Silicon Valley Metro Times (Detroit) Metroland (Albany) Michigan Chronicle (Detroit) Monterey County Weekly (Seaside, CA) Newcity (Chicago) News-Herald (Southgate, MI) >>> The Newtown Bee (Connecticut) New York Observer News-Register (McMinnville, OR) North Bay Bohemian Orlando Weekly Ouray County Plaindealer (Colorado) The Pacific Northwest Inlander (Spokane, WA) Palo Alto Weekly Pasadena Weekly The Portland Mercury The Portland Observer (Oregon) Portland Phoenix Providence Phoenix >>> Queens Tribune (New York) Random Lengths News Reno News & Review Roxbury Register (New Jersey) San Diego CityBeat San Francisco Bay Guardian Santa Barbara Independent (California) Santa Monica Mirror (California) Santa Fe Reporter >>> The Savannah Tribune (Georgia) Scene (Cleveland) Shepherd Express (Milwaukee) The Source Weekly (Bend, OR) >>> South Florida Times (Fort Lauderdale) Southtown Star (Chicago) Southwest News-Herald (Chicago) >>> The St. Louis American The Sylva Herald & Ruralite The Storm Lake Times (Iowa) The Stranger (Seattle) The Taos News (New Mexico) The Tennessee Tribune (Nashville) Tideland News (Swansboro, NC) Tuscon Weekly (Arizona) The Virginia Gazette (Williamsburg) Windsor Beacon (Colorado) Metro Santa Cruz (California) Ventura County Reporter >>> Weston Forum (Connecticut) >>> The Westside Gazette (Fort Lauderdale, FL) Willamette Week (Portland, OR) Worcester Magazine Yamhill Valley News-Register (McMinnville, OR) (B) JOHN McCAIN (21) Bureau County Republican (Illinois) Coweta American (Oklahoma) The Culpeper Times (Virginia) >>> Eufaula Tribune (Alabama) The Fauquier Times-Democrat (Virginia) The Frontiersman (Alaska) The Garden City News (New York) Hillsboro Argus (Oregon) The Hudson Star-Observer (Wisconsin) >>> The Jackson Herald Mountain Valley News (Colorado) Lampasas Dispatch Record (Texas) Paradise Post (California) Rappahannock News (Virginia) >>> The Redding Pilot (Connecticut) River Falls Journal (Wisconsin) >>> The Sand Mountain Reporter The Star (Wisconsin) >>> The Wetumpka Herald (Alabama) Wharton Journal-Spectator (Texas) Woodburn Independent (Oregon) COLLEGE NEWSPAPERS BARACK OBAMA (66) Advance-Titan (University of Wisconsin – Oshkosh) The Amherst Student (Amherst College) Arizona Daily Wildcat (University of Arizona) Badger Herald (University of Wisconsin – Madison) The Bates Student (Bates College) The Berkeley Beacon (Emerson College) Central Florida Future (University of Central Florida) Central Michigan Life (Central Michigan University) The Chronicle (Duke University) Columbia Daily Spectator (Columbia University) Cornell Daily Sun (Cornell University) The Crimson (Harvard University) The Daily Athenaeum (West Virginia University) Daily Bruin (UCLA) The Daily Californian (University of California, Berkeley) The Daily Campus (Southern Methodist University) The Daily Cardinal (University of Wisconsin – Madison) Daily Eastern News (Eastern Illinois University) Daily Evergreen (Washington State University) The Daily Gamecock (University of South Carolina) The Daily Illini (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) Daily Kent Stater (Kent State University) The Daily Nexus (UC – Santa Barbara) Daily Northwestern (Northwestern University) The Daily Pennsylvanian (University of Pennsylvania) Daily Texan (University of Texas – Austin) The Davidsonian (Davidson College) El Vaquero (Glendale Community College) The Et Cetera (Eastfield College) The Flat Hat (College of William & Mary) The Independent Collegian (University of Toledo) Indiana Daily Student (Indiana University) Iowa State Daily (Iowa State University) The Justice (Brandeis University) The Lamron (SUNY – Geneseo) The Louisville Cardinal (University of Louisville) Mace and Crown (Old Dominion University The Mac Weekly (Macalester College) The Maneater (University of Missouri) The Middlebury Campus (Middlebury College) The Miami Student (Miami University) The Michigan Daily (University of Michigan) The Michigan Journal (University of Michigan – Dearborn) Minnesota Daily (University of Minnesota) >>> The Mirror (Fairfield University) New University (UC – Irvine) Northern Star (Northern Illinois University) Oklahoma Daily (University of Oklahoma) The Optimist (Abeline Christian University) The Orient (Bowdoin College) The Orion (California State University – Chico) The Pacer (University of Tennessee – Martin) The Parthenon (Marshall University) The Phoenix (Swarthmore College) Pipe Dream (SUNY – Binghamton) The Pitt News (University of Pittsburgh) The Point News (St. Mary’s College) The Post (Ohio University) The Reporter (Stetson University) The Rocket (Slippery Rock University) The State News (Michigan State University) >>>The Tech (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Tufts Daily (Tufts University) The University Daily Kansan (University of Kansas) The University News (Saint Louis University) The Voice (Washtenaw Community College) JOHN McCAIN (2) The Criterion (Mesa State College) Daily Mississippian (University of Mississippi) CHOOSING TO MAKE NO ENDORSEMENT (22) Abilene Reporter-News Colorado Springs Gazette (N) The Fairfax County Times (Virginia) The Florida Times-Union (Jacksonville) Fort Meyers News-Press The Huntsville Times The Marietta Register (Ohio) The Morning Call (Allentown) Mountain Home News (Idaho) Loudoun Times Mirror (Virginia) The Roanoke Times (Virginia) Springfield News-Leader The Record Searchlight (California) >>> Rocky Mount Telegram (North Carolina) Rocky Mountain News (Colorado) St. Paul Pioneer Press The Virginian-Pilot (Norfolk) Waco Tribune Herald (Texas) Indianapolis Star (B) Ann Arbor News (B) Fredericksburg Free-Lance Star (B) Ventura County Star

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003875230

Monday, November 03, 2008

Pictures from Lois Brown swearing in ceremony today








Pictures from Lois Brown swearing in ceremony today

Congratulations again to Lois Brown! It was a pleasure and honour to share in this moment. Photos include Lois and her family. Also members of the campaign team.
-Darryl

Saturday, November 01, 2008

Final Obama interview with Wolf Blitzer

Final Obama interview with Wolf Blitzer

Good interview in the final days on this campaign. Came across very strong on foreign policy. Bin Laden and Obama's top five priorities should he become president come up in this interview.
-Darryl




Arnold Schwarzenegger campaigns in Ohio for John McCain

Arnold Schwarzenegger campaigns in Ohio for John McCain

This might be helpful to McCain. Schwarzenegger draws and than pumps up a large crowd for McCain in this crucial swing state of Ohio. I really like his joke about the Liberal giveaway on Halloween. Arnold should have been on the campaign trail from the beginning.
-Darryl